Posts
5972
Joined
11/25/2007
Location
Athens, GA
US
Edited Date/Time
3/27/2013 7:37pm
"GoPro filed a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) notice demanding that a camera-focused website called DigitalRev.com pull down a review comparing recent GoPro and Sony "action" cameras."
....and proceeded to have their asses handed to them by Reddit
Full thread:
http://www.reddit.com/r/gopro/comments/1anq5d/gopro_doesnt_like_you_to_…
Response from GoPro representative, hours later, followed by more justified thrashing...
http://www.reddit.com/r/gopro/comments/1anq5d/gopro_doesnt_like_you_to_…
Article:
https://socialreader.com/me/channels/78071/content/MS9QH?utm_source=edi…
I'm beginning to see more of what makes GoPro tick, and I'm not sure I like their approach.
....and proceeded to have their asses handed to them by Reddit
Full thread:
http://www.reddit.com/r/gopro/comments/1anq5d/gopro_doesnt_like_you_to_…
Response from GoPro representative, hours later, followed by more justified thrashing...
http://www.reddit.com/r/gopro/comments/1anq5d/gopro_doesnt_like_you_to_…
Article:
https://socialreader.com/me/channels/78071/content/MS9QH?utm_source=edi…
I'm beginning to see more of what makes GoPro tick, and I'm not sure I like their approach.
I got suckered by GoPro's marketing! Sometimes "most popular" isn't the "best".
http://www.forbes.com/pictures/emeg45fdgf/nicholas-woodman/ That kinda money changes everything!
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Don't let a company's attorneys and/or their actions deter you from the fact that their product absolutely kicks ass!
I'm jus' sayin'...
Just like I will continue you support companies that support the riders, I will continue to not support companies that do things like this.
Just saying of course...
Still think it's shitty that they only allow certain riders to run their cameras at the races. This will backfire.
1) A website called DigitalRev wrote a review about GoPro.
2) GoPro sent a DMCA notice to the webhosting provider of DigitalRev, telling them that DigitalRev is breaking copyright laws by using the names GoPro and Hero in their article.
3) DigitalRev is forced to take the review down by their provider - the hosting provider doesn't want to get into legal trouble.
4) Community gets outraged.
5) GoPro claims that it wasn't about the names at all, but about an allegedly unauthorized picture of the product in question; an issue they usually resolved with their resellers.
6) kris33 calls bullshit, saying that (1) the offending url was the review page, not the picture; (2) there was no attempt to correct any mistake and besides DigitalRev is not a reseller - instead a takedown demand was sent to the webhosting provider; (3) the letter sent unambiguously states what is actually going on (4) regardless of what the offending asset is, it's fair use under DMCA because it's a review.
The resemblance is uncanny
Therefore, I fall back on my original statement.
Otherwise, you self-righteous ass-holes end up lookin' as stupid as...well...
Me.
When I've reacted to shit that turned out o be BULLSHIT.
I'm jus' sayin'...' 'cause I'm an old Fugur that should know better...
Manny
Post a reply to: GoPro steps on a SNAKE by issuing DMCA against company who *reviewed* their camera