Toronto Sx practice discussion thread

MXerDW
Profile picture for user MXerDW
Posts
5620
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
San Diego, CA US
MXerDW
Edited Date/Time 3/26/2012 6:00am
Q1 250 group A


Q2 250 group A



Q1 250 group B


Q2 250 group B



Q1 250 group C


Q2 250 group C


250 Qualifying Overall








Q1 450 group A


Q2 450 group A



Q1 450 group B


Q2 450 group B



Q1 450 group C


Q2 450 group C



450 Qualifying Overall
|
SL91
Profile picture for user SL91
Posts
863
Joined
4/4/2008
Location
Halifax CA
SL91 3/24/2012 11:09am
3/24/2012 11:09am
It could be sub-45 seconds for the 450's!
kongols
Profile picture for user kongols
Posts
24220
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
kongols 3/24/2012 11:14am
3/24/2012 11:14am
Franklin Bluth wrote:
Where's Scottie?
Sleeping. He was up all night watching F1.
MXerDW
Profile picture for user MXerDW
Posts
5620
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
San Diego, CA US
MXerDW 3/24/2012 11:17am
3/24/2012 11:17am Edited Date/Time 3/24/2012 12:07pm
250 group B 1






250 group c 1

The Shop

See All »
Mstock
Profile picture for user Mstock
Posts
2044
Joined
9/14/2010
Location
Middleton, WI US
Mstock 3/24/2012 11:18am
3/24/2012 11:18am
SX is not an endurance event. Nothing wrong with 12 minute mains. This is not the outdoor nasty's gentlemen. This is the show that pays the bills for the season for the teams. We need both.
sbarrington314 3/24/2012 11:18am
3/24/2012 11:18am
man, this F1 season is rough on our boy scottie this year. Woohoo
sbarrington314 3/24/2012 11:18am
3/24/2012 11:18am
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
Franklin Bluth 3/24/2012 11:18am
3/24/2012 11:18am
Franklin Bluth wrote:
Where's Scottie?
kongols wrote:
Sleeping. He was up all night watching F1.
Ahhhh thanks for the info ... I was up watching the Lakers!

Predictions for lap times?

I'm going with 44.8 ...
kongols
Profile picture for user kongols
Posts
24220
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
kongols 3/24/2012 11:21am
3/24/2012 11:21am
Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

Lil stew looks focused and fast making everyone look average at best in the whoops.
kongols
Profile picture for user kongols
Posts
24220
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
kongols 3/24/2012 11:23am
3/24/2012 11:23am
Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

And lil stews down in the whoops..
kb1324
Profile picture for user kb1324
Posts
36
Joined
3/23/2012
Location
Battle Creek, MI US
kb1324 3/24/2012 11:23am
3/24/2012 11:23am
Roczen must really not be feeling well...
SL91
Profile picture for user SL91
Posts
863
Joined
4/4/2008
Location
Halifax CA
SL91 3/24/2012 11:26am
3/24/2012 11:26am
Bowers!
MX Sports Medicine 3/24/2012 11:28am
3/24/2012 11:28am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
MXerDW
Profile picture for user MXerDW
Posts
5620
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
San Diego, CA US
MXerDW 3/24/2012 11:28am
3/24/2012 11:28am
250 group A 1
sbarrington314 3/24/2012 11:32am
3/24/2012 11:32am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
not sure on that part of it. but if youve ever seen group c practice, youd get the first part. its scary.
DL
Profile picture for user DL
Posts
2627
Joined
8/20/2006
Location
Menifee, CA US
DL 3/24/2012 11:33am
3/24/2012 11:33am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
He is saying that there should be a time difference rule that if you are not with in a specified time, aprox 3.5 seconds of the fast time than the rider is a hazard to himself and the rest of the riders.... I fully agree.
DownSouth
Profile picture for user DownSouth
Posts
9891
Joined
7/5/2008
Location
Tallapoosa, GA US
DownSouth 3/24/2012 11:34am
3/24/2012 11:34am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/107%25_rule

Pit Row

See All »
DL
Profile picture for user DL
Posts
2627
Joined
8/20/2006
Location
Menifee, CA US
DL 3/24/2012 11:37am
3/24/2012 11:37am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
DownSouth wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/107%25_rule
Good info!
mac3-d
Profile picture for user mac3-d
Posts
1321
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
IE
mac3-d 3/24/2012 11:38am
3/24/2012 11:38am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
ok i will bite if the fastest lap is 50 sec then 107% . SO 50 X 107/100 ( times 107 divided by 100)=53.5 sec (very tight) Unsure
MX Sports Medicine 3/24/2012 11:38am
3/24/2012 11:38am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
DownSouth wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/107%25_rule
Thanks Buddy!
ky_savage
Profile picture for user ky_savage
Posts
2610
Joined
12/4/2008
Location
Kentucky, KY US
ky_savage 3/24/2012 11:38am
3/24/2012 11:38am
Windham to the top!
kongols
Profile picture for user kongols
Posts
24220
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga LV
kongols 3/24/2012 11:39am
3/24/2012 11:39am
Fuck yeah !!!
sbarrington314 3/24/2012 11:39am
3/24/2012 11:39am Edited Date/Time 3/24/2012 11:40am
sbarrington314 wrote:
ouch. chad on group c qualifying Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule...
ouch. chad on group c qualifying

Chad Reed ‏ @CRtwotwo
At what point do you go SX is just not for me...supercross needs a 107% rule ASAP
MX Sports Medicine wrote:
Please educate me on the 107 rule...
f1 rule. During the first phase of qualifying, any driver who fails to set a lap within 107 percent of the fastest time in the first qualifying session will not be allowed to start the race.

edit: everyone beat me to it. thats what i get for not refreshing.
MXerDW
Profile picture for user MXerDW
Posts
5620
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
San Diego, CA US
MXerDW 3/24/2012 11:41am
3/24/2012 11:41am
450 group A 1
sbarrington314 3/24/2012 11:47am
3/24/2012 11:47am
so if my math is correct, if a 107% rule were in effect, anyone slower than a 51.399 would be out.
tbanks
Profile picture for user tbanks
Posts
1515
Joined
5/28/2011
Location
Great Mills, MD US
tbanks 3/24/2012 11:48am
3/24/2012 11:48am
Man....rough go of it for my buddy Nick Lane racing his first supercross. Just got a text from his mom saying he went down and injured something after just a few laps.
Mstock
Profile picture for user Mstock
Posts
2044
Joined
9/14/2010
Location
Middleton, WI US
Mstock 3/24/2012 11:50am
3/24/2012 11:50am
sbarrington314 wrote:
so if my math is correct, if a 107% rule were in effect, anyone slower than a 51.399 would be out.
It would need to be around 103% for sx to be effective. I suggested this months ago and got laughed at. I am all for 10 rider gates. If you can't win you can't race. This is the pro's right?
sbarrington314 3/24/2012 11:50am
3/24/2012 11:50am
tbanks wrote:
Man....rough go of it for my buddy Nick Lane racing his first supercross. Just got a text from his mom saying he went down and injured...
Man....rough go of it for my buddy Nick Lane racing his first supercross. Just got a text from his mom saying he went down and injured something after just a few laps.
sx isnt for everyone.
Franklin Bluth 3/24/2012 11:52am
3/24/2012 11:52am
tbanks wrote:
Man....rough go of it for my buddy Nick Lane racing his first supercross. Just got a text from his mom saying he went down and injured...
Man....rough go of it for my buddy Nick Lane racing his first supercross. Just got a text from his mom saying he went down and injured something after just a few laps.
That sucks ... sorry man.

Post a reply to: Toronto Sx practice discussion thread