Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
That said, I am a believer that you should stay away from heavy helmets, no matter how much they cost. I mean, you don't want to be out in a bicycle helmet, but you don't need any extra mass that needs to change direction as it bounces off the ground.
I was refering to MX757
Even though I've abused it, it's better than what they were wearing.
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/FLY-RACING-F2-CARBON-TREY-CANARD-HELMET-BLUE-WH…
Any helmet thats good enough for canard and short cant be all bad.
I'm jus' knowin'...
Just a fyi, two years ago I wrecked badly. I fell from about 12ft. first thing to hit the ground was my head, next was my shoulder.Three days in trauma unit at Loma Linda and plenty of broken bones. Here is what I'm getting at, I was wearing a M2R helmet. I fully believe the M2R helmet did it's job, as did the doctors.
mx510, I suggest you get a back issue of ESPN the Magazine. Really good srticle about how players feel about he helmets they use. Has it ever, and I mean ever been proven that a 500$ helmet is better than a 250$ helmet? I see you fully suscribe to the "if it costs more money it must be better theory."
That's one fo the brands that people seem to leave out of these conversations about QUALITY... and you've got folks like RC and Chad...and MANY others wearing their production stuff ALL THE time and they seem to be doing really well with it....
I was wearing Fox's "cheap" helmet when I hit the ground really hard at the Baja 500...it PROTECTED me...too bad it couldn;t save my shoulder! DOH! Guess what...it's rated as well as the $800 "Better" helmets certain folks are selling...
Then there's FLY's stuff (I wear the Shorty/Trey helmet...whatever it's called and it is EXCELLENT and has all the "ratings' and what-not...) Single best helmet for the $?
Bell? Anyone? Bell...remember them...they kinda STARTED this whole thing back in the day! The 9 is an EXCELLENT helmet!
Etc., etc., etc. ...
I wear the Arai or Shoei because I believe in the fitment of the helmet. They fit my head far better than anyother helmet out there. I have tried on the new Troy Lee, Fox and Bell helmets and they do not fit nearly as well as the Arai or Shoei. I have never tried on the M2R or the new Fly, but I have worn the old "expensive" (2003-2004 time frame) Fly helmet and it was GARBAGE. So make your own conclusion on helmets, after all it is your head and your choice.
So your saying that had Broc been wearing a Arai, he wouldn't of gotten the concussions?
Pit Row
Yak- I never said that a Shoei or an Arai would completely prevent a concussion. I do believe that they will protect you better if they are fitted right but, they cannot protect you against every crash at every speed (there is no helmet that can).
And finally wawazat- I have no idea if he was wearing an Arai if he would not have gotten a concussion. You have to admit the fact that he came back wearing an Arai with HJC stickers on it says a little something doesnt it?
My bad.
To be even more direct: You notice that I never disagreed with your "point"?
You see, it turns out every test HAS to be 100% replicable everytime a test is performed, known as a standard. Snell, DOT, and all the EU safety rating companies comply by a general guideline. Usually the parameters for the test must be held constant (mass of object striking the helmet, velocity, angle, and impact area) so all of these tests are done on highly automated testing centers that are PLC controlled and every variable can be measured. All tests are done according to the standard parameters and a statistical bell-curve data plot is created to support that the findings are repeatable. The Toyota standard is often used in these statistics which, among other qualities, states the data must show that results of the tests contain less than .3% error, or in other-words a 99.7% success rate. Basically, a company must prove that every helmet will meet the standards, although a defective helmet may fail ocasionally, not the reverse as to where say maybe half of their helmets pass and the other half fail which would not reward the proper ratings. Third party engineering and physics firms are often involved to validate the operation of testing procedures and sanctioning bodies for snell and dot are usually involved to make sure testing procedures comply to acheive satisying ratings.
So, one should know that if a helmet is rated Snell and DOT approved, it has passed generalized testings. Helmets that are tagged "exceeds snell and DOT ratings" can be misleading and do not genereally mean a superior product without statistical data of impact ratings from the manufacturer. But I will say yes, a Shoei or Arai that exceeds standards is going to be better than the Rocky Mountain $69.99 Mossimo helmet that meets all standards.
What about the AGV?
What about the Suomi? It's incredibly light!
I have an Arai helmet which fits snug but is heavy.
I feel safer in the Arai but man the light weight of the carbon fiber fox helmet is a joy to ride with.
Post a reply to: Helmet Question.