Posts
3641
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD, USA
Edited Date/Time
1/25/2012 8:22pm
Rachel Maddow's "Lean Forward" commercial:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0gNga6v9EY
Anyone actually believe that today's "Progressives" would actually get behind ANYTHING like the Hoover Dam? I love this comment:
"The great irony is that we use tax dollars to fund windmills. That money goes to China so that they can build a coal powered electrical plant and use the power to build windmill blades. Then they loan the money back to us so that we can pay for the environmental lawyers who are suing to prevent the installation of the windmills.
Somehow this process will save the planet and create jobs."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0gNga6v9EY
Anyone actually believe that today's "Progressives" would actually get behind ANYTHING like the Hoover Dam? I love this comment:
"The great irony is that we use tax dollars to fund windmills. That money goes to China so that they can build a coal powered electrical plant and use the power to build windmill blades. Then they loan the money back to us so that we can pay for the environmental lawyers who are suing to prevent the installation of the windmills.
Somehow this process will save the planet and create jobs."
S
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Here are the top 10
http://americanhistory.about.com/od/greatdepression/tp/new_deal_program…
That's pure opinion; evidence suggests that the massive New Deal spending actually prolonged the Great Depression.
""High wages and high prices in an economic slump run contrary to everything we know about market forces in economic downturns," Ohanian said. "As we've seen in the past several years, salaries and prices fall when unemployment is high. By artificially inflating both, the New Deal policies short-circuited the market's self-correcting forces."
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depressio…
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2007/01/the_new_deal_a…
Vet, I do agree at least in part with your initial premise. Green tech is a great idea, but it should be tempered with proper evaluation. PV panels only sell because of govt subsidy. It interferes with market forces.
As far as the leap that the new deal led to our current economic situation, its really up to 555 to support his argument. That said, it could be argued that corporate welfare and the military industrial complex have bled us dry.
But, for a bigger picture, we could look at history and say that this is destiny. Every road leads to an eventual collapse. Money becomes pooled in the hands of very few and revolution ensues, redistributing the wealth.
Govt redristribution puts the revolution on hold, but as we see, it doesn't last. The money still pools.
IMO.
Pit Row
I like to know how Clinton and Obama fit into your picture. Surely they must be close if not even if you're a reasonable thinker.
Obama hasn't done anything specifically for investors and corporations, but has cut taxes for the middle class, and he's also gone to great efforts to keep teachers, policemen and firefighters on the job - all middle class people.
I voted for Reagan both times he ran, and I voted for HW Bush (and still think he was the best president of the last 30 years) both times, and even Bob Dole. I never voted for Clinton. But I don't know if Reagan's basic philosophy was bad or whether the Republican party has just distorted his ideas until they're unrecognizable, but the supply-side economic theory is a brutal failure in every way. Extreme capitalism is no better than extreme socialism.
Post a reply to: You First, Rachel