DUI

Fleece192
Posts
506
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Equinunk, PA, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/24/2012 6:39pm
|
yzthumpa
Posts
1772
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Slidell, LA, USA
12/12/2010 11:57am Edited Date/Time 12/12/2010 12:01pm
I'm all for prohibition. Screw everyone's "rights." Too many people prove themselves incapable of responsible drinking on a daily basis. I'll forego my right to be a casual drinker and drink responsibly if it saves others from the irresponsible fucks who can't handle themselves. When I got out of dental school in '91 I went to work with a dentist who had everything one could ask for, and more. He was pulling in $450K a year and had a wonderful wife and 3 kids. He ran out to pick up dinner one night, and about a half mile from home got hit by a carload of drunk teenagers and was killed instantly. Some of the kids in the other car lost limbs or lost their lives. The one person left virtually unscathed was the drunk driver. Currently, my wife works for friends of ours helping them take care of their daughter who was hit by a drunk driver. She was 15 years old, a cheerleader, great student, etc. She spent a couple months in a coma, came out of it with major brain damage, and for the past two years she's spent life in a wheelchair and is still learning how to speak and regain basic functions. Again, the drunk driver was virtually unhurt. They've started a designated driver-type service called "Ashlee's Angels." On Friday and Saturday nights, they have a small group of volunteers on call. Drunk people call from whatever bar they got wasted at, and a team of two people will meet them there. One will drive the drunk person home in that person's car, and the other will follow. That way the drunk person gets home along with their car. It's free, so it beats taking a taxi, and they don't have to worry about the hassle of getting a ride back to their car the next day.http://www.ashleesangels.com/
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
12/12/2010 4:08pm
There is an easy way to solve the DWI problem. All cars should have alcohol interlocks on the ignition.
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
12/12/2010 5:10pm
CamP wrote:
There is an easy way to solve the DWI problem. All cars should have alcohol interlocks on the ignition.
but then how would the government make money off DWIs?
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
12/12/2010 5:13pm
CamP wrote:
There is an easy way to solve the DWI problem. All cars should have alcohol interlocks on the ignition.
but then how would the government make money off DWIs?
And attorney's!

The Shop

dcmx326
Posts
899
Joined
11/19/2010
Location
Washington, DC, USA
12/12/2010 6:16pm
The problem with prohibition is, it doesn't work. The US tried that once and alcohol consumption actually increased as did organized crime.
huck
Posts
17024
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Mountain Home, AR, USA
12/13/2010 6:53am
You get caught driving drunk...you NEVER can drive again. If you get caught driving after a DWI...5 years in prison.


Why punish the responsible people, for the acts of the un-responsible?
yzthumpa
Posts
1772
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Slidell, LA, USA
12/13/2010 7:09am Edited Date/Time 12/13/2010 7:12am
dcmx326 wrote:
The problem with prohibition is, it doesn't work. The US tried that once and alcohol consumption actually increased as did organized crime.
I don't think this era compares to the 1920s. Yes, there would be bootleggers on a larger scale than there was back then, but you wouldn't see mass access to alcohol by teens, frat houses, etc. like you have right now. Don't get me wrong, I know it will never happen, I'm just saying theoretically that I would forego my rights to drink if they could realistically eliminate alcohol from modern society.
As far as having breath analyzer ignition locks, while certainly that would be a step forward, too many people would find a way around it. You'd have drunk guys finding a teenager passing by and paying them $20 to breathe into the device for them. You'd have drunk guys having their sober girlfriend blow into the device rather than allowing the sober girlfriend to drive the car. But surely it would put a major dent in drunk driving.
The consequences are just ridiculous. My wife and I were at a neighbor's party Saturday night. One of the women there was telling us she just got 2 DWI's in the SAME month by the SAME cop. She got a fine and 40 hours of community service. Thankfully, the woman who hit our friend's daughter got 10 years in prison (though she'll probably serve half of that at most). The problem with relying on punishment as a solution is that law enforcement can only catch such a small percentage of offenders. Yes, having very harsh, no-tolerance penalties would act as a deterrent for many, but there are still too many alcoholics who can't control themselves enough to make the rational decision.
Knowing that no matter what measures are taken only a fraction of drunk drivers would be stopped, how many people here would give up their right to drink for the common good if absolute prohibition were possible?
ehr400
Posts
2630
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Britton, MI, USA
12/13/2010 7:11am
The problem is that the real drunks will be the ones that still are going to do what they want to do.

The system loves it, lawyers, cops, judges, PO's, jails, rehab centers. Just think about who all has their hands in the pot making money off of it? There is no way alot of these people will give up this huge money maker for them.

ehr400
Posts
2630
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Britton, MI, USA
12/13/2010 7:17am
dcmx326 wrote:
The problem with prohibition is, it doesn't work. The US tried that once and alcohol consumption actually increased as did organized crime.
yzthumpa wrote:
I don't think this era compares to the 1920s. Yes, there would be bootleggers on a larger scale than there was back then, but you wouldn't...
I don't think this era compares to the 1920s. Yes, there would be bootleggers on a larger scale than there was back then, but you wouldn't see mass access to alcohol by teens, frat houses, etc. like you have right now. Don't get me wrong, I know it will never happen, I'm just saying theoretically that I would forego my rights to drink if they could realistically eliminate alcohol from modern society.
As far as having breath analyzer ignition locks, while certainly that would be a step forward, too many people would find a way around it. You'd have drunk guys finding a teenager passing by and paying them $20 to breathe into the device for them. You'd have drunk guys having their sober girlfriend blow into the device rather than allowing the sober girlfriend to drive the car. But surely it would put a major dent in drunk driving.
The consequences are just ridiculous. My wife and I were at a neighbor's party Saturday night. One of the women there was telling us she just got 2 DWI's in the SAME month by the SAME cop. She got a fine and 40 hours of community service. Thankfully, the woman who hit our friend's daughter got 10 years in prison (though she'll probably serve half of that at most). The problem with relying on punishment as a solution is that law enforcement can only catch such a small percentage of offenders. Yes, having very harsh, no-tolerance penalties would act as a deterrent for many, but there are still too many alcoholics who can't control themselves enough to make the rational decision.
Knowing that no matter what measures are taken only a fraction of drunk drivers would be stopped, how many people here would give up their right to drink for the common good if absolute prohibition were possible?
Another issue that is growing at a epidemic speed is people being doped up on pain killers or pills and driving. My friends house got hit by some chick who was stoned to beejeezus on Vicadin. Guess what, no ticket or anything.

A co worker got hit last spring by a dude high on Meth. Broke his femur, shattered hip, tib/ fib both legs, 4 broken ribs and dislocated shoulder. He was in traction for 6 months, might never walk right or walk again. The guy who hit him is getting probation.

Not saying 2 wrongs make a right but if he was drunk driving he would be in jail. Bottom line. Why are people like this being treated in a lighter light then drunks? There are alot of people abusing prescription drugs on a daily basis that are behind the wheel.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
12/13/2010 8:03am Edited Date/Time 12/13/2010 8:05am
yzthumpa wrote:
I don't think this era compares to the 1920s. Yes, there would be bootleggers on a larger scale than there was back then, but you wouldn't...
I don't think this era compares to the 1920s. Yes, there would be bootleggers on a larger scale than there was back then, but you wouldn't see mass access to alcohol by teens, frat houses, etc. like you have right now. Don't get me wrong, I know it will never happen, I'm just saying theoretically that I would forego my rights to drink if they could realistically eliminate alcohol from modern society.
As far as having breath analyzer ignition locks, while certainly that would be a step forward, too many people would find a way around it. You'd have drunk guys finding a teenager passing by and paying them $20 to breathe into the device for them. You'd have drunk guys having their sober girlfriend blow into the device rather than allowing the sober girlfriend to drive the car. But surely it would put a major dent in drunk driving.
The consequences are just ridiculous. My wife and I were at a neighbor's party Saturday night. One of the women there was telling us she just got 2 DWI's in the SAME month by the SAME cop. She got a fine and 40 hours of community service. Thankfully, the woman who hit our friend's daughter got 10 years in prison (though she'll probably serve half of that at most). The problem with relying on punishment as a solution is that law enforcement can only catch such a small percentage of offenders. Yes, having very harsh, no-tolerance penalties would act as a deterrent for many, but there are still too many alcoholics who can't control themselves enough to make the rational decision.
Knowing that no matter what measures are taken only a fraction of drunk drivers would be stopped, how many people here would give up their right to drink for the common good if absolute prohibition were possible?
The interlocks can be designed to be very difficult, if not impossible, to defeat. The answer to the DWI problem isn't prohibition or stiffer criminal penalties. The answer is stopping it before it happens through technology, and that technology already exists. Volvo has already designed a system with sensors in the steering wheel. No blowing into a device is required.
jndmx
Posts
9694
Joined
1/20/2008
Location
South Kingston, RI, USA
12/13/2010 8:35am
CamP wrote:
There is an easy way to solve the DWI problem. All cars should have alcohol interlocks on the ignition.
This right here is what would work in my opinion as well.

People that have already had multiple DUI's and have no license aren't going to suddenly see the light and stop driving......they don't care and having nothing to lose.

Prohibition is foolish, it didn't work before and it won't work now.
Cocaine, Meth, Heroin...all deadly drugs that are illegal and I could easily find some of each within an hour if I went to the right neighborhoods.
Sparkalounger
Posts
1664
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
12/13/2010 9:34am
Although i know there are a great number of drunk drivers that just don't care, there is also a portion that don't know for sure.

There is no law stating you can't go to a bar, have a few drinks a drive home, most everyone has done it. How many is too many? How does a guy know what .08 feels like?
When i am out i usually keep to a drink an hour, i am 220 lbs and feel this keeps me safe, i feel fine, but how do i KNOW?

I bring this up because i was in a small town bad a few months ago with some buddies, 1 am comes around and the town cop comes in to tell everyone its time to leave.
I decide to politely ask the cop if he had any breathalyzers with him, he says yes. I then ask if i could take one to see where i am at to get "point of reference". The cop got all belligerent with me and told me to move along. I was like so you won't do this for me?
Here's the surprise!
He proceeds to tell me "look, i'm getting in my car in 5 minutes"

I said "what?"

He then says "do you understand me? i am getting in my car IN 5 MINUTES"

I look at him a bit puzzled...

He says one more time "you got 5 minutes..."


That was unbelievable to me, instead of doing a public service he just wants everyone out of his town. Could be looked at as "cool" and "oldschool", i thought it was terribly irresponsible.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
12/13/2010 10:10am
That's the problem with the current system. You never know when you hit the the magic .08% blood alcohol level. I've spoken with a few cops about it and they all say that the vast majority of the people that they arrest for DWI are first time offenders. Just average people that had a few too many at dinner or the occasional night out with friends.

Mandatory interlocks on all cars will save lives, save money and save a lot of grief. Only people that earn their money arresting and adjudicating drunk drivers will lose.
Sparkalounger
Posts
1664
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
12/13/2010 10:14am
i think i would be all for that
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
12/13/2010 10:15am
CamP wrote:
That's the problem with the current system. You never know when you hit the the magic .08% blood alcohol level. I've spoken with a few cops...
That's the problem with the current system. You never know when you hit the the magic .08% blood alcohol level. I've spoken with a few cops about it and they all say that the vast majority of the people that they arrest for DWI are first time offenders. Just average people that had a few too many at dinner or the occasional night out with friends.

Mandatory interlocks on all cars will save lives, save money and save a lot of grief. Only people that earn their money arresting and adjudicating drunk drivers will lose.
.08 is pretty intoxicated, I dont understand how someone wouldnt know.

But your last sentence is exactly it, too many people make too much money off if DWI's
Sparkalounger
Posts
1664
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
12/13/2010 10:30am Edited Date/Time 12/13/2010 10:32am
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know?



i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a number, just what i felt.

Still, how do i KNOW what .08 is?
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
12/13/2010 10:34am
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know? i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a...
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know?



i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a number, just what i felt.

Still, how do i KNOW what .08 is?
you know if youre tipsy or not.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
12/13/2010 10:37am Edited Date/Time 12/13/2010 10:48am
I taught my daughter, who just got her license the other day, that to always believe that after 10pm, 1/3 of those on the road are likely to be legally drunk, after midnight, it's likely to be half.

ALWAYS remember that and drive with that in mind.

Do I have stats and data? No, but I believe it a fair estimate from my experience.



I don't leave a stadium or arena before the game or race is over, but I do try and get out as quickly as possible afterwards, because in my opinion, almost everyone leaving is drunk on some level and I want to get the fuck away from them.
Sparkalounger
Posts
1664
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
12/13/2010 10:38am
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know? i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a...
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know?



i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a number, just what i felt.

Still, how do i KNOW what .08 is?
you know if youre tipsy or not.
i know if i am tipsy, but i DO NOT KNOW what .08 feels like.
yzthumpa
Posts
1772
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Slidell, LA, USA
12/13/2010 11:59am
Although i know there are a great number of drunk drivers that just don't care, there is also a portion that don't know for sure. There...
Although i know there are a great number of drunk drivers that just don't care, there is also a portion that don't know for sure.

There is no law stating you can't go to a bar, have a few drinks a drive home, most everyone has done it. How many is too many? How does a guy know what .08 feels like?
When i am out i usually keep to a drink an hour, i am 220 lbs and feel this keeps me safe, i feel fine, but how do i KNOW?

I bring this up because i was in a small town bad a few months ago with some buddies, 1 am comes around and the town cop comes in to tell everyone its time to leave.
I decide to politely ask the cop if he had any breathalyzers with him, he says yes. I then ask if i could take one to see where i am at to get "point of reference". The cop got all belligerent with me and told me to move along. I was like so you won't do this for me?
Here's the surprise!
He proceeds to tell me "look, i'm getting in my car in 5 minutes"

I said "what?"

He then says "do you understand me? i am getting in my car IN 5 MINUTES"

I look at him a bit puzzled...

He says one more time "you got 5 minutes..."


That was unbelievable to me, instead of doing a public service he just wants everyone out of his town. Could be looked at as "cool" and "oldschool", i thought it was terribly irresponsible.
Amazing. What gets me is that a lot of bars will pay a cop to work a detail, and it's pretty much understood that he's there to stop fights and nothing else. Now I know you can't put a cop on DWI patrol at every small corner bar, but for all the fairly big bars and clubs they should have to pay a cop or two to monitor who walks out the door in what condition and who gets behind the wheel of a car. I know there is supposed to be some kind of rule about cutting people off when they get too drunk, but how many bartenders actually follow it? I think those serving the alcohol have to be held accountable to some extent for what happens when the patrons leave (and I don't want this to brank out into an argument about holding those who sell guns being responsible for those who commit murder with them). But there's so much more that can be easily done and just isn't.
The local bar owners here are pretty good about identifying those who shouldn't be driving and calling "Ashlee's Angels" to come give them a ride home.
Regarding people driving while loaded on prescription meds, I know in this area they've been cracking down on it. I think the problem with it is that there's no simple test like a breathalyzer to determine level of impairment. There are simple tests (like go behind that bush and pee on this stick for me, lol) that will identify what drugs they've taken, but it won't tell how much they've taken.
I can assure you there have been many, many times throughout my life when I've driven after drinking and definitely shouldn't have, and I was lucky to avoid any accidents. But spending 5 minutes with the brain-damaged young lady and her family that I spoke of will change the way you look at things drastically. I know my habits have changed as a result.
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
12/13/2010 12:00pm
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know? i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a...
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know?



i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a number, just what i felt.

Still, how do i KNOW what .08 is?
you know if youre tipsy or not.
i know if i am tipsy, but i DO NOT KNOW what .08 feels like.
right, but does that matter? Do you have to know what .08 feels like to know if you should be on the road or not?
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
12/13/2010 12:00pm Edited Date/Time 12/13/2010 12:01pm
flarider wrote:
I taught my daughter, who just got her license the other day, that to always believe that after 10pm, 1/3 of those on the road are...
I taught my daughter, who just got her license the other day, that to always believe that after 10pm, 1/3 of those on the road are likely to be legally drunk, after midnight, it's likely to be half.

ALWAYS remember that and drive with that in mind.

Do I have stats and data? No, but I believe it a fair estimate from my experience.



I don't leave a stadium or arena before the game or race is over, but I do try and get out as quickly as possible afterwards, because in my opinion, almost everyone leaving is drunk on some level and I want to get the fuck away from them.
why is your 16 year old daughter driving after midnight.
just giving you shit dave, you dont have to answer
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
12/13/2010 12:03pm
Although i know there are a great number of drunk drivers that just don't care, there is also a portion that don't know for sure. There...
Although i know there are a great number of drunk drivers that just don't care, there is also a portion that don't know for sure.

There is no law stating you can't go to a bar, have a few drinks a drive home, most everyone has done it. How many is too many? How does a guy know what .08 feels like?
When i am out i usually keep to a drink an hour, i am 220 lbs and feel this keeps me safe, i feel fine, but how do i KNOW?

I bring this up because i was in a small town bad a few months ago with some buddies, 1 am comes around and the town cop comes in to tell everyone its time to leave.
I decide to politely ask the cop if he had any breathalyzers with him, he says yes. I then ask if i could take one to see where i am at to get "point of reference". The cop got all belligerent with me and told me to move along. I was like so you won't do this for me?
Here's the surprise!
He proceeds to tell me "look, i'm getting in my car in 5 minutes"

I said "what?"

He then says "do you understand me? i am getting in my car IN 5 MINUTES"

I look at him a bit puzzled...

He says one more time "you got 5 minutes..."


That was unbelievable to me, instead of doing a public service he just wants everyone out of his town. Could be looked at as "cool" and "oldschool", i thought it was terribly irresponsible.
yzthumpa wrote:
Amazing. What gets me is that a lot of bars will pay a cop to work a detail, and it's pretty much understood that he's there...
Amazing. What gets me is that a lot of bars will pay a cop to work a detail, and it's pretty much understood that he's there to stop fights and nothing else. Now I know you can't put a cop on DWI patrol at every small corner bar, but for all the fairly big bars and clubs they should have to pay a cop or two to monitor who walks out the door in what condition and who gets behind the wheel of a car. I know there is supposed to be some kind of rule about cutting people off when they get too drunk, but how many bartenders actually follow it? I think those serving the alcohol have to be held accountable to some extent for what happens when the patrons leave (and I don't want this to brank out into an argument about holding those who sell guns being responsible for those who commit murder with them). But there's so much more that can be easily done and just isn't.
The local bar owners here are pretty good about identifying those who shouldn't be driving and calling "Ashlee's Angels" to come give them a ride home.
Regarding people driving while loaded on prescription meds, I know in this area they've been cracking down on it. I think the problem with it is that there's no simple test like a breathalyzer to determine level of impairment. There are simple tests (like go behind that bush and pee on this stick for me, lol) that will identify what drugs they've taken, but it won't tell how much they've taken.
I can assure you there have been many, many times throughout my life when I've driven after drinking and definitely shouldn't have, and I was lucky to avoid any accidents. But spending 5 minutes with the brain-damaged young lady and her family that I spoke of will change the way you look at things drastically. I know my habits have changed as a result.
in TX many bars swipe your license that way police know where you were when you got a DWI
RonSkj
Posts
2902
Joined
6/20/2008
Location
Radiator Springs, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/13/2010 12:33pm
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know? i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a...
i have never taken a breathalyzer... how would i know?



i also have never drivin when i thought i might be compromised, not caring about a number, just what i felt.

Still, how do i KNOW what .08 is?
If you really what to know, Do an e-bay search for Breathalyzer. I can't believe how cheap they are.
twizzler
Posts
1005
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/13/2010 3:09pm
Back in my senior year of HS our basketball team played our cross town rival. I had a good friend on our rival team. We had a great game that went down to the wire. At the end we all shook hands and I laughed it up with my friend, we both had played well. About 1 hour later me and a teammate were driving into town after the game to meet up with some of the players from the other team we had just played. And we came upon a head on wreck that just happened. Low and behold a drunk driver had hit my friend from the game head on. It is a site and moment I will never forget. My friend was severely injured and spent months in intesive care and has been a brain dead parapalegic ever since. I tried to watch that vid but had to stop it.
Sparkalounger
Posts
1664
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
12/13/2010 4:06pm
you know if youre tipsy or not.
i know if i am tipsy, but i DO NOT KNOW what .08 feels like.
right, but does that matter? Do you have to know what .08 feels like to know if you should be on the road or not?
Okay, i'll spell it out for you since from your posts here i can not tell if you know this or not...
if you do know this than maybe some kid will read it and learn something.

The is a term, it's called "tolerance". People that drink regularly have to drink more than someone who does not to feel a buzz. Just because they need to drink more to feel a buzz does not mean they are less inebriated... in other words 4 beers for one guy may feel like nothing and he thinks he is fine, when in reality he is not. Conversely, another guy at 4 beers might feel really buzzed and know there is no way he should be driving. Both men very well could have the same blood alcohol level.

Stop trying to turn this into something it isn't / trying to tell me something.

Was this trivial and obvious... yes of course, but then why do you feel the need to push the subject...

The point is that unless you have been tested a few times A LOT of people don't realize they are over the limit / too drunk to legally drive (or safely drive).
Sparkalounger
Posts
1664
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
12/13/2010 4:14pm
I think this video would make a great post for everyone who has a facebook account.
i will be posting this on the morning of Dec. 31st...
RonSkj
Posts
2902
Joined
6/20/2008
Location
Radiator Springs, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/13/2010 5:09pm
It's time for the tin foil hats..
Mod Killer
Posts
1827
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Worldwide, CA, USA
12/13/2010 7:52pm
your "solutions" to this "problem" are rediculous.

prohibition....name one instance in any field where this works, you cant. so anyone who suggested this, please remove yourself from the discussion as you are clearly uncapable of rational thought.

interlocking devices.....while we are at it, why dont we make it illegal to mfg a car that goes above 55 mph. im joking of course.


the fact is, you could easily make the penalty public hanging, and you know what? DUI's will still occur at the same rate. ive seen the studies to prove such. increase the penalties all you want, it wont prevent DUI's


why dont you ask yourself this, why is it that a person who drives off the road or causes an accident sober gets little to no criminal punishment....meanwhile the DUI is such a hot topic issue. if im drunk, and i drive off the road, at least i had an excuse. YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO SCARES ME: the people who get in accidents while they are supposedly at their most coherent (sober).

fact - most accidents happen in parking lots. not while speeding. not requiring any real difficulty of hand eye coordination. point being, a bad driver is a bad driver. they are everywhere....old people, asians, women, mexicans, etc etc etc. i lived in the bay area, vegas, and now south OC....ive seen the worst of all of them, and it had nothing to do with alcohol.

i have no doubt i could put down 4 straight shots and still drive better than 98% of the general public. my point, the system is broken and a mess.


you willingly put your life in many other peoples hands every time you get on the road. if you fail to acknowledge that, thats a you-problem, and it doesnt make it any less relevant.

DUI's are very easy to get. many of you are asking for penalties you have no business handing out do to lack of experience or perspective. you'd all be lying if you said youve never had a beer or two in your system while behind the wheel of a car. you may not have been drunk, but you dont have to be drunk or even intoxicated to get a DUI....simply under the influence is enough.

you dont have to be a danger to anyone, you dont have to be driving remotely dangerously, and you could be guilty of a DUI. you'd be suprised how little it takes.

80% of all people on the road between the hours of 11pm and 3am are guilty of a DUI. some might say we have a major problem there...i try and look at it a little more logically and say it sounds to me like people are getting in trouble for simply being human. i mean really, if 80% are doing it, at what point is it just human nature? and how can you get someone in trouble for simply being human? thats dangerous ground for the legal system to be treading.

ok, done with my rant. flame away.

Post a reply to: DUI

The Latest