Who Else But Reed...

sargeant
Posts
72
Joined
1/22/2014
Location
CA
2/3/2014 12:22pm
reeds style hasnt changed much, nor did the track look more technical in 2004. would love to know how much faster he his on a 2014 450 vs 2004 yz250, im guessing 1.5 seconds.
peelout
Posts
18385
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT, USA
2/3/2014 12:37pm
Big E wrote:
OK so for sure Windham was at it for longer than anyone. Not taking ANYTHING away from him, he is a bad dude, First 250 win...
OK so for sure Windham was at it for longer than anyone. Not taking ANYTHING away from him, he is a bad dude,

First 250 win was In Charlotte April 19, 1997. His last win (SX) was May 1, 2010. That is 13 years. INSANE!

Now Reeds first 250SX win was January 4,2003. His latest win was February 1, 2014 II years. Two SX titles and 43 SX wins and counting.

Go Reed!

this gives me serious wood
JW381
Posts
10638
Joined
7/21/2009
Location
Harrisburg, OR, USA
2/3/2014 12:41pm
Big E wrote:
OK so for sure Windham was at it for longer than anyone. Not taking ANYTHING away from him, he is a bad dude, First 250 win...
OK so for sure Windham was at it for longer than anyone. Not taking ANYTHING away from him, he is a bad dude,

First 250 win was In Charlotte April 19, 1997. His last win (SX) was May 1, 2010. That is 13 years. INSANE!

Now Reeds first 250SX win was January 4,2003. His latest win was February 1, 2014 II years. Two SX titles and 43 SX wins and counting.

Go Reed!

peelout wrote:
this gives me serious wood
You'd be gay if it didn't. I like everything except the cheap looking fork guards and the freestyle bars haha.
Crush
Posts
21108
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
2/3/2014 2:39pm
sargeant wrote:
reeds style hasnt changed much, nor did the track look more technical in 2004. would love to know how much faster he his on a 2014...
reeds style hasnt changed much, nor did the track look more technical in 2004. would love to know how much faster he his on a 2014 450 vs 2004 yz250, im guessing 1.5 seconds.
I dunno dude, there were a few things in that track that were technical. The big over/under jump down or inside table to table... and the big whoops with the turn double, small dragon into the next whoops and triple out... all that was pretty technical.

Go watch any of the 2003 races too... So much slower because everything was so much peakier... Matthes/Weege/JT were talking about this very subject based on Reeds A2 comments – Yeah 4 strokes are faster but generally 10 seconds a lap... Almost all the laptimes back then were 60 seconds... a lot of them now are 50s. That is not just bike, that's track too for sure. The obstacles are lower and flatter and definitely more rhythm based.

The Shop

Big E
Posts
460
Joined
12/8/2007
Location
Orange, CA, USA
2/3/2014 2:43pm
I think they were more tech. for sure, and I am a two stroke fan for life BUT...

No way you would have saw a smoker do three then the quad that JS7 was doing on Saturday night.
Crush
Posts
21108
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
2/3/2014 2:57pm
Yeah definitely not!

I don't think it's better to do that tho... The consequences right now at the speeds they go are almost always reflected in the injury list year after year.
Big E
Posts
460
Joined
12/8/2007
Location
Orange, CA, USA
2/3/2014 3:11pm Edited Date/Time 2/3/2014 3:11pm
Slower and more technical riders can get jacked just as bad though...especially with a four stroke chasing them in a crash.
Crush
Posts
21108
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
2/3/2014 3:16pm
Yeah definitely... Tho if I've got a choice I prefer to crash when i'm going slower!! Smile
sargeant
Posts
72
Joined
1/22/2014
Location
CA
2/3/2014 3:35pm
sargeant wrote:
reeds style hasnt changed much, nor did the track look more technical in 2004. would love to know how much faster he his on a 2014...
reeds style hasnt changed much, nor did the track look more technical in 2004. would love to know how much faster he his on a 2014 450 vs 2004 yz250, im guessing 1.5 seconds.
Crush wrote:
I dunno dude, there were a few things in that track that were technical. The big over/under jump down or inside table to table... and the...
I dunno dude, there were a few things in that track that were technical. The big over/under jump down or inside table to table... and the big whoops with the turn double, small dragon into the next whoops and triple out... all that was pretty technical.

Go watch any of the 2003 races too... So much slower because everything was so much peakier... Matthes/Weege/JT were talking about this very subject based on Reeds A2 comments – Yeah 4 strokes are faster but generally 10 seconds a lap... Almost all the laptimes back then were 60 seconds... a lot of them now are 50s. That is not just bike, that's track too for sure. The obstacles are lower and flatter and definitely more rhythm based.
i see that in most of the you tube vids. more technical in the past. but that particular track didnt come across to me that way.
Crush
Posts
21108
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
2/3/2014 3:39pm
Did you see KW, Le Cobra and CR all miss that triple out of the whoops a couple times? Or struggling to clean through the whoops, turn double and small-big-small? It was definitely pretty tech. Lots of little things to make time.
mehow2g
Posts
251
Joined
2/3/2014
Location
AU
2/3/2014 4:21pm
Reed really can't believe the bike, maybe he should of been on a KX many years ago?
tbanks
Posts
1515
Joined
5/28/2011
Location
Great Mills, MD, USA
2/3/2014 4:43pm
I loved that gear from San Diego 05. Crazy to think they lapped up to 3rd place. The tracks were so much different then as well.

It is definitely impressive Reed's career is still at its peak since then.

Post a reply to: Who Else But Reed...

The Latest