All

The Formula S is 22.06. There was no necessary change to certify, just the lengthy line for certification.

There's no standardized test standard to compare them, other than the certifications which are pass/fail. Ultimately it's marketing with different test methods by different doctors. There is technical material available from those companies and their skeptics. IMO the MIPS is just a slip-surface material, quite a bit different from the other features that offer some form of linear and rotational deflection.

I copied this from Alpinestars website's info on the 2024 SM10. I will provide a link as well , or You can go to the Alpinestars site Yourself if You do not feel safe clicking links. I hope that more manufacturers will include how they perform in the tests, by how much they pass or exceed the testing standards. If I find other similar info on other ECE 22.06 helmets I will post it and links to the manufactures site with the info. • The result of the unique shell lay-up process employed in the S-M10 construction results in extremely...

When you say more tested. Do you mean proven to work better? I've searched for testing results that will name names so they are worth something. And I have not found anything beyond the info on the websites for each of those brands. They all seem to make the case that their systems go above what MIPS offers. But it would be interesting to see some real info. I know every crash will be different , and results may not reflect how well the helmet might work in every crash. But I would think there has to be some sort...