Corporate 3Q Profits Largest in History

dcmx326
Posts
899
Joined
11/19/2010
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/24/2012 1:59am
Not accounting for inflation, still, it is obvious overall business in America is not hurting as much as some would like us to believe.

I believe the high unemployment rate is due to corps taking the opportunity of the recent recession to slough off dead weight.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/11/corporate-profits-hit-a-record-high-in-3q/1?csp=34news
|
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
11/24/2010 6:09am
Or a little fuzzy math?
dcmx326
Posts
899
Joined
11/19/2010
Location
Washington, DC, USA
11/24/2010 6:20am
jmar wrote:
Or a little fuzzy math?
I don't believe it is fuzzy math. I just believe the economy is changing quicker than the American people are willing to adapt to.

There are tons of jobs going unfilled due to the lack of workers in the US. The type of work has changed and the location of the jobs has changed. The old boom cities just don't have the jobs anymore so people need to move if they want to have steady work.

I believe that too many Americans are unwilling to adapt to go get the plethora of jobs that are out there.
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/24/2010 6:21am
Hope and Change 'eh?Tongue


Just kidding, don't blow a gasket!
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
11/24/2010 6:28am
jmar wrote:
Or a little fuzzy math?
dcmx326 wrote:
I don't believe it is fuzzy math. I just believe the economy is changing quicker than the American people are willing to adapt to. There are...
I don't believe it is fuzzy math. I just believe the economy is changing quicker than the American people are willing to adapt to.

There are tons of jobs going unfilled due to the lack of workers in the US. The type of work has changed and the location of the jobs has changed. The old boom cities just don't have the jobs anymore so people need to move if they want to have steady work.

I believe that too many Americans are unwilling to adapt to go get the plethora of jobs that are out there.
It's coming up on CEO bonus time.

The Shop

indy_maico
Posts
5103
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
11/24/2010 6:47am
How do corporations manage to make record profits when republicans are always saying the corporate tax rates are too high?

Funny they want to cut taxes for corporations and people making over $250 K annually, change the tax code so that the middle class and poor pay more, yet corporations are making record profits, and the rich have gotten richer over the last 20 years while the poor and middle class have struggled to say the least.

bana0401
Posts
220
Joined
8/10/2009
Location
Central, MN, USA
11/24/2010 7:06am
What do they mean by "Corporate profits?"
dcmx326
Posts
899
Joined
11/19/2010
Location
Washington, DC, USA
11/24/2010 7:48am
bana0401 wrote:
What do they mean by "Corporate profits?"
Profits made by corporations.
bana0401
Posts
220
Joined
8/10/2009
Location
Central, MN, USA
11/24/2010 8:08am
Thanks for pointing that out, but is it a net, gross, operating, pretax, or some other calculation of profit?
SteveS
Posts
5598
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
USA
11/24/2010 8:19am
indy_maico wrote:
How do corporations manage to make record profits when republicans are always saying the corporate tax rates are too high? Funny they want to cut taxes...
How do corporations manage to make record profits when republicans are always saying the corporate tax rates are too high?

Funny they want to cut taxes for corporations and people making over $250 K annually, change the tax code so that the middle class and poor pay more, yet corporations are making record profits, and the rich have gotten richer over the last 20 years while the poor and middle class have struggled to say the least.

The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though if you increase the tax rate, the company has to generate a higher profit margin to make the same amount of money for themselves.

Thing is, you can downsize your way to a profit, which is what the corporations have done. That's another way of saying the economy ISN'T growing because instead of making capital investment, they are hanging onto the money.

It's also a demonstration of how the government, when faced with declining revenues, could reduce deficit or balance the budget by cutting back on what they spend.
indy_maico
Posts
5103
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
11/24/2010 8:43am
indy_maico wrote:
How do corporations manage to make record profits when republicans are always saying the corporate tax rates are too high? Funny they want to cut taxes...
How do corporations manage to make record profits when republicans are always saying the corporate tax rates are too high?

Funny they want to cut taxes for corporations and people making over $250 K annually, change the tax code so that the middle class and poor pay more, yet corporations are making record profits, and the rich have gotten richer over the last 20 years while the poor and middle class have struggled to say the least.

SteveS wrote:
The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though...
The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though if you increase the tax rate, the company has to generate a higher profit margin to make the same amount of money for themselves.

Thing is, you can downsize your way to a profit, which is what the corporations have done. That's another way of saying the economy ISN'T growing because instead of making capital investment, they are hanging onto the money.

It's also a demonstration of how the government, when faced with declining revenues, could reduce deficit or balance the budget by cutting back on what they spend.
Well, after-tax profits are also at a record high, according to the accompanying chart.




Source:

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/visualizing-booming-profit…


brogge
Posts
76
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Poway, CA, USA
11/24/2010 8:51am
The company I work for has set up a bonus program for us that is based on metrics that we'll never be able to achieve. Things like increasing market share by 5 points, reducing cost of product by 10%, etc. Some of these things make sense as a company goal, but they are way outside of the day-to-day employee's hands that to tie it to a bonus is ridiculous.

We surpassed our yearly sales goals by July, and have so much cash in the bank that we can operate for a year or so without even touching our line of credit.

BUT...they're being very cheap on the bonuses, and there is no talk of salary increases, either cost of living or merit based. We went over 3 years for the last salary increase.

My point is...we're making money but all they want to do is talk doom & gloom. Little to no bonuses this year, probably no salary increases...they just keep sticking it to us, all the while hoarding cash to make the CEO and executive board look good to our investors. Business as usual, right?

I've also heard unsubstantiated rumors that they're delaying orders normally taken through the end of the year until first quarter next year. Since we're already past our bookings and revenue goals this year, they want to push some of the latest orders until early next year to make that look good to the investors. Like I said, these are rumors, but I really wouldn't be surprised if it were true.
JustMX
Posts
5353
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/24/2010 8:55am Edited Date/Time 11/24/2010 8:56am
SteveS wrote:
The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though...
The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though if you increase the tax rate, the company has to generate a higher profit margin to make the same amount of money for themselves.

Thing is, you can downsize your way to a profit, which is what the corporations have done. That's another way of saying the economy ISN'T growing because instead of making capital investment, they are hanging onto the money.

It's also a demonstration of how the government, when faced with declining revenues, could reduce deficit or balance the budget by cutting back on what they spend.
Exactly,

If corporations are showing a profit by downsizing and/or selling off assets or inventory that is not a sign that the economy is improving.

Back in the early 80's I lived down near Dalton Georgia, which is known for carpets and textiles.

The amount of plant expansion and construction was unbelievable.

I doubt many of those companies had any profits for several years.

Now many sit empty and instead of manufacturing companies that remain import product and sell it under their brand.

They are probably showing a profit.

Hell, GM is showing a profit and most know that it is a ponzi scheme that is delaying the inevitable.

Wal-mart shows a profit and all they are is a middleman for chinese goods that are bleeding us dry.

Yeah, the economy is improving................for China........and the administrations fix is to print more money to send to china
11/24/2010 9:11am
People are hanging on to their money as well as larger corporations.
Looks like they learned a lesson?
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/24/2010 10:27am
bana0401 wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out, but is it a net, gross, operating, pretax, or some other calculation of profit?
Profit is net before taxes. That's the definition of "profit". There is "income" which can be net or gross, but "profit" is the amount of money made after expenses are paid by definition.
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/24/2010 10:28am
SteveS wrote:
The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though...
The taxes are taken out of the profits after they are reported. So the tax rate doesn't really affect what they report as the profit. Though if you increase the tax rate, the company has to generate a higher profit margin to make the same amount of money for themselves.

Thing is, you can downsize your way to a profit, which is what the corporations have done. That's another way of saying the economy ISN'T growing because instead of making capital investment, they are hanging onto the money.

It's also a demonstration of how the government, when faced with declining revenues, could reduce deficit or balance the budget by cutting back on what they spend.
JustMX wrote:
Exactly, If corporations are showing a profit by downsizing and/or selling off assets or inventory that is not a sign that the economy is improving. Back...
Exactly,

If corporations are showing a profit by downsizing and/or selling off assets or inventory that is not a sign that the economy is improving.

Back in the early 80's I lived down near Dalton Georgia, which is known for carpets and textiles.

The amount of plant expansion and construction was unbelievable.

I doubt many of those companies had any profits for several years.

Now many sit empty and instead of manufacturing companies that remain import product and sell it under their brand.

They are probably showing a profit.

Hell, GM is showing a profit and most know that it is a ponzi scheme that is delaying the inevitable.

Wal-mart shows a profit and all they are is a middleman for chinese goods that are bleeding us dry.

Yeah, the economy is improving................for China........and the administrations fix is to print more money to send to china
Here's an economic fact: We have to spend money to get out of a recession like this, and since we don't HAVE any (thanks, in large part, to the Republican administrations in the last 30 years), we have to borrow it. The other option is to not spend money and watch the entire economy collapse.

Take your pick.
indy_maico
Posts
5103
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
11/24/2010 3:16pm
Nerd wrote:
Here's an economic fact: We have to spend money to get out of a recession like this, and since we don't HAVE any (thanks, in large...
Here's an economic fact: We have to spend money to get out of a recession like this, and since we don't HAVE any (thanks, in large part, to the Republican administrations in the last 30 years), we have to borrow it. The other option is to not spend money and watch the entire economy collapse.

Take your pick.
Now you're sounding like Paul Krugman.

Good job, and right on the money. (no pun intended!)
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
11/24/2010 6:01pm Edited Date/Time 11/24/2010 6:11pm
If corporate America was reinvesting their record profits in the economy, we'd be experiencing the greatest recovery in history. Excess corporate profits (in excess of 10 year norms) are annually higher than the entire stimulus plan, which were spent over a two year span. Unemployment would be down, productivity and exports would be through the roof, and there would be no stopping the American economy. But if that happened, it would have doomed the Republican party - they'd go down in history as the party that destroyed America's economy and the Democrats would go down in history as the one that saved it. I'm not saying that the details are as simple as that - I am saying that the overwhelming majority of American CEOs believe in Republicanism as a religion, and they are not going to do anything that would destroy it.

If the stimulus plan hadn't happened, those corporate profits would be vapor today. Basically, the American taxpayer enabled those corporations to make all that money, and they stuffed it in the mattress for political purposes, while Americans lost their jobs, their homes, their health insurance, their kids' college funds...

Anyone who thinks that politics is only practiced in Washington doesn't understand anything at all. In the big picture, politicians are the least effective architects of public policy in America.
KAWboy14
Posts
6502
Joined
12/31/2007
Location
Austin, TX, USA
11/25/2010 9:30am
this economy is a mirage......there is nothing real behind any of the numbers!
11/25/2010 1:07pm
FANTASTIC!!!!!!! I work for a big corporation and I love the profits. I get more and we all do better, Hell I love big oil also!!!
Frogman
Posts
906
Joined
10/14/2006
Location
Washington, DC, USA
11/29/2010 10:22am
Nerd wrote:
Profit is net before taxes. That's the definition of "profit". There is "income" which can be net or gross, but "profit" is the amount of money...
Profit is net before taxes. That's the definition of "profit". There is "income" which can be net or gross, but "profit" is the amount of money made after expenses are paid by definition.
Obviously not an accountant:

"Net profit" is the same as "net income" = net after taxes.

There is not one simple accounting definition of "profit" there is also, gross profit, operating profit, Profit before tax, whatever "profit" the latest consultant is trying to sell...etc etc...most uses of "profit" can be interchanged with most uses of "income."

What always amuses me about these "record profits" threads is that they are always record DOLLARS. Unless inflation goes backwards...there will always be new records in dollars....even during recessions.

How are corporate profits in relation to revenues?
11/29/2010 10:48am
It means the rich just get richer.
11/29/2010 12:00pm
Frogman wrote:
Obviously not an accountant: "Net profit" is the same as "net income" = net after taxes. There is not one simple accounting definition of "profit" there...
Obviously not an accountant:

"Net profit" is the same as "net income" = net after taxes.

There is not one simple accounting definition of "profit" there is also, gross profit, operating profit, Profit before tax, whatever "profit" the latest consultant is trying to sell...etc etc...most uses of "profit" can be interchanged with most uses of "income."

What always amuses me about these "record profits" threads is that they are always record DOLLARS. Unless inflation goes backwards...there will always be new records in dollars....even during recessions.

How are corporate profits in relation to revenues?
Now you did it. There will now be 5 pages of Nerd doing the cut and paste or googling and posting links to prove him right and you wrong.
dcmx326
Posts
899
Joined
11/19/2010
Location
Washington, DC, USA
11/29/2010 1:44pm
Nerd wrote:
Profit is net before taxes. That's the definition of "profit". There is "income" which can be net or gross, but "profit" is the amount of money...
Profit is net before taxes. That's the definition of "profit". There is "income" which can be net or gross, but "profit" is the amount of money made after expenses are paid by definition.
Frogman wrote:
Obviously not an accountant: "Net profit" is the same as "net income" = net after taxes. There is not one simple accounting definition of "profit" there...
Obviously not an accountant:

"Net profit" is the same as "net income" = net after taxes.

There is not one simple accounting definition of "profit" there is also, gross profit, operating profit, Profit before tax, whatever "profit" the latest consultant is trying to sell...etc etc...most uses of "profit" can be interchanged with most uses of "income."

What always amuses me about these "record profits" threads is that they are always record DOLLARS. Unless inflation goes backwards...there will always be new records in dollars....even during recessions.

How are corporate profits in relation to revenues?
Read this document from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Maybe it can shed light on your questions. It explains the data behind the article.

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/2010/pdf/gdp3q10_2nd.pdf

11/29/2010 1:45pm
Nerd wrote:
Here's an economic fact: We have to spend money to get out of a recession like this, and since we don't HAVE any (thanks, in large...
Here's an economic fact: We have to spend money to get out of a recession like this, and since we don't HAVE any (thanks, in large part, to the Republican administrations in the last 30 years), we have to borrow it. The other option is to not spend money and watch the entire economy collapse.

Take your pick.
It may be easy to blame the Republicans but it's not the correct answer. The easing of lending guidelines fueled a robust credit driven economy. We acted like sleeping dogs as jobs were shifted oversees since it was good for corporate profits. We borrowed in good times and bad and now we are trying to teach our children that it is beneficial to continue spending money to "save" the economy. What a crock of shit that is. So what would happen "IF" we spent less? The $8000 home buyers credit was suppose to keep home prices "inflated" because this is viewed by our Harvard Grads as good economic stragegy. So that logic would mean that a devaluation of the housing market would be bad. Making housing affordable and in line with wages is a bad thing? The difference between GM borrowing and the general public borrowing is night and day. GM will end up with a product that will increase its profitablity. If we are going to teach our children to "spend" money and run up credit it should be for the same goal as GMs. When the Twin Towers collapsed I visited NYC. I also took a trip down to DC and checked out the blackened front of the Pentagon. Even went to Disney. I'm not buying this bullshit spend policy. There is no trickle down. It's time to tell the children the truth. Save your money and spend some of it if it's going to make money for you. If someone really wants your money they will drop their asking price on anything.
Frogman
Posts
906
Joined
10/14/2006
Location
Washington, DC, USA
11/29/2010 1:56pm
dcmx326 wrote:
Read this document from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Maybe it can shed light on your questions. It explains the data behind the article.

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/2010/pdf/gdp3q10_2nd.pdf

Thanks!

Quick glance I can't find what I am looking for but it may be in there somewhere.
raynmann
Posts
173
Joined
8/4/2007
Location
Montgomery, TX, USA
11/29/2010 2:04pm
Damn, I think nerd just got out nerded.....outnerded,,,thats funny shit

Post a reply to: Corporate 3Q Profits Largest in History

The Latest