Supermotocross+pride month?

zanexdaniel wrote:

If you think liberals and marxists are the same thing you clearly lack a basic knowledge of politics 

inflammable wrote:

Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism. You lack any ability to research. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense...

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?
God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense I have heard today and that is saying something.
Liberalism, modern or otherwise, is a pro capitalist ideology through and through. It is built on private property, market worship, and the maintenance of class society. The only thing it shares with Marxism is that it occasionally pretends poor people should be allowed to live, so long as they do not inconvenience the stock market.

You have clearly never read a single page of Marx, but you have definitely spent way too much time sucking down YouTube thumbnails and AM radio screeds from right wing grifters like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Jesse Waters, etc. who make bank off keeping you scared of words you do not understand. You have been programmed to believe that any policy that slightly deviates from corporate feudalism is Marxism, when in reality, it is barely a Band Aid on a bleeding empire.

Liberals do not want to seize the means of production

Liberals do not want to abolish class hierarchy

Liberals do not want to dismantle imperialism or end capitalism

You know what liberals do want?

To make sure Jeff Bezos can fly to space while throwing crumbs to workers and calling it justice. That is not Marxism. That is capitalism with a smiley face.

But keep calling anything you do not like communism, sheep. It is what your MAGA cult leaders trained you to do. If Starbucks adds oat milk, you cry Stalin. If a worker wants healthcare, you scream gulag. It is pathetic.

Stop pretending liberalism is radical. It is just conservatism with Pride flags.

inflammable wrote:

Slavery and the Holocaust would be two times. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Are you fucking stupid? Gays and trans people were some of the first targeted in the holocaust. Fucking moron. Also slavery wasn’t exclusive to straight people??

inflammable wrote:

Okay, I'll give you an easier one:

Modern DEI programs

inflammable wrote:

Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism. You lack any ability to research. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense...

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?
God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense I have heard today and that is saying something.
Liberalism, modern or otherwise, is a pro capitalist ideology through and through. It is built on private property, market worship, and the maintenance of class society. The only thing it shares with Marxism is that it occasionally pretends poor people should be allowed to live, so long as they do not inconvenience the stock market.

You have clearly never read a single page of Marx, but you have definitely spent way too much time sucking down YouTube thumbnails and AM radio screeds from right wing grifters like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Jesse Waters, etc. who make bank off keeping you scared of words you do not understand. You have been programmed to believe that any policy that slightly deviates from corporate feudalism is Marxism, when in reality, it is barely a Band Aid on a bleeding empire.

Liberals do not want to seize the means of production

Liberals do not want to abolish class hierarchy

Liberals do not want to dismantle imperialism or end capitalism

You know what liberals do want?

To make sure Jeff Bezos can fly to space while throwing crumbs to workers and calling it justice. That is not Marxism. That is capitalism with a smiley face.

But keep calling anything you do not like communism, sheep. It is what your MAGA cult leaders trained you to do. If Starbucks adds oat milk, you cry Stalin. If a worker wants healthcare, you scream gulag. It is pathetic.

Stop pretending liberalism is radical. It is just conservatism with Pride flags.

inflammable wrote:

That's classical liberalism. It's not the stance of the left/liberals/Democrats in the US. If you believe it is then you are the one living in Fantasyland. It's...

That's classical liberalism. It's not the stance of the left/liberals/Democrats in the US. 

If you believe it is then you are the one living in Fantasyland. It's delusional for you to think liberalism is conservativism with pride flags. How can you be that out of touch?

zanexdaniel wrote:

Are you fucking stupid? Gays and trans people were some of the first targeted in the holocaust. Fucking moron. Also slavery wasn’t exclusive to straight people??

inflammable wrote:

Okay, I'll give you an easier one:

Modern DEI programs

zanexdaniel wrote:

Calling DEI oppression of white people is one of the dumbest takes out there. Seriously. You are not being oppressed because a company finally hires someone...

Calling DEI oppression of white people is one of the dumbest takes out there. Seriously. You are not being oppressed because a company finally hires someone who is not a white guy named Chad. DEI is not about giving handouts to people who suck at their job. It is about making sure people who are just as qualified, or more, actually get through the door for once instead of being shut out because they are not white or male or straight or born into the right zip code.

White dudes, have had the game rigged in their favor since day one. DEI is not flipping the table. It is just trying to unstack the damn deck. And the wild part is, white women and older workers have gained more from DEI than anyone. So if you are crying about DEI being unfair, you might wanna thank it for your mom’s job and your grandpa’s pension before you keep running your mouth.

And don’t even start with the whole DEI lowers standards garbage. James Stewart was a DEI athlete. He got in not because he was Black, but despite racism trying to keep him out. Have you seen the documentary ESPN did? Track owners wouldn’t let him race, fans were calling him and his family the N word. But he out rode the hell out of most of the white guys already there. DEI is not about lowering the bar. It is about letting the real talent actually get a shot instead of being gatekept by mediocrity with a trust fund.

So no, DEI is not oppression. You are not being silenced or erased. You are just not the only one getting picked anymore, and it is messing with your ego. If fairness feels like a threat to you, maybe you were never about merit in the first place. You just liked being first in line because no one else was allowed in. Grow up.

 

zanexdaniel wrote:

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense...

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?
God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense I have heard today and that is saying something.
Liberalism, modern or otherwise, is a pro capitalist ideology through and through. It is built on private property, market worship, and the maintenance of class society. The only thing it shares with Marxism is that it occasionally pretends poor people should be allowed to live, so long as they do not inconvenience the stock market.

You have clearly never read a single page of Marx, but you have definitely spent way too much time sucking down YouTube thumbnails and AM radio screeds from right wing grifters like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Jesse Waters, etc. who make bank off keeping you scared of words you do not understand. You have been programmed to believe that any policy that slightly deviates from corporate feudalism is Marxism, when in reality, it is barely a Band Aid on a bleeding empire.

Liberals do not want to seize the means of production

Liberals do not want to abolish class hierarchy

Liberals do not want to dismantle imperialism or end capitalism

You know what liberals do want?

To make sure Jeff Bezos can fly to space while throwing crumbs to workers and calling it justice. That is not Marxism. That is capitalism with a smiley face.

But keep calling anything you do not like communism, sheep. It is what your MAGA cult leaders trained you to do. If Starbucks adds oat milk, you cry Stalin. If a worker wants healthcare, you scream gulag. It is pathetic.

Stop pretending liberalism is radical. It is just conservatism with Pride flags.

inflammable wrote:

That's classical liberalism. It's not the stance of the left/liberals/Democrats in the US. If you believe it is then you are the one living in Fantasyland. It's...

That's classical liberalism. It's not the stance of the left/liberals/Democrats in the US. 

If you believe it is then you are the one living in Fantasyland. It's delusional for you to think liberalism is conservativism with pride flags. How can you be that out of touch?

zanexdaniel wrote:

All I hear is “bahh bahh”coming from you, sheep. mixed with the sound of trumps nutsack clapping your cheeks like the little good boy you are

Sandberm656 wrote:

eh, whatever.

As long as I do not see a dude sign up for the WMX class I really don't care.

inflammable wrote:

Okay, I'll give you an easier one:

Modern DEI programs

zanexdaniel wrote:

Calling DEI oppression of white people is one of the dumbest takes out there. Seriously. You are not being oppressed because a company finally hires someone...

Calling DEI oppression of white people is one of the dumbest takes out there. Seriously. You are not being oppressed because a company finally hires someone who is not a white guy named Chad. DEI is not about giving handouts to people who suck at their job. It is about making sure people who are just as qualified, or more, actually get through the door for once instead of being shut out because they are not white or male or straight or born into the right zip code.

White dudes, have had the game rigged in their favor since day one. DEI is not flipping the table. It is just trying to unstack the damn deck. And the wild part is, white women and older workers have gained more from DEI than anyone. So if you are crying about DEI being unfair, you might wanna thank it for your mom’s job and your grandpa’s pension before you keep running your mouth.

And don’t even start with the whole DEI lowers standards garbage. James Stewart was a DEI athlete. He got in not because he was Black, but despite racism trying to keep him out. Have you seen the documentary ESPN did? Track owners wouldn’t let him race, fans were calling him and his family the N word. But he out rode the hell out of most of the white guys already there. DEI is not about lowering the bar. It is about letting the real talent actually get a shot instead of being gatekept by mediocrity with a trust fund.

So no, DEI is not oppression. You are not being silenced or erased. You are just not the only one getting picked anymore, and it is messing with your ego. If fairness feels like a threat to you, maybe you were never about merit in the first place. You just liked being first in line because no one else was allowed in. Grow up.

 

inflammable wrote:

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?Why does Harvard offer remedial math?Why do...

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?

Why does Harvard offer remedial math?

Why do fire departments lower physical standards and test standards?

zanexdaniel wrote:

Calling DEI oppression of white people is one of the dumbest takes out there. Seriously. You are not being oppressed because a company finally hires someone...

Calling DEI oppression of white people is one of the dumbest takes out there. Seriously. You are not being oppressed because a company finally hires someone who is not a white guy named Chad. DEI is not about giving handouts to people who suck at their job. It is about making sure people who are just as qualified, or more, actually get through the door for once instead of being shut out because they are not white or male or straight or born into the right zip code.

White dudes, have had the game rigged in their favor since day one. DEI is not flipping the table. It is just trying to unstack the damn deck. And the wild part is, white women and older workers have gained more from DEI than anyone. So if you are crying about DEI being unfair, you might wanna thank it for your mom’s job and your grandpa’s pension before you keep running your mouth.

And don’t even start with the whole DEI lowers standards garbage. James Stewart was a DEI athlete. He got in not because he was Black, but despite racism trying to keep him out. Have you seen the documentary ESPN did? Track owners wouldn’t let him race, fans were calling him and his family the N word. But he out rode the hell out of most of the white guys already there. DEI is not about lowering the bar. It is about letting the real talent actually get a shot instead of being gatekept by mediocrity with a trust fund.

So no, DEI is not oppression. You are not being silenced or erased. You are just not the only one getting picked anymore, and it is messing with your ego. If fairness feels like a threat to you, maybe you were never about merit in the first place. You just liked being first in line because no one else was allowed in. Grow up.

 

inflammable wrote:

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?Why does Harvard offer remedial math?Why do...

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?

Why does Harvard offer remedial math?

Why do fire departments lower physical standards and test standards?

zanexdaniel wrote:

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.The FAA adjusted...

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.
The FAA adjusted hiring practices because they realized their system filtered out a lot of qualified people who never got a chance to even apply. This was not about hiring random people off the street. It was about removing unnecessary barriers that had nothing to do with job performance and everything to do with gatekeeping access to high paying careers. Being able to afford expensive flight school or knowing someone already in the field should not determine whether you get considered.

As for Harvard offering remedial math, yeah, they do. You know why? Because people from underfunded public schools often do not get the same prep as kids from elite private schools. That is not a sign of stupidity. That is a sign of an unequal education system. Harvard brings those students up to speed because they know talent is everywhere, but opportunity is not. And guess what, most of the students taking remedial classes are not even Black or brown. They are often white students from poor or rural areas. So if you are mad at that, you are actually just mad that Harvard is trying to level the playing field, especially considering that Harvard’s main focus is Law, not math 

And fire departments. Physical standards should be tied to the actual demands of the job, not some arbitrary CrossFit fantasy cooked up to weed people out. If the test is built in a way that has nothing to do with what the job really requires, then yeah, it should be changed. If you can do the work, save lives, and carry the equipment, who cares if you do not bench press 300 pounds. That is not lowering the bar. That is making sure the bar actually measures what matters.

 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Typical MAGA snowflake. Can dish it out but resorts to “cancel culture” as soon as you get schooled

zanexdaniel wrote:

If you think liberals and marxists are the same thing you clearly lack a basic knowledge of politics 

inflammable wrote:

Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism. You lack any ability to research. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense...

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?
God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense I have heard today and that is saying something.
Liberalism, modern or otherwise, is a pro capitalist ideology through and through. It is built on private property, market worship, and the maintenance of class society. The only thing it shares with Marxism is that it occasionally pretends poor people should be allowed to live, so long as they do not inconvenience the stock market.

You have clearly never read a single page of Marx, but you have definitely spent way too much time sucking down YouTube thumbnails and AM radio screeds from right wing grifters like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Jesse Waters, etc. who make bank off keeping you scared of words you do not understand. You have been programmed to believe that any policy that slightly deviates from corporate feudalism is Marxism, when in reality, it is barely a Band Aid on a bleeding empire.

Liberals do not want to seize the means of production

Liberals do not want to abolish class hierarchy

Liberals do not want to dismantle imperialism or end capitalism

You know what liberals do want?

To make sure Jeff Bezos can fly to space while throwing crumbs to workers and calling it justice. That is not Marxism. That is capitalism with a smiley face.

But keep calling anything you do not like communism, sheep. It is what your MAGA cult leaders trained you to do. If Starbucks adds oat milk, you cry Stalin. If a worker wants healthcare, you scream gulag. It is pathetic.

Stop pretending liberalism is radical. It is just conservatism with Pride flags.

inflammable wrote:

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?Why does Harvard offer remedial math?Why do...

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?

Why does Harvard offer remedial math?

Why do fire departments lower physical standards and test standards?

zanexdaniel wrote:

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.The FAA adjusted...

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.
The FAA adjusted hiring practices because they realized their system filtered out a lot of qualified people who never got a chance to even apply. This was not about hiring random people off the street. It was about removing unnecessary barriers that had nothing to do with job performance and everything to do with gatekeeping access to high paying careers. Being able to afford expensive flight school or knowing someone already in the field should not determine whether you get considered.

As for Harvard offering remedial math, yeah, they do. You know why? Because people from underfunded public schools often do not get the same prep as kids from elite private schools. That is not a sign of stupidity. That is a sign of an unequal education system. Harvard brings those students up to speed because they know talent is everywhere, but opportunity is not. And guess what, most of the students taking remedial classes are not even Black or brown. They are often white students from poor or rural areas. So if you are mad at that, you are actually just mad that Harvard is trying to level the playing field, especially considering that Harvard’s main focus is Law, not math 

And fire departments. Physical standards should be tied to the actual demands of the job, not some arbitrary CrossFit fantasy cooked up to weed people out. If the test is built in a way that has nothing to do with what the job really requires, then yeah, it should be changed. If you can do the work, save lives, and carry the equipment, who cares if you do not bench press 300 pounds. That is not lowering the bar. That is making sure the bar actually measures what matters.

 

inflammable wrote:

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. I would...

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. 

I would guess you are an aspiring musician who lacks talent, so sees an opportunity to gain from cheesy political songs, and by doing so taking advantage of folks who don't know better. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Typical MAGA snowflake. Can dish it out but resorts to “cancel culture” as soon as you get schooled

burn1986 wrote:

So, are you for or against Islam?

inflammable wrote:

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?Why does Harvard offer remedial math?Why do...

If DEI is not about lowering the bar, then why were standards lowered for air traffic controllers to increase diversity?

Why does Harvard offer remedial math?

Why do fire departments lower physical standards and test standards?

zanexdaniel wrote:

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.The FAA adjusted...

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.
The FAA adjusted hiring practices because they realized their system filtered out a lot of qualified people who never got a chance to even apply. This was not about hiring random people off the street. It was about removing unnecessary barriers that had nothing to do with job performance and everything to do with gatekeeping access to high paying careers. Being able to afford expensive flight school or knowing someone already in the field should not determine whether you get considered.

As for Harvard offering remedial math, yeah, they do. You know why? Because people from underfunded public schools often do not get the same prep as kids from elite private schools. That is not a sign of stupidity. That is a sign of an unequal education system. Harvard brings those students up to speed because they know talent is everywhere, but opportunity is not. And guess what, most of the students taking remedial classes are not even Black or brown. They are often white students from poor or rural areas. So if you are mad at that, you are actually just mad that Harvard is trying to level the playing field, especially considering that Harvard’s main focus is Law, not math 

And fire departments. Physical standards should be tied to the actual demands of the job, not some arbitrary CrossFit fantasy cooked up to weed people out. If the test is built in a way that has nothing to do with what the job really requires, then yeah, it should be changed. If you can do the work, save lives, and carry the equipment, who cares if you do not bench press 300 pounds. That is not lowering the bar. That is making sure the bar actually measures what matters.

 

inflammable wrote:

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. I would...

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. 

I would guess you are an aspiring musician who lacks talent, so sees an opportunity to gain from cheesy political songs, and by doing so taking advantage of folks who don't know better. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Why would I be against Islam?

zanexdaniel wrote:

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.The FAA adjusted...

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.
The FAA adjusted hiring practices because they realized their system filtered out a lot of qualified people who never got a chance to even apply. This was not about hiring random people off the street. It was about removing unnecessary barriers that had nothing to do with job performance and everything to do with gatekeeping access to high paying careers. Being able to afford expensive flight school or knowing someone already in the field should not determine whether you get considered.

As for Harvard offering remedial math, yeah, they do. You know why? Because people from underfunded public schools often do not get the same prep as kids from elite private schools. That is not a sign of stupidity. That is a sign of an unequal education system. Harvard brings those students up to speed because they know talent is everywhere, but opportunity is not. And guess what, most of the students taking remedial classes are not even Black or brown. They are often white students from poor or rural areas. So if you are mad at that, you are actually just mad that Harvard is trying to level the playing field, especially considering that Harvard’s main focus is Law, not math 

And fire departments. Physical standards should be tied to the actual demands of the job, not some arbitrary CrossFit fantasy cooked up to weed people out. If the test is built in a way that has nothing to do with what the job really requires, then yeah, it should be changed. If you can do the work, save lives, and carry the equipment, who cares if you do not bench press 300 pounds. That is not lowering the bar. That is making sure the bar actually measures what matters.

 

inflammable wrote:

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. I would...

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. 

I would guess you are an aspiring musician who lacks talent, so sees an opportunity to gain from cheesy political songs, and by doing so taking advantage of folks who don't know better. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Welp, every single right wing personality all parrots the same slop, so forgive me if I missed your special guy

zanexdaniel wrote:

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.The FAA adjusted...

There you go parroting Fox News propaganda some more, proving to me again that you completely lack any understanding of what DEI truly is.
The FAA adjusted hiring practices because they realized their system filtered out a lot of qualified people who never got a chance to even apply. This was not about hiring random people off the street. It was about removing unnecessary barriers that had nothing to do with job performance and everything to do with gatekeeping access to high paying careers. Being able to afford expensive flight school or knowing someone already in the field should not determine whether you get considered.

As for Harvard offering remedial math, yeah, they do. You know why? Because people from underfunded public schools often do not get the same prep as kids from elite private schools. That is not a sign of stupidity. That is a sign of an unequal education system. Harvard brings those students up to speed because they know talent is everywhere, but opportunity is not. And guess what, most of the students taking remedial classes are not even Black or brown. They are often white students from poor or rural areas. So if you are mad at that, you are actually just mad that Harvard is trying to level the playing field, especially considering that Harvard’s main focus is Law, not math 

And fire departments. Physical standards should be tied to the actual demands of the job, not some arbitrary CrossFit fantasy cooked up to weed people out. If the test is built in a way that has nothing to do with what the job really requires, then yeah, it should be changed. If you can do the work, save lives, and carry the equipment, who cares if you do not bench press 300 pounds. That is not lowering the bar. That is making sure the bar actually measures what matters.

 

inflammable wrote:

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. I would...

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. 

I would guess you are an aspiring musician who lacks talent, so sees an opportunity to gain from cheesy political songs, and by doing so taking advantage of folks who don't know better. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Also you implying that I’m “taking advantage of” anyone is rich. Thanks for checking out my music, man. Yes I’m a deep state plant who takes...

Also you implying that I’m “taking advantage of” anyone is rich. Thanks for checking out my music, man. Yes I’m a deep state plant who takes advantage of the less than 5000 people who saw my reels you watched. I’m a deep state antifa sleeper agent cashing in checks from George Soros to program my 17 monthly listeners on Spotify. You finally caught me in my ruse

inflammable wrote:

Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism. You lack any ability to research. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense...

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?
God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense I have heard today and that is saying something.
Liberalism, modern or otherwise, is a pro capitalist ideology through and through. It is built on private property, market worship, and the maintenance of class society. The only thing it shares with Marxism is that it occasionally pretends poor people should be allowed to live, so long as they do not inconvenience the stock market.

You have clearly never read a single page of Marx, but you have definitely spent way too much time sucking down YouTube thumbnails and AM radio screeds from right wing grifters like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Jesse Waters, etc. who make bank off keeping you scared of words you do not understand. You have been programmed to believe that any policy that slightly deviates from corporate feudalism is Marxism, when in reality, it is barely a Band Aid on a bleeding empire.

Liberals do not want to seize the means of production

Liberals do not want to abolish class hierarchy

Liberals do not want to dismantle imperialism or end capitalism

You know what liberals do want?

To make sure Jeff Bezos can fly to space while throwing crumbs to workers and calling it justice. That is not Marxism. That is capitalism with a smiley face.

But keep calling anything you do not like communism, sheep. It is what your MAGA cult leaders trained you to do. If Starbucks adds oat milk, you cry Stalin. If a worker wants healthcare, you scream gulag. It is pathetic.

Stop pretending liberalism is radical. It is just conservatism with Pride flags.

Tyler D wrote:

isnt it true that everything marxists dont like is nazi? doesn't matter what the correct academic label is, whatever you want to call it, its one...

isnt it true that everything marxists dont like is nazi? doesn't matter what the correct academic label is, whatever you want to call it, its one angle of attack on the status quo. you can debate all you want about establishment liberalism being a bunch of useful idiots or bourgeois or whatever, but the folks earnestly pushing stuff like this know what they're doing. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Why would I be against Islam?

burn1986 wrote:

Cause you’re gay right?

inflammable wrote:

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. I would...

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. 

I would guess you are an aspiring musician who lacks talent, so sees an opportunity to gain from cheesy political songs, and by doing so taking advantage of folks who don't know better. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Welp, every single right wing personality all parrots the same slop, so forgive me if I missed your special guy

inflammable wrote:

Parrots = provides information and facts that you don't like. 

I suspect you don't even see the irony of Queers for Palestine...

 

zanexdaniel wrote:

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense...

“Modern liberalism in the US is driven by Marxism”?
God, what kind of fantasyland are you living in? That is the most ignorant right wing parroted nonsense I have heard today and that is saying something.
Liberalism, modern or otherwise, is a pro capitalist ideology through and through. It is built on private property, market worship, and the maintenance of class society. The only thing it shares with Marxism is that it occasionally pretends poor people should be allowed to live, so long as they do not inconvenience the stock market.

You have clearly never read a single page of Marx, but you have definitely spent way too much time sucking down YouTube thumbnails and AM radio screeds from right wing grifters like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Jesse Waters, etc. who make bank off keeping you scared of words you do not understand. You have been programmed to believe that any policy that slightly deviates from corporate feudalism is Marxism, when in reality, it is barely a Band Aid on a bleeding empire.

Liberals do not want to seize the means of production

Liberals do not want to abolish class hierarchy

Liberals do not want to dismantle imperialism or end capitalism

You know what liberals do want?

To make sure Jeff Bezos can fly to space while throwing crumbs to workers and calling it justice. That is not Marxism. That is capitalism with a smiley face.

But keep calling anything you do not like communism, sheep. It is what your MAGA cult leaders trained you to do. If Starbucks adds oat milk, you cry Stalin. If a worker wants healthcare, you scream gulag. It is pathetic.

Stop pretending liberalism is radical. It is just conservatism with Pride flags.

Tyler D wrote:

isnt it true that everything marxists dont like is nazi? doesn't matter what the correct academic label is, whatever you want to call it, its one...

isnt it true that everything marxists dont like is nazi? doesn't matter what the correct academic label is, whatever you want to call it, its one angle of attack on the status quo. you can debate all you want about establishment liberalism being a bunch of useful idiots or bourgeois or whatever, but the folks earnestly pushing stuff like this know what they're doing. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

This is such a strawman argument. No, everything Marxists don’t like isn’t “nazism”, but where this country is headed especially during this current administration, is definitely...

This is such a strawman argument. No, everything Marxists don’t like isn’t “nazism”, but where this country is headed especially during this current administration, is definitely towards fascism. Trump just tapped Palantir to establish a deep surveillance profile for each and every citizen. Liberalism enabled all this B.S. too by capitulating and continuously leaning more and more right. You might think I’m some libtard snowflake pussy, but at the end of the day I just want everyone to be free to live how they please; Yes, even you, the people I disagree with. We’re living in a grim timeline and what you might thing is a total win right now and totally “owning the libs” is absolutely going to come back and be used against you or someone you know. We’re pretty damn close to martial law already

inflammable wrote:

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. I would...

The funniest part is how you keep mentioning outlets that I don't pay attention to. The off-base counter arguments you used were almost as funny. 

I would guess you are an aspiring musician who lacks talent, so sees an opportunity to gain from cheesy political songs, and by doing so taking advantage of folks who don't know better. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Also you implying that I’m “taking advantage of” anyone is rich. Thanks for checking out my music, man. Yes I’m a deep state plant who takes...

Also you implying that I’m “taking advantage of” anyone is rich. Thanks for checking out my music, man. Yes I’m a deep state plant who takes advantage of the less than 5000 people who saw my reels you watched. I’m a deep state antifa sleeper agent cashing in checks from George Soros to program my 17 monthly listeners on Spotify. You finally caught me in my ruse

inflammable wrote:

Oh, I guessed right!! 🤣🤣It did give you the chance to mention your viewership/listeners, which we both know you were hoping someone would do. Do you...

Oh, I guessed right!! 🤣🤣

It did give you the chance to mention your viewership/listeners, which we both know you were hoping someone would do. Do you have any major awards/nominations/selections you would like to brag about too?

zanexdaniel wrote:

Welp, every single right wing personality all parrots the same slop, so forgive me if I missed your special guy

inflammable wrote:

Parrots = provides information and facts that you don't like. 

I suspect you don't even see the irony of Queers for Palestine...

 

zanexdaniel wrote:

There’s nothing ironic about Queers for Palestine unless you believe queer people should only support liberation where it’s already safe for them. Queer solidarity isn’t about...

There’s nothing ironic about Queers for Palestine unless you believe queer people should only support liberation where it’s already safe for them. Queer solidarity isn’t about comfort, it’s about justice. Yes, there’s homophobia in Palestinian society just like there is everywhere including in Israel and the US. But using that as an excuse to ignore apartheid, occupation, and the bombing of civilians is just pinkwashing, using LGBTQ+ rights to distract from human rights abuses. Queer Palestinians exist, they resist, and they deserve freedom just like anyone else. Real liberation means standing against all forms of oppression, not picking and choosing based on what makes you feel morally superio

 

zanexdaniel wrote:

Also you implying that I’m “taking advantage of” anyone is rich. Thanks for checking out my music, man. Yes I’m a deep state plant who takes...

Also you implying that I’m “taking advantage of” anyone is rich. Thanks for checking out my music, man. Yes I’m a deep state plant who takes advantage of the less than 5000 people who saw my reels you watched. I’m a deep state antifa sleeper agent cashing in checks from George Soros to program my 17 monthly listeners on Spotify. You finally caught me in my ruse

inflammable wrote:

Oh, I guessed right!! 🤣🤣It did give you the chance to mention your viewership/listeners, which we both know you were hoping someone would do. Do you...

Oh, I guessed right!! 🤣🤣

It did give you the chance to mention your viewership/listeners, which we both know you were hoping someone would do. Do you have any major awards/nominations/selections you would like to brag about too?

zanexdaniel wrote:

Buddy, 17 Spotify listeners isn’t a flex 😂 it’s embarrassing on my end! 

inflammable wrote:

Parrots = provides information and facts that you don't like. 

I suspect you don't even see the irony of Queers for Palestine...

 

zanexdaniel wrote:

There’s nothing ironic about Queers for Palestine unless you believe queer people should only support liberation where it’s already safe for them. Queer solidarity isn’t about...

There’s nothing ironic about Queers for Palestine unless you believe queer people should only support liberation where it’s already safe for them. Queer solidarity isn’t about comfort, it’s about justice. Yes, there’s homophobia in Palestinian society just like there is everywhere including in Israel and the US. But using that as an excuse to ignore apartheid, occupation, and the bombing of civilians is just pinkwashing, using LGBTQ+ rights to distract from human rights abuses. Queer Palestinians exist, they resist, and they deserve freedom just like anyone else. Real liberation means standing against all forms of oppression, not picking and choosing based on what makes you feel morally superio

 

inflammable wrote:

So you don't understand it. What a surprise. 

You're so far down the leftist rabbit hole you aren't even worth the time to discuss things with 🤣🤣

zanexdaniel wrote:

No, I’m a straight white man

zanexdaniel wrote:

No, I’m a straight white man

burn1986 wrote:

So what’s your stance on SX pride

zanexdaniel wrote:

No, I’m a straight white man

burn1986 wrote:

So what’s your stance on SX pride

zanexdaniel wrote:

If Supercross wants to make a post acknowledging pride I think that’s fine. If a rider decides he wants a rainbow kit, that’s fine. Its not...

If Supercross wants to make a post acknowledging pride I think that’s fine. If a rider decides he wants a rainbow kit, that’s fine. Its not hurting anyone or taking anything away from the sport. 

zanexdaniel wrote:

If Supercross wants to make a post acknowledging pride I think that’s fine. If a rider decides he wants a rainbow kit, that’s fine. Its not...

If Supercross wants to make a post acknowledging pride I think that’s fine. If a rider decides he wants a rainbow kit, that’s fine. Its not hurting anyone or taking anything away from the sport.