War in Persian Gulf coming soon ?

CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 1:10pm
Forbes


One year ago, the Obama administration missed an opportunity to support Iran's uprising. They mistakenly calculated that back-door negotiations with Iran's clerics and promises made by its rulers would bring cooperation on the nuclear issue. The Americans were duped and now find themselves grasping for another chance to support an Iranian uprising.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has ordered a massive buildup of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf, starting with Carrier Strike Group 10, headed by the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier. Just last Friday an armada of more than 12 U.S. and Israeli warships passed through the Suez canal amid extreme security provided by Egypt. The ships are headed for the Red Sea and from there to the Persian Gulf. Another four U.S. warships will be making their way to the region to join the Strike Group.

The Americans have also conducted joint air and naval strike practices with France and the U.K. under the command of American forces, while Germany is sending warships to the area, also under the command of American forces.

Both Israel and the U.S. have positioned nuclear-armed submarines in the region. Israel has conducted multiple tests on its missile defense systems to protect its citizens once war breaks out. U.S. and Israeli Special Forces have been deployed inside Iran to investigate potential targets and gauge the willingness of Iranians to overthrow the current regime.

Meanwhile Iran is busy pursuing its nuclear bomb project and enriching its supply of uranium faster than ever before, with the hope of testing its first nuclear bomb. Accomplishing this will fulfill the prophecy sought by the radical members of the secretive society of Hojjatieh, particularly its leader Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, the person responsible for the initial election and fraudulent re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Hojjatieh movement impatiently seeks the end of times and the return of Imam Mahdi, the last messiah.
|
Mutt
Posts
1183
Joined
12/24/2006
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
6/23/2010 9:02pm
World War III is right around the corner. We're in Iraq and Afghanistan, it only makes sense to push into the center and Iran also. I've been predicting it, for oh, about seven years now.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
6/23/2010 9:07pm
CR250Rider wrote:
[url=http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/21/iran-nuclear-israel-war-opinions-reza-kahlili.html]Forbes[/url] One year ago, the Obama administration missed an opportunity to support Iran's uprising. They mistakenly calculated that back-door negotiations with Iran's clerics and promises made...
Forbes


One year ago, the Obama administration missed an opportunity to support Iran's uprising. They mistakenly calculated that back-door negotiations with Iran's clerics and promises made by its rulers would bring cooperation on the nuclear issue. The Americans were duped and now find themselves grasping for another chance to support an Iranian uprising.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has ordered a massive buildup of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf, starting with Carrier Strike Group 10, headed by the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier. Just last Friday an armada of more than 12 U.S. and Israeli warships passed through the Suez canal amid extreme security provided by Egypt. The ships are headed for the Red Sea and from there to the Persian Gulf. Another four U.S. warships will be making their way to the region to join the Strike Group.

The Americans have also conducted joint air and naval strike practices with France and the U.K. under the command of American forces, while Germany is sending warships to the area, also under the command of American forces.

Both Israel and the U.S. have positioned nuclear-armed submarines in the region. Israel has conducted multiple tests on its missile defense systems to protect its citizens once war breaks out. U.S. and Israeli Special Forces have been deployed inside Iran to investigate potential targets and gauge the willingness of Iranians to overthrow the current regime.

Meanwhile Iran is busy pursuing its nuclear bomb project and enriching its supply of uranium faster than ever before, with the hope of testing its first nuclear bomb. Accomplishing this will fulfill the prophecy sought by the radical members of the secretive society of Hojjatieh, particularly its leader Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, the person responsible for the initial election and fraudulent re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Hojjatieh movement impatiently seeks the end of times and the return of Imam Mahdi, the last messiah.
and hardcore conservatives like you must be all atwitter with excitement over the prospect
72kiteboarder
Posts
4645
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
90 MILES SOUTH-ISH, FL, USA
6/23/2010 9:17pm
All standard stuff here. Nothing to see, now move along please.


bultokid
Posts
2142
Joined
8/13/2007
Location
Houston, TX, USA
6/24/2010 4:32am
CR250Rider wrote:
[url=http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/21/iran-nuclear-israel-war-opinions-reza-kahlili.html]Forbes[/url] One year ago, the Obama administration missed an opportunity to support Iran's uprising. They mistakenly calculated that back-door negotiations with Iran's clerics and promises made...
Forbes


One year ago, the Obama administration missed an opportunity to support Iran's uprising. They mistakenly calculated that back-door negotiations with Iran's clerics and promises made by its rulers would bring cooperation on the nuclear issue. The Americans were duped and now find themselves grasping for another chance to support an Iranian uprising.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has ordered a massive buildup of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf, starting with Carrier Strike Group 10, headed by the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier. Just last Friday an armada of more than 12 U.S. and Israeli warships passed through the Suez canal amid extreme security provided by Egypt. The ships are headed for the Red Sea and from there to the Persian Gulf. Another four U.S. warships will be making their way to the region to join the Strike Group.

The Americans have also conducted joint air and naval strike practices with France and the U.K. under the command of American forces, while Germany is sending warships to the area, also under the command of American forces.

Both Israel and the U.S. have positioned nuclear-armed submarines in the region. Israel has conducted multiple tests on its missile defense systems to protect its citizens once war breaks out. U.S. and Israeli Special Forces have been deployed inside Iran to investigate potential targets and gauge the willingness of Iranians to overthrow the current regime.

Meanwhile Iran is busy pursuing its nuclear bomb project and enriching its supply of uranium faster than ever before, with the hope of testing its first nuclear bomb. Accomplishing this will fulfill the prophecy sought by the radical members of the secretive society of Hojjatieh, particularly its leader Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, the person responsible for the initial election and fraudulent re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Hojjatieh movement impatiently seeks the end of times and the return of Imam Mahdi, the last messiah.
flarider wrote:
and hardcore conservatives like you must be all atwitter with excitement over the prospect
I am not thrilled in the least. So how will the libs blame the right when a lib prez sends our troops in ? Face it, left/right , rep/dem it doesn't matter it's all about the dino juice.

The Shop

CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
6/24/2010 7:26am
The irony is a guy who ran on a "get us out of all wars" platform is starting another!

lol


meanwhile:

KABUL (AFP) – The deaths of another four NATO troops in an accident in Afghanistan made June the deadliest single month for US-led foreign forces in nearly nine years of conflict, according to an AFP tally Thursday.

The record eclipsed the previous bloodiest month for NATO troops last August, when 77 soldiers were killed.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
6/24/2010 7:31am
CR250Rider wrote:
The irony is a guy who ran on a "get us out of all wars" platform is starting another! lol meanwhile: KABUL (AFP) – The deaths...
The irony is a guy who ran on a "get us out of all wars" platform is starting another!

lol


meanwhile:

KABUL (AFP) – The deaths of another four NATO troops in an accident in Afghanistan made June the deadliest single month for US-led foreign forces in nearly nine years of conflict, according to an AFP tally Thursday.

The record eclipsed the previous bloodiest month for NATO troops last August, when 77 soldiers were killed.
He is?
You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various reasons, which may include intimidation?

DirtyFilter75
Posts
6915
Joined
1/9/2009
Location
Evansville, IN, USA
6/24/2010 7:36am
flarider wrote:
He is? You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various...
He is?
You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various reasons, which may include intimidation?

Can we at least agree that our boys aren't home like he promised?
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
6/24/2010 7:45am
flarider wrote:
He is? You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various...
He is?
You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various reasons, which may include intimidation?

Can we at least agree that our boys aren't home like he promised?
Well, how about you go back and research what he actually said.

He never said they'd be home overnight, and he said we would step up our offensive in Afghanistan

If you paid attention or care about facts, you'd see he's done exactly as he said he would and is on track with what he said he would
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
6/24/2010 8:44am
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election


he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals at about the same time, too.



you watch

Racer92
Posts
17965
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX, USA
6/24/2010 8:48am
CR250Rider wrote:
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals...
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election


he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals at about the same time, too.



you watch

This is a more likely hypothesis.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
6/24/2010 8:48am
CR250Rider wrote:
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals...
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election


he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals at about the same time, too.



you watch

HAHAHAHAHA....

Now it's bad to bring troops home.....

HAHAHAHAHA....

Some of you are so damn funny.....

DirtyFilter75
Posts
6915
Joined
1/9/2009
Location
Evansville, IN, USA
6/24/2010 9:04am
flarider wrote:
Well, how about you go back and research what he actually said. He never said they'd be home overnight, and he said we would step up...
Well, how about you go back and research what he actually said.

He never said they'd be home overnight, and he said we would step up our offensive in Afghanistan

If you paid attention or care about facts, you'd see he's done exactly as he said he would and is on track with what he said he would
I will not argue with the defender of all things Obama! I believe he was the best choice we had. Not that the choices were good. We should completely withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan.
MX479Guy
Posts
2577
Joined
4/5/2009
Location
Atlantic Beach, FL, USA
6/24/2010 9:28am
Ah....he never said this, he never said that...what he said was this, or let me clarify my statements, etc.


Either Obama is one hell of a word wizard or he's completely bullshitting the people who voted for him and doing exactly what every other POTUS does once they get into office..
bultokid
Posts
2142
Joined
8/13/2007
Location
Houston, TX, USA
6/24/2010 10:13am
CR250Rider wrote:
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals...
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election


he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals at about the same time, too.



you watch

Racer92 wrote:
This is a more likely hypothesis.
It will not matter , he's looking like four and out. And then we get to support him for the rest of his life....sweet gig, not that he'll need it as his book will bank many millions.
7I3N
Posts
1753
Joined
10/22/2009
Location
Moto Paradise, UT, USA
6/24/2010 10:38am



flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
6/24/2010 11:22am
and he is on his timeline.
He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the field.
Either way, he is within his timeline of withdrawl, which was adjusted after 2007 and even adjusted by 6 months after entering office under the advisement of his commanders in the field.

Unless of course you guys think he should just tell those most experienced with the situation to "fuck off"
bultokid
Posts
2142
Joined
8/13/2007
Location
Houston, TX, USA
6/24/2010 11:23am
7I3N wrote:



Which bank is he using ?
7I3N
Posts
1753
Joined
10/22/2009
Location
Moto Paradise, UT, USA
6/24/2010 12:14pm
flarider wrote:
and he is on his timeline. He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the...
and he is on his timeline.
He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the field.
Either way, he is within his timeline of withdrawl, which was adjusted after 2007 and even adjusted by 6 months after entering office under the advisement of his commanders in the field.

Unless of course you guys think he should just tell those most experienced with the situation to "fuck off"
I’m really curious to see if you will still be defending him after the bombs start falling in Tehran, although I’m pretty sure I already know the answer.

Daniel Ellsberg, legendary leaker of the "Pentagon Papers" in 1971, still has a bone to pick with the White House. In an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE, the 79-year-old peace activist accuses President Obama of betraying his election promises -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan and on civil liberties.

Interview
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
6/24/2010 12:29pm
flarider wrote:
and he is on his timeline. He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the...
and he is on his timeline.
He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the field.
Either way, he is within his timeline of withdrawl, which was adjusted after 2007 and even adjusted by 6 months after entering office under the advisement of his commanders in the field.

Unless of course you guys think he should just tell those most experienced with the situation to "fuck off"
7I3N wrote:
I’m really curious to see if you will still be defending him after the bombs start falling in Tehran, although I’m pretty sure I already know...
I’m really curious to see if you will still be defending him after the bombs start falling in Tehran, although I’m pretty sure I already know the answer.

Daniel Ellsberg, legendary leaker of the "Pentagon Papers" in 1971, still has a bone to pick with the White House. In an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE, the 79-year-old peace activist accuses President Obama of betraying his election promises -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan and on civil liberties.

Interview
As it stands now, no, I would not defend his Administration
I do not believe there is enough evidence to bomb Tehran and we would not have unilateral support in doing so.
7I3N
Posts
1753
Joined
10/22/2009
Location
Moto Paradise, UT, USA
6/24/2010 12:52pm
flarider wrote:
As it stands now, no, I would not defend his Administration I do not believe there is enough evidence to bomb Tehran and we would not...
As it stands now, no, I would not defend his Administration
I do not believe there is enough evidence to bomb Tehran and we would not have unilateral support in doing so.
I knew we could eventually find something to agree about. Tongue
DirtyFilter75
Posts
6915
Joined
1/9/2009
Location
Evansville, IN, USA
6/24/2010 1:46pm
What theater's will it be in? Do you have a link to a trailer?

Should be a good one!
indy_maico
Posts
5103
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
6/24/2010 2:08pm
How can we pay for it without adding to the deficit?

The republicans and tea-baggers would never approve. (Sarcasm)
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
6/24/2010 2:34pm
flarider wrote:
and he is on his timeline. He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the...
and he is on his timeline.
He also ALWAYS said that any decisions will be based on conditions on the ground and the commanders in the field.
Either way, he is within his timeline of withdrawl, which was adjusted after 2007 and even adjusted by 6 months after entering office under the advisement of his commanders in the field.

Unless of course you guys think he should just tell those most experienced with the situation to "fuck off"
7I3N wrote:
I’m really curious to see if you will still be defending him after the bombs start falling in Tehran, although I’m pretty sure I already know...
I’m really curious to see if you will still be defending him after the bombs start falling in Tehran, although I’m pretty sure I already know the answer.

Daniel Ellsberg, legendary leaker of the "Pentagon Papers" in 1971, still has a bone to pick with the White House. In an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE, the 79-year-old peace activist accuses President Obama of betraying his election promises -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan and on civil liberties.

Interview
SPIEGEL ONLINE: Mr. Ellsberg, you're a hero and an icon of the left. But we hear you're not too happy with President Obama anymore.

Daniel Ellsberg: I voted for him and I will probably vote for him again, as opposed to the Republicans. But I believe his administration in some key aspects is nothing other than the third term of the Bush administration.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: How so?

Ellsberg: I think Obama is continuing the worst of the Bush administration in terms of civil liberties, violations of the constitution and the wars in the Middle East.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: For example?

Ellsberg: Take Obama's explicit pledge in his State of the Union speech to remove "all" United States troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. That's a total lie. I believe that's totally false. I believe he knows that's totally false. It won't be done. I expect that the US will have, indefinitely, a residual force of at least 30,000 US troops in Iraq.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What about Afghanistan? Isn't that a justifiable war?

Ellsberg: I think that there's an inexcusable escalation in both countries. Thousands of US officials know that bases and large numbers of troops will remain in Iraq and that troop levels and bases in Afghanistan will rise far above what Obama is now projecting. But Obama counts on them to keep their silence as he deceives the public on these devastating, costly, reckless ventures.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: You doubt not only Obama's missions abroad but also his politics back home in the US. Why exactly are you accusing the president of violating civil liberties?

Ellsberg: For instance, the Obama administration is criminalizing and prosecuting whistleblowers to punish them for uncovering scandals within the federal government …

SPIEGEL ONLINE: … Such as the arrest, confirmed this week, of an Army intelligence analyst for leaking the "Collateral Murder" video of a deadly US helicopter attack in Iraq, which was later posted online at WikiLeaks.

Ellsberg: Also, the recent US indictment of Thomas Drake.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Drake was a former senior official with the National Security Agency (NSA) who provided reporters with information about failures at the NSA.

Ellsberg: For Obama to indict and prosecute Drake now, for acts undertaken and investigated during the Bush administration, is to do precisely what Obama said he did not mean to do -- "look backward." Of all the blatantly criminal acts committed under Bush, warrantless wiretapping by the NSA, aggression, torture, Obama now prosecutes only the revelation of massive waste by the NSA, a socially useful act which the Bush administration itself investigated but did not choose to indict or prosecute!

Bush brought no indictments against whistleblowers, though he suspended Drake's clearance. Obama, in this and other matters relating to secrecy and whistleblowing, is doing worse than Bush. His violation of civil liberties and the White House's excessive use of the executive secrecy privilege is inexcusable.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why would Obama reverse himself?

Ellsberg: He's a good politician. He said what he needed to say to get elected, and now he's just taking advantage of the office. Like any administration before, his administration caters to the profits of big corporations like BP and Goldman Sachs -- even though I think BP won't get off that easily this time. His early campaign contributions, the big corporate contributions, came from Wall Street. They got their money's worth.

In fact, during the campaign of 2008, three candidates were backed by Wall Street: Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain. If you look at the rhetoric, the most promising was John Edwards. Too bad he turned out to be a jerk.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But Obama has been very verbal about his criticism of Wall Street.

Ellsberg: His actions are totally uncoupled from his public statements. I don't even listen anymore. He has turned 180 degrees. Another example: His promise to filibuster a law giving the phone companies legal immunity for any role they played in the Bush's domestic eavesdropping program. Then he not only voted not to filibuster it, he also voted for the law -- against the wishes of his backers.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Do you think that will backfire for the Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections?

Ellsberg: I don't think what Obama is doing is the best way to get votes. But it's the best way to get campaign contributions.
Tiki
Posts
10669
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA, USA
Fantasy
6/24/2010 3:33pm
Hey I dont want to sound like Debbie Downer but exactly how old are some of you? Is history just something foreign? I realize it was 20 years ago but shit balls man!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
7I3N
Posts
1753
Joined
10/22/2009
Location
Moto Paradise, UT, USA
6/24/2010 4:28pm
I don’t think anyone on here is old enough to remember that the US has already overthrown the government of Iran once for oil back in 1953. And the funny thing is, guess who the oil company was that benefitted the most? That’s right, BP. More precisely the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, that then became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the then became British Petroleum.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ajax

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Iranian_Oil_Company




72kiteboarder
Posts
4645
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
90 MILES SOUTH-ISH, FL, USA
6/24/2010 5:57pm
Ellsberg: For instance, the Obama administration is criminalizing and prosecuting whistleblowers to punish them for uncovering scandals within the federal government …

SPIEGEL ONLINE: … Such as the arrest, confirmed this week, of an Army intelligence analyst for leaking the "Collateral Murder" video of a deadly US helicopter attack in Iraq, which was later posted online at WikiLeaks.


The guy that leaked that video was not a whistle blower and does not deserve whistle blower status and protection. He was a punk that thought the video was funny/cool and violated his security clearance to show it off. He got caught and then tried to claim whistle blower status. He deserves what he gets.
Scotty
Posts
4139
Joined
3/21/2008
Location
USA
6/24/2010 6:32pm
CR250Rider wrote:
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals...
if he brings them home at all, it will be %100 political, meaning right before the next election


he'll also grant amnesty for 20 million illegals at about the same time, too.



you watch

flarider wrote:
HAHAHAHAHA....

Now it's bad to bring troops home.....

HAHAHAHAHA....

Some of you are so damn funny.....

You and Oldfart hang out much?
Void Main
Posts
17013
Joined
3/19/2008
Location
USA
6/24/2010 6:35pm
Tiki wrote:
Hey I dont want to sound like Debbie Downer but exactly how old are some of you? Is history just something foreign? I realize it was...
Hey I dont want to sound like Debbie Downer but exactly how old are some of you? Is history just something foreign? I realize it was 20 years ago but shit balls man!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
I know it fairly well. I lived it:

mxrelated
Posts
109
Joined
5/27/2010
Location
Montgomery, TX, USA
6/24/2010 6:48pm
Hey Dave ( flarider) tell us what obamas nuts taste like , you nut huggin asswipe
Void Main
Posts
17013
Joined
3/19/2008
Location
USA
6/24/2010 6:52pm
flarider wrote:
He is? You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various...
He is?
You have evidence of him starting another war, or are you just speculating because we've done some troop movement to any one of various reasons, which may include intimidation?

Can we at least agree that our boys aren't home like he promised?
He brought one home yesterday.













(shamelessly stolen from Larry)

Post a reply to: War in Persian Gulf coming soon ?

The Latest