Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
It gets better…he attributes Project 2025 to Trump.
You Can Not Make This Shit Up
C'mon kid,
Trump disavowed any connection with this early on.
Nice try though.
People on the ground were warning of, and videotaped sniper boy for a documented 28 minutes.
cheadle says they were aware of him for just a few minutes, before he took his shots.
Also stated the roof where he set up, was too steep for them to set up on.
🤔
This broad needs to be fired.
Not be allowed to tender a resignation.
But FIRED.
Here’s what they’ll do…they find Paul Dans via a Google search…without seeing or looking for where he worked/what job he had…and they’ll go…”See, it’s got Trump all over it!”
Actual READING and LEARNING…defunct with The Narrative Followers.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Now we hear of the feds having intel on an Iranian plot to assassinate Trump.
And they beefed up security as a precaution.
Really ???
🤔🤔
While the counter snipers were on a steeper roof behind Trump.
The perch roof is about a 2 pitch.
I can’t believe how much pearl-clutching I’m seeing from the MAGA crowd right now. Trump says shit all the time that his supporters then defend by saying what he said doesn’t mean what he said.
This isn’t even like that. What Biden said is a bungled idiom. “Put him in the bulls-eye.” You guys love guns, right? If you’re taking it literally, how often do you put your target inside a bulls-eye? Never. The bulls-eye is the target.
People say phrases like “he has a target on his back” all the time. You HAVE to know that Biden meant something closer to “it’s time to focus on Donald Trump” than “it’s time to shoot Donald Trump.” Jesus Christ.
The post above mine was not published when I was responding to you. It is interesting you say it doesn't compare, but it's nearly verbatim what Trump said about Biden seven months ago.
Also you guys are happily changing context in the aftermath of the shooting. I've looked for ANYONE complaining about the Bullseye comment before the shooting and couldn't find anything. Not one article, nothing. But now you're happy to parrot the propaganda that he was inciting violence. I'll agree with everyone who said that some democrats' response after the shooting was unacceptable, but I also do not believe that if everything happened in reverse that there wouldn't be some abhorrent republicans doing as they've done. Anyone saying that type of stuff after he's shot, sure get as mad as you want, but it's dishonest to take campaign rhetoric as you did and frame it as sowing discord, when Trump said the exact inverse while campaigning. But hey there's still an election to win, so of course they're going to capitalize and try to pin the blame on Biden in any way possible.
Let's reframe this question though, even if Democrats use a more violent language, which party has had more examples of political violence perpetrated? https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-politics-violence/
And it's interesting to me that you only want to focus on recent things, as if everything currently happening is occurring in a vacuum.
Not to mention the links I posted above that no one seems to want to read or comment on.
I'm not ready to put blame on anyone for the attack. Like I said, I think it's just equally easy to build a conspiracy blaming either side. I'm inclined to believe the articles quoting neighbors and schoolmates of the shooter that he was conservative. It's not hard to fathom a 17 year old sympathizing with democrats then switching to the right. However it is a bit of a stretch for me to believe democrat rhetoric caused a republican to shoot Donald Trump, because there is more evidence he was conservative than democrat.
Both sides political propaganda machines are working overtime right now.
You're not wrong.
Doesn't change the fact that anyone with any ability to think reasonably can see this wasn't just some schmuck off the street who got lucky to get set up where he did. The Democrats were in on this. Period.
Continue to support and vote for Sleepy Joe, but do so knowing that you are supporting someone who put out an assassination attempt on his opponent.
But do you think that the people who would support Project 2025 believe that? I mean they mention him so often that they must believe he would go along with it right?
If we're taking what politicians say as true, then you guys must forgive Biden for the bulls-eye comment then right? He said it was a mistake.
To a normal, sane human being...it was/is obvious that he wasn't calling for Trumps assassination with the bullseye remark (though any sane person will admit-even Biden himself-that it was an awful choice of words)...but to someone who isn't normal, isn't sane, or is overly angry...like the person who attempted the assassination...it could very easily be understood as a call for his assassination...ESPECIALLY, when its just ONE MORE time the left has called for his elimination in the past 8 years. And that is the point...
Remember that C list celebrity chick (this isn't some fringe left winger in the back corner of the public library with no platform...this is a celebrity, and they actually published the photo) posing with trumps severed head for a magazine? Come on...there is far to much violence perpetrated and called for on the left to even remotely try and equate them with the right, or to try and claim it isn't having an affect...and remember, the left are the very same people who think that merely not supporting gay marriage, or simply believing that homosexuality is a sin, or that transgenderism is a mental illness is violence toward the LGBT community...so its complete hypocrisy to for the left to try and claim their violent rhetoric over the past 8 years towards Trump is harmless.
Again just loving that he can be an incompetent, incoherent dementia patient who is also a criminal mastermind.
wait, so youre saying that tying trump to project 2025, which he has disavowed, would be misinformation? So why then would biden and the media be coordinating in promoting a website his administration made trying to tie trump to project 2025 if it were misinformation? seems odd... almost like election interference? like the guy they put in jail for a meme?
I'm just asking questions guy. And I never said Trump is a threat to democracy. It's Trump supporters making that a big deal. What proof do you have that the shooter was a Biden supporter?
I'm more than happy to amend my position based on evidence. And so far the evidence to me shows me that the secret service failed. I have said on record that I'm happy that Donald Trump is alive and in the race still. But some of the cognitive dissonance here must be addressed.
Is a small donation to a political party before you can vote solid evidence of Democratic ideals? Is that enough to override the testimony of classmates and neighbors and official registering as a Republican? Or is it that it's easier to believe because it fits the narrative that you want to believe?
You keep wanting to talk about these sayings but they aren't the problem, they're just a really bad look given the circumstances.
The part you seem to want to ignore is all of the talk about what a threat he is and the comparisons to Hitler. This is commonplace language for Biden and his side. You have to be a total dumbass to not understand that not everyone is going to realize you're bloviating when you say those things. When taken literally, as some will certainly do, assassination is a logical response. That's why you don't use that kind of language. This isn't as complicated as you want it to be.
huh
No. What I am saying is that people are going to believe whatever they want, evidence be damned. Tell me, honestly, do you think the people who wrote Project 2025 think Donald Trump will not help them in their crusade? Do you think him disavowing the document will get those people to support a different candidate?
Shit, I've perused the Project 2025 text myself, seems like they mean business. Maybe they tried to kill Trump because he disavowed them?
People want to say the Bulls-eye comment was calling for an assassination (but only after someone tried to assassinate him), even if Biden said it was a mistake, yet when Trump says something, it must be true. That's all I was getting at.
If you're not gonna trust a politician, don't trust any politicians.
I don't buy the conspiracies, at all...but Biden doesn't have to be the criminal mastermind, he'd just have to approve it, or pretend like he doesn't know anything about it...and his string pullers would plan and carry it out (or, far more likely...in the incredibly unlikely event the conspiracies are true...the string pullers wouldn't even inform the POTUS...plausible deniability and all).
Biden wouldn't be the guy sitting at the table planning out all the details of the assassination (everyone knows he doesn't have the mental ability to do that)...so he can be both an "incompetent, incoherent dementia patient"...and be part of an assassination attempt on his opponent.
Pit Row
He is clearly all of those things you said. I thought it kinda went without saying that clearly Sleepy Joe isn't masterminding shit, but those around him are. So....it's reasonable to deduce that if you vote for Biden you are voting for someone who called for the assassination of their opponent as by keeping them in power you are keeping the people he is surrounded with in power.
I hope that makes sense.
I know at this point that ya'll are desperately doing anything you can to keep folks from seeing the obvious, so Im sure my explanation won't be good enough. Yet here are.
Trump doubled down on saying he would be a dictator “just for one day” or whatever. He said it would be appropriate to terminate rules of the constitution. His. Presidency. Is. A. Threat. To a lot of Americans.
People hate Donald Trump and what his re-appointment would stand for. I think a lot of conservatives have underestimated that sentiment until this week and are seeing it in the daylight right now.
I’m still wondering what the Atlanta/Obama Effigy story has to do with what’s up, today…?
Then there’s K-Girl’s “Pearl Clutching” hilarity that completely -yet- seemingly intentionally ignores The Left’s Narrative these last few years about The Donald’s “violent rhetoric” while COMPLETELY IGNORING the absolute SHITE that the Biden Handlers are putting up…JUST THESE LAST FEW WEEKS…that people like George, me, SMF & others are posting…hell, JUNE 28th…Joe is on “X” laying this shit up.
Now, about Joe”s posts…
You have to be even worse-off than Joe to believe he…personally…posts that shit…when the likes of KJP have been caught doing so…ON THE FUCKING RECORD…
Furthermore, I…and “we” (others in here) are continuously pointing out that…
Far too many in here are claiming to be intelligent whilst telling the rest of us that Joe is the good guy and The Donald is the liar. Wow.
As if we don’t know deference between 1.4 and 9…or…we lost count of those that FUCKING DIED IN AFG DURING JOE’S SURRENDER THERE-OF or he tries to make everything about “age” when he’s asked -constantly- about his mental capability…etc, etc, etc…then there’s his Agro-lies about NOT using a teleprompter or notes during his recent “22 major events”…as I’ve said…
We don’t have to make this shit up.
He’a an acknowledged liar as far back as ‘88 when he got kicked out of the presidential campaign for…PLAGIARISM. Hence…he’s a FUCKING LIAR…and NOW he’s a liar with FUCKING DEMENTIA. For Fuck-sake!
But, I digress.
I mean, after all, I just think a President should be cognizant and available to do their fucking job and actually know that they’re the President…in 2024.
”Four More Years, Pause”.
Damn.
This is meant for kbsci…
You must not have seen the interviews…unedited…yourself…
And…you can’t be serious about any of us thinking Joe is competent.
Context, & a legitimate attempt to gather such, is not the strong suit amongst some of you over in Joe’s corner; hence, you’re standing with a dementia patient that’s got his hands on the nuclear football.
Nuff said.
More than one person can be wrong at the same time. Another person doing wrong doesn't make your actions right.
You didn't address anything I actually said.
Do you or do you not see the problem with President Biden using the language he has used to describe Trump? Try to answer this question without telling me more irrelevant things that other people have done.
Which of our country’s two sides keeps talking about a civil war?
So one question, which no liberal or Democrat has so far been able to answer with any intelligence:
If being a dictator was Trump's goal, why would he wait for a re-election and bring it about in a 2nd term? Especially when one considers that he won in 2016 by electoral vote and not popular vote?
As to whether or not the 2020 election was fraudulent, and to what degree of it was, we won't know that answer for certain, either way, for a long time.
Which of the country's two sides go and destroy cities and riots over things they dont like? One side had a assassination attempt on Saturday yet no riots. Do you want to talk about the violence level from each side?
Your obviously a victim of the narrative…
That phrase has been a part of all that Jan 6th insanity that those of us that have no concept what an “insurrection” truly is even when your own country creates real ones on other continents.
But, again, I digress.
You said the left compares Trump to Hitler (which the right did all the time with Obama). Hitler was a dictator. Trump said he would be one. You said the left thinks Trump is a threat. I agree(d). What did I miss?
I do not have a problem with the language Joe Biden has used regarding Donald Trump.
The call came from inside the house on Saturday.
Lost on some; yet, true.
Post a reply to: Trump shot?