Ford 5.4l and 6.2l V8's

early
Posts
9891
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA

I'm looking at 2 trucks, both have Ford gas engines. One is an 09 with the 5.4 with 90k, the other is a 13 with a 6.2 with 75k. I'm not worried about power, both trucks are capable of what I'm going to throw at them, I'm concerned about reliability. What engine would you go with?

Poll

Which engine?

Choices
|
ARM670
Posts
2220
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH, USA
4/18/2024 7:39am

I have had a 2007 and a 2010 F150 with the 5.4, I liked the power and reliability just make sure you change time set at 175,000. I now have a 2017 F250 with the 6.2. same thing good power, I only have 115,000 miles on it so not sure on long term reliability. They all like to drink their gas but that is a lot of my fault as well. Forgot to add both my 5.4s I had between 250k to 275k on them and I am notoriously hard on trucks.

1
early
Posts
9891
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
4/18/2024 7:44am

It won't let me edit, but I wanted to add that the 5.4 truck is $6k less asking price, and this truck will probably only be driven about 5k miles a year so I'm not worried about gas.

plowboy
Posts
14391
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
4/18/2024 8:00am

Buying used is always a crap shoot.  You just never know how they've been treated.  My sister-in-law's 5.4 blew a spark plug in my driveway but that was one flogged truck.  (The '09 may have had this fixed).  The 6.2 has 16 spark plugs...that tells me it's overly complicated and not cheap to maintain.

My brother bought a 2012 150 with the Coyote.  Decent mileage, power, comfort.  That's all I got.Blush

ARM670
Posts
2220
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH, USA
4/18/2024 8:08am

To me its a toss up. The 09 would be like my 10 and I liked that truck, and $6k less would be nice. Just curious are they 4 doors? Because the 1 complaint I had on my '10 was the 5.5 bed. The '07 had a 6.5. I could not bring myself to vote in the poll as I am torn.

The Shop

early
Posts
9891
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
4/18/2024 8:15am

Both are 4 door with 8ft bed. It is a toss-up. I'm leaning toward the 09 with 5.4 because it's cheaper and it's less likely to have been used as a tow mule it's whole life with the 5.4 gasser. I've read about the spark plugs blowing threads in earlier engines and the spark plugs breaking when you take them out in later engines. 

Just putting it out there if anyone has specific experience, appreciate the input.

ARM670
Posts
2220
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH, USA
4/18/2024 8:27am

8' beds will be nice, I do most of all work on my own vehicles but with the history of taking plugs out of a 5.4 I took it to a local shop that I trust when they needed plugs. We did a job in Warren Oh when I had my '10 and I pulled a trailer with 12k of steel on it there and I ran I90 at 80 mph all way no problems.

motorick5052
Posts
816
Joined
9/8/2018
Location
Hillbillyville, FM, USA
4/18/2024 9:17am



 

Hey Early!

I want to start out saying up front, that I am NO Ford mechanic and all my experience is strictly as a shade-tree guy capable of doing a lot of my own maintenance! 
I have had two different 5.4 V8’s…both were stone reliable and were still running strong when I sold them BUT one was a 1997 & one was 2001 which was the earlier 2-valve version.
Ford changed to a 3-valve setup in 2005 and those engines had some serious longevity issues as the miles piled on!

I have two separate friends that have BOTH had to have a NEW ENGINE put in their vehicles… Both guys are hard core moto guys and are meticulous in their maintenance but despite their best efforts, their 5.4 made it to about 160k and had to be replaced. 
One was a 2011 Ford F150 4x4 crew cab in immaculate condition, and the other is a garage kept Ford 2014 E-350 Econoline moto van. 
The buddy with the F-150 texted above, he is an aircraft mechanic/technician and a damn good auto mechanic (I have watched him remove/rebuild/reinstall the engine in his daughters car out in his shop with my own two eyes!) and even he was unable to prevent the inevitable flawed issues built into that particular generation 5.4 V8. 

I would strongly encourage you to research the specific issues mentioned above before making any decisions! I am a huge fan of Ford and have had Econoline’s all the way back to the 80’s, hell I am still squeezing every mile out of my 2006 E-350 (with 6.8 ltr) but the 5.4 from the era you are considering have known serious issues to consider before investing in one!

Good luck and I hope this can help you out!

1
Zycki11
Posts
7800
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL, USA
4/18/2024 9:23am

The 5.4L has issues with Oil consumption which causes your timing to go out as well as when it needs a tune up Ford did the dumbest spark plug design known to mankind. They essentially have a 2 piece spark plug that will break in the cylinder head and be a fiasco to pull out. So what happens if you need  a legit tuneup is they will say hey we get you need plugs but we may need an extra 2 hours per cylinder to retrieve the plug if it breaks off. The porcelain on plug can destroy the cylinder walls. So they soak it overnight in hopes that it wont seize on its way out. 

2
ARM670
Posts
2220
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH, USA
4/18/2024 9:38am
  Hey Early! I want to start out saying up front, that I am NO Ford mechanic and all my experience is strictly as a shade-tree...



 

Hey Early!

I want to start out saying up front, that I am NO Ford mechanic and all my experience is strictly as a shade-tree guy capable of doing a lot of my own maintenance! 
I have had two different 5.4 V8’s…both were stone reliable and were still running strong when I sold them BUT one was a 1997 & one was 2001 which was the earlier 2-valve version.
Ford changed to a 3-valve setup in 2005 and those engines had some serious longevity issues as the miles piled on!

I have two separate friends that have BOTH had to have a NEW ENGINE put in their vehicles… Both guys are hard core moto guys and are meticulous in their maintenance but despite their best efforts, their 5.4 made it to about 160k and had to be replaced. 
One was a 2011 Ford F150 4x4 crew cab in immaculate condition, and the other is a garage kept Ford 2014 E-350 Econoline moto van. 
The buddy with the F-150 texted above, he is an aircraft mechanic/technician and a damn good auto mechanic (I have watched him remove/rebuild/reinstall the engine in his daughters car out in his shop with my own two eyes!) and even he was unable to prevent the inevitable flawed issues built into that particular generation 5.4 V8. 

I would strongly encourage you to research the specific issues mentioned above before making any decisions! I am a huge fan of Ford and have had Econoline’s all the way back to the 80’s, hell I am still squeezing every mile out of my 2006 E-350 (with 6.8 ltr) but the 5.4 from the era you are considering have known serious issues to consider before investing in one!

Good luck and I hope this can help you out!

Here is the tricky part of a 5.4, the variable timing is adjusted off of oil pressure, so if the oil pressure gets low the cam phasers will not adjust correctly which will grenade the engine. That is why it is so important if the engine recommends 5-20w oil. People make a mistake and run 5-30w because 5-20w is like water (not saying that's always the problem) I was told that ford ran to tight of tolerance on the 5.4 and oil passages are not large enough so if they get a little sludge in them the oil doesn't flow properly.  Just my experience. 

TeamGreen
Posts
37024
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
4/18/2024 9:42am
early wrote:
Both are 4 door with 8ft bed. It is a toss-up. I'm leaning toward the 09 with 5.4 because it's cheaper and it's less likely to...

Both are 4 door with 8ft bed. It is a toss-up. I'm leaning toward the 09 with 5.4 because it's cheaper and it's less likely to have been used as a tow mule it's whole life with the 5.4 gasser. I've read about the spark plugs blowing threads in earlier engines and the spark plugs breaking when you take them out in later engines. 

Just putting it out there if anyone has specific experience, appreciate the input.

The 6-Deuce is an amazing engine. It’s the engine that was in all of our Gen 1 Raptors…well, except for the very anemic 1st year flexi-framed 5.4s…Laughing

4/18/2024 9:45am

First off, I assume we're talking a Super Duty here, and not a half ton?

TeamGreen
Posts
37024
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
4/18/2024 9:52am
r_outsider wrote:

First off, I assume we're talking a Super Duty here, and not a half ton?

In an SD, I’d certainly go with the 6.2. 

1
4/18/2024 9:55am
TeamGreen wrote:

In an SD, I’d certainly go with the 6.2. 

I'd do the 6.2 or if I was going back to 2009, V10. 

Zycki11
Posts
7800
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL, USA
4/18/2024 10:01am

IMO 5.4L is awful. Cam Phasers, timing chains, plug issues... you name it.  Not a good design.  6.2 while doing nothing well has reliability. Just ticks like a mother idling lol

early
Posts
9891
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
4/18/2024 10:07am
TeamGreen wrote:

In an SD, I’d certainly go with the 6.2. 

r_outsider wrote:

I'd do the 6.2 or if I was going back to 2009, V10. 

Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first then engines and miles and pickens are slim.

1
4/18/2024 10:26am
early wrote:
Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first...

Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first then engines and miles and pickens are slim.

Yeah, for sure. Well, from experience on several fronts with these things, the 5.4's were a bit out of their league with 7000lbs of truck to pull, and it is an engine that has been out of production for 14 years. The plug issues weren't a thing by 2009, and phasers go out on everything with variable timing eventually, it's a big, expensive job to be sure, but the 6.2 (or 6.8, if you can find one) is just the better motor for the application and will be easier to keep going in the long term. And are almost as reliable long term as the old 2-valve modular engines.

2
ARM670
Posts
2220
Joined
12/11/2020
Location
Napoleon, OH, USA
4/18/2024 10:55am
TeamGreen wrote:

In an SD, I’d certainly go with the 6.2. 

r_outsider wrote:

I'd do the 6.2 or if I was going back to 2009, V10. 

early wrote:
Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first...

Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first then engines and miles and pickens are slim.

Some dumb reason I thought 1/2 ton when I saw 5.4. I would definitely go with the 6.2 in a 3/4 ton.

VL13
Posts
474
Joined
4/8/2024
Location
Eagle Nest, NM, USA
4/18/2024 1:17pm

Have you ever heard of the Triton tick? Yeah, that’s the 5.4.

TeamGreen
Posts
37024
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
4/18/2024 2:36pm
TeamGreen wrote:

In an SD, I’d certainly go with the 6.2. 

r_outsider wrote:

I'd do the 6.2 or if I was going back to 2009, V10. 

early wrote:
Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first...

Yes, we are talking SD's. I've looked at some V10's. With trucks this old around here you have to look at body and frame condition first then engines and miles and pickens are slim.

Go negotiate a good price in the 6deuce…you’ll be a happy man. 

2
crowe660
Posts
2268
Joined
8/15/2020
Location
USA
4/19/2024 4:29am Edited Date/Time 4/19/2024 4:31am

180k on my 13 6.2. Still as crisp as the day I bought it.  Burns MAYBE a half quart every 6k. 

2
Mr. G
Posts
4225
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Riverside, CA, USA
4/19/2024 2:07pm

The only good 5.4's are the 2 Valve 2001 through 2003. They had improved heads with more spark plug threads. In 2004 Ford screwed the pooch and added variable valve timing with oiling holes so small they can get clogged and take out the cam phasers. Steer clear. The 6.2's are Way better.

I by the way have a 1999 2V 5.4. Engine has 219K on it with the original plugs. Afraid to touch them and hoping they are corroded in place. lol. Other than that super tough and reliable. Ford was damn good when Bill was running things. 

4/19/2024 2:53pm

My old 2005 5.4L, 3-valve, uses oil, ticks like a timex watch at 169K. Done plugs many times, both exhaust manifolds and can't recall how many coil over plug units have been put in it.

1

Post a reply to: Ford 5.4l and 6.2l V8's

The Latest