Biden ‘willfully’ kept classified info, would come off as ‘elderly man with poor memory’ at trial, scathing report says

Shiftfaced
Posts
859
Joined
12/15/2008
Location
Ruby Ridge, ID US
2/9/2024 8:50am Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 8:51am
jrrundle wrote:
Who cares whether Republicans or Democrats get more concessions when in the end the American people still get screwed? That's the entire point, we've moved so...

Who cares whether Republicans or Democrats get more concessions when in the end the American people still get screwed? That's the entire point, we've moved so much into the my side and your side of politics that we've forgot about the people. 

That is the exact problem.

the Senate, in good faith, hammered out a STARTING POINT to deal with our border problems.

Is it perfect? Probably not, but it was a starting point. Negotiate. Refine it. Make it better, and then let’s go from there.

 

NOPE. Dead on arrival.

House does not want to address it, because solving that takes away Pervy Trumps “wedge issue”.

The fealty to trump is embarrassing.

3
15
Zycki11
Posts
7762
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL US
2/9/2024 8:50am Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 8:51am
Talking trash to the two or three people who are not red hat fools does not make you a tough guy.   This is one of...

Talking trash to the two or three people who are not red hat fools does not make you a tough guy.
 

This is one of the things I find so hilarious about this non moto section. Anyone who isn’t MAGA just gets insulted constantly by everyone else in MAGA (which this board is clearly the majority of). Look how many people immediately quoted your first post. Then they’ll say things like yeah none of our lib posters are in this thread see they can’t defend any of this! Maybe those who aren’t MAGA (even other conservatives on the board!) just don’t want to deal with making an opposing view point or disagreeing with Trump’s rhetoric only to have 5-10 people immediately quote your post just to insult you and not add anything of substance.

Shiftfaced wrote:
Their base is whiter, older and angrier. They realize they cannot legislate, so they obstruct and threaten political violence. Run. Run scared. Courts and elections are...

Their base is whiter, older and angrier.

They realize they cannot legislate, so they obstruct and threaten political violence.

Run. Run scared. Courts and elections are on their way, and they will grind Pervy Trump into grist.

Dude, you are so far from the truth it isn't funny. The only thing people are angry about is our own government constantly sticking to us in the pooper and saying it was for the betterment. Look around, the only thing they have done is make things more difficult. 

8
4
jrrundle
Posts
330
Joined
3/10/2016
Location
Stanwood, WA US
2/9/2024 8:54am
Talking trash to the two or three people who are not red hat fools does not make you a tough guy.   This is one of...

Talking trash to the two or three people who are not red hat fools does not make you a tough guy.
 

This is one of the things I find so hilarious about this non moto section. Anyone who isn’t MAGA just gets insulted constantly by everyone else in MAGA (which this board is clearly the majority of). Look how many people immediately quoted your first post. Then they’ll say things like yeah none of our lib posters are in this thread see they can’t defend any of this! Maybe those who aren’t MAGA (even other conservatives on the board!) just don’t want to deal with making an opposing view point or disagreeing with Trump’s rhetoric only to have 5-10 people immediately quote your post just to insult you and not add anything of substance.

Shiftfaced wrote:
Their base is whiter, older and angrier. They realize they cannot legislate, so they obstruct and threaten political violence. Run. Run scared. Courts and elections are...

Their base is whiter, older and angrier.

They realize they cannot legislate, so they obstruct and threaten political violence.

Run. Run scared. Courts and elections are on their way, and they will grind Pervy Trump into grist.

I would disagree with a number of statements being made here but the number one issue I see is calling the base white and old. Latinos and black voters are actually polling record numbers for Trump. Enough to the point that it is becoming very worrying for the Democrat party. 

9
1
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO US
2/9/2024 9:02am
Zycki11 wrote:
No, it is very simple.  Trumps border was much more secure than the border today and it isn't even close. Both of you just went from...

No, it is very simple.  Trumps border was much more secure than the border today and it isn't even close. Both of you just went from trying to argue a point, to letting said point go by the wayside so you can deflect and say well Trump from 16-20 we had a problem as well and he didn't address it. He did address it, and he continuously tried but was met with stupid resistance on both sides of the aisle. Why I wonder? Because politicians are fucking corrupt and suckling on the government tit and each 
"bill" they put out is dog and pony show that you guys lap up and say it was for the betterment. Well guess what? Passing some stupid bill that spends money and accomplishes nothing should be turned down.  But alas, I am sure you know what is in that bill and how great it was. Damn republicans getting in the way of dems spending more money for the American peoples safety in Ukraine. 

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when...

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when you govern. This legislation would have strengthened border security more than any legislation has in the last decade plus (maybe even multiple decades). The only reason they said no is because Trump told them to and he doesn’t want anything done on the border so he and other Republicans can campaign on this issue in November. Republicans decided to kill the bill that strengthened our border and gave aid to Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Now legislation without the border security is moving ahead based solely on the aid for those three countries. So instead of taking the border security and aid to those three countries, now it’s just going to be aid to those three countries. From a Republican standpoint, if you truly cared about the border, taking a few steps forward is better than none at all. But they said no. So here we are.

Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

1
9

The Shop

Zycki11
Posts
7762
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL US
2/9/2024 9:04am Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 9:05am
The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when...

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when you govern. This legislation would have strengthened border security more than any legislation has in the last decade plus (maybe even multiple decades). The only reason they said no is because Trump told them to and he doesn’t want anything done on the border so he and other Republicans can campaign on this issue in November. Republicans decided to kill the bill that strengthened our border and gave aid to Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Now legislation without the border security is moving ahead based solely on the aid for those three countries. So instead of taking the border security and aid to those three countries, now it’s just going to be aid to those three countries. From a Republican standpoint, if you truly cared about the border, taking a few steps forward is better than none at all. But they said no. So here we are.

Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

Because it is a shit bill. This isn't rock science, you guys believe that you work together across the aisle blah blah blah. Both sides are corrupt, and on top of that.  The bill will not fix or help a thing. It is more money spent when he can just sign an executive order to end it today. If you want to get serious and fix the problem then do just that. You are making talking points from every show and it shows ZERO depth of thought. How on earth do you not see this? 

8
4
jrrundle
Posts
330
Joined
3/10/2016
Location
Stanwood, WA US
2/9/2024 9:11am
The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when...

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when you govern. This legislation would have strengthened border security more than any legislation has in the last decade plus (maybe even multiple decades). The only reason they said no is because Trump told them to and he doesn’t want anything done on the border so he and other Republicans can campaign on this issue in November. Republicans decided to kill the bill that strengthened our border and gave aid to Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Now legislation without the border security is moving ahead based solely on the aid for those three countries. So instead of taking the border security and aid to those three countries, now it’s just going to be aid to those three countries. From a Republican standpoint, if you truly cared about the border, taking a few steps forward is better than none at all. But they said no. So here we are.

Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

I think you're missing the point that on Bidens first day in office he eliminated Trump's border and immigration policy. This is literally a self inflicted wound that he and you are now trying to blame others for. 

17
1
Joey Bridges
Posts
9451
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
2/9/2024 9:11am
Zycki11 wrote:
No, they all have the EXACT same talking points and it is hilarious. None of them see it either, they all downvote for one another and...

No, they all have the EXACT same talking points and it is hilarious. None of them see it either, they all downvote for one another and upvote for one another. Kind of like sheep in a herd... It is funny because i am only on 2 forums and zero social media. Both forums, the people who are anti Trump say the same thing. Those who are not anti Trump have different reasons as to why they felt he was better in office. The guys saying Biden over Trump can't rely on policy(train wreck), administration who can not tell the truth who ran on transparency lol, and Joe is now like everyone knew was going to happen be ousted by his own party. Critical thinking is gone it seems these days. Putin is bad, but to think he is going to control the fucking world with Trump these people are lunatics. 

It isn't hard to see what is happening with Russia and Ukraine. If you want real answers simply look at the US bases that have popped up right next to Russian territory. Putin fucking sucks no doubt, but to think we are innocent is the dumbest shit i have ever heard. People vote out of hate for a person vs what is actually good for the country

I will continuously wait for one person to explain the policies that Biden has put into place and how they have helped AMERICANS

 

If you go to, and follow, 

Occupy Democrats,  you'll see almost word for word what these guys come in here and spew.

Constant denial of all things leftist, constant bashing of all things Trump, MAGA, and any republican politician who isn't a rino.

 

Or....

You can just spend 30 minutes a couple of times a day tuned in to msnbc.

 

It's all the same talking points over, and over, and...

5
5
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO US
2/9/2024 9:31am
Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

Zycki11 wrote:
Because it is a shit bill. This isn't rock science, you guys believe that you work together across the aisle blah blah blah. Both sides are...

Because it is a shit bill. This isn't rock science, you guys believe that you work together across the aisle blah blah blah. Both sides are corrupt, and on top of that.  The bill will not fix or help a thing. It is more money spent when he can just sign an executive order to end it today. If you want to get serious and fix the problem then do just that. You are making talking points from every show and it shows ZERO depth of thought. How on earth do you not see this? 

If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would cost millions? The executive orders need teeth. They need some legislation to back it more often than not. If you were a Republican legislator and you got this type of border security with Democrats controlling the White House and Senate, that’s a W all day long. Take it. Move a few steps toward your goal instead of saying nope not perfect not exactly what we want dead on arrival.

1
8
Zycki11
Posts
7762
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL US
2/9/2024 9:42am
Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

Zycki11 wrote:
Because it is a shit bill. This isn't rock science, you guys believe that you work together across the aisle blah blah blah. Both sides are...

Because it is a shit bill. This isn't rock science, you guys believe that you work together across the aisle blah blah blah. Both sides are corrupt, and on top of that.  The bill will not fix or help a thing. It is more money spent when he can just sign an executive order to end it today. If you want to get serious and fix the problem then do just that. You are making talking points from every show and it shows ZERO depth of thought. How on earth do you not see this? 

If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would...

If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would cost millions? The executive orders need teeth. They need some legislation to back it more often than not. If you were a Republican legislator and you got this type of border security with Democrats controlling the White House and Senate, that’s a W all day long. Take it. Move a few steps toward your goal instead of saying nope not perfect not exactly what we want dead on arrival.

BECAUSE WALLS WORK. Hence why every Castle was built tall with a mote around it, why every point of interest has gates so on so forth. Again, your missing the entire point. They took these things away, build the wall, keep BP in place and allow them to do the job correctly. Don't label them as evil men who chase people down on horseback and whip them with ropes. All a complete joke to allow the border to open and people feel sympathetic. So again, you want to get serious? It is simple. Stop looking red vs blue and look at government vs the people. Because you are nothing but a fucking credit card for them to do what they want. 

5
2
2/9/2024 9:52am
jrrundle wrote:
Who cares whether Republicans or Democrats get more concessions when in the end the American people still get screwed? That's the entire point, we've moved so...

Who cares whether Republicans or Democrats get more concessions when in the end the American people still get screwed? That's the entire point, we've moved so much into the my side and your side of politics that we've forgot about the people. 

Shiftfaced wrote:
That is the exact problem. the Senate, in good faith, hammered out a STARTING POINT to deal with our border problems. Is it perfect? Probably not...

That is the exact problem.

the Senate, in good faith, hammered out a STARTING POINT to deal with our border problems.

Is it perfect? Probably not, but it was a starting point. Negotiate. Refine it. Make it better, and then let’s go from there.

 

NOPE. Dead on arrival.

House does not want to address it, because solving that takes away Pervy Trumps “wedge issue”.

The fealty to trump is embarrassing.

That bill was so bad the only thing to negotiate was whether to burn it with lighter fluid or alcohol. Which would burn it faster?

TM

7
1
2/9/2024 10:00am
The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when...

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when you govern. This legislation would have strengthened border security more than any legislation has in the last decade plus (maybe even multiple decades). The only reason they said no is because Trump told them to and he doesn’t want anything done on the border so he and other Republicans can campaign on this issue in November. Republicans decided to kill the bill that strengthened our border and gave aid to Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Now legislation without the border security is moving ahead based solely on the aid for those three countries. So instead of taking the border security and aid to those three countries, now it’s just going to be aid to those three countries. From a Republican standpoint, if you truly cared about the border, taking a few steps forward is better than none at all. But they said no. So here we are.

Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

Let's see, only after 5,000 per day coming in are they going to do something. But wait, if 4,000 of those are from a country that does not border the US they don't get counted. What the hell is that? They talking point is the immigration system is "broken", the only thing that's broken is they don't enforce it. You think that a country 200+ years old does not have laws on the books to keep people OUT that didn't ask to come in? You may not know this, remember something called the holocaust? Well there was a boat full of Jewish folks that made it to the US, you know, the same ones that were getting killed? Yes those Jews, and the US would not let them off the boat and come in. But we are now letting people come in and claim they have to come here because of "climate change"? How was this bill any good for us?

TM

8
1
Zycki11
Posts
7762
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL US
2/9/2024 10:05am
Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

ToolMaker wrote:
Let's see, only after 5,000 per day coming in are they going to do something. But wait, if 4,000 of those are from a country that...

Let's see, only after 5,000 per day coming in are they going to do something. But wait, if 4,000 of those are from a country that does not border the US they don't get counted. What the hell is that? They talking point is the immigration system is "broken", the only thing that's broken is they don't enforce it. You think that a country 200+ years old does not have laws on the books to keep people OUT that didn't ask to come in? You may not know this, remember something called the holocaust? Well there was a boat full of Jewish folks that made it to the US, you know, the same ones that were getting killed? Yes those Jews, and the US would not let them off the boat and come in. But we are now letting people come in and claim they have to come here because of "climate change"? How was this bill any good for us?

TM

It doesn't it is just a talking point by the Dems and people continue to lick it up and say it is a good thing. How is this a good thing? Anyone who runs/owns a business can sniff this out from anywhere. It doesn't make sense at all. Yet they say this is a good "start" to fucking what? Just end the shit. Bills are nothing but red tape and filled with fat to pay off lobbyists 

 

5
1
vet323
Posts
3584
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD US
2/9/2024 10:21am
Talking trash to the two or three people who are not red hat fools does not make you a tough guy.   This is one of...

Talking trash to the two or three people who are not red hat fools does not make you a tough guy.
 

This is one of the things I find so hilarious about this non moto section. Anyone who isn’t MAGA just gets insulted constantly by everyone else in MAGA (which this board is clearly the majority of). Look how many people immediately quoted your first post. Then they’ll say things like yeah none of our lib posters are in this thread see they can’t defend any of this! Maybe those who aren’t MAGA (even other conservatives on the board!) just don’t want to deal with making an opposing view point or disagreeing with Trump’s rhetoric only to have 5-10 people immediately quote your post just to insult you and not add anything of substance.

Zycki11 wrote:
No, it is very simple.  Trumps border was much more secure than the border today and it isn't even close. Both of you just went from...

No, it is very simple.  Trumps border was much more secure than the border today and it isn't even close. Both of you just went from trying to argue a point, to letting said point go by the wayside so you can deflect and say well Trump from 16-20 we had a problem as well and he didn't address it. He did address it, and he continuously tried but was met with stupid resistance on both sides of the aisle. Why I wonder? Because politicians are fucking corrupt and suckling on the government tit and each 
"bill" they put out is dog and pony show that you guys lap up and say it was for the betterment. Well guess what? Passing some stupid bill that spends money and accomplishes nothing should be turned down.  But alas, I am sure you know what is in that bill and how great it was. Damn republicans getting in the way of dems spending more money for the American peoples safety in Ukraine. 

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when...

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when you govern. This legislation would have strengthened border security more than any legislation has in the last decade plus (maybe even multiple decades). The only reason they said no is because Trump told them to and he doesn’t want anything done on the border so he and other Republicans can campaign on this issue in November. Republicans decided to kill the bill that strengthened our border and gave aid to Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Now legislation without the border security is moving ahead based solely on the aid for those three countries. So instead of taking the border security and aid to those three countries, now it’s just going to be aid to those three countries. From a Republican standpoint, if you truly cared about the border, taking a few steps forward is better than none at all. But they said no. So here we are.

As far as I can tell, the Democrat stance is:

"There is absolutely no emergency at the border, and the Republicans won't do anything to fix it"

Do I understand this correctly?

6
1
jrrundle
Posts
330
Joined
3/10/2016
Location
Stanwood, WA US
2/9/2024 10:36am
Zycki11 wrote:
No, it is very simple.  Trumps border was much more secure than the border today and it isn't even close. Both of you just went from...

No, it is very simple.  Trumps border was much more secure than the border today and it isn't even close. Both of you just went from trying to argue a point, to letting said point go by the wayside so you can deflect and say well Trump from 16-20 we had a problem as well and he didn't address it. He did address it, and he continuously tried but was met with stupid resistance on both sides of the aisle. Why I wonder? Because politicians are fucking corrupt and suckling on the government tit and each 
"bill" they put out is dog and pony show that you guys lap up and say it was for the betterment. Well guess what? Passing some stupid bill that spends money and accomplishes nothing should be turned down.  But alas, I am sure you know what is in that bill and how great it was. Damn republicans getting in the way of dems spending more money for the American peoples safety in Ukraine. 

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when...

The Republicans got more concessions out of Democrats for this bill than they ever will again unless they get 60 Senators. You have to compromise when you govern. This legislation would have strengthened border security more than any legislation has in the last decade plus (maybe even multiple decades). The only reason they said no is because Trump told them to and he doesn’t want anything done on the border so he and other Republicans can campaign on this issue in November. Republicans decided to kill the bill that strengthened our border and gave aid to Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Now legislation without the border security is moving ahead based solely on the aid for those three countries. So instead of taking the border security and aid to those three countries, now it’s just going to be aid to those three countries. From a Republican standpoint, if you truly cared about the border, taking a few steps forward is better than none at all. But they said no. So here we are.

vet323 wrote:
As far as I can tell, the Democrat stance is: "There is absolutely no emergency at the border, and the Republicans won't do anything to fix...

As far as I can tell, the Democrat stance is:

"There is absolutely no emergency at the border, and the Republicans won't do anything to fix it"

Do I understand this correctly?

v3R1yq1R7BufbxUQ 0

12
2
Bill_Carroll
Posts
5053
Joined
9/15/2010
Location
Falcon, CO US
2/9/2024 10:51am
jrrundle wrote:

v3R1yq1R7BufbxUQ 0

“Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste” ~ Pelosi 

3
1
2/9/2024 10:56am
jrrundle wrote:

v3R1yq1R7BufbxUQ 0

“Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste” ~ Pelosi 

I though that was Rahm Emanual quote.

1
Gworm
Posts
2739
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO US
2/9/2024 11:26am
If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would...

If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would cost millions? The executive orders need teeth. They need some legislation to back it more often than not. If you were a Republican legislator and you got this type of border security with Democrats controlling the White House and Senate, that’s a W all day long. Take it. Move a few steps toward your goal instead of saying nope not perfect not exactly what we want dead on arrival.

Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel for PENNIES on the dollar. 

Biden stopped everything that was working  

 

9
1
2/9/2024 11:40am
Zycki11 wrote:
Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate.  Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term...

Please read through that bill. I am sorry dude, that is totally inaccurate. 

Facts-Biden opened up the border and numbers have increased exponentially from Trumps term, so they opened up the border and now want to throw more money at the very thing they allowed to get worse. They threw fencing away, tor down barriers, force BP to have hands tied and lied about situations at the border. Now they want to spend money via a bill that is skewed with fat to help Ukraine instead of Americans at home.  Get out of here. At any rate, Biden caused this... Nobody else The worst part is that it is on both sides of the aisle and dumbasses think government is out to help them? They don't help you, they spend money and make changes that further their own reach. Hence why none will ever be held accountable. But continue living in that world by all means. 

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border...

Yeah dude if we can’t even agree that the bill is clearly a step (or two or three or four) in the direction of stronger border security like Republicans claim to want, then we are too far apart to really continue this conversation. Not sure how you read the bill and not think it strengthens border security. Of course it’s not going to be exactly what MAGA wants. They’ll never get that unless they have the House, Presidency, and 60 Senators. Compromise. Work it out. Dead on arrival and refusing to even discuss it is mind boggling.

jrrundle wrote:
I think you're missing the point that on Bidens first day in office he eliminated Trump's border and immigration policy. This is literally a self inflicted...

I think you're missing the point that on Bidens first day in office he eliminated Trump's border and immigration policy. This is literally a self inflicted wound that he and you are now trying to blame others for. 

Exactly. Biden fucked the USA properly and it's going to take years to fix.

Are these immigrants allowed to vote? 

4
3
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO US
2/9/2024 11:53am
If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would...

If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would cost millions? The executive orders need teeth. They need some legislation to back it more often than not. If you were a Republican legislator and you got this type of border security with Democrats controlling the White House and Senate, that’s a W all day long. Take it. Move a few steps toward your goal instead of saying nope not perfect not exactly what we want dead on arrival.

Gworm wrote:
Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel...

Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel for PENNIES on the dollar. 

Biden stopped everything that was working  

 

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge wall? Seems like a reasonable question doesn’t it? Furthermore, instead of even negotiating at all on the bill, they said nope. We aren’t even going to advance negotiations and it’s dead on arrival in the House. So, as I said before, now the aid to the other three countries is advancing on its own without border security. For a party who claims to deeply care about securing the border, it seems odd to not even take a few steps forward, even if it wasn’t exactly what they wanted.

1
10
TeamGreen
Posts
36883
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
2/9/2024 12:09pm
Oldschool wrote:

Jan 6th erases Trump from any political seat for life.

So who's left after that to vote for....So Far.

We’ll see; but, what about that absolute pain in your ass that y’all are oddly forgetting about? 

You know, The Constitution of The United States? 

3
4
2/9/2024 12:14pm
If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would...

If it can be ended with the snap of a finger and an executive order, why does MAGA want a huge wall to build that would cost millions? The executive orders need teeth. They need some legislation to back it more often than not. If you were a Republican legislator and you got this type of border security with Democrats controlling the White House and Senate, that’s a W all day long. Take it. Move a few steps toward your goal instead of saying nope not perfect not exactly what we want dead on arrival.

Gworm wrote:
Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel...

Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel for PENNIES on the dollar. 

Biden stopped everything that was working  

 

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge...

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge wall? Seems like a reasonable question doesn’t it? Furthermore, instead of even negotiating at all on the bill, they said nope. We aren’t even going to advance negotiations and it’s dead on arrival in the House. So, as I said before, now the aid to the other three countries is advancing on its own without border security. For a party who claims to deeply care about securing the border, it seems odd to not even take a few steps forward, even if it wasn’t exactly what they wanted.

Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage of the bill. The "Bill" was not to give Biden more or better tools, it was to limit what Trump can do when he gets in office. If you can't see that, this conversation is worthless.

TM

12
3
Zycki11
Posts
7762
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edwardsville, IL US
2/9/2024 12:24pm

That Paul, my god he is a good trader. All the while getting clobbered on the head and skating out of a DUI? This family is amazing 🤩 IMG 7040

5
1
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO US
2/9/2024 12:28pm
Gworm wrote:
Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel...

Tell me why it was a good idea to stop construction that was already PAID for. I’ve seen on auctions where they are selling the steel for PENNIES on the dollar. 

Biden stopped everything that was working  

 

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge...

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge wall? Seems like a reasonable question doesn’t it? Furthermore, instead of even negotiating at all on the bill, they said nope. We aren’t even going to advance negotiations and it’s dead on arrival in the House. So, as I said before, now the aid to the other three countries is advancing on its own without border security. For a party who claims to deeply care about securing the border, it seems odd to not even take a few steps forward, even if it wasn’t exactly what they wanted.

ToolMaker wrote:
Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage...

Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage of the bill. The "Bill" was not to give Biden more or better tools, it was to limit what Trump can do when he gets in office. If you can't see that, this conversation is worthless.

TM

“when”

You sound pretty confident your guy is gonna win! All I’d ask is that if he loses you concede the election like a man. Which we all know he won’t do.

1
9
jrrundle
Posts
330
Joined
3/10/2016
Location
Stanwood, WA US
2/9/2024 12:29pm
All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge...

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge wall? Seems like a reasonable question doesn’t it? Furthermore, instead of even negotiating at all on the bill, they said nope. We aren’t even going to advance negotiations and it’s dead on arrival in the House. So, as I said before, now the aid to the other three countries is advancing on its own without border security. For a party who claims to deeply care about securing the border, it seems odd to not even take a few steps forward, even if it wasn’t exactly what they wanted.

ToolMaker wrote:
Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage...

Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage of the bill. The "Bill" was not to give Biden more or better tools, it was to limit what Trump can do when he gets in office. If you can't see that, this conversation is worthless.

TM

“when” You sound pretty confident your guy is gonna win! All I’d ask is that if he loses you concede the election like a man. Which...

“when”

You sound pretty confident your guy is gonna win! All I’d ask is that if he loses you concede the election like a man. Which we all know he won’t do.

Like Hillary and all of mainstream media in 2016?

5
4
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO US
2/9/2024 12:32pm
ToolMaker wrote:
Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage...

Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage of the bill. The "Bill" was not to give Biden more or better tools, it was to limit what Trump can do when he gets in office. If you can't see that, this conversation is worthless.

TM

“when” You sound pretty confident your guy is gonna win! All I’d ask is that if he loses you concede the election like a man. Which...

“when”

You sound pretty confident your guy is gonna win! All I’d ask is that if he loses you concede the election like a man. Which we all know he won’t do.

jrrundle wrote:

Like Hillary and all of mainstream media in 2016?

 

 

2
5
Gworm
Posts
2739
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO US
2/9/2024 12:36pm
All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge...

All I was asking is if it can be stopped at the snap of a finger with an executive order, why spend millions on a huge wall? Seems like a reasonable question doesn’t it? Furthermore, instead of even negotiating at all on the bill, they said nope. We aren’t even going to advance negotiations and it’s dead on arrival in the House. So, as I said before, now the aid to the other three countries is advancing on its own without border security. For a party who claims to deeply care about securing the border, it seems odd to not even take a few steps forward, even if it wasn’t exactly what they wanted.

The same reason putting a no entry sign on the front of your house instead of a door won’t keep thieves out when you’re not there. 

2
1
jrrundle
Posts
330
Joined
3/10/2016
Location
Stanwood, WA US
2/9/2024 12:36pm

But only because Russia interfered, right?

2
2
LOOnatic
Posts
725
Joined
5/20/2019
Location
New Orleans, LA US
2/9/2024 12:43pm Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 12:44pm
ToolMaker wrote:
Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage...

Your questions are intellectually dishonest. If Biden won't enforce with the tools he has, what makes you think he would do anything different with the passage of the bill. The "Bill" was not to give Biden more or better tools, it was to limit what Trump can do when he gets in office. If you can't see that, this conversation is worthless.

TM

Thanks for making that point.

 

It was a way for the Dems to codify 5,000 illegals a day and more bc non Mexican Hispanics aren't counted  in that daily 5,000 number. Nor are unaccompanied minors.

 

Totally intended to hamstring future administrations who will have to fix the mess that Biden and Soros' money train have created. You know the Open Border Society guy.

 

3
4
JustMX
Posts
5249
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
2/9/2024 1:12pm Edited Date/Time 2/9/2024 1:17pm
jrrundle wrote:

v3R1yq1R7BufbxUQ 0

BIDEN 2024

I have had a lengthy conversation with Egyptian president abdel fatah al-sisi concerning all the non American citizens streaming across the Canadian border and we are taking the proper steps to address it. The 5000 new irs agents added in the legislation we passed to address deflation will be checking tire pressure in all ice powered vehicles and entering it in a data base to confiscate said vehicles as we continue to fight climate change and create jobs, good union jobs, that will help control the price gouging of greedy big businesses. I feel like a kindred spirit with these suffering blue color workers from my time as a truck driver. I have a bunch of boxes next to my corvette. My father alway said, well, he said a lot of stuff. How can you argue with that. Trump is bad.

2
1
Titan1
Posts
9411
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT US
2/9/2024 1:22pm
jrrundle wrote:

v3R1yq1R7BufbxUQ 0

JustMX wrote:
BIDEN 2024 I have had a lengthy conversation with Egyptian president abdel fatah al-sisi concerning all the non American citizens streaming across the Canadian border and...

BIDEN 2024

I have had a lengthy conversation with Egyptian president abdel fatah al-sisi concerning all the non American citizens streaming across the Canadian border and we are taking the proper steps to address it. The 5000 new irs agents added in the legislation we passed to address deflation will be checking tire pressure in all ice powered vehicles and entering it in a data base to confiscate said vehicles as we continue to fight climate change and create jobs, good union jobs, that will help control the price gouging of greedy big businesses. I feel like a kindred spirit with these suffering blue color workers from my time as a truck driver. I have a bunch of boxes next to my corvette. My father alway said, well, he said a lot of stuff. How can you argue with that. Trump is bad.

The sad part is I can't tell if that is an actual Biden quote or satire...I'd believe either way.  Biden is an idiot...

He's way to old to be president...he's to old to drive a car...he's a pedophile, a liar, corrupt, and morally bankrupt...there is no way someone can look at Biden and his history and say he is morally superior to Trump, no way at all...so I'm basing my vote on policies...and as much as I hoped Trump wouldn't be on the general election ballot, its going to be him against Biden...and based on policy, its an easy decision for Trump.  No question at all. 

6
5

Post a reply to: Biden ‘willfully’ kept classified info, would come off as ‘elderly man with poor memory’ at trial, scathing report says

The Latest