So who will lose the most ?

2DoorKicker75
Posts
247
Joined
4/11/2022
Location
Fayetteville, NC, USA
5/27/2023 6:37am
ns503 wrote:
I'm not getting this grooming stuff. What exactly does that mean? Does it mean Target is turning kids gay by selling rainbowed out clothes? That would...

I'm not getting this grooming stuff. What exactly does that mean? Does it mean Target is turning kids gay by selling rainbowed out clothes? That would mean gay is something someone chooses to be rather than just being how they were born. I don't think being gay is something anybody just chooses to be. You are or you aren't.  Or maybe you're a bit of both, some are wired that way too. And there's nothing wrong with that. 

(Ducks the incoming artillery...)

Titan1 wrote:
Being gay is a choice…people switch between gay, bi, straight, asexual, etc etc etc etc etc all the time.  And society has to respect their choices...

Being gay is a choice…people switch between gay, bi, straight, asexual, etc etc etc etc etc all the time.  And society has to respect their choices, try and keep up with their sexuality of the week (or day), and we are homophobic if we don’t.  
 

the argument USED to be they were born that way…and that’s why they needed equal rights because they couldn’t help how they were born, etc….then they got so far out there that sexuality became fluid and they could choose their sexuality, just like they can chose their gender, depending on which side of the bed they woke up on.  
 

So I believe the LGBT movement is all about recruiting, and they are starting as young as possible to condition (groom) children into thinking they can choose to be whatever sexuality and gender they feel like.  It’s wrong.

Adults can do what they want, I have no issue with adults choosing whatever sexuality and gender and whatever else they want to do….I couldn’t care less…but to force sexuality on younger and younger children is wrong.  

It’s a mental illness.

3
4
jeffro503
Posts
27632
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
5/27/2023 7:41am
ns503 wrote:
Did you chose to be straight? I didn't either. I was born that way. As was my brother born gay. Still love him like a brother...

Did you chose to be straight? I didn't either. I was born that way.

As was my brother born gay. Still love him like a brother though.

Your brother is also an adult. And any adult can make their own choices in life , and be with whoever makes them happy. I've always been some what supportive of LGB ( I draw the line on T and the rest ). 

I'll also bet. Your brother doesn't go around asking kids what their sexual orientation is.  I have a good 8 - 10 I know very well who are Gay or Lesbian. Some really cool people!!  But knowing them.....I bet 100% they are against what Target is doing. I know a few of them were pissed off about the drag shows , as they were strait up pedophile gatherings performing sex acts in front of kids!! 

If you're an adult , go do what ever freaky stuff makes you happy. Don't ever push your lifestyle and sexual orientation down other people's throats.... especially other people's kids!! 

I'm a " Cis Male " ( it's a stupid name , I'm just a normal male! ) Strait.  Do we have Strait pride month?  Do we get to put on Strait plays in front of kids where dudes slobber all over women, and pretend to use toys on women?  Do we get strait parades , ect.....? 

Point being....I don't go walking around bragging I'm a strait man. People already know it. Why would I even want to go around telling/ talking to people about my sexual orientation??  And WHY......would I ever go talk to kids about my sexual orientation?? I wouldn't...... because that is Pedo/ grooming to the highest extent! 

2
4
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
5/27/2023 8:26am
SEEMEFIRST wrote:

So, to paraphrase. 

No Bud light, no Target, no Adidas, no North Face..

Be a dick, I'll be a dick back.

Exactly. Vote with your dollars. A small percentage of folks, think this crap is ok. 
 

Signed, proud Member of the Not So Silent Majority.

jeffro503 wrote:
We don't need to just speak with the wallet here. This goes way beyond that. These clothes and books they sell at a major outlet...

We don't need to just speak with the wallet here. This goes way beyond that. These clothes and books they sell at a major outlet , geared towards kids?  These fucking drag shows they say are just " plays " while using dildo's as play items in front of kids? 

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line! 

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!
 

Let me make sure I understand. You believe that any attack on our children should be met with a strong resistance, and we should band together and do whatever is necessary, up to and including legislation, to protect our children? Because any attack on them is absolutely unacceptable and they need to be protected? Is this correct?

4
TeamGreen
Posts
37009
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
5/27/2023 8:28am

Exactly. Vote with your dollars. A small percentage of folks, think this crap is ok. 
 

Signed, proud Member of the Not So Silent Majority.

jeffro503 wrote:
We don't need to just speak with the wallet here. This goes way beyond that. These clothes and books they sell at a major outlet...

We don't need to just speak with the wallet here. This goes way beyond that. These clothes and books they sell at a major outlet , geared towards kids?  These fucking drag shows they say are just " plays " while using dildo's as play items in front of kids? 

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line! 

TDeath21 wrote:
This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!   Let me make sure...

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!
 

Let me make sure I understand. You believe that any attack on our children should be met with a strong resistance, and we should band together and do whatever is necessary, up to and including legislation, to protect our children? Because any attack on them is absolutely unacceptable and they need to be protected? Is this correct?

And…3, 2, 1…

”But, what about guns?”

The Shop

TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
5/27/2023 8:45am
jeffro503 wrote:
We don't need to just speak with the wallet here. This goes way beyond that. These clothes and books they sell at a major outlet...

We don't need to just speak with the wallet here. This goes way beyond that. These clothes and books they sell at a major outlet , geared towards kids?  These fucking drag shows they say are just " plays " while using dildo's as play items in front of kids? 

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line! 

TDeath21 wrote:
This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!   Let me make sure...

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!
 

Let me make sure I understand. You believe that any attack on our children should be met with a strong resistance, and we should band together and do whatever is necessary, up to and including legislation, to protect our children? Because any attack on them is absolutely unacceptable and they need to be protected? Is this correct?

TeamGreen wrote:

And…3, 2, 1…

”But, what about guns?”

You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is right now, with 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dying from a gun, whether that be an accident, a victim, or suicide? Don’t you think a “protect the children” mindset would want put a few more measures in place so children and adolescents aren’t dying at a rate of 9 per day from a gun?

4
TeamGreen
Posts
37009
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
5/27/2023 8:51am
TDeath21 wrote:
This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!   Let me make sure...

This is a full on attack on children in my eyes! This very topic is where I draw the fucking line!
 

Let me make sure I understand. You believe that any attack on our children should be met with a strong resistance, and we should band together and do whatever is necessary, up to and including legislation, to protect our children? Because any attack on them is absolutely unacceptable and they need to be protected? Is this correct?

TeamGreen wrote:

And…3, 2, 1…

”But, what about guns?”

TDeath21 wrote:
You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is...

You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is right now, with 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dying from a gun, whether that be an accident, a victim, or suicide? Don’t you think a “protect the children” mindset would want put a few more measures in place so children and adolescents aren’t dying at a rate of 9 per day from a gun?

Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave your flag and do your thing…

Aka,”nothing”. 

1
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
5/27/2023 8:55am
TeamGreen wrote:

And…3, 2, 1…

”But, what about guns?”

TDeath21 wrote:
You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is...

You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is right now, with 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dying from a gun, whether that be an accident, a victim, or suicide? Don’t you think a “protect the children” mindset would want put a few more measures in place so children and adolescents aren’t dying at a rate of 9 per day from a gun?

TeamGreen wrote:
Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave...

Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave your flag and do your thing…

Aka,”nothing”. 

Good! You’re a responsible gun owner! I have no issue with people like you purchasing firearms.

2
jeffro503
Posts
27632
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
5/27/2023 9:35am
TDeath21 wrote:
You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is...

You don’t think it’s extremely fucking stupid to sit here and try to make a “protect the children” argument when our country is how it is right now, with 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dying from a gun, whether that be an accident, a victim, or suicide? Don’t you think a “protect the children” mindset would want put a few more measures in place so children and adolescents aren’t dying at a rate of 9 per day from a gun?

TeamGreen wrote:
Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave...

Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave your flag and do your thing…

Aka,”nothing”. 

TDeath21 wrote:

Good! You’re a responsible gun owner! I have no issue with people like you purchasing firearms.

The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but felonies prevented me from purchasing them.....I'd just go steal yours. Or someone else's. 

I know you don't like guns....that's your business. But what in the Eff does that have to do with Pedo groomers selling shit to kids? Your train of thought is....." Well if you can own dangerous guns , it should be ok for pedo groomers to approach your kids ".....

Cause yeah....it's exactly the same thing. What in the hell made you come up with that reasoning? 

4
ATKpilot99
Posts
10443
Joined
4/13/2010
Location
Lake Geneva, WI, USA
5/27/2023 9:38am

Round and round they go , where they stop nobody knows .... anyone changed their mind on anything yet  ?

3
2
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
5/27/2023 9:43am Edited Date/Time 5/27/2023 9:51am
TeamGreen wrote:
Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave...

Well, it’s like this: my guns are locked up behind steel and really good locks…hell, even in my cars; but, you go out there and wave your flag and do your thing…

Aka,”nothing”. 

TDeath21 wrote:

Good! You’re a responsible gun owner! I have no issue with people like you purchasing firearms.

jeffro503 wrote:
The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but...

The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but felonies prevented me from purchasing them.....I'd just go steal yours. Or someone else's. 

I know you don't like guns....that's your business. But what in the Eff does that have to do with Pedo groomers selling shit to kids? Your train of thought is....." Well if you can own dangerous guns , it should be ok for pedo groomers to approach your kids ".....

Cause yeah....it's exactly the same thing. What in the hell made you come up with that reasoning? 

They sure are! The vast majority of people flying on planes aren’t going to hijack them and fly them into buildings either. Yet, for the <.01% that did, things changed drastically for everyone to keep everyone safer.

So your logic is because they’d just try to steal someone else’s gun anyway, let’s not strengthen the laws at all? People are going to try to illegally immigrate anyway. Why have border security? See how stupid that logic is?

I actually don’t mind guns at all and I support the 2A. I’d never support banning all firearms or a confiscation. My comparison is relatable because YOU YOURSELF said you wanted to protect kids. 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dies as a result of a firearm in some form. 0 have died at drag queen story hour or because Target had transgender merchandise. Which issue would need us all to band together to fix to protect children?

Honestly, if you can’t see your insane hypocrisy with that logic, then I’m not even sure what else anyone could ever say to get it through your head.

1
5
jeffro503
Posts
27632
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
5/27/2023 10:27am
TDeath21 wrote:

Good! You’re a responsible gun owner! I have no issue with people like you purchasing firearms.

jeffro503 wrote:
The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but...

The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but felonies prevented me from purchasing them.....I'd just go steal yours. Or someone else's. 

I know you don't like guns....that's your business. But what in the Eff does that have to do with Pedo groomers selling shit to kids? Your train of thought is....." Well if you can own dangerous guns , it should be ok for pedo groomers to approach your kids ".....

Cause yeah....it's exactly the same thing. What in the hell made you come up with that reasoning? 

TDeath21 wrote:
They sure are! The vast majority of people flying on planes aren’t going to hijack them and fly them into buildings either. Yet, for the <.01%...

They sure are! The vast majority of people flying on planes aren’t going to hijack them and fly them into buildings either. Yet, for the <.01% that did, things changed drastically for everyone to keep everyone safer.

So your logic is because they’d just try to steal someone else’s gun anyway, let’s not strengthen the laws at all? People are going to try to illegally immigrate anyway. Why have border security? See how stupid that logic is?

I actually don’t mind guns at all and I support the 2A. I’d never support banning all firearms or a confiscation. My comparison is relatable because YOU YOURSELF said you wanted to protect kids. 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dies as a result of a firearm in some form. 0 have died at drag queen story hour or because Target had transgender merchandise. Which issue would need us all to band together to fix to protect children?

Honestly, if you can’t see your insane hypocrisy with that logic, then I’m not even sure what else anyone could ever say to get it through your head.

One is legal......owning as many firearms as you want as long as you're legally able to. It's also a huge sport , and used in target practice and hunting. 

The other one is illegal......being a pedo groomer. 

One is written into the constitution, the other one will get you put in prison.  ......and in prison , those inmates even understand the difference. 

Do a gun crime , you fit right in. You do a pedo thing.....your days are numbered. 

And I'm all for common sense gun laws , that can't be politically abused. Like Red flag laws would be 100% abused. BUT.....a perfectly sane person can buy a gun , and some where down the line they lose their mind. 

That isn't the GUNS fault......that's a human fault! 

Gun owner......legal. 

Pedo.....not legal. 

4
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13780
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
5/27/2023 11:44am

No matter what your beliefs are, let's look at reality. 

After watching what happened with Bud Light, why would anyone risk losing 75% of your customers to make. 5% of them happy.

It just makes no sense. 

1
Chance1216
Posts
8616
Joined
4/1/2018
Location
Carson, CA, USA
5/27/2023 12:08pm

0A328BA0-ED66-4AE1-B3CF-746E3C9381AA.jpeg?VersionId=

 

1
5/27/2023 12:11pm
TDeath21 wrote:

Good! You’re a responsible gun owner! I have no issue with people like you purchasing firearms.

jeffro503 wrote:
The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but...

The vast amount of gun owners are responsible. If I was a thief , murdering maniac that wanted to go kill a bunch of people, but felonies prevented me from purchasing them.....I'd just go steal yours. Or someone else's. 

I know you don't like guns....that's your business. But what in the Eff does that have to do with Pedo groomers selling shit to kids? Your train of thought is....." Well if you can own dangerous guns , it should be ok for pedo groomers to approach your kids ".....

Cause yeah....it's exactly the same thing. What in the hell made you come up with that reasoning? 

TDeath21 wrote:
They sure are! The vast majority of people flying on planes aren’t going to hijack them and fly them into buildings either. Yet, for the <.01%...

They sure are! The vast majority of people flying on planes aren’t going to hijack them and fly them into buildings either. Yet, for the <.01% that did, things changed drastically for everyone to keep everyone safer.

So your logic is because they’d just try to steal someone else’s gun anyway, let’s not strengthen the laws at all? People are going to try to illegally immigrate anyway. Why have border security? See how stupid that logic is?

I actually don’t mind guns at all and I support the 2A. I’d never support banning all firearms or a confiscation. My comparison is relatable because YOU YOURSELF said you wanted to protect kids. 1 child/adolescent every 3 hours dies as a result of a firearm in some form. 0 have died at drag queen story hour or because Target had transgender merchandise. Which issue would need us all to band together to fix to protect children?

Honestly, if you can’t see your insane hypocrisy with that logic, then I’m not even sure what else anyone could ever say to get it through your head.

Stupidest analogy ever. Well not ever, I've read other posts from you. Next you'll want to get rid of cars because more kids get seriously injured in auto accidents per your analogy. Hijacking airplanes used to justify taking away guns. And not even that planes are hijacked with guns lol. SMH

1
2
5/27/2023 12:15pm

You might want to advocate for getting rid of hotdogs because kids choke on those. Would that not be hypocritical for you to not got after hotdogs with your examples that you use to justify your opinion?

Whistling

2
jeffro503
Posts
27632
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
5/27/2023 3:21pm
ToolMaker wrote:
You might want to advocate for getting rid of hotdogs because kids choke on those. Would that not be hypocritical for you to not got after...

You might want to advocate for getting rid of hotdogs because kids choke on those. Would that not be hypocritical for you to not got after hotdogs with your examples that you use to justify your opinion?

Whistling

I'm sure some of the " T " crowd have choked on quite a few " hotdog's" in the name of inclusivity and social justice haha. 😂😂

2
Chance1216
Posts
8616
Joined
4/1/2018
Location
Carson, CA, USA
5/27/2023 4:30pm
Chance1216 wrote:
 

0A328BA0-ED66-4AE1-B3CF-746E3C9381AA.jpeg?VersionId=

 

Honda Sucks! 🤣🤣🤣

Don’t even get me started on your bike..😂

9A6C0927-E45D-4964-9CC5-730B81E6D3D2

 

1
Bill_Carroll
Posts
5059
Joined
9/15/2010
Location
Falcon, CO, USA
5/27/2023 5:48pm

Jeffro~ Do we have Strait pride month?

What I don't get is why there is dedicated TV Channels soley for African American, BLM rallies, Black pride month and many more offensive objectives that divide America rather than unite.

 

 Just think, If "White" folks had a dedicated TV channel, WLM Rallies, White pride month ect....

That would be racist and cause division amongst America.

 

2
2DoorKicker75
Posts
247
Joined
4/11/2022
Location
Fayetteville, NC, USA
5/27/2023 5:56pm
Chance1216 wrote:
Don’t even get me started on your bike..😂  

Don’t even get me started on your bike..😂

9A6C0927-E45D-4964-9CC5-730B81E6D3D2

 

Mother of God, Dr. Pepper out the nose! Now I’ve got to clean my laptop…….🤣🤣🤣🏁

1
1
Bill_Carroll
Posts
5059
Joined
9/15/2010
Location
Falcon, CO, USA
5/27/2023 6:12pm
ATKpilot99 wrote:
  This thread needs more lumberjack 
 

This thread needs more lumberjack 

"I too am a lumberjack and take offence to this, Many of my friends are lumberjacks, and only a few of them are transvestites"

Eyes are watering with laughter Laughing

1
1
Bill_Carroll
Posts
5059
Joined
9/15/2010
Location
Falcon, CO, USA
5/27/2023 6:15pm
Chance1216 wrote:
 

0A328BA0-ED66-4AE1-B3CF-746E3C9381AA.jpeg?VersionId=

 

Honda Sucks! 🤣🤣🤣

Chance1216 wrote:
Don’t even get me started on your bike..😂  

Don’t even get me started on your bike..😂

9A6C0927-E45D-4964-9CC5-730B81E6D3D2

 

Weird but true,

That model of Ass gets up the hills with more weight than most bikes with less gas/fuel.

 

2
2DoorKicker75
Posts
247
Joined
4/11/2022
Location
Fayetteville, NC, USA
5/27/2023 6:46pm

Weird but true,

That model of Ass gets up the hills with more weight than most bikes with less gas/fuel.

 

Mule Skinner! 🤠

5/28/2023 7:01am
ns503 wrote:
I'm not getting this grooming stuff. What exactly does that mean? Does it mean Target is turning kids gay by selling rainbowed out clothes? That would...

I'm not getting this grooming stuff. What exactly does that mean? Does it mean Target is turning kids gay by selling rainbowed out clothes? That would mean gay is something someone chooses to be rather than just being how they were born. I don't think being gay is something anybody just chooses to be. You are or you aren't.  Or maybe you're a bit of both, some are wired that way too. And there's nothing wrong with that. 

(Ducks the incoming artillery...)

Titan1 wrote:
Being gay is a choice…people switch between gay, bi, straight, asexual, etc etc etc etc etc all the time.  And society has to respect their choices...

Being gay is a choice…people switch between gay, bi, straight, asexual, etc etc etc etc etc all the time.  And society has to respect their choices, try and keep up with their sexuality of the week (or day), and we are homophobic if we don’t.  
 

the argument USED to be they were born that way…and that’s why they needed equal rights because they couldn’t help how they were born, etc….then they got so far out there that sexuality became fluid and they could choose their sexuality, just like they can chose their gender, depending on which side of the bed they woke up on.  
 

So I believe the LGBT movement is all about recruiting, and they are starting as young as possible to condition (groom) children into thinking they can choose to be whatever sexuality and gender they feel like.  It’s wrong.

Adults can do what they want, I have no issue with adults choosing whatever sexuality and gender and whatever else they want to do….I couldn’t care less…but to force sexuality on younger and younger children is wrong.  

ns503 wrote:
Did you chose to be straight? I didn't either. I was born that way. As was my brother born gay. Still love him like a brother...

Did you chose to be straight? I didn't either. I was born that way.

As was my brother born gay. Still love him like a brother though.

It's not a black and white line. There are some people that are born that way, but there are also people that it's a choice. Not everyone is born with the same desires. However, if you believe in procreation of the species, you have to acknowledge that a male being attracted to a female is what keeps the species going. We don't have to vilify people who are gay. And I don't even think gay people in general are on board with recruiting toddlers to confuse the shit out of them for the rest of their lives. Let kids be kids without sexulizing them. Do you think kids are born to beat their kids? And yet kids who were abused are more likely to abuse their kids. We know that a child's personality, habits, life, is affected by what they are taught. So you have to admit this is grooming kids to a lifestyle they didn't choose for themself.

Post a reply to: So who will lose the most ?

The Latest