Club of Rome limits of growth

7/4/2021 2:33am
GabeM wrote:
You do you, and believe what they tell you to.

You looking to volunteer to depopulate?
Snide comments like this only reinforce your lack of education and arrogance. Totally subjective opinion... Half a billion people sounds nice. Ride dirt bikes anywhere. No...
Snide comments like this only reinforce your lack of education and arrogance.
Totally subjective opinion...
Half a billion people sounds nice. Ride dirt bikes anywhere. No pollution. Healthy wild spaces to enjoy. Fishing. Camping.
I’m just glad I don’t live in a city. And am not reliant on imaginary safe food resources outside of my control. And have no need for technology if it disappears.
Buggered if I know.
GabeM wrote:
My arrogance only matched yours. Lay your arrogance down and I will mine. As far as uneducated, I wish that were the case
What did I say that was arrogant?
“You looking to volunteer to depopulate?” Now that’s arrogant.
You’ve made your point again (and again and again).
Stop dominating the discussion. Let others have an educated opinion without shouting them down.
Stop being boorish. You may even learn something.
2
2
7/4/2021 2:45am
Right on. Mother Nature is indifferent to individual species. Humanity needs to lose its ego and be more humble. Humanity is a zen straw dog asking to be burned.
1
2
Retablo
Posts
14
Joined
8/2/2020
Location
New York, NY, USA
7/4/2021 11:05am
Show us on the doll where the “ stinking rich ” touched you.
2
APLMAN99
Posts
12771
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
7/4/2021 11:56am
GabeM wrote:
They may have released what was on his shelf which is probably how I was familiar with it. But the document wasn't on their website until...
They may have released what was on his shelf which is probably how I was familiar with it. But the document wasn't on their website until November 2017

You are just looking to discredit me because you don't like what I have to say , ever. You obviously down vote almost every post I make. You have a weird complex

You can't deal with the info so you try to discredit my citations


APLMAN99 wrote:
You are correct, I have a ‘weird complex’. I definitely find it weird when people are dishonest about their intentions and post bullshit like you did...
You are correct, I have a ‘weird complex’. I definitely find it weird when people are dishonest about their intentions and post bullshit like you did with those dishonest intentions.

I’m definitely guilty of that.

And I hate liars.
GabeM wrote:
No you are just a weirdo who is trying to find a way to discredit me like you always do because you can never deal with...
No you are just a weirdo who is trying to find a way to discredit me like you always do because you can never deal with the subject matter.

You are accusing me of being a liar because I didn't research why something was on a website

You are projecting that I would infer that because I cited a document on the CIA website that makes it accurate and credible

You are the liar



I have no idea when or why this was posted but it is your entire schtick

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad%20hominem


ad hominem adjective

appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
an ad hominem argument

:marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
made an ad hominem personal attack on his rival

Again, you are dishonest in your argument.

You clearly inferred that this was a legitimate piece because of it being catalogued by the CIA, reinforced by your glowing endorsement of it.

Yet you were completely ignorant of why it was there, despite the URL to the piece.

It’s hard to believe that a grown, allegedly educated adult could see the URL and not be able to understand why that is there.

If you weren’t trying to infer that it being in the CIA catalogue, you’d have likely linked to Amazon so people could buy one of your chosen bibles……
2
3

The Shop

7/5/2021 3:29am
Limits of growth has been readdressed and remained true until the present.
Ignore science and rely on personal observation.
There is a place in North Queensland where my father built a holiday shack in the 1970s. It is unique as protected by island it had coral reef to the shore. And no people. Last paradise.
Walking the low hills reveal strata of ancient coral beds from tens of thousands of years while the ocean rose and fell.
After a lifetime of snorkeling, in 20 years the coral has gone. No fish, no crustaceans, no dugong.
This is not a natural cyclic event.
Buggered if I know.
1
7/6/2021 7:04am
I was wondering when rent free living in my head Aplman Would get on board in this thread train.
5
Rooster
Posts
4432
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edmonton, CA
7/8/2021 12:19pm
Rooster backs slowly out of the thread, shaking his head and muttering obscenities about weirdos and kooks.

Have at it boys, he yells as the doors swing shut behind him.
1
8/15/2022 2:35am
*cough cough* has the smoke cleared?
More flooding predicted in Australia
Europe and USA in drought and fire
Limits to growth
Love our children
4/2/2026 3:27am

There has been a lot of topics related to this original post 

Wars, fuel prices, recession…

The big picture 

50 years ago Club of Rome, a group of scientists using early computers to model the future 

Their results are still on track 

Simple evidence based logic 

Peak at 2030

Then regression 

Pray it it is a slow roll where we slowly lose what we gained in the last 150 years 

What gave humanity the right to global air travel , and rockets, (now found to destroy the most fragile ecosystem on the planet, the biosphere)

Plastic? Pharmaceuticals? CFCs? Nuclear power plant meltdowns? Fossil fuel climate change? Social media? Overfishing?

Hard to catch a fish these days 

150 years. Such a short time 

Saw a lady riding a horse into town last week. She sat the horse well. And it was a calm horse in traffic 

2030 is the roll of point apparently

Sounds about right 

1

Post a reply to: Club of Rome limits of growth

The Latest