Posts
848
Joined
7/10/2009
Location
Bushnell, IL, USA
Found this pretty interesting. One of them was Ferandis; how longs he be racing SX? While the new 450's have been improved and no doubt great bikes they're still losing traction as an all out racing platform in SX. I'd think some of these 450 guys might start to get embarrassed and perhaps mad that they're not really running the "premier" SX racing machine in what's considered the premier class.
It was said in another thread there was talk of switching to an MEC format. Well I think it's time to implement the full set of MEC rules i.e. any displacement bike, any engine type and no homologation.
It was said in another thread there was talk of switching to an MEC format. Well I think it's time to implement the full set of MEC rules i.e. any displacement bike, any engine type and no homologation.
The whole systems upside down and surely confusing as hell to the casual fans in the stands which has gotta be the majority of SX attendees.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Also if the 250s were the better bike then why doesn't anyone race the 350?
And yes the track condition differences can account for some of the improved times for the 250's.
So those of us really familiar with the sport understand these differences and that the 450's require more effort from the riders to ride quickly. But the casual fans don't know this and surely wonder why a bike with close to twice the engine size doesn't perform significantly better. There seemed to be a definite distinction in the classes performance when we watched the 125 and 250 two strokes. The 500cc class went away when the 250's began to routinely outperform them in professional racing.
Post a reply to: Six of the top ten qualifying times at Toronto and are set by 250 riders