Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
I've been reading the F out of the manual and books on composition (rule of thirds, golden triangle, golden spiral, golden rectangle). Right now I'm focusing on studio light. I've talked to a few other pro photographers as well. I'm even compiling this thread into a single word document.
Steve-
It's an honor to be called a nerd by you. I enjoy your work (words and pixels) and think your photography is underrated because it's spectacular. You have a unique composition that stands out, and I always like your color and tones. I was aware that you're one of the minority Nikon via your bio on your site.
The reason I'm worried is that I'm about to go "all in" on some glass and flashes. I like the Canons for their slightly cheaper pro glass, pixel density, video, and crop factor. I like the Nikons for their ISO and form factor (like the physical switches/buttons vs Canon's love for the menu). I know cameras are just brushes for the artist, I just don't want buyers remorse to the tune of the cost of a brand new 450!
PS: If either of you guys need a guy to pack your gear around, or do whatever else at Seattle or Washougal, please, please, please give me a message. I'll carry your telephotos around for you all day!
You won't go wrong with Canon or Nikon as long as you buy the right body. Whichever you pick, you'll learn it and love it, and that'll be that.
Picards whatever brand you decide on I highly recommend B&H Photo I've bought from them for decades, they have good prices and you always get everything that the manufacturer put in the box.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Just because I've been shooting MX as long as you've been... alive!
So what do you think?
I like to keep riders in the upper portion of the frame when they're in the air or at least keep more space under them than over them, it just gives them an illusion of more height.
Watch the light, I know you can't control what time of day the motos are run so you have to find an angle that works best for whatever crappy sunlight you have to deal with. Here's a tip, when the sun is harshest (10AM-2PM) try backlit shots with a long telephoto or your zoom at it's longest setting.
what are you thoughts on school/getting a degree in Visual Journalism vs. just shooting photos and knocking on doors until something happens for you.. what route did you take?
Been looking at Brooks Institute lately, ultimately I want to be freelance doing a variety of photography not working for 1 company, but many outlets.
so the question is: you think school is always necessary or just in certain fields of photography?
Another question, I've noticed when set up at a track I get to caught up in one spot, if its good. How do you guys navigate the tracks so well? when i was at Hangtown & Washougal this last summer i found it difficult to get all the shots i wanted, Im guessing this comes with experience.. it seems like the magazine photos are usually pretty diverse in track sections.
here are a few of my favorites lately
Keep in mind that there are so many people who like doing photography for fun and are so happy to see their photos published that they'll do it for free. How do you make a living competing with them?
I get what you're saying.
Thanks for the insight Paul, good thread btw!
Anywho, here are some photos I've shot with film. (Shot at Red Bud 2010 with 100 speed film on accident).
My scanner made the colors all screwy with this one, but I still kind of like it.
(After reading through this whole thread, I can already see how I can apply a lot of your tips (such as finding that background that isn't busy, positioning the rider during those air shots, etc)
And a couple digital shots from Red Bud just for fun. (Also, the digital ones were shot with a Canon point and shoot... I have since gotten a Nikon D300 which sadly I haven't shot any moto with yet).
Like these I shot while switching back and forth between the two modes. The bike ones were in my garage with a CFL bulb as the only source of light. The school desk one, I signed out some studio lights from my photo class.
Pit Row
second is more technical, but i shoot with a nikon D200 with at most 8,000 shots on it. I always shoot in raw and lately i have noticed a really high amount of noise on everything from like 600 iso and up! i know that cant be right, and when up to a thousand the noise is very significant. any suggestions? the thought of my camera already going through a image sensor does not make me a happy camper.
Here is a some shots from on a Flickr set HERE if you dont mind taking a look at some of my photos and tellin me what you think. I know i have a ton to learn. That goes for anyone else too.
Thanks again
Dominick
Do you have older files from your D200 taken in similar conditions as your recent noisy ones? I've never shot with that camera so I'm not much help on the noise issue but if older but similar shots don't have the noise issue something might be up with that body. Keep in mind that when you lighten up a raw file you're going to increase the noise.
But yes i do and they dont even compare in the noise department! that a untouched RAW file also. no brightening of any sort. think im gonna do some serious research. im tired of having to pull it out in PS Cs5. Recomend any good photography sites and forums? maybe even action sports based ones?
i shoot with a olympus evolt E-300
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Some of my photos come out like this or flat and I'm not sure where to start.
Before
After
Here's what I did to this shot of wicksy85's
1. Shadow/Highlight to bring out some detail in the shadow areas. Some of the highlights were blown out completely so there was no recovering those.
2. Curves where I option dragged the black point so there would be at least one small area that went black, I like to have a full range of tones from pure white to solid black.
3. Vibrance punched up the colors without over saturating things. I think it was plus 40 on the Vibrance slider and plus 5 on the saturation slider.
4. Selective color brought some red back into the plastic.
5. a couple passes with Unsharp Mask 10-5.0-0 then 150-0.3-4
I think that was it.
Maybe something like this? I'm new to PS
Before
After
Post a reply to: Anyone got any photo question?