Donk - PulpMX - Thompson's Chick

Kawibra wrote:

Those aren't claims, those are cold hard facts. Each and every one of them. Like I said, its a very small industry.

Jharper wrote:

Cmon dude, I like Donk, but the Google SERP is not proof of anything. It actually disproves the basis of the theory. Her Instagram post with...

Cmon dude,
I like Donk, but the Google SERP is not proof of anything. It actually disproves the basis of the theory. Her Instagram post with that email comes up. I could go post that email on something; if I had enough followers, it could make it relevant enough to pop up on a SERP. That means literally nothing...

All that being said, it IS fishy that she tagged that exact email address, yet everyone claims to not know who owns that domain. She obviously at least knows who runs the email if she's tagging it. Of course if I was accused, I wouldn't want to help the accuser figure anything out either. I know nobody came out and specifically said it, and Donk sounded like he didn't want it on the radio, but it WAS hinted at. Regardless, In this instance it might be better for her to help solve the mystery to remove the fingers pointing at her though.

fullfloater wrote:

Did this kawibra sign up with the email slatonracing@hotmail.com by chance?

Jharper wrote:

Cmon dude, I like Donk, but the Google SERP is not proof of anything. It actually disproves the basis of the theory. Her Instagram post with...

Cmon dude,
I like Donk, but the Google SERP is not proof of anything. It actually disproves the basis of the theory. Her Instagram post with that email comes up. I could go post that email on something; if I had enough followers, it could make it relevant enough to pop up on a SERP. That means literally nothing...

All that being said, it IS fishy that she tagged that exact email address, yet everyone claims to not know who owns that domain. She obviously at least knows who runs the email if she's tagging it. Of course if I was accused, I wouldn't want to help the accuser figure anything out either. I know nobody came out and specifically said it, and Donk sounded like he didn't want it on the radio, but it WAS hinted at. Regardless, In this instance it might be better for her to help solve the mystery to remove the fingers pointing at her though.

early wrote:

Of course i dont expect her to out any of her friends. Just pointing out that there are 3 sides to this story; Donks, Ms. Flakes...

Of course i dont expect her to out any of her friends. Just pointing out that there are 3 sides to this story; Donks, Ms. Flakes, and the truth. Someone with enough of an axe to grind sent that email and chances are pretty good they were close to Cole and/or Slaton racing.

Jharper wrote:

Update: Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk. If you go to hotmail and tell them...

Update:

Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk.

If you go to hotmail and tell them you forget your password and give them the email, usually there are the last four digits of the number. In this case it's just two. Sometimes there's an alternate email. No luck there.

Enjoy .

Jharper wrote:

Update: Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk. If you go to hotmail and tell them...

Update:

Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk.

If you go to hotmail and tell them you forget your password and give them the email, usually there are the last four digits of the number. In this case it's just two. Sometimes there's an alternate email. No luck there.

Enjoy .

early wrote:

Now we're getting somewhere!!!!

Jharper wrote:

Update: Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk. If you go to hotmail and tell them...

Update:

Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk.

If you go to hotmail and tell them you forget your password and give them the email, usually there are the last four digits of the number. In this case it's just two. Sometimes there's an alternate email. No luck there.

Enjoy .

Chloe_Flake wrote:

Donk ran his mouth without having facts. Bookchloeflake@hotmail.com is in my Instagram bio and I had @slatonracing tagged in a post. Google put those two things...

Donk ran his mouth without having facts. Bookchloeflake@hotmail.com is in my Instagram bio and I had @slatonracing tagged in a post. Google put those two things together but they are completely separate in the search. Many people have told him that. It obviously went in one ear and out the other because he still went on to say it on the show. Google search does not connect me to that email address. If you know how the internet works you know this is the truth. He needed someone to blame and it was a random and bad coincidence. Check out the screen shots. If you google anything I tag with @hotmail.com my Instagram profile pops up. I hope next time he'll keep his mouth shut until he finds out actual facts and not a jumbled up Google search.

Jharper wrote:

Update: Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk. If you go to hotmail and tell them...

Update:

Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk.

If you go to hotmail and tell them you forget your password and give them the email, usually there are the last four digits of the number. In this case it's just two. Sometimes there's an alternate email. No luck there.

Enjoy .

Jharper wrote:

Update: Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk. If you go to hotmail and tell them...

Update:

Whomever it is... Their last two digits of their phone number are 68. Hope this helps Donk.

If you go to hotmail and tell them you forget your password and give them the email, usually there are the last four digits of the number. In this case it's just two. Sometimes there's an alternate email. No luck there.

Enjoy .

FastEddy wrote:

Be careful dude.Hope you used a vpn or proxy or tor. :) See,it will alert the real account owner of the ip you attempted to retrieve...

Be careful dude.Hope you used a vpn or proxy or tor.
See,it will alert the real account owner of the ip you attempted to retrieve their login info from...hotmail does that.
But on a side note good effort.

Camp332 wrote:

Hit glamour muscles today. Bi's, Tri's, and abs. With that said, it looks like we got a little action in here.

Camp332 wrote:

Hit glamour muscles today. Bi's, Tri's, and abs. With that said, it looks like we got a little action in here.

MxKing809 wrote:

It's all about the calves bro....

411on11000110 wrote:

Lots of misinformation here from certain good Samaritans: -obtaining the IP address is as good as worthless. Even if it is AT&T owned network space it...

Lots of misinformation here from certain good Samaritans:

-obtaining the IP address is as good as worthless. Even if it is AT&T owned network space it could still be a coincidence. At best the hostname might reveal a locale which again is still coincidence.

-“@“ does not universally function like it does with email, HTTP, social media or Google searches. In fact it is a search operator within Google hence the results displayed when searching for the email address in question. It is not unheard of for any characters before and after the “@“ to be ignored or separate the query either.


EVERYONE in this thread should be made aware of digital intrusion laws for their own good.

411on11000110 wrote:

Lots of misinformation here from certain good Samaritans: -obtaining the IP address is as good as worthless. Even if it is AT&T owned network space it...

Lots of misinformation here from certain good Samaritans:

-obtaining the IP address is as good as worthless. Even if it is AT&T owned network space it could still be a coincidence. At best the hostname might reveal a locale which again is still coincidence.

-“@“ does not universally function like it does with email, HTTP, social media or Google searches. In fact it is a search operator within Google hence the results displayed when searching for the email address in question. It is not unheard of for any characters before and after the “@“ to be ignored or separate the query either.


EVERYONE in this thread should be made aware of digital intrusion laws for their own good.

Jharper wrote:

This was already explained. As far as the law is concerned [IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/spg0w0.png[/IMG] 1. Intentional invasion - well I guess tracking someone's IP would count as that...

This was already explained.

As far as the law is concerned

1. Intentional invasion - well I guess tracking someone's IP would count as that, but nobody here has done that.

2.invasion must be offensive- not sure how you could possibly argue this point. I don't find Internet Protocol Addresses offensive, but maybe I'm not reasonable?

3. Must be a private matter- well this one is impossible to prove. The whole matter was broadcast live to the dozens and dozens of pulp show fans.

4.mental anguish and suffering- not sure how an IP address could cause this either? Maybe the guilt that they illegally besmirched and slandered the name of Donk? Ha

Jharper wrote:

This was already explained. As far as the law is concerned [IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/spg0w0.png[/IMG] 1. Intentional invasion - well I guess tracking someone's IP would count as that...

This was already explained.

As far as the law is concerned

1. Intentional invasion - well I guess tracking someone's IP would count as that, but nobody here has done that.

2.invasion must be offensive- not sure how you could possibly argue this point. I don't find Internet Protocol Addresses offensive, but maybe I'm not reasonable?

3. Must be a private matter- well this one is impossible to prove. The whole matter was broadcast live to the dozens and dozens of pulp show fans.

4.mental anguish and suffering- not sure how an IP address could cause this either? Maybe the guilt that they illegally besmirched and slandered the name of Donk? Ha

FastEddy wrote:

Keep in mind ,if the Gov wants you bad enough they'll bend the laws and over react in regards to minor stuff. Back when I was...

Keep in mind ,if the Gov wants you bad enough they'll bend the laws and over react in regards to minor stuff.
Back when I was doing a lot of Red Team work it entitled a lot of scanning other networks outside the networks
I was pen testing when it came Gov stuff. Gov Admins would bitch and say probing & mapping was illegal etc...
They've gone after people before for just probing & mapping systems.

I call it window shopping.

Like what you did could sorta be seen the same.
Sorta probing for partial data.
But if that email was to let's say a member of Congress or some big gov big wig.
They would look into it and possibly come after you.
It just depends.

But tracking an ip and not port scanning it etc.. isnt invasion.
It's sorta like a temp license plate when it comes residential ips.
There's tons of legal stuff you can do with it.
Lots of great data tanks out there mainly built for marketing that are as good as prism and some of the other big tanks.

Jharper wrote:

Window shopping ! HAR! Well, I did something anyone can easily do. I imagine that's why the entire phone number isn't displayed. If I tried to...

Window shopping ! HAR!

Well, I did something anyone can easily do. I imagine that's why the entire phone number isn't displayed. If I tried to get into the account , I could see that being intentional invasion; I didn't however, and that's the only one on the list even.

Now, you are suggesting you can trace the IP. To my knowledge you haven't done it yet, but that would be interesting information.

On a side note. I don't know if I think it was Chloe. Unless she has two phones ( which is of course possible) her number doesn't match up.