Posts
6435
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
Edited Date/Time
7/28/2015 9:29pm
I have been a lifelong Cycle News reader and have kept up more than any average person with the Flat Track series and I can't understand what they are talking about?
Think about how these same idiots are making the rules for MX/SX.
http://www.cyclenews.com/689/36251/Racing-Article/AMA-Pro-Racings-Propo…

Think about how these same idiots are making the rules for MX/SX.
http://www.cyclenews.com/689/36251/Racing-Article/AMA-Pro-Racings-Propo…

Or how a 450 will run for 25 or 30 min wide open at Springfield.
MX Sports is leasing the rights to the series from DMG who purchased the series from the AMA. MX Sports employees fill the majority of the AMA positions at a National ie Jeff Canfield Race Director
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
I will wait to see, a twin on a short track might not be very good.
What exactly are the riders?
Pit Row
The point of the thread is:
* Stupid names for classes that don't describe the series. I honestly thought it was GNCC off road.
* Rule changes to suit manufacturers. (like no 2 stokes, 250f and 450f classes. Production rule. Homolgation.)
* The riders and fans don't have any voice.
* Leathers for everyone (like road racing)
* The AMA has let the sport die, now (when Marquez, Rossi and Europe are getting into it) they outlaw singles when they are the fastest at some tracks.
Post a reply to: AMA rule book strikes again Flat Track