Posts
6
Joined
4/16/2015
Location
Clearwater, FL, USA
Edited Date/Time
4/23/2015 7:56am
I need a new rear brake rotor for my 2006 rm125 as the current one is bent/warped. I am stuck between a Galfer Wave rotor or the Tusk Typhoon. How much does the Tusk rear rotor weigh? I'm guessing the Galfer would be lighter, but is the Tusk an extremely heavy rotor compared to all other rotors? The Tusk rotor is only $60 and the Galfer is double that at $113 (or more). Which rotor would last longer? Which has better brake performance? I like the look of the Galfer better but is the extra cost justifiable? As of now I'm leaning toward the Galfer even though it's on the expensive side. In this case can I just assume you get what you pay for?
1. I have a 125, in which lightweight is important. You wouldn't want to run the heaviest rotor out there on a 125 would you?
2. Would the heavier tusk last longer? I can't find how much they weigh. I know the Galfer weighs 1.27lbs, which I assume is pretty light.
Why is the Tusk so cheap? Is it because other brands try to make lightweight yet strong parts that cost a lot to do so? And Tusk makes a strong part but doesn't worry about shaving weight at all therefore producing a strong and cheap, but heavy part?
Post a reply to: Brake rotors: Galfer Wave vs Tusk Typhoon