Racerx & TWMX

jasonbecker wrote:

Do racer x and TWMX have the same reporters/interviewers. Because if you watch TWMX how was your night videos and then read racer x interviews that...

Do racer x and TWMX have the same reporters/interviewers. Because if you watch TWMX how was your night videos and then read racer x interviews that come out Monday morning they are the exact same. I'm always expecting to hear different questions to the riders but the are pretty much exactly the same. Any one else notice this

jasonbecker wrote:

Do racer x and TWMX have the same reporters/interviewers. Because if you watch TWMX how was your night videos and then read racer x interviews that...

Do racer x and TWMX have the same reporters/interviewers. Because if you watch TWMX how was your night videos and then read racer x interviews that come out Monday morning they are the exact same. I'm always expecting to hear different questions to the riders but the are pretty much exactly the same. Any one else notice this

Whoops_Blitzer wrote:

Matthes interviewed Roczen in the latest How Was Yr Wkend on Transworld. Their video player works for me, but it is annoying to have to jump...

Matthes interviewed Roczen in the latest How Was Yr Wkend on Transworld.

Their video player works for me, but it is annoying to have to jump back n forth between 10 pages and cue up 10 videos.

With 10 race car noises...

timlake wrote:

I prefer the Vital Photo/Audio style. I'd much rather look at photos whilst hearing the interview than look at some guys sweaty face.

Crush wrote:

[img]https://www.openlettersmonthly.com/issue/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/media-scrum.jpg[/img]

timlake wrote:

I prefer the Vital Photo/Audio style. I'd much rather look at photos whilst hearing the interview than look at some guys sweaty face.

GuyB wrote:

Thanks. I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get...

Thanks.

I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get some interviews that sound the same. It's because they are.

Personally I like the audio versions, because I think you get more hearing it than you do if you're just reading text and having to figure out the inflection. (Is he joking? Serious?)

As for the group setting interviews, we currently have one agent who likes to call people in by announcing, "Gather around for the circle jerk." He did it again on Saturday night. I asked, "Seriously?" When he laughed and nodded, I turned around and walked away...as he tried to grab my photo vest to pull me back.

I'm far from being a sensitive type, but I respect his rider in how I portray him. I think it's fair that he respects what we're doing, too.

Trav138 wrote:

Everything i've seen reported on here has been very respectful, all you guys do a hell of job Guy B. I would get real tired of...

Everything i've seen reported on here has been very respectful, all you guys do a hell of job Guy B. I would get real tired of that kinda shit, no doubt. respect is a two way street. You've been at it a long time Guy, i most certainly would of been burnt out long ago if i had your gig, or runoff or both haha.

Grieby54 wrote:

I just prefer to read interviews as opposed to listening to/watching them. It's much more convenient.

Grieby54 wrote:

I just prefer to read interviews as opposed to listening to/watching them. It's much more convenient.

kiwifan wrote:

same here

timlake wrote:

I prefer the Vital Photo/Audio style. I'd much rather look at photos whilst hearing the interview than look at some guys sweaty face.

GuyB wrote:

Thanks. I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get...

Thanks.

I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get some interviews that sound the same. It's because they are.

Personally I like the audio versions, because I think you get more hearing it than you do if you're just reading text and having to figure out the inflection. (Is he joking? Serious?)

As for the group setting interviews, we currently have one agent who likes to call people in by announcing, "Gather around for the circle jerk." He did it again on Saturday night. I asked, "Seriously?" When he laughed and nodded, I turned around and walked away...as he tried to grab my photo vest to pull me back.

I'm far from being a sensitive type, but I respect his rider in how I portray him. I think it's fair that he respects what we're doing, too.

GuyB wrote:

Thanks. I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get...

Thanks.

I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get some interviews that sound the same. It's because they are.

Personally I like the audio versions, because I think you get more hearing it than you do if you're just reading text and having to figure out the inflection. (Is he joking? Serious?)

As for the group setting interviews, we currently have one agent who likes to call people in by announcing, "Gather around for the circle jerk." He did it again on Saturday night. I asked, "Seriously?" When he laughed and nodded, I turned around and walked away...as he tried to grab my photo vest to pull me back.

I'm far from being a sensitive type, but I respect his rider in how I portray him. I think it's fair that he respects what we're doing, too.

timlake wrote:

I prefer the Vital Photo/Audio style. I'd much rather look at photos whilst hearing the interview than look at some guys sweaty face.

GuyB wrote:

Thanks. I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get...

Thanks.

I think more often these days, riders prefer doing post-race interviews in a group setting, rather than a bunch of one-on-ones. That's why you get some interviews that sound the same. It's because they are.

Personally I like the audio versions, because I think you get more hearing it than you do if you're just reading text and having to figure out the inflection. (Is he joking? Serious?)

As for the group setting interviews, we currently have one agent who likes to call people in by announcing, "Gather around for the circle jerk." He did it again on Saturday night. I asked, "Seriously?" When he laughed and nodded, I turned around and walked away...as he tried to grab my photo vest to pull me back.

I'm far from being a sensitive type, but I respect his rider in how I portray him. I think it's fair that he respects what we're doing, too.

Grieby54 wrote:

I just prefer to read interviews as opposed to listening to/watching them. It's much more convenient.

Grieby54 wrote:

I just prefer to read interviews as opposed to listening to/watching them. It's much more convenient.

Jarid332 wrote:

I enjoy a good written interview myself.

Grieby54 wrote:

I just prefer to read interviews as opposed to listening to/watching them. It's much more convenient.

kiwifan wrote:

same here

GuyB wrote:

Ha! They're not quite that bad. Usually five or six people at a time.

Grieby54 wrote:

I just prefer to read interviews as opposed to listening to/watching them. It's much more convenient.

Jarid332 wrote:

I enjoy a good written interview myself.

GuyB wrote:

Feel free to write one up.