Raising TAXES or cut spending?

Oldmotoguy
Profile picture for user Oldmotoguy
Posts
1772
Joined
8/29/2008
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
Oldmotoguy
Edited Date/Time 1/24/2012 7:55am
why is paying more taxes supposed to be more "patriotic"..?

why wouldn't it be more patriotic if these senators cut spending and formed a budget

and didn't spend more than they got

after the 700 billion dollar bail out just shows the congress doen't care what we say

termlimits.com

|
`ol Ger
Profile picture for user `ol Ger
Posts
6269
Joined
7/15/2007
Location
Piqua, OH, USA
`ol Ger 10/21/2008 9:43am
10/21/2008 9:43am
CUT SPENDING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Thanks,

oG
MXMatt
Profile picture for user MXMatt
Posts
553
Joined
10/18/2006
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
MXMatt 10/21/2008 9:54am
10/21/2008 9:54am
Gut it. I mean make it hurt. Make people hungry for producing for themselves. Give it 10 years. We'll be fine.
Oldmotoguy
Profile picture for user Oldmotoguy
Posts
1772
Joined
8/29/2008
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
Oldmotoguy 10/21/2008 9:59am
10/21/2008 9:59am
on that termlimits site..read what it says about "the poison of carreer politicians"
dougie
Profile picture for user dougie
Posts
2140
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
dougie 10/21/2008 10:58am
10/21/2008 10:58am
How about we just print more money?

The Shop

See All »
Oldmotoguy
Profile picture for user Oldmotoguy
Posts
1772
Joined
8/29/2008
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
Oldmotoguy 10/21/2008 11:12am
10/21/2008 11:12am
wheres NSZ to tell us that raising taxes is good
BMSOB
Profile picture for user BMSOB
Posts
1191
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
PN
BMSOB 10/21/2008 1:53pm
10/21/2008 1:53pm
Oldmotoguy wrote:
wheres NSZ to tell us that raising taxes is good
Aside from dougie this is obviously a sore loser, right wing pity party featuring the usual suspects. Carry on.
Oldmotoguy
Profile picture for user Oldmotoguy
Posts
1772
Joined
8/29/2008
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
Oldmotoguy 10/21/2008 3:06pm
10/21/2008 3:06pm
no answer,just attack ..nice !!!
flarider
Profile picture for user flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
flarider 10/21/2008 3:13pm
10/21/2008 3:13pm
I'm voting for the guy who will wind up with a lower overall deficit
Oldmotoguy
Profile picture for user Oldmotoguy
Posts
1772
Joined
8/29/2008
Location
Oceanside, CA, USA
Oldmotoguy 10/21/2008 3:22pm
10/21/2008 3:22pm
flarider wrote:
I'm voting for the guy who will wind up with a lower overall deficit
i'm glad you can believe his promises..i don't trust any of them..

and i'm surprised at you knowing full well that cutting spending and waste is the most important thing next to conserving oil..
the government just spent more than they have ever have ..and now they are talking about another 300 billion stimulus package..they are like drunken sailors
BMSOB
Profile picture for user BMSOB
Posts
1191
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
PN
BMSOB 10/21/2008 3:36pm
10/21/2008 3:36pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 8:55pm
Oldmotoguy wrote:
no answer,just attack ..nice !!!
It's already been answered a dozen times on this board but you guys can't get past your "talking points" & bias. Pointless exercise yet you continue to pursue it as if more whining will make it better or make you right. You've been indoctrinated by 30 years of failed economic policy.

Cut spending? If you're serious how about we start with an unnecessary war in Iraq & no bid contracts to corporate interests who have been shown to be less than forthcoming about accounting for where all the money they've been given to serve the troops lousy food & unclean water went. Better yet, what about all the schools, hospitals, water & electricity services in Iraq that never materialized? Pure boondoggle. Couple that with reasonable taxes for those who can afford it & we might make some progress.

Attack? Hardly. More like stating the obvious.
Scotty
Profile picture for user Scotty
Posts
4139
Joined
3/21/2008
Location
USA
Scotty 10/21/2008 3:55pm
10/21/2008 3:55pm
flarider wrote:
I'm voting for the guy who will wind up with a lower overall deficit
If our deficit isn't down in two years will you send me another case of E.I? Woohoo
No Spin Zone 10/21/2008 4:00pm
10/21/2008 4:00pm
The correct answer is both. We need to do both.
jmar
Profile picture for user jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
jmar 10/21/2008 4:35pm
10/21/2008 4:35pm
No Spin Zone wrote:
The correct answer is both. We need to do both.
I agree but anyone that’s getting bailout funds should be taxed at an even higher rate than other businesses.
No Spin Zone 10/21/2008 4:44pm
10/21/2008 4:44pm
No Spin Zone wrote:
The correct answer is both. We need to do both.
jmar wrote:
I agree but anyone that’s getting bailout funds should be taxed at an even higher rate than other businesses.
Either that, or they should just be nationalized.
flarider
Profile picture for user flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
flarider 10/21/2008 4:46pm
10/21/2008 4:46pm
flarider wrote:
I'm voting for the guy who will wind up with a lower overall deficit
Scotty wrote:
If our deficit isn't down in two years will you send me another case of E.I? Woohoo
Neither plan lowers the deficit from present numbers during the first term, but one candidate's plan will have a LOWER overall deficit over the other
race
Profile picture for user race
Posts
3480
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
USA
race 10/21/2008 5:05pm
10/21/2008 5:05pm
Oldmotoguy wrote:
why is paying more taxes supposed to be more "patriotic"..? why wouldn't it be more patriotic if these senators cut spending and formed a budget and...
why is paying more taxes supposed to be more "patriotic"..?

why wouldn't it be more patriotic if these senators cut spending and formed a budget

and didn't spend more than they got

after the 700 billion dollar bail out just shows the congress doen't care what we say

termlimits.com

Why are you so concerned with the tax bill of the "wealthy"?

When Bush gave out all those tax cuts to the wealthy and to corporations were you asking why Bush went and raised taxes for the midde class? Because that was the net effect of his give away to his cronies.

No one likes paying taxes but for fock's sakes ... quit piling them on the middle class. If the "wealthy" have to suck it up a bit I'm not losing sleep. BO is just putting things back the way they were before Dumbya went and sold out the middle class.

Straighten it out down the road.

Post a reply to: Raising TAXES or cut spending?