Posts
1363
Joined
8/3/2014
Location
Annapolis, MD
US
Edited Date/Time
10/15/2014 6:45pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11155731/13m…
(anybody in the US that bought a can of Red Bull is due a $10 refund!. You can't make this stuff up..)
From the link...
It is hard to imagine that anyone who saw Red Bull's advertising slogan would actually believe the caffeinated soft drink "gives you wings", but in litigation-hungry America the claim has been officially falsified.
Benjamin Careathers, a regular consumer of the fizzy drink, sued the company for false advertising, arguing that after 10 years drinking Red Bull he neither had wings nor any enhanced athletic or intellectual performance.
According to the complainant, the Austria-based firm deliberately misled unsuspecting customers to spend millions of pounds on the premium drink in the hope of gaining an edge on their competitors.
And fearful of a costly and time-consuming trial, Red Bull was forced to settle the case out of court, pledging to refund $10 to any US customer who bought the drink since 2002 and agreeing to amend future advertising.
(anybody in the US that bought a can of Red Bull is due a $10 refund!. You can't make this stuff up..)
From the link...
It is hard to imagine that anyone who saw Red Bull's advertising slogan would actually believe the caffeinated soft drink "gives you wings", but in litigation-hungry America the claim has been officially falsified.
Benjamin Careathers, a regular consumer of the fizzy drink, sued the company for false advertising, arguing that after 10 years drinking Red Bull he neither had wings nor any enhanced athletic or intellectual performance.
According to the complainant, the Austria-based firm deliberately misled unsuspecting customers to spend millions of pounds on the premium drink in the hope of gaining an edge on their competitors.
And fearful of a costly and time-consuming trial, Red Bull was forced to settle the case out of court, pledging to refund $10 to any US customer who bought the drink since 2002 and agreeing to amend future advertising.
This line is classic in the article.
According to the complainant, the Austria-based firm deliberately misled unsuspecting customers. . .
Really? The customers really suspected they'd get wings? Or a competitive advantage? And all that because it says "red bull gives you wings"? Give me a break. I have heard of 0 people taking an energy drink as a training supplement. Maybe to get the caffeine but not as a training supplement.
I wonder how they know you bought Red Bull. Are you supposed to present a receipt from a can of Red Bull you bought in 2003?
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Do IT!
https://youtu.be/rWlNesxOGrU
Seriously, this is the most stupid thing I've read in awhile. I hope it's not true. What the hell is wrong with us?!
I am compiling my complaint...
Pit Row
Skeet !
Post a reply to: Red Bull sued because it doesn't "give you wings"