Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
125 125 125 125, 144 44 44 44 44, 150!! 150 150 150 150, 167!!!!! 67 67 67 67 .............
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Arguing anything else is never going to fly, otherwise pro's would still be riding them at a national level all over the world.
There seems to be one major theme in two stroke arguments, the idea that they are a cheaper way to go and keeps riders in the sport and on the start line. Spending thousands of dollars modifying these engines goes against that argument. So if this rule helps quell that temptation then its a good thing in my opinion. Its debatable whether it will lower the costs as people will find a way around it as usual. One thing that is guaranteed is that guys will still race them locally and in the right hands a stock engined 250sx will still be competitive against the modified 250F's, atleast off the line anyways.
Im confused about what you're getting at? Do you want a 125 2 stroke v 250F class but the 125's are allowed to run big bores? How big? I'm having a bit of trouble following your train of thought.
125's get waxed by 250f's all things being equal, that has pretty much been the case for over 10 years now.
CC for CC is a closer match and WEM is trying a bitof tinkering with the edges to try and even the balance out for privateers and manufacturers alike, I dont know if its perfect but a lot of people have thrown them under the bus before we've even seen a wheel turned in anger.
I'm telling you right now there are many 250f's making much more then 38 HP so i'm not sure exactly how worked your mates bike is, and i wont comment on your bike specifically as im sure its the fastest and easiest 125 to ride thats ever graced a track; but in my experience theres a fairly good chance that his 37.5 HP gets put to the ground easier then your 38 HP.
I'm gonna bail out of this thread now as im not sure we're going to make any further progress.
Just to clarify I currently race a YZ250 2 stroke in the lites class so im not talking in any way from a 4 stroke lover boy standpoint.
Pit Row
The biggest change was the airboot shape and space and travel. They're so much more constricted than they used to be.
The MA rules for MX2 that I can access - 2014, had, simply, up to 250cc listed. No rules relating to bore and stroke mods for 125 / 144 /150 based bikes.
The new, restrictive 2015 MX2 rule only seems to apply to 250cc 2 strokes.
So, those that feel well suited to / confident they can be competitive on smaller 2ts, seem to be able to make use of #991's 'engine builders'. Yes, they, the 'engine builders', lose out on 250 2t business, but the bikes #991 seems so devoted to (and, I don't blame him for being devoted to them - great things) don't appear to be restricted.
So, a rider who feels competitive on a highly modded (well even a standard) 125 / 150 base engine, still appears to be allowed to 'have at it'.So, 'have at it', boys!
It's great to see someone post some cdf (common dog F@$k) on here in regards to this topic. And no disrespect to any other point of views etc as we are all entitled to our own. But my favourite is in relation to the use of semis. I would rather see the extra money used to parade one of them around Australia on a extra rider or support staff etc and run out of a couple of sprinter vans (taking into account the marketing tool they are used for). We go to the races to race dirt bikes not trucks.
Great post and a great topic that causes a lot of controversy in Australia resulting in a lot of sandy Vag!?&s down here.
M C Hammerd again!
This would be interesting but unsure as to how legit it would be in the class given homologation?
[/img]http://www.mxfreakspix.com/Friends/Cameron-955/i-Hf7PQB7/0/L/DSC2040-L…]
Post a reply to: Aussie National Rules Changes