Presidential Polls 2012

Mr. G wrote:

They ALWAYS say the Democrat is doing better than they really are. It is no secret.

RandyS wrote:

Yeah, I know. Rasmussen is probably the most reliable and he has it bouncing back and forth within a couple of points. I'm just more curious...

Yeah, I know. Rasmussen is probably the most reliable and he has it bouncing back and forth within a couple of points. I'm just more curious if there is anyone out there who voted last time but not for Obama who is now going to, if not he's gonna lose big.

Mr. G wrote:

So far not one single person who did not vote for Obama last time will vote for him this time?

RandyS wrote:

I don't want a president I like and I don't want a president who thinks he's a comedian. I want a president to take care of...

I don't want a president I like and I don't want a president who thinks he's a comedian. I want a president to take care of problems. There wasn't a single good choice on the GOP side, at least Romney has taken on big tasks in the past and accomplished things. That's by far the better of two less that ideal choices. Four more years of president rock star/comedian and this country is never coming back.

Skip376 wrote:

The uneducated masses don't understand polls or what different polls you can have so don't take much stock in them.

Skip376 wrote:

The uneducated masses don't understand polls or what different polls you can have so don't take much stock in them.

J.F.S wrote:

Sad if the masses are uneducated, that means you are in desperate need of socialized quality education. Vote for the pres that is more likely to...

Sad if the masses are uneducated, that means you are in desperate need of socialized quality education. Vote for the pres that is more likely to fix something like that. Well educated masses will create trickle up economics.

GoldenState54 wrote:

How is Ron Paul doing in the polls?

Skip376 wrote:

The uneducated masses don't understand polls or what different polls you can have so don't take much stock in them.

J.F.S wrote:

Sad if the masses are uneducated, that means you are in desperate need of socialized quality education. Vote for the pres that is more likely to...

Sad if the masses are uneducated, that means you are in desperate need of socialized quality education. Vote for the pres that is more likely to fix something like that. Well educated masses will create trickle up economics.

Skip376 wrote:

That's the last thing we as a country need. We need to untie the hands of our teachers and let those that can't do it fail...

That's the last thing we as a country need. We need to untie the hands of our teachers and let those that can't do it fail.

Ironically I doubt you know the diffrent types of polling that is out there and your country is socialized... Please explain the differentials in polling types and what they mean.

J.F.S wrote:

So the masses are uneducated but the education system does not need to be fixed so that the masses can become educated? You called the masses...

So the masses are uneducated but the education system does not need to be fixed so that the masses can become educated? You called the masses uneducated, not me, you brought attention to a problem. If that is a real problem, it is bigger than wether I can answer your extremely general question or not. Hopefully you are one of the "few" Americans that know how to interpret polls. I do not think that my daughters deserve a better education than others, just because I may be richer than most others. A system where your parents income dictate your level of education is an extreme waste of talent and an extremely dumb and wasteful way to select people and cut people out of a talent pool. It is as if a football team could only draft the ten players that had the richest parents, out of lets say a thousand. Not the best out of those thousand, only the best out of the ten with the riches parents. Low education levels are a problem, no country benefits from it, not even the USA.

RandyS wrote:

I've been trying to stay out of the election BS on message boards and Facebook. But there is something I've been wondering. Many of the pollsters...

I've been trying to stay out of the election BS on message boards and Facebook. But there is something I've been wondering. Many of the pollsters are doing their best to convince the world that Obama is walking away with it. In 2008 Obama won by what 4-5 points in the final count. With record turnout from people who voted for him who had never or don't normally vote and more than likely won't bother.

I have talked to plenty of people who voted for him that regret it and would vote for anyone but. Does anyone here know someone who voted for McCain that now feels they need to vote for Obama?

Mr. G wrote:

So far not one single person who did not vote for Obama last time will vote for him this time?

kongols wrote:

Huck will. That`s why he changed his name to huck.o where "O" stands for Obama.

Mr. G wrote:

If that is true then there is one vote change. Is there anyone that voted for Obama last time that will not vote for him this...

If that is true then there is one vote change. Is there anyone that voted for Obama last time that will not vote for him this time?

J.F.S wrote:

Sad if the masses are uneducated, that means you are in desperate need of socialized quality education. Vote for the pres that is more likely to...

Sad if the masses are uneducated, that means you are in desperate need of socialized quality education. Vote for the pres that is more likely to fix something like that. Well educated masses will create trickle up economics.

Skip376 wrote:

That's the last thing we as a country need. We need to untie the hands of our teachers and let those that can't do it fail...

That's the last thing we as a country need. We need to untie the hands of our teachers and let those that can't do it fail.

Ironically I doubt you know the diffrent types of polling that is out there and your country is socialized... Please explain the differentials in polling types and what they mean.

J.F.S wrote:

So the masses are uneducated but the education system does not need to be fixed so that the masses can become educated? You called the masses...

So the masses are uneducated but the education system does not need to be fixed so that the masses can become educated? You called the masses uneducated, not me, you brought attention to a problem. If that is a real problem, it is bigger than wether I can answer your extremely general question or not. Hopefully you are one of the "few" Americans that know how to interpret polls. I do not think that my daughters deserve a better education than others, just because I may be richer than most others. A system where your parents income dictate your level of education is an extreme waste of talent and an extremely dumb and wasteful way to select people and cut people out of a talent pool. It is as if a football team could only draft the ten players that had the richest parents, out of lets say a thousand. Not the best out of those thousand, only the best out of the ten with the riches parents. Low education levels are a problem, no country benefits from it, not even the USA.

Mr. G wrote:

If that is true then there is one vote change. Is there anyone that voted for Obama last time that will not vote for him this...

If that is true then there is one vote change. Is there anyone that voted for Obama last time that will not vote for him this time?

jimmie wrote:

That will be me. I vote republican 95% of the time. However in 2007 I just could not pull the lever for McCain. First time I...

That will be me.

I vote republican 95% of the time. However in 2007 I just could not pull the lever for McCain. First time I have ever voted Democrat in a presidential election. I admit, I believed the hype, I thought Obama was sincere and the lesser of two evils.

Dole almost had me vote for Carter...............almost, that was a nose holder vote for me.

Out of Carter, Mondale,Dukakis,Clinton Gore and Kerry I had to pick the absolute worse time to try the other side!

I won't be fooled again.

RandyS wrote:

I don't want a president I like and I don't want a president who thinks he's a comedian. I want a president to take care of...

I don't want a president I like and I don't want a president who thinks he's a comedian. I want a president to take care of problems. There wasn't a single good choice on the GOP side, at least Romney has taken on big tasks in the past and accomplished things. That's by far the better of two less that ideal choices. Four more years of president rock star/comedian and this country is never coming back.

kongols wrote:

Four more years of Congressional deadlock and your country is never coming back.

jmar wrote:

No matter who wins, it's going to be four more years of that same old bullshit. Mitt and Barack are really not all that different, and...

No matter who wins, it's going to be four more years of that same old bullshit.

Mitt and Barack are really not all that different, and even if they were, both are puppets on a string and neither have the balls to do what is right for this country.

jmar wrote:

No matter who wins, it's going to be four more years of that same old bullshit. Mitt and Barack are really not all that different, and...

No matter who wins, it's going to be four more years of that same old bullshit.

Mitt and Barack are really not all that different, and even if they were, both are puppets on a string and neither have the balls to do what is right for this country.

jimmie wrote:

I have to say, I completely disagree. Romney may not be "the man", however he will be a bit of fresh air compared to the last...

I have to say, I completely disagree.

Romney may not be "the man", however he will be a bit of fresh air compared to the last 4 years.

Here's hopin'

Sup Jim? Mr. old school So. Cal.