Michael Moore talks about gun control.

Ghost of Jabroni
Posts
4425
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
7/26/2012 8:32am
Barrett57 wrote:
I beleive it's something along the lines of a private jet (like you said) hitting big ben and the houses of parliment. I don't give them...
I beleive it's something along the lines of a private jet (like you said) hitting big ben and the houses of parliment. I don't give them an ounce of credibility though.

Anyway, If thats the case I hope every politician is present and correct when it happens.
If the politicians are present, we know it was some freedom fighter revolutionist group (aka "terrorist") that is getting a little payback.

If the politicians are not present then we know it was a terrorist attack (aka inside-job meant to terrorize us into supporting another Afganistan-type invasion of some country.)
spd721
Posts
1391
Joined
9/23/2009
Location
Fenton, MO, USA
7/26/2012 11:29am
To those that are for more gun control, explain to me why Prohibition was repealed, why Chicago has the most murders and yet has the strictest gun control in the country, and how there are millions of people in the USA that partake in drugs even though they are illegal.
gabrielmalinois
Posts
1972
Joined
2/2/2011
Location
USA
7/26/2012 11:46am
jmar wrote:
Please explain why MM is un American?
Simple answer? He's a socialist. Now I rant... Or because he wants further restrictions on gun ownership. Any restrictions is a assault on the 2nd amendment...
Simple answer? He's a socialist.

Now I rant...

Or because he wants further restrictions on gun ownership. Any restrictions is a assault on the 2nd amendment IMO. He doesnt see the value in gun ownership so he is ok with everyone handing them over. An attack on the constitution is un-American.

Furthermore, if you really want me to get into it, I could say that he is a pawn for the globalist agenda, as is most of Hollywood. This republic has been under siege since the banks took over. That is where his efforts need to be focused, not on gun laws.

There is a lot of questionable stuff regarding both Columbine and Aurora that everyone seems to just gloss right over because the truth of the matter (if the suspicions have merit) is way too difficult for all of us to swallow. If indeed those two incidents were indeed psy-ops then they are part of a greater plan, and he is part of it as well with the bullshit he spews. Whatever the agenda of the NWO is, he's playing right into their hand. But that is all a bunch of tin-foil shit that isnt real. Zeigest isnt real. JFK was really killed by Lee Harvey. 9/11 had nothing to do with invading Afganistan for their opium. And we didnt care that Sadam wanted to trade oil on a currency other than the dollar, we went in and ousted him for humanitarian reasons right? Fair enough. Oh, and the 90 second response time in a black neighborhood in Aurora is about 11 times faster than average but we wont pay that or any of the other inconsistencies any mind. Lets sit and argue about what we would have done had that theater been armed with CCW carrying citizens (which is a ridiculous argument btw).



All the theories aside... disarm the police and military and I'll gladly hand over my weapons.

I trust my fellow neighbor a hell of a lot more than I trust the goons in the uniforms. Face it, the vast majority in the police force are ex-military. The vast majority in the military went their because they had little other options. Meaning, our police forces are made up of the countries lowest common denominator. All the training in the world wont make up for poor judgement. Forgive me if I dont trust the people in uniforms but they are IMO the dumbest and weakest individuals this country produces. Lemmings.

Ive witnessed with my own eyes the brutality the people with badges will do to defenseless non-violent citizens. And you have too, that is unless we are to forget the Kent State shootings.

jmar, what is your stance on disarming our police and military? And what evidence is their that they are any more responsible with their weapons than the common citizen?

Statistically we are twice as likely to get struck by lightening than end up a victim in a mass shooting. All this outcry over this incident and the way it is being covered reeks of "agenda". It's knee-jerk. And the timing is oh so convenient to the new bill that needs votes.
The vast majority in the military went their because they had little other options. Meaning, our police forces are made up of the countries lowest common denominator. All the training in the world wont make up for poor judgement. Forgive me if I dont trust the people in uniforms but they are IMO the dumbest and weakest individuals this country produces

Wow, That is really insulting to a lot of people. I guess you don't know too many who have served in the military, especially in special forces.
Ghost of Jabroni
Posts
4425
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
7/26/2012 12:00pm Edited Date/Time 7/26/2012 12:11pm
[b]The vast majority in the military went their because they had little other options. Meaning, our police forces are made up of the countries lowest common...
The vast majority in the military went their because they had little other options. Meaning, our police forces are made up of the countries lowest common denominator. All the training in the world wont make up for poor judgement. Forgive me if I dont trust the people in uniforms but they are IMO the dumbest and weakest individuals this country produces

Wow, That is really insulting to a lot of people. I guess you don't know too many who have served in the military, especially in special forces.
Special Forces are the cream of the crop. I think it is safe to say that most whom enter the military dont make it into Special Forces?

It may be insulting to say that our police forces are made up of the bottom of the barrel but I think it is the truth. Just because someone is a good solider doesnt make them a person of good judgement. Following orders and critical thinking do not always go hand in hand. If you can think on your own two feet, like JT, then you are the exception, not the rule.

When was the last time you were in boot camp? The majority of the kids in their are derelicts. And when they get out, they are just well disciplined derelicts. No more equipped to go start a business and contribute to society than they were prior to joining the military. Their best option is often the police force.

Look, I could get into a lengthy discussion explaining just how detrimental and inefficient our police and military are to our countries economy but I will spare you. The simple analogy is that it is a snake eating its own tail. They do not produce anything, they do not contribute to the economy, they only take. They are not worth their cost. It doesnt take an economics degree to see that it is a failed institution. The bottom line is that if a police officer had half a conscious, they'd turn in their badge and go work a productive job that adds to the economy and doesnt take from it as all social programs do. Which brings me to my original point, they are not smart enough to see it that way. Nor do I trust their judgement when it comes to their power, responsibility, and weapons use.

People will do some crazy and in-humane shit in the name of "following orders". Even smart people.

The Shop

Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/26/2012 12:08pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Change our attitudes towards one another: Fine. More laws when you don't ENFORCE the laws you ALREADY HAVE? Blow me. I can understand his sentiment: I...
Change our attitudes towards one another: Fine.

More laws when you don't ENFORCE the laws you ALREADY HAVE?

Blow me.

I can understand his sentiment: I can't understand his disdain for our foundation and our charter.

...nothing but a White Al Sharpton.

Period.
Well said. Agreed 100%.


MM = Un-American.
jmar wrote:
Please explain why MM is un American?
He's un-American because the entire premise of his rant was that the GOVERNMENT is the solution to this problem (and if you know anything about him, he believes its the solution to most every problem). And that mentality (that government is the solution) is entirely un-American.

American's are what made this country great, NOT the government. And its Americans that are the solution to our problems, NOT the government. This country was founded because of too much government. So to much government goes against the very grain that is America....

Big government, often, is the problem or the cause of the problem or a huge contributing factor to the problem. As soon as politicians and socialists alike realize that, then America will be able to get our of its own way and actuall improve for a change.

We need a smaller, much more limited, federal government.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/26/2012 4:43pm Edited Date/Time 7/26/2012 4:44pm
Special Forces are the cream of the crop. I think it is safe to say that most whom enter the military dont make it into Special...
Special Forces are the cream of the crop. I think it is safe to say that most whom enter the military dont make it into Special Forces?

It may be insulting to say that our police forces are made up of the bottom of the barrel but I think it is the truth. Just because someone is a good solider doesnt make them a person of good judgement. Following orders and critical thinking do not always go hand in hand. If you can think on your own two feet, like JT, then you are the exception, not the rule.

When was the last time you were in boot camp? The majority of the kids in their are derelicts. And when they get out, they are just well disciplined derelicts. No more equipped to go start a business and contribute to society than they were prior to joining the military. Their best option is often the police force.

Look, I could get into a lengthy discussion explaining just how detrimental and inefficient our police and military are to our countries economy but I will spare you. The simple analogy is that it is a snake eating its own tail. They do not produce anything, they do not contribute to the economy, they only take. They are not worth their cost. It doesnt take an economics degree to see that it is a failed institution. The bottom line is that if a police officer had half a conscious, they'd turn in their badge and go work a productive job that adds to the economy and doesnt take from it as all social programs do. Which brings me to my original point, they are not smart enough to see it that way. Nor do I trust their judgement when it comes to their power, responsibility, and weapons use.

People will do some crazy and in-humane shit in the name of "following orders". Even smart people.
Special forces might be cream of the military crop for combat training (I guess Seals are amongst those). However, there are a TON of intellectual positions in the military, and if you're talking intelligence, it isn't necessarily special forces. There are a bunch of highly technical positions (weapons systems, avionics, nuclear technologies, electronic technologies, mechanical technologies) that can't be filled by simply anyone. Additionally, I've also met very smart people in relatively low-level positions who ended up there for a variety of circumstance (poor test scores, were just desperate and needed to get away from a bad situation, and a bunch of others). I'd be very careful in grouping people who've gone into the military.
Ghost of Jabroni
Posts
4425
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
7/26/2012 5:07pm Edited Date/Time 7/26/2012 5:24pm
JT, of course their exceptions to the rule. But I'm making generalizations. Are the generalizations that far off in your opinion based on what you've seen as a whole? Would you consider the bulk of those whom enter boot camp the britest and free-ist thinkers our country has to offer? Or more importantly would you consider the one who end up as police officers the brightest bulbs this country has produced?

The fact that I'm grouping those that have gone into the military might offend some. But the truth is that I get my assessment largely from those I speak to whom have been in the military. They didnt speak too highly of their fellow soldiers when speaking of their intelligence. I'm not even really taking into consideration the fact that I've never personally known one half-intelligent person that ended up a grunt.

Learning a highly technical skill doesnt make one of sound personal judgement/decision making either. Michael Vick is extremely skilled, but he doesnt have a lick of decent judgement.

Is it that much of a reach for me to say that for "most" whom ended up in the military, that it wasnt their first choice of path in life. That, like you said, they ended up their due to some unfortunate circumstance or bad situation (ie due to poor judgement). Poor test scores or whatever the case, I dont see how Im supposed to trust these people more than my fellow neighbor when it comes to responsible behavior.
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
14243
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
7/26/2012 5:19pm
SEEMEFIRST wrote:
AR-15s make great hunting rifles. Shot this little bastard at 275 yards with this one. [IMG]http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j220/SEEMEFIRST/CoyoteatCommanche.jpg[/IMG]
AR-15s make great hunting rifles.

Shot this little bastard at 275 yards with this one.
Shiftfaced wrote:
How does that stuff taste?
No idea, but this one will not know how baby deer, goats, or chickens taste either.
Shiftfaced
Posts
859
Joined
12/15/2008
Location
Ruby Ridge, ID, USA
7/27/2012 7:59am
I have always been under the impression that the honorable sportsman eats what he kills.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 8:26am Edited Date/Time 7/27/2012 8:27am
Shiftfaced wrote:
I have always been under the impression that the honorable sportsman eats what he kills.
Not always. Some game laws are for animal control. Some certainly work. Personally, I'd only hunt what I'd eat.

I don't find it objectionable that a coyote is hunting for food. What's wrong with that? I guess if you own a farm you'd be pissed if they're tearing through your fences and getting after your livestock. But, if it's just killing what you leave roaming around, figure out how to fix it without killing the coyote. If you have sheep, get a couple llamas. Raise 'em with the sheep, and you'll have essentially free 24/7 bodyguards for your sheep.

What I really hate are those fucking panzy suburbanites who move next to the mountains then start bitching about the animals coming into their yard, killing their cats and dogs, and eating the fruit or leaves off their trees. Uh....duh. No shit, Sherlock. You moved into the area they inhabited.

Personally, I dig the wildlife. I leave my back gate open so the wildlife can come into my yard and have at the fruit. Kinda cool when a bull elk with a rack that's tall enough to hit my deck (which is 8' above my backyard) cruises through in the dark. If a coyote gets at my dogs, well, either I'll have to get bigger dogs or better fencing. If they get at a girlfriend's cats....I'll get her more cats to feed the coyotes...lol.
Ghost of Jabroni
Posts
4425
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
7/27/2012 9:09am
The people I cant stand are the sport hunters. The people that get a minor boner when they kill something.

Ive never understood it. It reeked of inferiority complex.

And what exactly is the rush of killing an animal that doesnt stand a chance? I get the rush from the hunt, if it is actually a challenge. Which is why I love paintball. You get to hunt humans. That can shoot back.

Killing a deer or elk or lion for that matter arent a challenge. It doesnt take great cunning. It isnt uncharted territory.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 9:54am
The people I cant stand are the sport hunters. The people that get a minor boner when they kill something. Ive never understood it. It reeked...
The people I cant stand are the sport hunters. The people that get a minor boner when they kill something.

Ive never understood it. It reeked of inferiority complex.

And what exactly is the rush of killing an animal that doesnt stand a chance? I get the rush from the hunt, if it is actually a challenge. Which is why I love paintball. You get to hunt humans. That can shoot back.

Killing a deer or elk or lion for that matter arent a challenge. It doesnt take great cunning. It isnt uncharted territory.
Well, what's the rush in going around a dirt track on a motorcycle? I'd bet the excitement/adrenaline rush we feel is as foreign to a person who doesn't feel it like your lack of connection is to the sport hunter. I'm not totally against sport hunting. If the laws are set up right for population regulation, and the hunters abide by them, to each their own. I'd never do it (I tried and didn't care for it), but I can see where some might like it. I'd bet bow hunting adds a level of adrenaline/skill much beyond some rifle hunting.

I wish I had the time/patience to hunt for elk, though. I love that meat.
Ghost of Jabroni
Posts
4425
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
7/27/2012 10:18am
Now with bow hunting their is a bit of a challenge. Bow hunt a tiger and I could see what the fuss is about. But when their is no element of danger (ie: riding a dirtbike at high speeds) then I dont get the rush and I dont understand why someone else would.
Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/27/2012 10:42am
You know, I'm NOT a hunter (I absolutely hate killing things), but, because my grandfather owns a 6,000 acre hunting ranch and gave me the opportunity to go hunt elk there, for free (something people from all over the world have paid thousands of dollars to do), I decided to give it a go.

Packing a 7mm, I spent a week on the mountain-early mornings, late nights, hiking up and down mountains for more miles than I care to count-on the last day of the hunt I managed to knock down a bull elk at 700 yards. Let me tell you, the sense of accomplishment was something I've never felt before, and trust me it was NOT easy! It was the best the elk had (speed, stamina, incredible sense of smell, great hearing, natural camo, etc) against the best that I had (my brain, binocs, and a gun-thankfully), and for 6 days the damn elk was kicking my ass...and it was until the last moments of daylight on the last day of the hunt that I managed to just barely sneak within rifle range and knock him down (and knocking him down is another-funny, embarrasing-story for another day).

I personally ate or gave away every single edible piece of that elk. And seeing that huge magnificent animal dead-because of me-was one of the saddest things I've ever experienced (the conflicting emotions was interested-satisfaction for tagging a huge animal and sad that I'd killed it...all at the same time).

Anyway, I've got it out of my system...I'll probably never do it again. But my perspective on "sport hunting" changed drastically. It's not as easy as driving your truck into the mountains and shooting an elk. And with a gun its hard. With a bow, that's just down right impressive (of course, they get to wear camo, hunt during the rut and can call/bugle the elk in to them...so they have a few tools that I didn't).

Anyway, knocking humans for killing animals with guns...and/or expecting them to kill the animals with a knife or whatever, in order for the playing field to be level (all humans have in this big huge nature game is our brains, and the things our brains have been able to invent over the centuries...without our brains, we're nothing compared to nature)...would be like asking lions to survive without there sharp teeth and claws...or cheetas to survive without their speed...bears without their size and strength. Anyway, not sure if that makes sense...but in nature-and in hunting-its the best the animals have (their size, speed, eyesight, hearing, strength, natural camo, size, etc) against the best we humans have (our brains and the things our brains have made). Asking humans to hunt without our brains, is like asking the animals to be hunted without the things that give them a natural edge.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 11:44am Edited Date/Time 7/27/2012 11:51am
Titan1 wrote:
You know, I'm NOT a hunter (I absolutely hate killing things), but, because my grandfather owns a 6,000 acre hunting ranch and gave me the opportunity...
You know, I'm NOT a hunter (I absolutely hate killing things), but, because my grandfather owns a 6,000 acre hunting ranch and gave me the opportunity to go hunt elk there, for free (something people from all over the world have paid thousands of dollars to do), I decided to give it a go.

Packing a 7mm, I spent a week on the mountain-early mornings, late nights, hiking up and down mountains for more miles than I care to count-on the last day of the hunt I managed to knock down a bull elk at 700 yards. Let me tell you, the sense of accomplishment was something I've never felt before, and trust me it was NOT easy! It was the best the elk had (speed, stamina, incredible sense of smell, great hearing, natural camo, etc) against the best that I had (my brain, binocs, and a gun-thankfully), and for 6 days the damn elk was kicking my ass...and it was until the last moments of daylight on the last day of the hunt that I managed to just barely sneak within rifle range and knock him down (and knocking him down is another-funny, embarrasing-story for another day).

I personally ate or gave away every single edible piece of that elk. And seeing that huge magnificent animal dead-because of me-was one of the saddest things I've ever experienced (the conflicting emotions was interested-satisfaction for tagging a huge animal and sad that I'd killed it...all at the same time).

Anyway, I've got it out of my system...I'll probably never do it again. But my perspective on "sport hunting" changed drastically. It's not as easy as driving your truck into the mountains and shooting an elk. And with a gun its hard. With a bow, that's just down right impressive (of course, they get to wear camo, hunt during the rut and can call/bugle the elk in to them...so they have a few tools that I didn't).

Anyway, knocking humans for killing animals with guns...and/or expecting them to kill the animals with a knife or whatever, in order for the playing field to be level (all humans have in this big huge nature game is our brains, and the things our brains have been able to invent over the centuries...without our brains, we're nothing compared to nature)...would be like asking lions to survive without there sharp teeth and claws...or cheetas to survive without their speed...bears without their size and strength. Anyway, not sure if that makes sense...but in nature-and in hunting-its the best the animals have (their size, speed, eyesight, hearing, strength, natural camo, size, etc) against the best we humans have (our brains and the things our brains have made). Asking humans to hunt without our brains, is like asking the animals to be hunted without the things that give them a natural edge.
Although rifle hunting isn't as easy as some make it seem, it sounds like you're an inexperienced hunter, so I wouldn't assume first impressions are what it is. My friend bow hunts elk, because hunting them with a gun just wasn't a challenge anymore. He told me that bow hunting them taught him things about his prey, his environment, and himself that he never would've learned if he kept rifle hunting.

And, if a gun is the natural evolution of the human, then you're behind me. I just go to the store and buy the meat. Takes me 30 minutes, and I'm back home drinking a beer. Asking me to go backwards and hunt with a gun is like taking away the eyesight and talons from a hawk...right? lol....
Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/27/2012 1:13pm
Titan1 wrote:
You know, I'm NOT a hunter (I absolutely hate killing things), but, because my grandfather owns a 6,000 acre hunting ranch and gave me the opportunity...
You know, I'm NOT a hunter (I absolutely hate killing things), but, because my grandfather owns a 6,000 acre hunting ranch and gave me the opportunity to go hunt elk there, for free (something people from all over the world have paid thousands of dollars to do), I decided to give it a go.

Packing a 7mm, I spent a week on the mountain-early mornings, late nights, hiking up and down mountains for more miles than I care to count-on the last day of the hunt I managed to knock down a bull elk at 700 yards. Let me tell you, the sense of accomplishment was something I've never felt before, and trust me it was NOT easy! It was the best the elk had (speed, stamina, incredible sense of smell, great hearing, natural camo, etc) against the best that I had (my brain, binocs, and a gun-thankfully), and for 6 days the damn elk was kicking my ass...and it was until the last moments of daylight on the last day of the hunt that I managed to just barely sneak within rifle range and knock him down (and knocking him down is another-funny, embarrasing-story for another day).

I personally ate or gave away every single edible piece of that elk. And seeing that huge magnificent animal dead-because of me-was one of the saddest things I've ever experienced (the conflicting emotions was interested-satisfaction for tagging a huge animal and sad that I'd killed it...all at the same time).

Anyway, I've got it out of my system...I'll probably never do it again. But my perspective on "sport hunting" changed drastically. It's not as easy as driving your truck into the mountains and shooting an elk. And with a gun its hard. With a bow, that's just down right impressive (of course, they get to wear camo, hunt during the rut and can call/bugle the elk in to them...so they have a few tools that I didn't).

Anyway, knocking humans for killing animals with guns...and/or expecting them to kill the animals with a knife or whatever, in order for the playing field to be level (all humans have in this big huge nature game is our brains, and the things our brains have been able to invent over the centuries...without our brains, we're nothing compared to nature)...would be like asking lions to survive without there sharp teeth and claws...or cheetas to survive without their speed...bears without their size and strength. Anyway, not sure if that makes sense...but in nature-and in hunting-its the best the animals have (their size, speed, eyesight, hearing, strength, natural camo, size, etc) against the best we humans have (our brains and the things our brains have made). Asking humans to hunt without our brains, is like asking the animals to be hunted without the things that give them a natural edge.
jtomasik wrote:
Although rifle hunting isn't as easy as some make it seem, it sounds like you're an inexperienced hunter, so I wouldn't assume first impressions are what...
Although rifle hunting isn't as easy as some make it seem, it sounds like you're an inexperienced hunter, so I wouldn't assume first impressions are what it is. My friend bow hunts elk, because hunting them with a gun just wasn't a challenge anymore. He told me that bow hunting them taught him things about his prey, his environment, and himself that he never would've learned if he kept rifle hunting.

And, if a gun is the natural evolution of the human, then you're behind me. I just go to the store and buy the meat. Takes me 30 minutes, and I'm back home drinking a beer. Asking me to go backwards and hunt with a gun is like taking away the eyesight and talons from a hawk...right? lol....
I am an inexperienced hunter. But my guide wasn't. And I'm sure there are hunters that can stalk in to within 20 yards of an elk on the regular, and they are just awesome (just ask them)...

I've been out "calling for elk" during the rut with my grandfather a bunch of times, and in so doing was able to get, several times, within 15 feet of a bull elk (in full camo, down wind). I assumed rifle hunting would be easy....it wasn't. The difficulty wasn't in killing the animal, it was in finding it, and then keeping it in sight long enough to get a shot off. And without the benefit of a cow call/bugle...we had no choice but to go to them, and that ain't easy, its a needle in a hay stack and the needle can hear us coming, smell us coming etc. and then move (neither of which are an issue when calling an elk to you).

And of course the rifle was a natural evolution of the human, but it was the ultimate evolution. Raising our food in captivity from babies, pumping it full of chemicals and hormones to make it grow faster, and then killing it in slaughter houses are much more efficient than a rifle Unsure . But most don't hunt because its the easiest/most efficient way to get their food...they hunt because, in a way, it is more primitive. But even that wasn't my point. My point was simply countering the argument that humans hunting with guns isn't "fair" to the animal. And I disagree with that point.
4stroke4DWIN
Posts
2765
Joined
1/15/2012
Location
texas city, TX, USA
7/27/2012 1:20pm
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't hunt by the way. It's easier to hunt at the market lol.
Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/27/2012 1:28pm
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't...
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't hunt by the way. It's easier to hunt at the market lol.
Who hunts like that?
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 1:32pm
Titan1 wrote:
I am an inexperienced hunter. But my guide wasn't. And I'm sure there are hunters that can stalk in to within 20 yards of an elk...
I am an inexperienced hunter. But my guide wasn't. And I'm sure there are hunters that can stalk in to within 20 yards of an elk on the regular, and they are just awesome (just ask them)...

I've been out "calling for elk" during the rut with my grandfather a bunch of times, and in so doing was able to get, several times, within 15 feet of a bull elk (in full camo, down wind). I assumed rifle hunting would be easy....it wasn't. The difficulty wasn't in killing the animal, it was in finding it, and then keeping it in sight long enough to get a shot off. And without the benefit of a cow call/bugle...we had no choice but to go to them, and that ain't easy, its a needle in a hay stack and the needle can hear us coming, smell us coming etc. and then move (neither of which are an issue when calling an elk to you).

And of course the rifle was a natural evolution of the human, but it was the ultimate evolution. Raising our food in captivity from babies, pumping it full of chemicals and hormones to make it grow faster, and then killing it in slaughter houses are much more efficient than a rifle Unsure . But most don't hunt because its the easiest/most efficient way to get their food...they hunt because, in a way, it is more primitive. But even that wasn't my point. My point was simply countering the argument that humans hunting with guns isn't "fair" to the animal. And I disagree with that point.
Not all domestically raised animals are pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I'm going halves with a friend on a cow being raised to slaughter for us. Not really that expensive.

So, first you say it's modern evolution to hunt with a gun, but now you say it's more primitive. Hey, tell ya' what....go throw an animal hide over you and hunt it with a stick and a rock. Get real primitive. I'm the other side of the spectrum....I use Google and my cell phone. Tongue
Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/27/2012 1:41pm
Titan1 wrote:
I am an inexperienced hunter. But my guide wasn't. And I'm sure there are hunters that can stalk in to within 20 yards of an elk...
I am an inexperienced hunter. But my guide wasn't. And I'm sure there are hunters that can stalk in to within 20 yards of an elk on the regular, and they are just awesome (just ask them)...

I've been out "calling for elk" during the rut with my grandfather a bunch of times, and in so doing was able to get, several times, within 15 feet of a bull elk (in full camo, down wind). I assumed rifle hunting would be easy....it wasn't. The difficulty wasn't in killing the animal, it was in finding it, and then keeping it in sight long enough to get a shot off. And without the benefit of a cow call/bugle...we had no choice but to go to them, and that ain't easy, its a needle in a hay stack and the needle can hear us coming, smell us coming etc. and then move (neither of which are an issue when calling an elk to you).

And of course the rifle was a natural evolution of the human, but it was the ultimate evolution. Raising our food in captivity from babies, pumping it full of chemicals and hormones to make it grow faster, and then killing it in slaughter houses are much more efficient than a rifle Unsure . But most don't hunt because its the easiest/most efficient way to get their food...they hunt because, in a way, it is more primitive. But even that wasn't my point. My point was simply countering the argument that humans hunting with guns isn't "fair" to the animal. And I disagree with that point.
jtomasik wrote:
Not all domestically raised animals are pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I'm going halves with a friend on a cow being raised to slaughter for us. Not...
Not all domestically raised animals are pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I'm going halves with a friend on a cow being raised to slaughter for us. Not really that expensive.

So, first you say it's modern evolution to hunt with a gun, but now you say it's more primitive. Hey, tell ya' what....go throw an animal hide over you and hunt it with a stick and a rock. Get real primitive. I'm the other side of the spectrum....I use Google and my cell phone. Tongue
You mentioned running to the store to buy your meat...most of the meat you buy there is pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I buy a half beef from my grandfather every year...none of those things there. But that is an entirely different animal (no pun intended) that what you get in the store.

A gun is "modern" in the perspective of human history....but not as modern as going to the grocery store and eating domestically raised/slaughtered meat.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 1:44pm Edited Date/Time 7/27/2012 1:59pm
Titan1 wrote:
You mentioned running to the store to buy your meat...most of the meat you buy there is pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I buy a half beef...
You mentioned running to the store to buy your meat...most of the meat you buy there is pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I buy a half beef from my grandfather every year...none of those things there. But that is an entirely different animal (no pun intended) that what you get in the store.

A gun is "modern" in the perspective of human history....but not as modern as going to the grocery store and eating domestically raised/slaughtered meat.
I meat shop at a butcher, if I don't order directly from the rancher. The meat that my store orders (Edwards Meats in Wheatridge) does have antibiotics, but nothing else.
4stroke4DWIN
Posts
2765
Joined
1/15/2012
Location
texas city, TX, USA
7/27/2012 1:51pm
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't...
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't hunt by the way. It's easier to hunt at the market lol.
Titan1 wrote:
Who hunts like that?
Deer stand and a feeder, thats pretty standard protocol in Tx. Everyone I know that hunted back in Tx did it that way. Not much sport if you ask me.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 2:02pm
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't...
It's not hunting anymore, its luring you lure that poor fucker to a feeder than shoot it from 15yrds away. No sport in that. I don't hunt by the way. It's easier to hunt at the market lol.
Titan1 wrote:
Who hunts like that?
Deer stand and a feeder, thats pretty standard protocol in Tx. Everyone I know that hunted back in Tx did it that way. Not much sport...
Deer stand and a feeder, thats pretty standard protocol in Tx. Everyone I know that hunted back in Tx did it that way. Not much sport if you ask me.
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised the question was asked. I know a bunch of my buddies back in PA used to tell me that's how they'd hunt. Or, they'd find out where the deer bed, then just sit there and freeze their asses off until the deer showed again. I don't recall any 700 yard shots.

The best I saw was my one buddy whose parents own a ranch near Absarokee Montana. They'll only shoot the Elk on their property, because those Elk are feeding on the alfalfa hay they grow, and have no gamey taste to them. Best elk I've ever had. My buddy told me he could shoot them right from his bedroom window. Now that's what I call primitive...had to open the window.
Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/27/2012 2:39pm
Titan1 wrote:
Who hunts like that?
Deer stand and a feeder, thats pretty standard protocol in Tx. Everyone I know that hunted back in Tx did it that way. Not much sport...
Deer stand and a feeder, thats pretty standard protocol in Tx. Everyone I know that hunted back in Tx did it that way. Not much sport if you ask me.
jtomasik wrote:
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised the question was asked. I know a bunch of my buddies back in PA used to tell me that's how they'd hunt...
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised the question was asked. I know a bunch of my buddies back in PA used to tell me that's how they'd hunt. Or, they'd find out where the deer bed, then just sit there and freeze their asses off until the deer showed again. I don't recall any 700 yard shots.

The best I saw was my one buddy whose parents own a ranch near Absarokee Montana. They'll only shoot the Elk on their property, because those Elk are feeding on the alfalfa hay they grow, and have no gamey taste to them. Best elk I've ever had. My buddy told me he could shoot them right from his bedroom window. Now that's what I call primitive...had to open the window.
Hey, like I said, I'm not a hunter...the only hunting I've been exposed to have been as I described (wild free range animals). No feeder stands or baiting. Though I have heard of bow hunters using a tree stand (but that doesn't even seem that common, and the hunters on my grandfathers ranch aren't allowed to hunt that way).

But I agree with you, no sport in hunting like that. None at all.
Titan1
Posts
9482
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT, USA
7/27/2012 2:40pm
Titan1 wrote:
You mentioned running to the store to buy your meat...most of the meat you buy there is pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I buy a half beef...
You mentioned running to the store to buy your meat...most of the meat you buy there is pumped full of chemicals/hormones/steroids. I buy a half beef from my grandfather every year...none of those things there. But that is an entirely different animal (no pun intended) that what you get in the store.

A gun is "modern" in the perspective of human history....but not as modern as going to the grocery store and eating domestically raised/slaughtered meat.
jtomasik wrote:
I meat shop at a butcher, if I don't order directly from the rancher. The meat that my store orders (Edwards Meats in Wheatridge) does have...
I meat shop at a butcher, if I don't order directly from the rancher. The meat that my store orders (Edwards Meats in Wheatridge) does have antibiotics, but nothing else.
then you are the exception, and, as they say, the exception proves the rule. 99% of the people that buy meat, buy it at the grocery store. You can't blame me for assuming the same for you.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/27/2012 2:45pm
Titan1 wrote:
then you are the exception, and, as they say, the exception proves the rule. 99% of the people that buy meat, buy it at the grocery...
then you are the exception, and, as they say, the exception proves the rule. 99% of the people that buy meat, buy it at the grocery store. You can't blame me for assuming the same for you.
No, I'm not. But, you eat out? Any idea what's in those dishes? You eat any cheese? Butter? Anything other than wild game meat, and veggies and/or fruits? Hell, the water we drink is testing with elevated levels of estrogen. Man, it's all around us. Not everyone can hunt or afford natural meats (although my butcher is less expensive than going to the grocery store).

Ok...so we strayed from the subject here a bit....not that that ever happens...lol.
Ghost of Jabroni
Posts
4425
Joined
12/5/2011
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
7/27/2012 5:52pm
It's all the same subject JT. You know that.


Gotta beware of any meat we eat these days. Whether they are homegrown and without antibiotics or not, they still have to be slaughtered at the slaughterhouses with all the other diseased and sick "normal" fed cows. 'They' find a way to contaminate the meat one way or another.

Maybe the rules are different these days, but their was a time where ranchers who did it the right way couldnt slaughter their own beef for commercial use.




Titan1, good story. But I still dont see the rush. You didnt outsmart that Elk. I get that it was grueling physically but so are a lot of things. You clearly didnt "get off" from killing the animal, so you dont exactly fit into the demographic I was trying to describe earlier.

If people want to hunt for food, so be it. I got no issue with it. Spear fish for all I care. As long as a person eats it then what is the harm. But if the motivation is the kill, and not the food or the hunt, then I just dont get it. There is no thrill in killing a weaker advissary if you ask me. If out-smarting a Elk is a challenge to someone, then my point is proven as to just how dumb they are.

I grew up on a ranch. Hunted regularly for food. But I never "got off" on it. But I knew plenty of other hick ranchers that would pay to go on hunting reserves like your grandfather. Pay big money just to say they took down a large animal. As if they could have done it without a guide. Again, dont take offense because this isnt directed at you.

But if their isnt any real chance of losing and the only real challenge is the physical challenge of the hike, I just dont understand it.

There is something about "the kill" that these sport hunters get off on and I think it says they might have issues. It would be like me getting enjoyment in hunting the neighbor dog with my paintball gun and sending him home yelping and looking like a bowl of fruit loops.
Prairieboy43
Posts
610
Joined
1/30/2012
Location
Edmonton, AB, CA
7/28/2012 12:46pm
newmann wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2012/07/25/gun_971754.jpg[/img] Friend of mine has let my youngest son burn off thousands of rounds through this one and thousands through several other historical guns and no...


Friend of mine has let my youngest son burn off thousands of rounds through this one and thousands through several other historical guns and no one died. Funny how that works. Manufactured in the General Motors Saginaw Steering Gear Plant back during WW2. Little history involved there but the anti gun nuts won't appreciate that I'm sure.
This gun is good for Hamburger.
7/29/2012 7:34am
US = 5% of world population
US = 50% of worlds guns
US = 88 guns per 100 people

XXVoid MainXX
Posts
8105
Joined
5/25/2012
Location
Schenectady, NY, USA
8/1/2012 7:44pm
Bob693 wrote:
One point you are mistaken on is that a lot of people have "fully automatic" guns. Those are more tightly regulated and are much more expensive...
One point you are mistaken on is that a lot of people have "fully automatic" guns. Those are more tightly regulated and are much more expensive. I think most start in the $15,000 range. Just about everyone I know owns some kind of gun, but I don't know anyone with full auto.
Markout wrote:
I wasn't implying that a lot of people had them, just why would you need one? And why are they available? I realize they are expensive...
I wasn't implying that a lot of people had them, just why would you need one? And why are they available? I realize they are expensive, and fun to shoot I'm sure. Maybe they should require a special license to own one, and higher level of secured storage?

One thing I do find interesting is that our two countries are similar in many ways, but Canadians don't have the fear Americans have of not owning a gun. I talk to Americans about this, and their question is " how do you feel safe without a gun"? I'm not anti gun, I have owned a few in the past. I just wonder if the media plays a bigger role in the fear mongering.

Newmann, I'm not anti gun, and I would love to shoot that myself, and I doubt your friend carries that around over his shoulder, or would shoot up a movie theater. I think it's cool your son has shot it, and has learned proper, and safe use of a firearm.
Just why would you need a dirt bike? Kids die on them every day. I mean I am sure they are fun to ride but why would you need one?

Post a reply to: Michael Moore talks about gun control.

The Latest