Team Suzuki 1986-2012

tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
Edited Date/Time 10/14/2019 5:38am


Kehoe 1986
3
|
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:08pm


O'Mara 1987






Donny Schmit 1987
1
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:08pm


O'Mara 1988
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:09pm


O'Mara 1989
1
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:10pm


Big Bird 1990
2

The Shop

tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:10pm


LaRocco 1991
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:11pm


Cooper 1992
look out below
Posts
4208
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Grain Valley, MO, USA
7/17/2012 6:11pm
oh yeah--you rule tblazier!!!
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:12pm


Cooper 1993



Swink 1993
1
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:13pm


Huffman 1994
2
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:14pm


Ferry 1995


Albee 1995
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:15pm




Albee & Dobb 1996
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:16pm


Albee 1997
2
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:17pm


Big Bird 1998
1
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:18pm


Albee 1999
look out below
Posts
4208
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Grain Valley, MO, USA
7/17/2012 6:18pm
Remember when triple pinch bolts on the lower triple clamp was the bees knees? Damn im getting old.
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:19pm





Albee and TP199 2000
1
7/17/2012 6:20pm
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back to conventional forks in the mid 90's and then finally back to upside down again in the late 90's??
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:20pm


TP199 2001
1
7/17/2012 6:21pm
The jump from 92 to 93 is gigantic, aesthetically speaking. The 92 is so incredibly hideous and the 93 still looks good to me. It's night and day.
look out below
Posts
4208
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Grain Valley, MO, USA
7/17/2012 6:22pm
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back...
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back to conventional forks in the mid 90's and then finally back to upside down again in the late 90's??
I think they switched back to inverted due to flex, don't quote me though.
1
rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI, USA
7/17/2012 6:24pm
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back...
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back to conventional forks in the mid 90's and then finally back to upside down again in the late 90's??
all i can tell is that i have ridden a lot of different bikes and those conventional forks are still the best to me.
look out below
Posts
4208
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Grain Valley, MO, USA
7/17/2012 6:25pm
The jump from 92 to 93 is gigantic, aesthetically speaking. The 92 is so incredibly hideous and the 93 still looks good to me. It's night...
The jump from 92 to 93 is gigantic, aesthetically speaking. The 92 is so incredibly hideous and the 93 still looks good to me. It's night and day.
The Rmx250 stayed with that styling untill the discontinued it.
7/17/2012 6:25pm
The jump from 92 to 93 is gigantic, aesthetically speaking. The 92 is so incredibly hideous and the 93 still looks good to me. It's night...
The jump from 92 to 93 is gigantic, aesthetically speaking. The 92 is so incredibly hideous and the 93 still looks good to me. It's night and day.
The jump from 2000 to 2001 is even bigger in my opinion
rmpilot
Posts
776
Joined
4/8/2010
Location
Tomah, WI, USA
7/17/2012 6:25pm
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back...
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back to conventional forks in the mid 90's and then finally back to upside down again in the late 90's??
I think they switched back to inverted due to flex, don't quote me though.
almost all pros with that from what i know. real riders they work better
look out below
Posts
4208
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Grain Valley, MO, USA
7/17/2012 6:28pm
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back...
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back to conventional forks in the mid 90's and then finally back to upside down again in the late 90's??
I think they switched back to inverted due to flex, don't quote me though.
rmpilot wrote:
almost all pros with that from what i know. real riders they work better
The front number plate/fork gaurd combo still looks rad.
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:28pm
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back...
I'm to young to remember. Anyone know the reason for Suzuki switching from conventional forks to upside down in the late 80's only to switch back to conventional forks in the mid 90's and then finally back to upside down again in the late 90's??
The short answer is that everyone switched to USD forks in the late 90's to provide more rigidity for supercross. The only problem was that these early forks were too harsh and many people thought they were actually worse than the conventional forks they replaced. As a result Suzuki came out with 49mm conventional forks in 96. The new Zook forks were 49mm instead of the old 43mm ones and tried to give you the best of both worlds by being stiffer than the old 43's but less harsh than the USD's. They actually worked awesome for everyone but pros who needed the stiffness of the USD's. KTM also tried the same thing in the mid 90's with Marzocchi. In the end, bad PR from the factory team (MC and the factory guys did not like them) and development costs torpedoed the Conventional experiment and everyone went back to USD's.
1
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:29pm


TP199 2002
1
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:30pm


2003 TORTELLI
tblazier
Posts
8819
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA, USA
7/17/2012 6:31pm




Tortelli and Hepler 2004
look out below
Posts
4208
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Grain Valley, MO, USA
7/17/2012 6:31pm
tblazier wrote:
The short answer is that everyone switched to USD forks in the late 90's to provide more rigidity for supercross. The only problem was that these...
The short answer is that everyone switched to USD forks in the late 90's to provide more rigidity for supercross. The only problem was that these early forks were too harsh and many people thought they were actually worse than the conventional forks they replaced. As a result Suzuki came out with 49mm conventional forks in 96. The new Zook forks were 49mm instead of the old 43mm ones and tried to give you the best of both worlds by being stiffer than the old 43's but less harsh than the USD's. They actually worked awesome for everyone but pros who needed the stiffness of the USD's. KTM also tried the same thing in the mid 90's with Marzocchi. In the end, bad PR from the factory team (MC and the factory guys did not like them) and development costs torpedoed the Conventional experiment and everyone went back to USD's.
So I wonder how good they could make a conventional fork for us mere mortals today with all of the newer tech?

Post a reply to: Team Suzuki 1986-2012

The Latest