Posts
365
Joined
12/24/2011
Location
USA
Edited Date/Time
2/26/2012 12:32pm
How much is too much when it comes to altering a race bike? What is the length one should go to squeeze out more horsepower and alter the geometry of a motocross bike and when does it become too much? Stewart's YZ is a work of art and it's obvious JGR has the resources to manufacture just about anything. Are they overdoing it or are they simply improving upon a bike with an inherent disadvantage?
I know Reed (and I'm sure many others) would change the engine mount positions quite a bit, millimeter by millimeter, to get the right balance and shift the CG where it felt most comfortable for him. It just seems like every race Stewart is talking about improvements and changes their making to the bike throughout the week. Not to mention the tire situation with Pirelli. Was Stewart getting custom tires from Dunlop in years past weeks before a race?
I know Reed (and I'm sure many others) would change the engine mount positions quite a bit, millimeter by millimeter, to get the right balance and shift the CG where it felt most comfortable for him. It just seems like every race Stewart is talking about improvements and changes their making to the bike throughout the week. Not to mention the tire situation with Pirelli. Was Stewart getting custom tires from Dunlop in years past weeks before a race?
Gibbs has the abilities and the finances to give James whatever he wants. But the team can't figure it out for him.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
It cost a ton of money for a race team to work around production/spec rules and nearly impossible for a governing body to control and enforce. And yes it's costly to allow full factory bikes, but at least the cards are out on the table.
I love the technology and not a fan of the production rules.
And of course gentlemen, just my opinion.
Post a reply to: JGR Bike Innovations - How Much is Too Much?