Hey Ron Paul Supporters step in here.

flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
1/13/2012 3:06pm
Titan1 wrote:
Okay, so you then acknowledge that in certain instances "taking someone elses" life is justified. So you also acknowledge that EVERY instance of taking someones life...
Okay, so you then acknowledge that in certain instances "taking someone elses" life is justified. So you also acknowledge that EVERY instance of taking someones life isn't the same "black and white" situation. That is my point.

Abortion is bad...it's looked at as murder (taking someone elses life). But just like in other instances of murder (taking someone elses life) there are times when it's justified.
So the fetus is an illegal womb intruder, intent to cause undo harm and possibly kill the mother?

You're really using self-defense as a justification for abortion?
Frogman
Posts
906
Joined
10/14/2006
Location
Washington, DC, USA
1/13/2012 4:10pm
Titan1 wrote:
Do you acknowledge that in certain cases murder is justified (self defence, among others)???
Frogman wrote:
Murder no...homicide yes.
Titan1 wrote:
Taking another persons life...lets put it that way. Is that ever justified? (You just said it was...which is my point).
Point I am making is if you look up the actual definition of "murder" you will see it is never justified.

Homicide is "taking another persons life...let's put it that way"
vet323
Posts
3623
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD, USA
1/13/2012 4:27pm
Titan1 wrote:
Okay, so you then acknowledge that in certain instances "taking someone elses" life is justified. So you also acknowledge that EVERY instance of taking someones life...
Okay, so you then acknowledge that in certain instances "taking someone elses" life is justified. So you also acknowledge that EVERY instance of taking someones life isn't the same "black and white" situation. That is my point.

Abortion is bad...it's looked at as murder (taking someone elses life). But just like in other instances of murder (taking someone elses life) there are times when it's justified.
flarider wrote:
So the fetus is an illegal womb intruder, intent to cause undo harm and possibly kill the mother? You're really using self-defense as a justification for...
So the fetus is an illegal womb intruder, intent to cause undo harm and possibly kill the mother?

You're really using self-defense as a justification for abortion?
Holy shit, flarider.

Are you really having that much problem following this, or are you pranking everyone?
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
1/13/2012 4:36pm
I guess I am having a problem getting it.

If life begins at conception and is sacred, and life is life, and abortion is murder, how can one murderous act be justified over another based solely on the manner of conception, which is no fault of the fetus, which is now considered "living" by the standards of "life begins at conception"

The Shop

vet323
Posts
3623
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD, USA
1/13/2012 4:45pm
flarider wrote:
I guess I am having a problem getting it. If life begins at conception and is sacred, and life is life, and abortion is murder, how...
I guess I am having a problem getting it.

If life begins at conception and is sacred, and life is life, and abortion is murder, how can one murderous act be justified over another based solely on the manner of conception, which is no fault of the fetus, which is now considered "living" by the standards of "life begins at conception"
Every life is sacred, if Joe Dirtbag (who's life is sacred) breaks into your house and pulls a gun on you, then you shoot and kill him, neither the justice system or the church would convict you, for the same reason (you have the right to preserve your own life and health). It's also not called murder anymore.

If a carrying fetus to term/birth will put a woman's life/health in jeopardy, she has the same right to preserve her own life and health.
jammin76tx
Posts
384
Joined
1/5/2009
Location
Waco, TX, USA
1/13/2012 5:10pm
lumpy790 wrote:
You think Obama is being cock blocked.......even If RP was elected... he would never get other politicians to pass anything
jndmx wrote:
This right here nails it on the head. How the fuck do you think RP is going to make all that radical change happen? The president...
This right here nails it on the head.

How the fuck do you think RP is going to make all that radical change happen?
The president is basically a figurehead, without the approval of the Congress nothing is going to happen.
flarider wrote:
This is what I have been saying to deaf ears
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
1/13/2012 5:27pm
flarider wrote:
I guess I am having a problem getting it. If life begins at conception and is sacred, and life is life, and abortion is murder, how...
I guess I am having a problem getting it.

If life begins at conception and is sacred, and life is life, and abortion is murder, how can one murderous act be justified over another based solely on the manner of conception, which is no fault of the fetus, which is now considered "living" by the standards of "life begins at conception"
vet323 wrote:
Every life is sacred, if Joe Dirtbag (who's life is sacred) breaks into your house and pulls a gun on you, then you shoot and kill...
Every life is sacred, if Joe Dirtbag (who's life is sacred) breaks into your house and pulls a gun on you, then you shoot and kill him, neither the justice system or the church would convict you, for the same reason (you have the right to preserve your own life and health). It's also not called murder anymore.

If a carrying fetus to term/birth will put a woman's life/health in jeopardy, she has the same right to preserve her own life and health.
I am not questioning self defense and it's not really a part of the discussion.

But the fetus is not putting the woman's life in jeopardy.

Post a reply to: Hey Ron Paul Supporters step in here.

The Latest