NZ Cimate Scientists Epic Fail!

Gardner37
Posts
271
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Stuart, FL US
Edited Date/Time 1/10/2012 7:11pm
Face guys, Its all been a fuggin lie to keep the grant $ rolling in.



http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/new_zealand_climate_science_co…

New Zealand Climate Science Coalition caught lying about temperature trends
Category: Global Warming
Posted on: November 26, 2009 7:49 AM, by Tim Lambert

The latest story exciting the denialosphere is being put about by Anthony Watts and is based on a "news alert" from the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition. (Note: New Zealand Climate Science Coalition contains no actual climate scientists.)

The New Zealand Government's chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn't there.

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain's CRU climate research centre. ...

Gareth Renowden explains how the NZCSC concocted their result -- they made the NZ warming trend go away by treating measurements from different sites as if they came from the same site. Now that might be simple incompetence, but they also claim that NIWA won't explain how they adjust the data for site changes, and as Renowden says:

Nothing in the station histories? It's all there for anyone who can be bothered to look, or to ask politely. But Treadgold and the NZ CSC have no excuse, because the NZ CSC were told about this information at least two years ago, the last time they tried to make a fuss about "adjusted data". In other words, Treadgold and whoever in the NZ CSC helped him with the data are being more than economical with the truth, they are lying through their teeth.

I wonder how many of the folks accusing NIWA of cooking their data will correct their posts?
|
Motodude
Posts
5250
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney AU
11/26/2009 3:30pm Edited Date/Time 11/26/2009 3:31pm
'Climate Change' will be the new Madof scam of the next market drop.
`ol Ger
Posts
6269
Joined
7/15/2007
Location
Piqua, OH US
11/26/2009 8:15pm
WHAT investment of yours makes it so vital that human GW be true? What will you lose when it is proven to be false?



g
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA US
11/26/2009 9:12pm
Gardner37 wrote:
Face guys, Its all been a fuggin lie to keep the grant $ rolling in. http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/new_zealand_climate_science_co.php?utm_source=sbhomepage&utm_medium=link&utm_content=channellink New Zealand Climate Science Coalition caught lying about temperature trends...
Face guys, Its all been a fuggin lie to keep the grant $ rolling in.



http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/new_zealand_climate_science_co…

New Zealand Climate Science Coalition caught lying about temperature trends
Category: Global Warming
Posted on: November 26, 2009 7:49 AM, by Tim Lambert

The latest story exciting the denialosphere is being put about by Anthony Watts and is based on a "news alert" from the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition. (Note: New Zealand Climate Science Coalition contains no actual climate scientists.)

The New Zealand Government's chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn't there.

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain's CRU climate research centre. ...

Gareth Renowden explains how the NZCSC concocted their result -- they made the NZ warming trend go away by treating measurements from different sites as if they came from the same site. Now that might be simple incompetence, but they also claim that NIWA won't explain how they adjust the data for site changes, and as Renowden says:

Nothing in the station histories? It's all there for anyone who can be bothered to look, or to ask politely. But Treadgold and the NZ CSC have no excuse, because the NZ CSC were told about this information at least two years ago, the last time they tried to make a fuss about "adjusted data". In other words, Treadgold and whoever in the NZ CSC helped him with the data are being more than economical with the truth, they are lying through their teeth.

I wonder how many of the folks accusing NIWA of cooking their data will correct their posts?
nerd? care to respond to this one?
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA US
11/26/2009 9:50pm

The Shop

Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
11/27/2009 12:11am
Gardner37 wrote:
Face guys, Its all been a fuggin lie to keep the grant $ rolling in. http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/new_zealand_climate_science_co.php?utm_source=sbhomepage&utm_medium=link&utm_content=channellink New Zealand Climate Science Coalition caught lying about temperature trends...
Face guys, Its all been a fuggin lie to keep the grant $ rolling in.



http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/new_zealand_climate_science_co…

New Zealand Climate Science Coalition caught lying about temperature trends
Category: Global Warming
Posted on: November 26, 2009 7:49 AM, by Tim Lambert

The latest story exciting the denialosphere is being put about by Anthony Watts and is based on a "news alert" from the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition. (Note: New Zealand Climate Science Coalition contains no actual climate scientists.)

The New Zealand Government's chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn't there.

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain's CRU climate research centre. ...

Gareth Renowden explains how the NZCSC concocted their result -- they made the NZ warming trend go away by treating measurements from different sites as if they came from the same site. Now that might be simple incompetence, but they also claim that NIWA won't explain how they adjust the data for site changes, and as Renowden says:

Nothing in the station histories? It's all there for anyone who can be bothered to look, or to ask politely. But Treadgold and the NZ CSC have no excuse, because the NZ CSC were told about this information at least two years ago, the last time they tried to make a fuss about "adjusted data". In other words, Treadgold and whoever in the NZ CSC helped him with the data are being more than economical with the truth, they are lying through their teeth.

I wonder how many of the folks accusing NIWA of cooking their data will correct their posts?
CR250Rider wrote:
nerd? care to respond to this one?
The science coalition that contains no scientists in the field is in trouble? And you want me to respond to this how? By pointing out that anybody who would give grant money on a scientific subject to a group that contains no scientists who work within that subject is really dumb?

Okay, you win, they were really dumb to give that grant money to a group like that. What does that prove again?
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA US
11/28/2009 9:44am
Even senior IPCC scientist Kevin Trenberth himself asks, "Where the heck is global warming?…The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment, and it is a travesty that we can’t."


ouch!

Post a reply to: NZ Cimate Scientists Epic Fail!

The Latest