Benchtop planer question

9/26/2024 5:33pm
Dirtydeeds wrote:
I put a helical head on my dewalt, still got snipes on the ends but always planned for it. Haven’t used it in years now. Always...


I put a helical head on my dewalt, still got snipes on the ends but always planned for it. Haven’t used it in years now. Always use my Powermatic 15” with the helical head, that thing eats!

IMG 2497
borg wrote:
I looked up the powermatic 15". That's the real deal.The DeWalt is a toy compared to that beast. Do you still get snipe with that one...

I looked up the powermatic 15". That's the real deal.The DeWalt is a toy compared to that beast. Do you still get snipe with that one too?

Its a little fickled in my opinion. I need to adjust the feed rollers a little bit. It doesn’t really leave a fine finish but I have a double 50” drum sander to make it money! 

But to answer your question, I’m so used to snipe after 20+ years that I always plan for it ahead of time. 

borg
Posts
6718
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
9/26/2024 5:41pm

From the Powermatic manual:

Snipe.jpg?VersionId=5tOIJ5hoEpMeRR7Vmrayx5oi2g

If that beast still gets snipe then it's time to stop whining and get longer stock.

 

9/26/2024 5:58pm
borg wrote:
From the Powermatic manual:If that beast still gets snipe then it's time to stop whining and get longer stock. 

From the Powermatic manual:

Snipe.jpg?VersionId=5tOIJ5hoEpMeRR7Vmrayx5oi2g

If that beast still gets snipe then it's time to stop whining and get longer stock.

 

I’ve got it tuned in good enough to where a few passes through the sander and they are gone 🙌 

ns503
Posts
4574
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NS Toolies CA
9/26/2024 6:50pm

Weird timing with this thread for me. Been using mine the past week or two for the first time in like 2 or 3 years after finding some window and door sill rot to deal with. It's a 20? year old Mastercraft, which I think is a rebranded Delta. It only seems to snipe on the trailing end. 

Which is likely a useless thread contribution. Except maybe to add to the 'it's everywhere'...

The Shop

9/27/2024 4:27pm

I'll give it a go.  First off, I was never the best at what I did but I was very good.  I've had the privilege of working with people much smarter than me from multiple backgrounds.  I am the first to admit, I have forgotten more than I know.  All my life I have constantly had to retrain myself on things I've already learned over and over.  I haven't run millwork since 2015.  I would never claim to put someone in their place on any subject or anything.  But maybe I can put some things into perspective in an understandable way.  At least in the way I view and understand them.  

Snipe.  I've never had to deal with snipe that much unless it was close to having to perform maintenance on a machine.  I've been lucky to work with planners that had multiple heads such as the first being a thickness head and the second being a finishing head. The finishing head generally removes snipe, if there was any.  Or double side planners.  Those are cool but not my favorite.  

Snipe in production.  There is a 1000 ways to design an line depending on the product you are making.  But the first stage of every process is to produce a workable kant to go to a profile machine be that a molder, CNC, shaper or a finger jointer.  Assuming varied width wood stock the fist step is always thickness planning.  Then straight line, precision end trip (maybe chop) then gang rip.  Chop can be before or after gang rip (pros and cons depending on the part).  So in that run any snipe if existed would be eliminated in the precision end trim.   

Knife marks per inch (KMPI)  This is really interesting and more technical than one would think.  I speak molder talk more than planner but they essentially do the same thing.  Many times I've set up a molder to surface 4 sides which basically makes it a 4 head planner.

Lets talk about dominant knife while we talk about KMPI.  There will always be a dominant knife and there are a couple of reasons. First off it is physically impossible.  There is a lot that goes into grinding knives and creating profiles.  Generally on a head there will be 4 knives that are ground within .005.  They can be so close that you can never see a difference by the eye.  But they will never, very rarely weigh the same.  We grind out spots and scale them to as close as we can to have them balanced just like a car tire. Then they are installed on a head with a .005 tolerance of one another.   Also never will a knife be installed that is as sharp as a razor.  When we grind them, they for sure are razor sharp.  But if we installed them without deburring or slightly dulling them they would heat up and wear very quickly, enough to screw up a profile dimension. Maybe even chip.  It is also impossible to deburr them all the same.  So there is always a variance.  But this is not the reason for a dominant knife.  

Here is a brain twist.  All knives cut.  There is always a dominant knife.  But! the dominant knife is not always the same knife.  It is not called the biggest knife, the longest knife.  It is called the dominant knife.  How does this happen? 

We have a knife set at 25 degrees spinning in a circle into a moving surface.  If it was a hockey puck sliding on flat ice it would always be in contact with the flat surface leaving one long flat line.  The puck would be moving and not the surface but in our case the surface is moving and we are not always in contact to the total depth of the surface.  We are not a flat like a hockey puck, we are a 25 degree knife spinning at 6000 to 10,000 RPM in a circle.  Lets just say the footprint of the knife is .005. There is only a minuet period that a knife is reaching total depth on the surface.  The surface has to move or we would be like a sewing machine hitting the same hole.  If we were to move and leave a perfectly flat surface, we would have to be moving as a rate the same as the footprint of the knife.  I'm not doing the math but at 6000 RPM and a footprint of .005 we would be moving at something like 6 inches per minute.    

What gets lost in trying to describe this is that most of the milling is happening on the upcut of each knife.  (Every knife is removing material on the upcut)  As a knife hits the surface (AND MAKES A CUT) at total depth it is not always the same knife and it is never the same knife on every rotation.  The surface has to move.  As the surface moves and it is timed out that a knife hits the surface at total depth (and makes a cut), there is a period where a knife reaches total depth (in the void of the dominant knife) but does not make a cut.  But that knife will make a cut into the moving surface on the upcut.  That is how we get mill marks and that is what we call knife marks.  Our feed rate controls the number of knife marks per minute.  

If you was cutting a profile on a molder, something of depth, and you put a strobe or timing light on it.  You will see knives on the upcut.  You would likely never be able to see a knife making dominant cuts at total depth.  

It really is kind of a neat thing.  

9/28/2024 7:02am

So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose grip vs letting the material pull in and fly through the machine. When you conventional cut the blade slides along the flat surface until there's enough pressure to force it in the material, generating heat in the blade like flick mentioned. To small of a cut and more sliding, more heat. Climb cut, the cutter bites right away causing thet heat to leave with the removed material. In addition, you can see the conventional finishes it's cut, lifting the material (creating the snipe) vs climb cut pushing it down and away eliminating the snipe. 1000002461.jpg?VersionId=5ICzbH23MHy3G42smDjOH

borg
Posts
6718
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
9/28/2024 7:58am
ToolMaker wrote:
So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose...

So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose grip vs letting the material pull in and fly through the machine. When you conventional cut the blade slides along the flat surface until there's enough pressure to force it in the material, generating heat in the blade like flick mentioned. To small of a cut and more sliding, more heat. Climb cut, the cutter bites right away causing thet heat to leave with the removed material. In addition, you can see the conventional finishes it's cut, lifting the material (creating the snipe) vs climb cut pushing it down and away eliminating the snipe. 1000002461.jpg?VersionId=5ICzbH23MHy3G42smDjOH

Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what is happening on a milling machine or router where depth of cut or stepover is as much as 30 to 50% of the cutter diameter.  I use 50% all the time. On a planer, the depth of cut or stepover is more like 1.5%. 2" cutter vs .0312 depth of cut. The dynamics are very much different. 

I hope this shows up:

Cut2

 

9/28/2024 1:52pm
ToolMaker wrote:
So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose...

So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose grip vs letting the material pull in and fly through the machine. When you conventional cut the blade slides along the flat surface until there's enough pressure to force it in the material, generating heat in the blade like flick mentioned. To small of a cut and more sliding, more heat. Climb cut, the cutter bites right away causing thet heat to leave with the removed material. In addition, you can see the conventional finishes it's cut, lifting the material (creating the snipe) vs climb cut pushing it down and away eliminating the snipe. 1000002461.jpg?VersionId=5ICzbH23MHy3G42smDjOH

borg wrote:
Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what...

Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what is happening on a milling machine or router where depth of cut or stepover is as much as 30 to 50% of the cutter diameter.  I use 50% all the time. On a planer, the depth of cut or stepover is more like 1.5%. 2" cutter vs .0312 depth of cut. The dynamics are very much different. 

I hope this shows up:

Cut2

 

I get your point that you're not going very deep but you're still cutting at an upward angle. The more I think about it, the more issues I believe need to be considered. Remember though, the less deep of a cut, the harder it is for the leading edge to get into the material because the the wedge is so slight. 

borg
Posts
6718
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
9/28/2024 2:43pm
ToolMaker wrote:
So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose...

So the first problem is running a conventional cut vs climb cut. Albeit, this is safer as the cutter pushes back when the drive rollers lose grip vs letting the material pull in and fly through the machine. When you conventional cut the blade slides along the flat surface until there's enough pressure to force it in the material, generating heat in the blade like flick mentioned. To small of a cut and more sliding, more heat. Climb cut, the cutter bites right away causing thet heat to leave with the removed material. In addition, you can see the conventional finishes it's cut, lifting the material (creating the snipe) vs climb cut pushing it down and away eliminating the snipe. 1000002461.jpg?VersionId=5ICzbH23MHy3G42smDjOH

borg wrote:
Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what...

Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what is happening on a milling machine or router where depth of cut or stepover is as much as 30 to 50% of the cutter diameter.  I use 50% all the time. On a planer, the depth of cut or stepover is more like 1.5%. 2" cutter vs .0312 depth of cut. The dynamics are very much different. 

I hope this shows up:

Cut2

 

ToolMaker wrote:
I get your point that you're not going very deep but you're still cutting at an upward angle. The more I think about it, the more...

I get your point that you're not going very deep but you're still cutting at an upward angle. The more I think about it, the more issues I believe need to be considered. Remember though, the less deep of a cut, the harder it is for the leading edge to get into the material because the the wedge is so slight. 

I looked around and never found any climb cutting planers.  The only other way I can see eliminating snipe would be for the work to be pulled down to a moving bed. Lots of CNC routers have vacuum tables but that would have to be a long machine. Better off buying a little extra stock.  I'm going to post a link to the cabinet door job. Not sure where to post it.

9/28/2024 6:39pm
borg wrote:
Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what...

Your illustration shows exactly what the dynamics are when it pertains to climb vs conventional. The difference is that your drawing is much more like what is happening on a milling machine or router where depth of cut or stepover is as much as 30 to 50% of the cutter diameter.  I use 50% all the time. On a planer, the depth of cut or stepover is more like 1.5%. 2" cutter vs .0312 depth of cut. The dynamics are very much different. 

I hope this shows up:

Cut2

 

ToolMaker wrote:
I get your point that you're not going very deep but you're still cutting at an upward angle. The more I think about it, the more...

I get your point that you're not going very deep but you're still cutting at an upward angle. The more I think about it, the more issues I believe need to be considered. Remember though, the less deep of a cut, the harder it is for the leading edge to get into the material because the the wedge is so slight. 

borg wrote:
I looked around and never found any climb cutting planers.  The only other way I can see eliminating snipe would be for the work to be...

I looked around and never found any climb cutting planers.  The only other way I can see eliminating snipe would be for the work to be pulled down to a moving bed. Lots of CNC routers have vacuum tables but that would have to be a long machine. Better off buying a little extra stock.  I'm going to post a link to the cabinet door job. Not sure where to post it.

I'm pretty sure it's a safety issue. The neighbor, when he got his TimeSaver, he set it a bit too low and the belt grabbed the part and shot it out the back of the machine, flew 15ft and impaled the part in the wall. Many of those planers sell to amateurs that would kill themselves. The belt on the TimeSaver runs in the direction of what would be a climb cut for a tool.

10/3/2024 10:42am

Hey Borg,

Being an electrician, maybe you could confirm for me. If I run a motor (load) off 2 meters, The meters will run equally (with a very small difference of one might have slightly longer wiring). And if that's the case, instead of having 1 200AMP breaker on one meter, I'd install a 100amp breaker on each meter.

TM

1/30/2026 2:36pm
I'm not being argumentative either but honestly there is nothing to argue about.  They are 2 different things. LOL  You did the calculations. Look on a...

I'm not being argumentative either but honestly there is nothing to argue about.  They are 2 different things. LOL  You did the calculations. Look on a board your planned, grab a tape measure and see if there are 16 knife marks per inch.  Go to Lowes or home depot and look at any piece of molding or milled board and you can see the marks.  Theirs will be in the 8-10 KMPI range. Call them mill marks if it brings more understanding. (I'm not being sarcastic) That is what they are.  But they are called knife marks per inch.  Not knife cuts per inch.

The reason why the calculation is for 1 knife is there is always a dominate knife.  Even a router or shaper bit has a dominate side. Anything with a spindle and a feed.  If you somehow was able to achieve 66 knife marks per inch on your planner you would burn up your knives in minutes.    

Looking up the knife marks per inch equation from a knife manufacture kinda made me chuckle because it brought back a memory. I used to be heavy into woodwork and grew up with my family owned cabinet face and molding shop. We manufactured stile, rail and raised panels.  We also manufactured furniture and at one time had a sawmill and dry kilns.   I mostly ran and maintained Weinig and SCMI 6 head molders.  I did most of the knife grinding and setting up the heads and setting up runs.  Years later I found myself in Indonesia renting space from (at the time) the second largest molding factory in the world.  I manufactured furniture parts there and did consulting work with the factory on the molding, finger jointing and optimization lines.  The funny thing about that math equation is that even though what we did was technical it was still hands on.  My Dad would always get on to me for making things to complicated (like equations).   When I found myself in Indonesia, in the second largest molding factory in the world, I got the biggest chuckle.  We had 24 molders in which 4 at a time had to run in unison with one another.  They ran in unison with profile sanders and every 45 minutes there was a bottleneck.  Times that by 6 lines and it was a huge problem.  They were these huge German machines.  I was way over my head with these Indonesian engineers walking all around with their calculators doing their figures in metric.  We still did decimal on the machines which is the same as here but rates were all metric.  They couldn't get a consistent equation they could input into multiple machines with accuracy.  Machines differ just a little.  Knife profiles differ just a little.  I went down a line and checked each machine with my standard ruler and noticed the differences between the knife marks per inch on each machine.  They varied something like between 14 and 18 and some of the settings were in the half marks.  Meaning they didn't end on the inch.  After determining the problem, it took about 10 minutes to adjust them into unison.  But it was on the inch and not 2.54 mm. which was funny. The line I adjusted ran overnight with no bottlenecks and was part of the overall solution.  As far as I know, I'd bet my ruler is still floating around that place.  Physically counting marks was the only way to achieve unison. Just like Dad said.  It really did have me tickled.   Looking up those equations reminded me of that.  Not in a million years would I ever use them.  

 

So I know this is an old thread. Been noodling on this. I believe the "dominant" blade as you call it, which leaves the "Knife Mark" will always be the knife/blade that follows the dullest blade. The dullest blade will have the hardest time initiating a cut as it will slide before it actually cuts into the material leaving a higher surface. Then along comes the next blade and because that material is marginally higher it's very easy for the next knife to enter the material earlier and pull a deeper cut making the "mark". If you only have 2 blades, of course it would be the sharp blade but if you had let's say 4 or 5 blades, it would be the blade that follows the dullest blade. which brings me to the question, if you only had 1 blade, how would you achieve knife marks?

TM

borg
Posts
6718
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
1/30/2026 6:10pm
I'm not being argumentative either but honestly there is nothing to argue about.  They are 2 different things. LOL  You did the calculations. Look on a...

I'm not being argumentative either but honestly there is nothing to argue about.  They are 2 different things. LOL  You did the calculations. Look on a board your planned, grab a tape measure and see if there are 16 knife marks per inch.  Go to Lowes or home depot and look at any piece of molding or milled board and you can see the marks.  Theirs will be in the 8-10 KMPI range. Call them mill marks if it brings more understanding. (I'm not being sarcastic) That is what they are.  But they are called knife marks per inch.  Not knife cuts per inch.

The reason why the calculation is for 1 knife is there is always a dominate knife.  Even a router or shaper bit has a dominate side. Anything with a spindle and a feed.  If you somehow was able to achieve 66 knife marks per inch on your planner you would burn up your knives in minutes.    

Looking up the knife marks per inch equation from a knife manufacture kinda made me chuckle because it brought back a memory. I used to be heavy into woodwork and grew up with my family owned cabinet face and molding shop. We manufactured stile, rail and raised panels.  We also manufactured furniture and at one time had a sawmill and dry kilns.   I mostly ran and maintained Weinig and SCMI 6 head molders.  I did most of the knife grinding and setting up the heads and setting up runs.  Years later I found myself in Indonesia renting space from (at the time) the second largest molding factory in the world.  I manufactured furniture parts there and did consulting work with the factory on the molding, finger jointing and optimization lines.  The funny thing about that math equation is that even though what we did was technical it was still hands on.  My Dad would always get on to me for making things to complicated (like equations).   When I found myself in Indonesia, in the second largest molding factory in the world, I got the biggest chuckle.  We had 24 molders in which 4 at a time had to run in unison with one another.  They ran in unison with profile sanders and every 45 minutes there was a bottleneck.  Times that by 6 lines and it was a huge problem.  They were these huge German machines.  I was way over my head with these Indonesian engineers walking all around with their calculators doing their figures in metric.  We still did decimal on the machines which is the same as here but rates were all metric.  They couldn't get a consistent equation they could input into multiple machines with accuracy.  Machines differ just a little.  Knife profiles differ just a little.  I went down a line and checked each machine with my standard ruler and noticed the differences between the knife marks per inch on each machine.  They varied something like between 14 and 18 and some of the settings were in the half marks.  Meaning they didn't end on the inch.  After determining the problem, it took about 10 minutes to adjust them into unison.  But it was on the inch and not 2.54 mm. which was funny. The line I adjusted ran overnight with no bottlenecks and was part of the overall solution.  As far as I know, I'd bet my ruler is still floating around that place.  Physically counting marks was the only way to achieve unison. Just like Dad said.  It really did have me tickled.   Looking up those equations reminded me of that.  Not in a million years would I ever use them.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
So I know this is an old thread. Been noodling on this. I believe the "dominant" blade as you call it, which leaves the "Knife Mark"...

So I know this is an old thread. Been noodling on this. I believe the "dominant" blade as you call it, which leaves the "Knife Mark" will always be the knife/blade that follows the dullest blade. The dullest blade will have the hardest time initiating a cut as it will slide before it actually cuts into the material leaving a higher surface. Then along comes the next blade and because that material is marginally higher it's very easy for the next knife to enter the material earlier and pull a deeper cut making the "mark". If you only have 2 blades, of course it would be the sharp blade but if you had let's say 4 or 5 blades, it would be the blade that follows the dullest blade. which brings me to the question, if you only had 1 blade, how would you achieve knife marks?

TM

My best guess. The blade is making a concave cut and the material is constantly feeding into the cut at a certain speed. There has to be ripple. Now even a surfacing cutter on a very stable CNC machine is not making a concave cut but will still leave cutter marks. No matter how many inserts are in the cutter because nothing is perfect. 1 insert will be .0001 proud and that's all it takes. Wood is squishy and bendy and has multiple densities within a few inches. You just have to sand that shit out. 

Joey Bridges
Posts
9451
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
5/27/2026 5:38am Edited Date/Time 5/27/2026 5:40am

Bumped this back up to show my solution to sniping.

Working on an 90" long, edge grain maple top for a custom dresser.

Built in two pieces, 8' long with a few long tails. Leaves the snipe in sections that will be cut off when sized. 

Then dowled together when glued up.

Actually, every piece is doweled to the next with 4-5 1/2" oak dowels.

20260527 08130120260525 16441320260521 20262820260520 072109

Long tails help to give you handles for moving, and flipping this heavy beast. 

borg
Posts
6718
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
5/27/2026 6:02am
Bumped this back up to show my solution to sniping.Working on an 90" long, edge grain maple top for a custom dresser.Built in two pieces, 8'...

Bumped this back up to show my solution to sniping.

Working on an 90" long, edge grain maple top for a custom dresser.

Built in two pieces, 8' long with a few long tails. Leaves the snipe in sections that will be cut off when sized. 

Then dowled together when glued up.

Actually, every piece is doweled to the next with 4-5 1/2" oak dowels.

20260527 08130120260525 16441320260521 20262820260520 072109

Long tails help to give you handles for moving, and flipping this heavy beast. 

I did 2 table tops that were 30" x 72". On those I could only plane each piece before glueup because they were just over 7" wide. My planer maxes out at 12". Keeping it flat at glueup was somewhat of a challenge partly because I was using 4 quarter stock and also because I don't have a jointer. The belt sander got a workout. 

Did you plane each piece before glueup or after gluing the 4 wide sections?

1
Joey Bridges
Posts
9451
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
5/27/2026 6:22am

Started with 8/4 boards. 

Milled clean to whatever dimension it took.

Straight edged one edge using a homemade 8' fence on my tablesaw. 

Ripped 1 1/2" strips, planed the cut faces to 1 7/16", then after gluing up the two pieces, planed both to 1 3/8".

Wish I had a festool domino machine.

I could have done a one time glue up, and saved a coupe of days of gluing and dowling one piece at a time, waiting 3hrs +/- before unclamping, and gluing the next one.

 

Sounds like their patent has expired, and Kreg has a battery powered verision for $450.

Beats the $1,200 + the cost of a vacumm system for the festool model.

Joey Bridges
Posts
9451
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
5/27/2026 6:26am

Used a domino machine in the past for some fast assembly on some huge tops, glued up at one time.

13988105 10207592446071632 486079036897568873 o
moto-moto
Posts
24
Joined
6/8/2012
Location
unknown? ...but NOT..., MP US
Fantasy
5/27/2026 6:56am

^^^

1

Post a reply to: Benchtop planer question

The Latest