Another Track Near Closing

Rim Lock
Posts
713
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Nikiski, USA
12/23/2010 2:45am
Rim Lock wrote:
Well, if it means anything to anyone, I still ride a 2-stroke. The 4-strokes are insanely loud and not to start another thread all together but...
Well, if it means anything to anyone, I still ride a 2-stroke.

The 4-strokes are insanely loud and not to start another thread all together but the quad 4-strokes seem to be the loudest. Don't know why that is.

I believe FMF makes a Q-exhaust but not sure if any other pipe manufacturer addresses the issue.

Dating myself here but still remember the old Bassani pipes motto of "Less sound - More ground" or something like that and that was from the 70's.

One thing that does bother me about some of my friends who ride 4-strokes and claim to be decent mechanics is if you ask them when the last time they put new muffler packing in their exhaust, they stare at you like you were an eye chart.
In other words, it isn't in their maintenance program.

If any of you are interested, I did a search on decibel meters and there are a bunch of them available for under a hundred bucks. Our club is going to buy one. We aren't going to implement enforcement right off the bat but start bringing awareness to people how loud their bikes really are.

Yesterday I was tasked to sending e-mails to over 30 politicians (City Council, Planning Commission, Assembly, Mayors, City Manager, etc.).
It has truly been one of the most stressful things I have ever been through and I wouldn't wish this hassle on anyone.

My best advice would be to be proactive and don't let it get to this point.
Nutty C wrote:
Get that decibal meter today and start enforcing the same level as a AMA event tomorrow. Don't drag your feet or the show will be over.
That we will do but consider the following that I took out of the AMA book:

c. Machines entered in all meets shall have
mufflers/silencers which do not exceed the maximum
db(A) required by the state where the meet is being
held or 99 db(A), whichever is less, measured at half
maximum rpm per MIC manual SAE J1287 test at
0.5-meters (20-inches).

www.ama-cycle.org/rulebooks/2010/AMARacing_rulebook10_Web_MX.pdf

Without boring you with more links & attachments, Alaska has no sound restrictions so the 99 DBA should fly.

The local City is not exactly favorable with us as well even though the noise ordinance is 10 PM and we are shutting down at 8 PM.

This all totally sucks and the only reason I made this post was to make you aware that it could happen to you as well in the blink of an eye by just a couple of people bitching.


Hammer
Posts
93
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Longwood, FL, USA
12/23/2010 5:50am
"If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems." thatdad...
"If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems."



thatdad - You've bought into the lie. "Noise is what causes the problems."



Noise is not what causes the problems - it is just one of the problems. Don't you see the bigger picture? What is the greatest cause of more track closures and motorcycle land use closures? You really believe it is noise? We have all been lead to believe that, but don't you see the fallacy in that type of single minded thinking? If noise were truly the main cause of track closures and land use closures all we would have to do is have zero decibel bikes and we could keep all of our tracks open and lands from being closed - right?



NOT ON YOUR LIFE!



There are many factors and like I have been saying, having quieter bikes is a good thing, but it is way to painfully obvious that sound levels in and of themselves are just a small part of the reason tracks get shut down and we lose riding spaces.



Apathy is the greatest cause of our loss of riding areas.



What part of noise had anything to do with this?

America's Great Outdoors Act of 2010



Absolutely ZERO!



When we lost over 2 millions aces of public riding area in 2009 due to legislative maneuvering what part of that loss was excessive noise responsible for?



Yep - zip, nada nothing!



So what exactly is the greatest cause of us losing our riding areas? Noise? Hardly...



Noise as it relates to private land use has become the cause celeb of people who want to shut down motorcycle riding on private land, but the noise itself is not the real battle. As a community of motorcycle enthusiast we have become lazy and like a lot of America we look for a simple single issue to lay blame so that we don't have to think beyond the surface. Yeah, quite bikes, that's the answer, if we just had quite bikes everything would be OK....



BULLSHIT!



We need to organize and be pro-active. We need to overwhelm our city officials, council members, Congressmen Senators etc and let them know if they are involved with land closures or legislation that restricts private land use they will be held accountable. Until we do this, we are all chasing a pipe dream believing that quite bikes will save us.



Often times a noise issue, just like Rim Lock's issue of a neighbor complaining is a single person or very small group that grabs the ear of the city officials. Making quieter bikes isn't going to help Rim Lock and he knows it -

"My best advice would be to be proactive and don't let it get to this point."



We have to be proactive and vigilant. We have to be aggressive in watching legislation and city ordinances that are being written with the intent to restrict us and shut them down before they get off the ground. We have to use the same legal tactics our opponents use to shut down our riding areas to defend our riding areas against them. We have to use city ordinances and the legislative process to go on the offense and protect our riding areas, not wait until they are used against us.



In short if we go the simple route and buy into the "If we just had quite bikes" argument, we will all end up losers. As Rim Lock is finding out, it is extremely difficult and requires massive organization, money and hard work to fight off even one complaining neighbor, but that is the reality of what we have to do. We need to work together.



Sure, quite bikes can help, but the issues are much more complicated then that and require the hard work commitment and organization that, for what ever reason, we can not, as a motorcycle community seem to grasp. Especially when even amongst our own people we dumb down the issue to a simple belief that if we just had quite bikes everything would be OK...



















Nutty C wrote:
After reading most of your posts I have come to the conclusion you must somehow be tied in to the after market exhaust industry for off...
After reading most of your posts I have come to the conclusion you must somehow be tied in to the after market exhaust industry for off road vehicles. ( bikes and quads)
Nutty, very good point. Our buddy Jake seems to be young and dumb, and seems to know everything.... I have a couple of children that are in the same boat.

Hopefully people will realize that a little compromise on noise, would significantly make our neighbors happier.... and they would not even realize when we are riding dirt bikes????

ThatDad, thank you for your hard work on keeping the local tracks open!

Jake, put down the crack pipe and enjoy the holiday's.

HAMMER
ehr400
Posts
2630
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Britton, MI, USA
12/23/2010 5:52am
ehr400 wrote:
I still strongly believe noise is the easiest for them to point out right now regarding tracks and ORV areas. I think if everyones bikes were...
I still strongly believe noise is the easiest for them to point out right now regarding tracks and ORV areas. I think if everyones bikes were 70dB they would be saying soil erotion, dust, carbon footprint, etc. These people arent rational and noise is the easiest thing they can get alot of people that arent down with their cause to agree with them.

One track I ride at is near a dragstrip, they host IHRA events and race every Friday/ Saturday with test and tune Wed. The track has been there since 1964. Houses have been built around the area and it is loud, yet no one says anything. The minute this one guy builds his mx track less then 1/2 mile from the strip all of a sudden there is noise issues. The cars literally drown out the bike noise. But it is those evil dirtbikers. Each to their own I guess.
thatdad wrote:
I respectfully disagree. I am an attorney with a solid real estate background and over 20 years of litigation experience. I raced as a kid and...
I respectfully disagree.

I am an attorney with a solid real estate background and over 20 years of litigation experience. I raced as a kid and both of my sons race. I have kept several local tracks open fot the last five or six years and pissed off more than my share of townships and neighborhoods.

The four strokes are too loud. The noise carries further and they disturb other peoples enjoyment of their homes, particularly on Sunday afternoon. We have gone backwards and everyone knows it.

If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems.
I am sorry I respectfully disagree too.

Read my second paragraph, no complaints about that. Dirt bikes are riding and NOW there is complaints about noise?! There is NO way any 4 stroke bike is loader then a Pro Stock car, alcohol funny car, or any sub 10 second race car.

I agree with jake48, noise is an easy excuse. They will find a way to take it away in their special interest.
12/23/2010 6:19am
Hammer wrote:
Nutty, very good point. Our buddy Jake seems to be young and dumb, and seems to know everything.... I have a couple of children that are...
Nutty, very good point. Our buddy Jake seems to be young and dumb, and seems to know everything.... I have a couple of children that are in the same boat.

Hopefully people will realize that a little compromise on noise, would significantly make our neighbors happier.... and they would not even realize when we are riding dirt bikes????

ThatDad, thank you for your hard work on keeping the local tracks open!

Jake, put down the crack pipe and enjoy the holiday's.

HAMMER
Ah man... You're a work of art Hammer. I guess living in a dream world and being as clueless as you are has it's advantages..

For the record, I have been racing cycles for over 34 years. ...

Ever notice how when someone doesn't have an intelligent thing to say they attack the person's character and not the message? My favorite 3rd grade line is "You think you know everything"

Hahahahaha

The Shop

12/23/2010 6:48am Edited Date/Time 12/23/2010 8:50am
ehr400 wrote:
I am sorry I respectfully disagree too. Read my second paragraph, no complaints about that. Dirt bikes are riding and NOW there is complaints about noise...
I am sorry I respectfully disagree too.

Read my second paragraph, no complaints about that. Dirt bikes are riding and NOW there is complaints about noise?! There is NO way any 4 stroke bike is loader then a Pro Stock car, alcohol funny car, or any sub 10 second race car.

I agree with jake48, noise is an easy excuse. They will find a way to take it away in their special interest.
ehr - Thanks. I know there are lots of people like you that "Get it" I would never argue that sound isn't a contributing factor, but to say it is THE cause for tracks being shut down is just plain ignorant.



A few years back and near me, a new track opened up in a canyon along side a highway. As one would expect, there was opposition. Specifically one woman who was concerned the "Noise" would scare the animals in the area - (Not making this up)



Interesting enough, when I would go to ride at this track and sit in the pits, the Harley's and street bikes driving down the highway above the track would drown out the dirt bikes with noise as these bikes were louder than the dirt bikes, but no one was trying to stop them from their weekend cruises. Really? It's about the "Noise" Hmmmm...



Anyways, we organized, supported the track owner, were lucky enough to have a city council member who rode dirt bikes and prevailed - for a while....



Eventually, the owner of the property who leased the land to the guy who ran the track got tired of the constant barrage of complaints that were organized by that one woman and her multitude of Sierra Club goons. Sound was one of the issues she used, but in the end, it wasn't the noise that killed the track, it was the lack of people willing to get involved that did the track in.



Not sure why people like hammer can't seem to think beyond the surface. Their logic just doesn't pan out. I am guessing it's the same type of people who think we should just sit down and talk to the poor misunderstood terrorists. If we just validated the terrorist's feelings and showed them we cared, everything would be OK - after all, we are the ones causing the terrorists to blow us up...



Get real - people want to shut down tracks and riding areas because, quite frankly, they just plain don't like motorcycles. Quieting our bikes may help some, but ultimately there seem to be more people that don't give a hoot about you and your desire to ride your scooter off road than the people that want to.



I will try it again: If you want to save our riding areas - GET INVOLVED. Just putting a quiet exhaust on your scooter won't do it...
Nutty C
Posts
463
Joined
10/28/2009
Location
Waterdown, CA
12/23/2010 6:49am
Hammer wrote:
Nutty, very good point. Our buddy Jake seems to be young and dumb, and seems to know everything.... I have a couple of children that are...
Nutty, very good point. Our buddy Jake seems to be young and dumb, and seems to know everything.... I have a couple of children that are in the same boat.

Hopefully people will realize that a little compromise on noise, would significantly make our neighbors happier.... and they would not even realize when we are riding dirt bikes????

ThatDad, thank you for your hard work on keeping the local tracks open!

Jake, put down the crack pipe and enjoy the holiday's.

HAMMER
In closing I am so fortunate to have had the best years of this sport being the eightees and nintees. Only rode recreationally the last ten years as things decline due to thumpers so I really do not care.
Hammer great picture on your web site hole shooting that national in BC. I missed 86 to 92 so I was not aware of your racing achievments. Nutty
thatdad
Posts
229
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/23/2010 6:56am Edited Date/Time 12/23/2010 7:20am
"If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems." thatdad...
"If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems."



thatdad - You've bought into the lie. "Noise is what causes the problems."



Noise is not what causes the problems - it is just one of the problems. Don't you see the bigger picture? What is the greatest cause of more track closures and motorcycle land use closures? You really believe it is noise? We have all been lead to believe that, but don't you see the fallacy in that type of single minded thinking? If noise were truly the main cause of track closures and land use closures all we would have to do is have zero decibel bikes and we could keep all of our tracks open and lands from being closed - right?



NOT ON YOUR LIFE!



There are many factors and like I have been saying, having quieter bikes is a good thing, but it is way to painfully obvious that sound levels in and of themselves are just a small part of the reason tracks get shut down and we lose riding spaces.



Apathy is the greatest cause of our loss of riding areas.



What part of noise had anything to do with this?

America's Great Outdoors Act of 2010



Absolutely ZERO!



When we lost over 2 millions aces of public riding area in 2009 due to legislative maneuvering what part of that loss was excessive noise responsible for?



Yep - zip, nada nothing!



So what exactly is the greatest cause of us losing our riding areas? Noise? Hardly...



Noise as it relates to private land use has become the cause celeb of people who want to shut down motorcycle riding on private land, but the noise itself is not the real battle. As a community of motorcycle enthusiast we have become lazy and like a lot of America we look for a simple single issue to lay blame so that we don't have to think beyond the surface. Yeah, quite bikes, that's the answer, if we just had quite bikes everything would be OK....



BULLSHIT!



We need to organize and be pro-active. We need to overwhelm our city officials, council members, Congressmen Senators etc and let them know if they are involved with land closures or legislation that restricts private land use they will be held accountable. Until we do this, we are all chasing a pipe dream believing that quite bikes will save us.



Often times a noise issue, just like Rim Lock's issue of a neighbor complaining is a single person or very small group that grabs the ear of the city officials. Making quieter bikes isn't going to help Rim Lock and he knows it -

"My best advice would be to be proactive and don't let it get to this point."



We have to be proactive and vigilant. We have to be aggressive in watching legislation and city ordinances that are being written with the intent to restrict us and shut them down before they get off the ground. We have to use the same legal tactics our opponents use to shut down our riding areas to defend our riding areas against them. We have to use city ordinances and the legislative process to go on the offense and protect our riding areas, not wait until they are used against us.



In short if we go the simple route and buy into the "If we just had quite bikes" argument, we will all end up losers. As Rim Lock is finding out, it is extremely difficult and requires massive organization, money and hard work to fight off even one complaining neighbor, but that is the reality of what we have to do. We need to work together.



Sure, quite bikes can help, but the issues are much more complicated then that and require the hard work commitment and organization that, for what ever reason, we can not, as a motorcycle community seem to grasp. Especially when even amongst our own people we dumb down the issue to a simple belief that if we just had quite bikes everything would be OK...



















First, the title of this was "Another track Near Closing," not, "The Tree Huggers are Taking Away Public Land." Tracks are generally on private property, and the issue comes down to how a given use interferes with the rights of the neighbors. Most neighbors, particularly those in rural areas, actually have a strong belief in property rights. They don't screw with yours, and expect you wont screw with theirs. Recognizing this is a positive when trying to keep your track open.

Most people also have a full plate of day to day problems. Neighbors suffer from the same apathy that you ascribe to the bulk of dirt bike riders. If you are not really bothering them, most will leave you alone. Granted, there is always an asshole, but most run out of steam once it starts eating into their time or costing them money.

When I am in front of a township board defending a track, I have to have credibility. My talking points are first and foremost: this is for the kids. It keeps families together, and kids off the streets. If operating your track will keep kids from not riding on other private property, avoid incarcerating another kid for getting in trouble, or avoid the funerals of kids racing down township roads, your track has public benefit. Second, all of the local shops are also small businesses who employ friends and neighbors. Third, if it is a public track, it provides employment and ancillary benfit to the local motels, restaurants, etc. As a track owner, it is in your best interest to involve local shops and businesses.

That being said, I dont like being shot in the foot because the riders are dirtbags. Neighbors dont want to see litter, racing down the streets, etc. How many of you, on your way home after a weekend of racing, drain your wash water, grey water, or your black water? The argument is "Hey, its just bike wash water," but when one clown out of 50 drains his shit tanks, the neighbors see a trail of wet and smell shit. Hardly a mutual respect position. I also had to endure the pleasure of a stern talk from a local Amishman who almost lost his family on the way home from Sunday Gathering after getting run off the road.

Now, sorry for the rant, and back to my initial point: Noise. If your track is off the road a bit, and you do your job to control dust, the only way your neighbors know you are riding is the noise. In fact, the biggest complaint about injuries from the neighbors is hearing the sirens from an ambulance. They dont care if you kill yourself, they just dont want to hear about it.

Regarding your complaint about apathy, We have managed to fill two township halls for riding bans. It works. Many times the Board of Supervisors are elected by the employees and friends are elected by a small number of friends, neigbors, and the employees of a local developer who also provides jobs. If you can pack the township hall with voters who otherwise wouldn't show up, you have influence.











Hammer
Posts
93
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Longwood, FL, USA
12/23/2010 7:04am
Yes I am a work of something, but that is still being debated... and one day I will find that box of clues.

Jake, that is great that you have been racing for 34 years but out of respect for others, you probably have learned to follow the rules. And based on rules(or laws of the land), we cannot expect people to tolerate things that make their life unpleasant for very long. And they, being the track owners, probably have been riding and racing motorcycles at these tracks for a long time, so what gives anyone the right to think they should be friendly neighbors?

And as time/years goes by, and new homes, new owners of existing homes, populations intrusions, people start to realize what use to me a minor irritant is now a major pain is the back side. Instead of a couple of squid riders making a little noise, it is now a gate full of riders every 15 minutes all day long, two or three times a month(or maybe every friday night in Dade City)....

You are probably right it is not the fact that the manufactures are creating the fastest and most powerful bikes they can, it is probably that they are all jealous of the rock star life style racers live.....

My thought, and yes it is probably a waste of time, let’s just be friendly to the people that do not know and love this great sport! The noise issue just makes us an easy target, and the government is just look for another reason to break us down....

enuf sed HAMMER
Nutty C
Posts
463
Joined
10/28/2009
Location
Waterdown, CA
12/23/2010 7:05am
that dad
How about the motor home owners who empty their holding tank in the pits of Goupher Dunes after a race. What a slap in the face to all involved in the sport. Nutty
ehr400
Posts
2630
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Britton, MI, USA
12/23/2010 7:35am
"If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems." thatdad...
"If the bikes were quiet, we wouldn't attract attention. Erosion and dust can be controlled by the track operators. Noise is what causes the problems."



thatdad - You've bought into the lie. "Noise is what causes the problems."



Noise is not what causes the problems - it is just one of the problems. Don't you see the bigger picture? What is the greatest cause of more track closures and motorcycle land use closures? You really believe it is noise? We have all been lead to believe that, but don't you see the fallacy in that type of single minded thinking? If noise were truly the main cause of track closures and land use closures all we would have to do is have zero decibel bikes and we could keep all of our tracks open and lands from being closed - right?



NOT ON YOUR LIFE!



There are many factors and like I have been saying, having quieter bikes is a good thing, but it is way to painfully obvious that sound levels in and of themselves are just a small part of the reason tracks get shut down and we lose riding spaces.



Apathy is the greatest cause of our loss of riding areas.



What part of noise had anything to do with this?

America's Great Outdoors Act of 2010



Absolutely ZERO!



When we lost over 2 millions aces of public riding area in 2009 due to legislative maneuvering what part of that loss was excessive noise responsible for?



Yep - zip, nada nothing!



So what exactly is the greatest cause of us losing our riding areas? Noise? Hardly...



Noise as it relates to private land use has become the cause celeb of people who want to shut down motorcycle riding on private land, but the noise itself is not the real battle. As a community of motorcycle enthusiast we have become lazy and like a lot of America we look for a simple single issue to lay blame so that we don't have to think beyond the surface. Yeah, quite bikes, that's the answer, if we just had quite bikes everything would be OK....



BULLSHIT!



We need to organize and be pro-active. We need to overwhelm our city officials, council members, Congressmen Senators etc and let them know if they are involved with land closures or legislation that restricts private land use they will be held accountable. Until we do this, we are all chasing a pipe dream believing that quite bikes will save us.



Often times a noise issue, just like Rim Lock's issue of a neighbor complaining is a single person or very small group that grabs the ear of the city officials. Making quieter bikes isn't going to help Rim Lock and he knows it -

"My best advice would be to be proactive and don't let it get to this point."



We have to be proactive and vigilant. We have to be aggressive in watching legislation and city ordinances that are being written with the intent to restrict us and shut them down before they get off the ground. We have to use the same legal tactics our opponents use to shut down our riding areas to defend our riding areas against them. We have to use city ordinances and the legislative process to go on the offense and protect our riding areas, not wait until they are used against us.



In short if we go the simple route and buy into the "If we just had quite bikes" argument, we will all end up losers. As Rim Lock is finding out, it is extremely difficult and requires massive organization, money and hard work to fight off even one complaining neighbor, but that is the reality of what we have to do. We need to work together.



Sure, quite bikes can help, but the issues are much more complicated then that and require the hard work commitment and organization that, for what ever reason, we can not, as a motorcycle community seem to grasp. Especially when even amongst our own people we dumb down the issue to a simple belief that if we just had quite bikes everything would be OK...



















thatdad wrote:
First, the title of this was "Another track Near Closing," not, "The Tree Huggers are Taking Away Public Land." Tracks are generally on private property, and...
First, the title of this was "Another track Near Closing," not, "The Tree Huggers are Taking Away Public Land." Tracks are generally on private property, and the issue comes down to how a given use interferes with the rights of the neighbors. Most neighbors, particularly those in rural areas, actually have a strong belief in property rights. They don't screw with yours, and expect you wont screw with theirs. Recognizing this is a positive when trying to keep your track open.

Most people also have a full plate of day to day problems. Neighbors suffer from the same apathy that you ascribe to the bulk of dirt bike riders. If you are not really bothering them, most will leave you alone. Granted, there is always an asshole, but most run out of steam once it starts eating into their time or costing them money.

When I am in front of a township board defending a track, I have to have credibility. My talking points are first and foremost: this is for the kids. It keeps families together, and kids off the streets. If operating your track will keep kids from not riding on other private property, avoid incarcerating another kid for getting in trouble, or avoid the funerals of kids racing down township roads, your track has public benefit. Second, all of the local shops are also small businesses who employ friends and neighbors. Third, if it is a public track, it provides employment and ancillary benfit to the local motels, restaurants, etc. As a track owner, it is in your best interest to involve local shops and businesses.

That being said, I dont like being shot in the foot because the riders are dirtbags. Neighbors dont want to see litter, racing down the streets, etc. How many of you, on your way home after a weekend of racing, drain your wash water, grey water, or your black water? The argument is "Hey, its just bike wash water," but when one clown out of 50 drains his shit tanks, the neighbors see a trail of wet and smell shit. Hardly a mutual respect position. I also had to endure the pleasure of a stern talk from a local Amishman who almost lost his family on the way home from Sunday Gathering after getting run off the road.

Now, sorry for the rant, and back to my initial point: Noise. If your track is off the road a bit, and you do your job to control dust, the only way your neighbors know you are riding is the noise. In fact, the biggest complaint about injuries from the neighbors is hearing the sirens from an ambulance. They dont care if you kill yourself, they just dont want to hear about it.

Regarding your complaint about apathy, We have managed to fill two township halls for riding bans. It works. Many times the Board of Supervisors are elected by the employees and friends are elected by a small number of friends, neigbors, and the employees of a local developer who also provides jobs. If you can pack the township hall with voters who otherwise wouldn't show up, you have influence.











Agreed. There has been a few cases in SE Michigan that have filled the seats with people overwhelmingly supportive of the track and speaking all in a educated manner, not spewing garbage and they have lost. There has been one recently that boggles my mind with the judge over stepping his bounds IMO about property owner rights. There was a thread in here a few weeks ago about it actually. Either way like you said the positives need to be stressed first and foremost.
12/23/2010 8:41am Edited Date/Time 12/23/2010 8:47am
thatdad - clearly you understand the issue. This is what it is about:



"Regarding your complaint about apathy, We have managed to fill two township halls for riding bans. It works. Many times the Board of Supervisors are elected by the employees and friends are elected by a small number of friends, neigbors, and the employees of a local developer who also provides jobs. If you can pack the township hall with voters who otherwise wouldn't show up, you have influence."



The unfortunate reality is that there are more people that ride motorcycles who don't get involved like you have described than do. Just a fact. My point is that even if we get our bikes to zero decibels we will still have to deal with the very small percentage of people who just plain don't want a motorcycle;e anywhere near them. They will always have an excuse to shut us down whether it is noise or something else. And like Rim Lock said - It was ONE person who complained that is causing him all these problems



This is not a one issue problem. Too many people are pushing the "We need quieter bikes" as the solution, when in the end, it will not get the job done if we don't organize, get information out like you mentioned you have done or hold the elected officials who pass city or county ordinances restricting us from riding responsible by un-electing them.



Quiet exhausts help, but we need to ensure that we have laws (City / County ordinances) that either remain intact or that we as a community help pass to protect our tracks form being shut down. This requires us to be vocal and get involved and all the quiet exhausts in the world won't get this done...



Which of these do think would have the greater impact on keeping tracks open? Quiet exhausts or motorcycle riders getting together, voting as a collective group and protecting / creating laws that ensure our desire to ride on tracks.
thatdad
Posts
229
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/23/2010 9:22am
thatdad - clearly you understand the issue. This is what it is about: "Regarding your complaint about apathy, We have managed to fill two township halls...
thatdad - clearly you understand the issue. This is what it is about:



"Regarding your complaint about apathy, We have managed to fill two township halls for riding bans. It works. Many times the Board of Supervisors are elected by the employees and friends are elected by a small number of friends, neigbors, and the employees of a local developer who also provides jobs. If you can pack the township hall with voters who otherwise wouldn't show up, you have influence."



The unfortunate reality is that there are more people that ride motorcycles who don't get involved like you have described than do. Just a fact. My point is that even if we get our bikes to zero decibels we will still have to deal with the very small percentage of people who just plain don't want a motorcycle;e anywhere near them. They will always have an excuse to shut us down whether it is noise or something else. And like Rim Lock said - It was ONE person who complained that is causing him all these problems



This is not a one issue problem. Too many people are pushing the "We need quieter bikes" as the solution, when in the end, it will not get the job done if we don't organize, get information out like you mentioned you have done or hold the elected officials who pass city or county ordinances restricting us from riding responsible by un-electing them.



Quiet exhausts help, but we need to ensure that we have laws (City / County ordinances) that either remain intact or that we as a community help pass to protect our tracks form being shut down. This requires us to be vocal and get involved and all the quiet exhausts in the world won't get this done...



Which of these do think would have the greater impact on keeping tracks open? Quiet exhausts or motorcycle riders getting together, voting as a collective group and protecting / creating laws that ensure our desire to ride on tracks.
I agree you have to fight for what you believe in. That is a given. You just have less scars if you can avoid the fight (and get what you want) in the first place. If no one complains, you are avoiding the fight, the hassle, and the expense. From that perspective, muffler packing is an inexpensive solution. At one of out local tracks, we don't start until after church. I will tie something up in ligitation for years, but why? If you really want to see apathy, ask for payment. The loudmouths are the first ones to scatter.

You are going to encounter opposition in everything you do. Trust me, my ability to earn a living depends upon it. I do not believe there are an abundance of people who get up in the morning and decide to crusade against dirt bike riders. People get pissed off because loud bikes ruin their sunday picnic.
thatdad
Posts
229
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/23/2010 9:52am Edited Date/Time 12/24/2010 2:11am
I will take it a step futher on the concept of Noise and provide what I thought was a funny solution to a legal issue a client had a few years ago. I represented a suburban (read good old boy white guys) construction company that was performing manhole repairs in a nearby city.

The city inspectors would show up and write them up for everything and anything. As a solution, they started buying the inspectors lunch, which they thought was a good thing because at least they would know when they were going to show up. The problem with this was the city inspectors started showing up way more often, and bringing friends to the point of disrupting the business. Everyone was getting along just fine, but now the question was how to get rid of them.

Evidently, Waylon Jennings, Meryl Haggard and George Straight was just the ticket. One man's music is another's torture. My point is that you may like the sound of dirt bikes, but imagine if it were noise that wasn't your cup of tea.
12/23/2010 10:00am Edited Date/Time 12/23/2010 10:02am
thatdad wrote:
I agree you have to fight for what you believe in. That is a given. You just have less scars if you can avoid the fight...
I agree you have to fight for what you believe in. That is a given. You just have less scars if you can avoid the fight (and get what you want) in the first place. If no one complains, you are avoiding the fight, the hassle, and the expense. From that perspective, muffler packing is an inexpensive solution. At one of out local tracks, we don't start until after church. I will tie something up in ligitation for years, but why? If you really want to see apathy, ask for payment. The loudmouths are the first ones to scatter.

You are going to encounter opposition in everything you do. Trust me, my ability to earn a living depends upon it. I do not believe there are an abundance of people who get up in the morning and decide to crusade against dirt bike riders. People get pissed off because loud bikes ruin their sunday picnic.
Dad - good points. Only one thing. You imply that if we had quiet exhausts no one would complain. False premise.



"If no one complains, you are avoiding the fight,"



My guess is that you have probably been around as long as I have. Do you really believe no one would complain if our bikes were whisper quiet? Really? We have already established (beginning of this thread) It only takes one person to complain



Do you mountain bike ride? I do. I have been just as active trying to keep mountain bike trails accessible here in my local mountains and parks as I have with my fight to keep motorcycle riding areas open. The mountain biking issues had nothing to do with sound....



My point is that if we go after the politicians and ensure that we have good laws that allow us to operate our motorcycles on our own land we can truly avoid the issue of a single person complaining, whether it be noise or what ever excuse they choose to use. Although quiet exhausts help, the remedy is superficial to the problem. Our time and energy spent would be more effective and have a greater impact by us getting involved in the judicial process, not on the back end worrying about 15 -20 decibels.



We are wasting too much time and energy obsessing over those few decibels when we know our opponents will just move on to another reason to shut us down. Quieting the exhaust of our bikes is reactive, we need to focus more on being proactive.
thatdad
Posts
229
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/23/2010 10:54am
Well, your right, somebody might complain. But if a bunch of kids are having a good time and not bothering anyone, or maybe only bothering someone a little bit, your chances are certainly a lot better. It is a lot easier to fight the lone jerk than the entire neighborhood. If you stand outside the track with the codes emforcement officer, and his response is "What the hell is she bitching about." you are in much better shape than "Jees, those things are loud.' Just because you never are going to make everyone happy doesn't mean you have license to piss everyone off.

It is not "just a few decibles." I put two kids through Cobras and up now in the B and Schoolboy classes. The 250fs are brutally loud. It hurts when I stand behind them at the line. I wake up most mornings with ringing in my ears. Now, when my wife says I am not listening to her, it really is because I didn't hear her.

Your argument about mountain bikers still runs back to the public land tree hugger side of the argument. When you are doing anything on public land, everyone thinks its "theirs." It could be right next to a major highway, but somehow they can't hear the birds because of your bike. The same people that bitched about our local enduro would use the trails to hike on. They wanted the forest service to keep them clean in the off season.

I want to keep tracks open as much as you do. Quieter bikes would make that a lot easier.
12/23/2010 11:18am
dad - I fully agree that quieter bikes would make things "A lot easier" , but if we think the only cause for us losing our right to ride on private land is sound, we will lose.

Read back through this thread. There are plenty of people who seem to think if we just had quieter bikes things would be OK

Here is another example: The city adjoining mine is horse property in an urban setting. A few of the residents made mini bike tracks in their back yards and of course, some of the neighbors began to complain. "Noise" was their issue. The complainers went to the city council and quickly, without any opposition, the city council passed a city ordnance prohibiting the use of motorized equipment in the back yards within the city limits.

OOPS! Within a few weeks the city council was getting complaints that the residents could not operate their gas powered lawn mowers, leaf blowers, weed whackers and quads used to maintain their premises. Quickly, the city council amended the city ordinance to allow the use of the above mentioned gas equipment. The city council was very diligent, however, to ensure that no motorcycles were allowed to operate.

If it is about 'Noise" why were all of the other gas powered equipment allowed to operate when they are just as loud, if not louder than a 50cc mini bike, but the mini bike was not?

Which would have made the greater impact? Residence in the community addressing their city council members in support of the right to ride their min bikes or a quieter exhaust?


teggers
Posts
3722
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL, USA
12/23/2010 11:33am
I'm pretty sure that if we had NHRA( Nitro -Pro Stock) at Speed World (Bithlo) 6 days a week, even as far out as that track is, it would not last long. The fact is, there are noise ordinances in this country, even for Gatorback and Bithlo. When you push it to the edge (and over now), you are asking for litigation for sound - and my bet is the small things will now be argued as well. I am at the end of my racing and riding times, so personally, it does not matter much to me, but the bigger picture must always be kept in sight.

Good luck on some of your thoughts on this matter. Let's look back on this in 10-20 years and see how this turns out.
JustMX
Posts
5350
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
12/23/2010 11:37am Edited Date/Time 12/23/2010 11:39am
Jakefortyeight

If less noise would get rid of 80% of the complaints we shouldn't do it because some people would just find something else to complain about?

The difference in your viewpoint and that of most of those in this thread appears to be that we feel addressing the noise issue is proactive, while you think it is somehow reactive.
Nutty C
Posts
463
Joined
10/28/2009
Location
Waterdown, CA
12/23/2010 11:44am
teggers wrote:
I'm pretty sure that if we had NHRA( Nitro -Pro Stock) at Speed World (Bithlo) 6 days a week, even as far out as that track...
I'm pretty sure that if we had NHRA( Nitro -Pro Stock) at Speed World (Bithlo) 6 days a week, even as far out as that track is, it would not last long. The fact is, there are noise ordinances in this country, even for Gatorback and Bithlo. When you push it to the edge (and over now), you are asking for litigation for sound - and my bet is the small things will now be argued as well. I am at the end of my racing and riding times, so personally, it does not matter much to me, but the bigger picture must always be kept in sight.

Good luck on some of your thoughts on this matter. Let's look back on this in 10-20 years and see how this turns out.
You hit the nail right on the head. These drag strips etc only run on occasion and when some one is runing a moto track they want to run seven days a week from dawn to dusk and if they could buy some lights they would run 24/7 365 days a year. A lot of times the track owner is kind of asking for it.
teggers
Posts
3722
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL, USA
12/23/2010 11:46am Edited Date/Time 12/23/2010 11:48am
You can always argue this sound issue from the other side of absurdity. if sound is not a concern, then just go straightpipe (like drag racing). Have no sound limits. At what point is too loud? There really does come a tipping point - I think we can all agree on this. Is it 130dB? Maybe 140? Maybe 200?



I'm thinking the tipping point was at the edge of 2 stroke noise. Again, we'll see in 20 years.



BTW - the 6 days a week I mentioned....was in reference to practicing 6 days a week (not allowed), then a race on Saturday Night(which is currently running)
Nutty C
Posts
463
Joined
10/28/2009
Location
Waterdown, CA
12/23/2010 11:50am
teggers wrote:
You can always argue this sound issue from the other side of absurdity. if sound is not a concern, then just go straightpipe (like drag racing)...
You can always argue this sound issue from the other side of absurdity. if sound is not a concern, then just go straightpipe (like drag racing). Have no sound limits. At what point is too loud? There really does come a tipping point - I think we can all agree on this. Is it 130dB? Maybe 140? Maybe 200?



I'm thinking the tipping point was at the edge of 2 stroke noise. Again, we'll see in 20 years.



BTW - the 6 days a week I mentioned....was in reference to practicing 6 days a week (not allowed), then a race on Saturday Night(which is currently running)
20 years noise won't be the issue because everyone will be running electric bikes . yeck
12/23/2010 1:29pm
teggers wrote:
I'm pretty sure that if we had NHRA( Nitro -Pro Stock) at Speed World (Bithlo) 6 days a week, even as far out as that track...
I'm pretty sure that if we had NHRA( Nitro -Pro Stock) at Speed World (Bithlo) 6 days a week, even as far out as that track is, it would not last long. The fact is, there are noise ordinances in this country, even for Gatorback and Bithlo. When you push it to the edge (and over now), you are asking for litigation for sound - and my bet is the small things will now be argued as well. I am at the end of my racing and riding times, so personally, it does not matter much to me, but the bigger picture must always be kept in sight.

Good luck on some of your thoughts on this matter. Let's look back on this in 10-20 years and see how this turns out.
Nutty C wrote:
You hit the nail right on the head. These drag strips etc only run on occasion and when some one is runing a moto track they...
You hit the nail right on the head. These drag strips etc only run on occasion and when some one is runing a moto track they want to run seven days a week from dawn to dusk and if they could buy some lights they would run 24/7 365 days a year. A lot of times the track owner is kind of asking for it.
" These drag strips etc only run on occasion"

If you apply this logic then why does the AMA have to regulate the sound of the bikes at an outdoor motocross National that only happens once a year?

Really? It's about the noise?
Nutty C
Posts
463
Joined
10/28/2009
Location
Waterdown, CA
12/23/2010 4:23pm Edited Date/Time 12/24/2010 7:33am
" These drag strips etc only run on occasion" If you apply this logic then why does the AMA have to regulate the sound of the...
" These drag strips etc only run on occasion"

If you apply this logic then why does the AMA have to regulate the sound of the bikes at an outdoor motocross National that only happens once a year?

Really? It's about the noise?
AMA decided to regulate the noise due to families complaining that the events were too noisy to bring young children too. Also they followed the lead of the FIM. Next.
teggers
Posts
3722
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL, USA
12/24/2010 1:34pm
" These drag strips etc only run on occasion" If you apply this logic then why does the AMA have to regulate the sound of the...
" These drag strips etc only run on occasion"

If you apply this logic then why does the AMA have to regulate the sound of the bikes at an outdoor motocross National that only happens once a year?

Really? It's about the noise?
Nutty C wrote:
AMA decided to regulate the noise due to families complaining that the events were too noisy to bring young children too. Also they followed the lead...
AMA decided to regulate the noise due to families complaining that the events were too noisy to bring young children too. Also they followed the lead of the FIM. Next.
Honestly, I hope you are right and that I am wrong. Good luck with your argument.

I happen to be on different hours than the rest of the US. Just what I need.....a gate dropping every 12 minutes on Sunday morning starting at 8 AM. ...the other 6 days.....practice.

I would be one of the first in line though to stop a track from opening in my back yard.....95% because of noise, and I am on your side!

I have done low frequency tests on many of the nightclubs sound systems (big ones) that I have designed. Because of the resonant frequencies of the roof moving with the low frequency of the music, I have had low frequency complaints from as far as 5 miles away, but could not hear the same frequencies at 1 mile. The low frequencies tend to "curve" over a certain distance (with wind and humidity) and then can come back to the ground at other distances....it is a strange thing. This is why some track owners think the people at 5 miles are singling them out and they can't believe them because at 1 mile - there is no problem. The higher frequencies (in nightclubs) tend to dissipate because of the shorter wavelength.

Again......20 years, there will be an answer. I hope you find more willing people in your neighborhood.
12/24/2010 4:36pm Edited Date/Time 12/24/2010 4:38pm
Teggers I am just speaking the truth about the clear double standard that exists between motorcycle noise and just about everything else. Interesting that you bring up nightclubs. There is a big outdoor concert venue near me. When they have an event the sound is continuos and at a level much greater than that of any motocross / supercross race or practice. Neighbors have complained, but the city council gives them a pass.



Why? Revenue and the fact that a large percentage of people want the place to remain open.



Guess what used to be at the very same location several years before? A motocross track - at least until enough people complained about the dust and the noise.



So a concert venue that is WAY louder on peak decibels is allowed to operate, but a motocross track that is considerably quieter is not allowed to operate.



Someone please tell me again how quieter bikes are going to save all are riding areas?



Look, let me make it clear quieter bikes are GOOD, I am all for them and Dad is right, there are many examples of where a quieter bike can help. One of my points, which is clearly supported by several posts from other people in this thread, is that for whatever reason, too many people have bought into the lie that if we just had quiet bikes everything will be OK.



Collectively, we need to put more thought into the issue and understand that the complexity is much deeper than the single issue of making our bikes quiet. I am not advocating louder bikes, but if we do our work, use the local, state and federal legislative process we can protect our riding areas and not have to spend near the time and energy we currently do trying to attempt what is arguably impossible - quieting every single dirt bike ridden off road.



Think about it, it only takes one bitchy neighbor to complain about a loud bike and it only takes one loud bike to get that neighbor to complain. There is no way we can get every offroad bike quiet enough so that no one complains. We can, however, keep or pass legislayion that protects our right to ride our bikes on our own private land. Passing legislation and defending our rights would be a more effective use of our time in keeping our tracks open when compared to the reality that in the end, just having quiet bikes will absolutely not get the job done.



To be sure we need to do both, have quiet bikes and fight for our rights. The problem I am trying to identify is that WAY too many people are not working on the fighting for our rights side of things and that a good number of those people don't do so because they seem to think the solution to the problem is to just have quiet bikes.
teggers
Posts
3722
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL, USA
12/25/2010 2:25am Edited Date/Time 12/25/2010 2:26am
I know when I am out argued.



Again, good luck with your position.
akrider
Posts
3
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Kasilof, AK, USA
12/25/2010 1:43pm Edited Date/Time 12/25/2010 1:44pm
Keep fighting the good fight Rimlock. You get the honor of being the leader, cuz your the old man. MX has been preping you for this your whole life.



It is all about Noise, thats what their bitching about.



Thanks for the best cheese burger of my life.

Post a reply to: Another Track Near Closing

The Latest