Seriously, You Privateers Should

Rupert X
Posts
11086
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Newark, OH, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 6:40am


You guys desperately need to form a union, oops, a RIDER'S SAFETY COMMITTEE.


Call it the PROFESSIONAL MOTOCROSS RACERS ASSOCIATION, whatever, but

you need to do it.

Or, you can keep complaining forever.

And, suffering at the hands of others.
|
mertensmx365
Posts
75
Joined
10/13/2009
Location
Millstadt, IL, USA
12/19/2010 8:30am
I wish Vital had a "like" button.
in2mx
Posts
110
Joined
4/1/2010
Location
Rosburg, OR, USA
12/19/2010 8:34am
explian your union?
12/19/2010 8:41am
not to hard to explain....don't show up because the races are paying ridiculous entry fees, travel expenses, and no support, while they are the SHOW.

in2mx
Posts
110
Joined
4/1/2010
Location
Rosburg, OR, USA
12/19/2010 8:43am
ya thatd be cool have a strike no privateers at A1 but it wont happen. it should but wont

The Shop

Chris_ONeal
Posts
1273
Joined
5/14/2009
Location
Essex, CT, USA
12/19/2010 8:44am
From the ones I know only about half of them care enough to deal with the politics side of things. The rest either don't know what is going on and just want to ride or Daddy is paying their way and could careless about money.

Now with Warthog gone, its going to be even harder for real privateers to do the whole series especially the outdoors.
Rupert X
Posts
11086
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Newark, OH, USA
12/19/2010 8:47am
in2mx wrote:
explian your union?

Gathering of like-minded individuals intent on making things better for their coalition.

Not "MY" union. It would be an "OUR" Union.

And, for my money, I'd probably look to a guy like JT$Money to be the "leader".

Why him? He's smart, savvy, been around the motocross block and knows his

politics. Would he do it ? I don't know.

.
in2mx
Posts
110
Joined
4/1/2010
Location
Rosburg, OR, USA
12/19/2010 8:50am
The other thing is all the privateer teams ther being paid to be ther. so really you could only get the privateers in vans.I feel if your gettin paid from a team your not a true privateer
Rupert X
Posts
11086
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Newark, OH, USA
12/19/2010 8:58am

I get my ear tugged at EVERY motocross gathering - from Privateers and their parents,

complaining of HOW this and THAT need to be fixed in MX / SX and, I'm a great listener

and I think - that they think - that somehow, that I can make change. I can't.

But, together, we can.

It all starts with one man standing up.

Are WE the ONLY motorsport without a racer's association ?

Without representation, you get handed the plate and eat what is offered, only.

And, after a while, you live to accept that.
LouDog
Posts
709
Joined
11/8/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA, USA
12/19/2010 9:00am
in2mx wrote:
The other thing is all the privateer teams ther being paid to be ther. so really you could only get the privateers in vans.I feel if...
The other thing is all the privateer teams ther being paid to be ther. so really you could only get the privateers in vans.I feel if your gettin paid from a team your not a true privateer
Exactly but there are alot of riders paying there own way out of trucks also
SL91
Posts
863
Joined
4/4/2008
Location
Halifax, CA
12/19/2010 9:06am
Every major sport has a union and motocross needs one more than most, given that it is so dangerous and standardized safety measures could go a long way to preventing the end of any given rider's career. (Think of the infamous SX jump RV nearly ended his career on last year). I don't think it's ever going to happen though, because the very social matrix many of the riders and teams come from has a strong bias against any kind of union-
englishman
Posts
2835
Joined
3/7/2008
Location
England, GB
12/19/2010 9:28am
I thought this had already been tried and failed.

Didn't Albyteen & Emig talk about it years ago and Langston just a few months ago.

downandup
Posts
1241
Joined
5/24/2010
Location
In A Cave, CA, USA
12/19/2010 9:41am

Totally agree with you, these guys need to start a union. Everytime this is brought up, people here shoot it down. I'm surprised the negative no it alls haven't jumped in here yet.

Most of the riders are not paying attention to anything other than getting ready to ride. They aren't thinking about their future other than the next race, much less 6 months from now or 1 year from now. Ask them what they think they'll be doing 10 years from now and you'll get a blank stare. Ask them what would they do if they got hurt and it ended their career, and they would most likely say they don't want to think negatively and leave it at that. Heaven forbid they PREPARE for all possibilities.

So, getting a union together would be a great idea for them, but you will have to change their mindset.
Mod Killer
Posts
1827
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Worldwide, CA, USA
12/19/2010 9:59am
been there done that.

biggest problem, the very people you are trying to help, will be fighting you every step of the way. other racers, sponsors, etc will all tear you apart because they are unwilling to stand beside you and make the sacrifice needed. and sadly, for it to be really effective, you would need the dungeys, stewarts, and reeds of the way to spearhead this thing. reed might be mature enough at this point to get it and be willing to do it, but dungey and stewart would not.

you gotta remember, that most every racer in every motorsport doesnt have much of a education outside of racing. there understanding of economics and whatnot is very little. the motorsport athlete cant be compared to the typical stick n ball athlete (who is much more responsible politically) due to their mostly college educations.

sad thing is, if its good for the sport (which a union is, its helped every other motorsport) then its good for everyone involved in the long run. if you look back at the history of other sports, they became exponentially more profitable (for everyone not just the athletes) in the decades following the formation of unions. owners of teams fought it at first, but its hard to argue the results.

its not just the privateers who need this. its for everyone who isnt on worx equipment. the mfg's must be pushed back. teams should control the sport, not OEM's. whats good for the teams is good for racing. whats good for the racing is good for everyone.

im not here to shoot it down. just to point out some relevant facts/obstacles.
downandup
Posts
1241
Joined
5/24/2010
Location
In A Cave, CA, USA
12/19/2010 10:24am
I know you're not shooting it down.

Totally agree with your points.

Sad, but true.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
12/19/2010 10:44am
I wish Vital had a "like" button.
Have you ever looked at the bottom of the page? If you've set up Facebook connect, you can like threads here. Smile
MX4EVR
Posts
835
Joined
7/27/2010
Location
Canton, OH, USA
12/19/2010 10:48am
what is the cash payout for the top ten positions A-1 NOT counting parts/bike contingency????
what does the Event promoter pay?
SRP33
Posts
452
Joined
10/1/2008
Location
Shelton, CT, USA
12/19/2010 10:50am Edited Date/Time 12/19/2010 10:51am
Rupert X wrote:
You guys desperately need to form a union, oops, a RIDER'S SAFETY COMMITTEE. Call it the PROFESSIONAL MOTOCROSS RACERS ASSOCIATION, whatever, but you need to do...


You guys desperately need to form a union, oops, a RIDER'S SAFETY COMMITTEE.


Call it the PROFESSIONAL MOTOCROSS RACERS ASSOCIATION, whatever, but

you need to do it.

Or, you can keep complaining forever.

And, suffering at the hands of others.
Rupert
I have been putting somethings together with Sponsors for my Team that I am putting together and we all know that money is hard to come by
I have even been dealing with some teams well I thought they where teams lets put it that way and I have to tell you I can't believe how un professional the people have been that I have been dealing with. I send them product to test cost me money I do not get any phone calls saying the got the product, what the thoughts where on the products, nothing and some refuse to send them back its insaine.
The riders for the most part I would say are to young and live in fear for what ever reason not to communicate with others its better to tell someone they are not interested but thank you anyway than not to say anything maybe thats why a lot of riders have no job. There are always new kids coming up that are hungry in this sport, riders time is short so you need to make the most of it when you can and that means keep all your options open.
A Riders Union makes perfect sense I am a Teamster and have talked with The Teamsters about this they have some interest but I have not proceeded in doing anything because of the unprofessionalism of the riders
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
12/19/2010 10:53am
in2mx wrote:
ya thatd be cool have a strike no privateers at A1 but it wont happen. it should but wont
Just as an FYI, A1 would be the worst place to try and make a show of force. Nearly everyone's attention is focused on the top guys, not the privateers, and there are too many storylines. It'd get buried in the hype.

Also, at A1 you could have no privateers show up, and probably still have a full gate in the 450 class.

Now near the end of the season, as the field thins? That'd be different.

And Rup, if you're going to call it a Safety Committee, then it should deal with safety issues. If you want to tackle purse or expense issues, call it something else.
TeamGreen
Posts
37792
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
12/19/2010 10:56am Edited Date/Time 12/19/2010 10:59am
not to hard to explain....don't show up because the races are paying ridiculous entry fees, travel expenses, and no support, while they are the SHOW.

While -I AM- a supporter of the Privateer's cause: The whole "We ARE the Show" argument has already become a lost cause.



This years 450 field will have very few privateers and the Lites program will be more "Team Exclusive" than ever...



So, a viable position is needed.



The idea of a "Rider's Safety Committee" has merit. It'll need the support of folks like JS7, RD5, CR22...etc., too.



As to the issue of "Expense"...? Yes, it is expensive. Hell, Jus' the travel budget for someone on 1 of the smaller/lightly supported teams is a huge undertaking (I'm currently working on this very situation/circumstance).



Another-thing: It's time to, finally, put an honest definition on the term,"Privateer".



Do I consider my rider a "Real" Privateer? He's buying his own practice bike(s) and paying his own entries, travel...etc.; yet, he'll have a race bike, rig, gear, race-day tires*...etc. provided for him.



Meanwhile: I watch the Moto-Community call riders on teams like Valli "Privateers"...?



JGR is a Privateer operation?



Well?



bents
Posts
3428
Joined
12/31/2009
Location
CA
Fantasy
12/19/2010 10:58am
Rupert,

I've written to magazines (one was published on the now deceased MXracer) about the necessity for a riders union. This comes up every 6 months or so, or after a serious incident where a rider or several riders complained about something and it never got addressed, and bang something happens.

Everyone who has posted has legitimate points to make. I believe that a worker's right is also a human right, and to me pro mx riders don't have any rights at all. Some very fast and famous riders have made a bit of noise about it, but then back away from it just as quickly. Its too bad b/c their leadership would essential.

I also believe that if workers don't have rights, their employers will fuck them over and rip them off more often than not, and it will always be that way-that is why unions are required, period. Wall street meltdown? The middle and lower classes paid the bills while the top dogs made off like bandits. Fact.

Courage and conviction in spades would be required to make this happen in our sport and the people in power will do everything possible from letting that happen. That is also fact. Until this happens-pro riders will continue to get fucked, except for the very few top dogs-sound familiar?
Rupert X
Posts
11086
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Newark, OH, USA
12/19/2010 11:02am Edited Date/Time 12/19/2010 11:02am


Good points all. Appreciate the constructive input.



I would presume - that in the backrooms of our sport's movers and shakers -



there was a collective sigh of relief when Langston & Reed failed to follow



through with their UNION plans. Perhaps they received warnings ? Subtle or



otherwise...



Who knows - the fact remains that currently - most of the riders



would benefit with the features of a union, especially things like safety situations,



a REALISTIC payout, disability entitlements, etc....



Will the privateers be SMART enough and BRAVE enough to form up, take



a stand and quit complaining and take action ? I doubt it,



but would very much like to see it and would be anxious to assist.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
12/19/2010 11:03am
Oh, and for the record? I expect that there'll be some chatter on this, and a lot of keyboard mashing and finger-pointing (picture an unruly mob chanting, "Promoters are evil! Pay the riders more!")...

And nothing will happen. Just like always.

Personally, when Chad and Langston were making noise about doing something, I thought that one stood the best chance of gaining some momentum. But when you get down to it, something like this requires a lot of heavy lifting (phone time talking with others, planning and persuasion, then implementation and maintenance) that takes away from race prep. Also, when the riders are competing against each other, what's good for one rider may not be good for another. Getting everyone on the same page? That may be nearly impossible.
bents
Posts
3428
Joined
12/31/2009
Location
CA
Fantasy
12/19/2010 11:12am
GuyB,

Totally agree-I thought when Chad and Grant got going I thought this may finally get some legs...but as long as Chad continues to race he cannot move this thing forward as it would take a completely committed effort to attain everything Rupert just posted. But, the bottom line is that most other sports have done it and have gone through substantial crap to get it done. It is not impossible, but the mountain is steep to be sure.

Pro mx is a lot like slave labor, with incredible risk mixed in for good measure.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
12/19/2010 11:18am
"But, the bottom line is that most other sports have done it and have gone through substantial crap to get it done. It is not impossible, but the mountain is steep to be sure."

Both basketball and football are looking at potential work stoppages in the next year, and I'm already picturing the gnashing of teeth over that one. It took fans a while to return to baseball after one of their strikes.

I know fans are all for the idea of a rider's union, but how many of the people that post here would still support the riders if they sat out a race...or five...or a whole season?
SRP33
Posts
452
Joined
10/1/2008
Location
Shelton, CT, USA
12/19/2010 11:36am
Riders Boycotted Vegas in 93 I think it was when the lights went out
Henry ,McGrath , Emig etc the promoters where pissed said they would never race again well we all know how that turned out
These guys today are in it for the money not the love of it when one of the top names gets killed and its all over the news than maybe and only maybe will something be done untill then the show must go on
bents
Posts
3428
Joined
12/31/2009
Location
CA
Fantasy
12/19/2010 11:40am
Well, that is the price they paid for BEING in a union. If you aren't prepared to stand up to that degree for your rights, then don't be in a union. Plenty have other normal folks have had to sit out for months to ensure their rights were respected and those situations were no different. I believe fans would support them if their causes were just-which they should be if they had to go on strike.

It was a harder sell for baseball when they went out to make millions more then the millions they were already making! But as far as revenue sharing, merchandising, retirement, health care-these are all super important to the professional athlete b/c their careers are incredibly short.

If the riders felt the track or a portion of the track wasn't safe, and they flat out refused to ride, would the fans be pissed? I don't think so. If the riders en masse refused to ride when RV crashed, would the jump have been modified to the degree that the risk was lessened substantially? I wouldn't be mad at that-I would have been impressed frankly.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
12/19/2010 11:51am
bents wrote:
Well, that is the price they paid for BEING in a union. If you aren't prepared to stand up to that degree for your rights, then...
Well, that is the price they paid for BEING in a union. If you aren't prepared to stand up to that degree for your rights, then don't be in a union. Plenty have other normal folks have had to sit out for months to ensure their rights were respected and those situations were no different. I believe fans would support them if their causes were just-which they should be if they had to go on strike.

It was a harder sell for baseball when they went out to make millions more then the millions they were already making! But as far as revenue sharing, merchandising, retirement, health care-these are all super important to the professional athlete b/c their careers are incredibly short.

If the riders felt the track or a portion of the track wasn't safe, and they flat out refused to ride, would the fans be pissed? I don't think so. If the riders en masse refused to ride when RV crashed, would the jump have been modified to the degree that the risk was lessened substantially? I wouldn't be mad at that-I would have been impressed frankly.
I think riders already have a decent feedback system, like Chad requesting that a quad jump (maybe aptly named) in Houston be changed...which it was before practice even started.

RV crashed in the main event at St. Louis. It's sort of hard to change a jump after a main has already started. If there was a problem with the jump, it should have been handled before the main started.

FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
12/19/2010 12:09pm
Unless you have every AMA Pro that races MX,SX or AX involved/a member of your union, it will not work.
You need every rider from the Ryan Dungey's down to #999 from Bumfuct Arkansans.
Nobody is going to care if a bunch of the non top guys sit out a few races or whatever.
Or that they are campaigning to get rid of tuff-blocks or have smoother tracks etc...
The show will go on without them, and within time other riders will step-up and fill their spots.

Another problem is....
If you had a union like that, sponsors like Monster who support alot of the riders and also the series are not going to want to be involved in the BS.
And I would assume they would pull personal sponsorship's from riders who wanted to strike/boycott a few races that they were also the title sponsor of.And within time possibly pull all their support out of the sport.

I could go on and on.....

The sport does need some fixing and it really should not need a union in the first place.






B DUB 333
Posts
772
Joined
9/9/2010
Location
New Richland, MN, USA
12/19/2010 12:12pm
Eh, if they form a union and dont ride....we'll just replace em with illegal immigrantsTongue
bents
Posts
3428
Joined
12/31/2009
Location
CA
Fantasy
12/19/2010 12:24pm
GuyB,

The example of track safety is but one of many issues that riders need input and representation on within their "job". It is my firm belief that any rider who makes a SX main event should be able to make a good salary on purse alone, even in 20th place. If I placed 20th in 17 consecutive main events, I should be able to afford myself and my family a decent living after expenses, with a decent health care plan and a contribution to a retirement plan. Now that would be a union. We don't know what the books show in SX or MX for that matter, and that is a huge part of the problem. The riders are partners in this thing, so revenue sharing should be a consideration b/c without them, there is no event.

And FastEddy, you're right-everyone has be in. If you become a pro rider, you automatically become a member and pay your dues. And, yes, it is worth the hassle b/c right now riders are disposable assets, nothing more in the current system (if you want to call it a system at all). You can point out every reason why it shouldn't happen, but fundamentally the reasons it should happen are much stronger, and most have been listed.

Post a reply to: Seriously, You Privateers Should

The Latest