Posts
1561
Joined
7/23/2024
Location
Tallahassee, FL
US
I think they got off cheap.....
Paramount, CBS forced to pay eight figures, change editorial policy in settlement with President Trump
Result of the agreement on lawsuit could reach north of $30 million with $16 million upfront
Paramount Global and CBS agreed on Tuesday to pay President Donald Trump a sum that could reach north of $30 million to settle the president’s election interference lawsuit against the network.
Trump will receive $16 million upfront. This will cover legal fees, costs of the case, and contributions to his future presidential library or charitable causes, to be determined at Trump’s discretion.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/paramount-global-settles-trumps-lawsuit-a…
That's Trump change.
So, ABC & CBS -both- have that phrase…
This will cover legal fees, costs of the case, and contributions to his future presidential library or charitable causes, to be determined at Trump’s discretion.
Isn’t it wonderful? Those lying piece of shit MSM ass holes are “The Primary Monetary Providers” for Trumps Presidential Library!
Bwaaaaahaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaa
Some of the 60 minute peeps were in tears after it was announced. Would they feel the same if they were on the financial hook for the settlement?
They ARE the problem.
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
They tried to manipulate public opinion of a presidential candidate by changing the answers to questions in an interview. Unfortunately, I watch my local CBS affiliate every morning for local news and weather and they have yet to mention anything about this story.
They DID manipulate public opinion with a false message…
With a LIE…
A FALSE NARRATIVE.
In 2016…& all too successfully in 2020.
Hence, my oft laid down sig-lines…
You Can Not Make This Shit Up
Orwell Was Right
Is the Wall Street Journel next?
What’s the number he hit them with…? $10B…?
I don’t know. Ole’ Rupert isn’t in the middle of trying to get his network buyout approved by the feds…. He may choose to hold his ground and see if The President is willing to go on the stand.
Did he go on the stand with his other settlements? ABC, CBS, etc.
No court .....they know they would lose.
Correct you are, sir.
Well…The Prez doesn’t have to…
The WSJ needs to prove the validity of their claims or…pay damages.
Trump told them it was a bogus document......and they went with it anyway. The below applies.
In the context of libel law, "absence of malice" refers to the absence of malicious intent or reckless disregard for the truth when publishing a potentially defamatory statement. It's a crucial concept, particularly for public figures, as it can determine whether a media outlet is liable for defamation.
Way more hair on those settlements. Not even close to that clear.
Look at the Cohen case President Trump dropped before he would have to testify.
Also, seems pretty likely the letter is real, and the sitting President of the United States was in regular contact with a Pedophile. Although I will go with innocent until proven guilty, but hard not to notice the circumstantial evidence is piling up…..
Hope I’m wrong, as it would be a terrible thing for America.
So, go on record, tell us who is on the so-called list?
Nobody seems to want to do that, you guys drive me nuts with your junior high antics.......just drama queens.
I have no idea what information they have. But no one is claiming there is an ongoing investigation in process which is the problem.
I fear people like Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and President Trump are all implicated. If true it shows that money is the real deep state.
If thinking exposing a potential pedophilia ring made up of the most powerful people in the country is a high priority makes me a drama queen…. I am guilty. The only way to make it go away is to let the sunlight in.
We are not talking about some white collar crime bullshit that we can sweep under the rug and ignore.
I concur and I’ll go as far as to say that the flight manifests are only fodder. What evidence actually exists is the question.
Their are witnesses, victims and even participants that can provide answers.
Maybe Ghislaine will spill some 'choice' secrets carefully packaged by the WH for public consumption, before being flown to live out the rest of her days in a Majorcan villa.
As for the Paramount settlement, the general opinion seems to be that this was just blatant extortion, paid so that Trump wouldn't block their looming $8billion dollar merger with SkyDance media. I can only find one passage of the Harris interview that was edited, or rather one answer about Israel that was condensed and used for two separate programmes. What else did they change, or 'lie' about specifically?
One of the "Usual Suspects" is chirping in.
All it takes is one. Where is Harris, in the witness protection program?
Post a reply to: "60 Minutes" spoke with their wallet...