A Criminal Trial Begins Today

SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13504
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX US
4/25/2024 11:29am

vital is not sending their brightest today are they? lmfao

I guess you don't. 

adjective. capable of being set on fire; combustible; flammable

Now you do.

4/25/2024 11:32am
OW38B wrote:

Only if true, I would never admit to something I did not do.

Bang trim, don't bang trim.......either way does not matter to me.

so why did he pay the money then? that is established fact. His lawyer literally went to jail for it.

OW38B wrote:
They felt it was prudent at the time.....Stormy said none of it was true.......but you know that. And you are aware the Stormy has a large...

They felt it was prudent at the time.....Stormy said none of it was true.......but you know that.

And you are aware the Stormy has a large judgment against via President Trump correct?

You make this too easy CLD.

You are aware she retracted that statement she made because she was in fear of NDA repercussions.  A simple google search will tell you that.

I don't care what she owes or doesn't. That judgment doesn't concern the facts of  Trump's guilt. 

2
2
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 11:33am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2024 11:33am

vital is not sending their brightest today are they? lmfao

You seem to be showing up more than most though.

If you were the brightest, you would be bringing the average up right? But since you say not the brightest today, guess it's working the other way....

3
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX US
4/25/2024 11:34am
slightly more on topic. If Trump came out and said, yeah I slept with a porn star, I tend to believe it would not have hurt...

slightly more on topic. If Trump came out and said, yeah I slept with a porn star, I tend to believe it would not have hurt him at all, agree/disagree?

Agree, it probably wouldn't have hurt him.  I mean, everyone knew Bill Clinton was sleeping with Hillary Clinton, but it didn't seem to have any negative...

Agree, it probably wouldn't have hurt him. 

I mean, everyone knew Bill Clinton was sleeping with Hillary Clinton, but it didn't seem to have any negative effect on him 🙂

Laughing

The Shop

OW38B
Posts
3619
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Coto de Caza, CA US
4/25/2024 11:35am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2024 11:36am

so why did he pay the money then? that is established fact. His lawyer literally went to jail for it.

OW38B wrote:
They felt it was prudent at the time.....Stormy said none of it was true.......but you know that. And you are aware the Stormy has a large...

They felt it was prudent at the time.....Stormy said none of it was true.......but you know that.

And you are aware the Stormy has a large judgment against via President Trump correct?

You make this too easy CLD.

You are aware she retracted that statement she made because she was in fear of NDA repercussions.  A simple google search will tell you that. I...

You are aware she retracted that statement she made because she was in fear of NDA repercussions.  A simple google search will tell you that.

I don't care what she owes or doesn't. That judgment doesn't concern the facts of  Trump's guilt. 

So the porn star was lying then or lying now?

You and your other CLD know the truth of what is going on here. What are you stupid CLD's afraid of? 

If Trump is as bad as you say the voters will vote the geezer back in and you can hug each other in joy.

1
5
TeamGreen
Posts
36574
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/25/2024 11:36am Edited Date/Time 4/25/2024 11:40am

why are you deflecting to Biden? Who has the court case here and is potentially going to become a felon? 

TeamGreen wrote:
It’s called a comparison. One President compared to another; hence, setting a precedent…but, he didn’t want to confuse you with the obvious difficulty in the closeness...

It’s called a comparison. One President compared to another; hence, setting a precedent…but, he didn’t want to confuse you with the obvious difficulty in the closeness of the spelling and enunciation of those 2 big words. 

And, we can all tell how you like them there big words! 

Comparison: As in your continuous angry mainstream news reported drivel about The Donald compared to what’s actually going on and who’s actually in the White House and supposedly running the county…

Then there’s one of your favorite other big words…

Deflection…

Yup! “Deflection”… and this is mentioned without “deflection”…as in your obsession to deflect via the need to try to tell others that you’re the smart guy in the room…so…versus you and your team constantly telling us how civil you are & how stupid we all are…well…you can just go read your own posts and get the point…oh, wait! 

No, actually, you obviously can’t.

We don’t have to make this shit up. You just keep doing it right in front of us. Even with your…

New screen-names…but, we know who you are by your same old angry name calling & same old angry fails.

So, please, keep trying to “match our energy”.

At this point, you’d do well to just try to discover some intellectual “potential energy” when it comes to these exchanges (btw, that’s more of that science stuff). 

I’m jus’ sayin’…(for posterity) 

Do you go through with a dictionary to help understand my posts? Honestly that makes sense given your cognitive abilities - keep doing it. Are you...

Do you go through with a dictionary to help understand my posts? Honestly that makes sense given your cognitive abilities - keep doing it.

Are you suggesting that me and MXguy are the same person? Could I assert the same about all you MAGA parrots in here with your tired platitudes?

 

I’m not suggesting anything…

I am stating the following for the record: 

There are those of you that have had a necessity to hide behind new screen-names. 

You call people certain and specific names due to your own insecurities and shortcomings.

You, and the person you just directly “jumped into bed with”(not that there’s anything wrong with that!), both are your own echo chamber and sure spend a helluva lot of time making that accusations at and about others. 

When you post responses like “Do you go through with a dictionary to help understand my posts? Honestly that makes sense given your cognitive abilities - …” well, we’ll just leave that out there…because, it’s you being you and that’s obviously lost…on…you. That makes me actually feel sorry for you. Not kidding. 

You lack energy. Your energy is sub-par when compared to a 60 year old man that’s siting in an office reviewing solid models on a computer and laughing about what you’re saying on the web in-front of God & anyone-else that’s laughing their asses off at the ease with which you drag yourself out into the middle of the room and thoroughly get all discombobulated. 

You are neither capable of nor do you even seem to comprehend the meaning of “civil discussion”.

What do we call someone that attempts to disparage someone’s education? Especially when emphasizing that a GED makes some men a lesser person?

We call them an Elitist. In your case, and ..again…on the record…you’re a False Elitist. Aka, a wannabe.

It is obvious from your lack of any actual debating skills. There’s no real retained knowledge there; so, again…the GED thing was very telling. Notice how I’m not the 1st nor only one to recognize what a completely ignorant commentary that was on your part? 

Anyways…there it is. Clarification without suggestion. Stated on the record. No intentionally implied misleading names/name calling or accusations as seen in most all of your posts. Statements. Facts. 

2
1
LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID US
4/25/2024 11:38am

TLDR

Did they get him this time?

4/25/2024 11:44am
TeamGreen wrote:
It’s called a comparison. One President compared to another; hence, setting a precedent…but, he didn’t want to confuse you with the obvious difficulty in the closeness...

It’s called a comparison. One President compared to another; hence, setting a precedent…but, he didn’t want to confuse you with the obvious difficulty in the closeness of the spelling and enunciation of those 2 big words. 

And, we can all tell how you like them there big words! 

Comparison: As in your continuous angry mainstream news reported drivel about The Donald compared to what’s actually going on and who’s actually in the White House and supposedly running the county…

Then there’s one of your favorite other big words…

Deflection…

Yup! “Deflection”… and this is mentioned without “deflection”…as in your obsession to deflect via the need to try to tell others that you’re the smart guy in the room…so…versus you and your team constantly telling us how civil you are & how stupid we all are…well…you can just go read your own posts and get the point…oh, wait! 

No, actually, you obviously can’t.

We don’t have to make this shit up. You just keep doing it right in front of us. Even with your…

New screen-names…but, we know who you are by your same old angry name calling & same old angry fails.

So, please, keep trying to “match our energy”.

At this point, you’d do well to just try to discover some intellectual “potential energy” when it comes to these exchanges (btw, that’s more of that science stuff). 

I’m jus’ sayin’…(for posterity) 

Do you go through with a dictionary to help understand my posts? Honestly that makes sense given your cognitive abilities - keep doing it. Are you...

Do you go through with a dictionary to help understand my posts? Honestly that makes sense given your cognitive abilities - keep doing it.

Are you suggesting that me and MXguy are the same person? Could I assert the same about all you MAGA parrots in here with your tired platitudes?

 

TeamGreen wrote:
I’m not suggesting anything… I am stating the following for the record:  There are those of you that have had a necessity to hide behind new...

I’m not suggesting anything…

I am stating the following for the record: 

There are those of you that have had a necessity to hide behind new screen-names. 

You call people certain and specific names due to your own insecurities and shortcomings.

You, and the person you just directly “jumped into bed with”(not that there’s anything wrong with that!), both are your own echo chamber and sure spend a helluva lot of time making that accusations at and about others. 

When you post responses like “Do you go through with a dictionary to help understand my posts? Honestly that makes sense given your cognitive abilities - …” well, we’ll just leave that out there…because, it’s you being you and that’s obviously lost…on…you. That makes me actually feel sorry for you. Not kidding. 

You lack energy. Your energy is sub-par when compared to a 60 year old man that’s siting in an office reviewing solid models on a computer and laughing about what you’re saying on the web in-front of God & anyone-else that’s laughing their asses off at the ease with which you drag yourself out into the middle of the room and thoroughly get all discombobulated. 

You are neither capable of nor do you even seem to comprehend the meaning of “civil discussion”.

What do we call someone that attempts to disparage someone’s education? Especially when emphasizing that a GED makes some men a lesser person?

We call them an Elitist. In your case, and ..again…on the record…you’re a False Elitist. Aka, a wannabe.

It is obvious from your lack of any actual debating skills. There’s no real retained knowledge there; so, again…the GED thing was very telling. Notice how I’m not the 1st nor only one to recognize what a completely ignorant commentary that was on your part? 

Anyways…there it is. Clarification without suggestion. Stated on the record. No intentionally implied misleading names/name calling or accusations as seen in most all of your posts. Statements. Facts. 

Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument? 

You are getting cooked relentlessly in here because the facts are just not on your side. The ad-hominem is just me having fun cause you get so triggered by it.  

 

2
6
4/25/2024 11:49am
OW38B wrote:
They felt it was prudent at the time.....Stormy said none of it was true.......but you know that. And you are aware the Stormy has a large...

They felt it was prudent at the time.....Stormy said none of it was true.......but you know that.

And you are aware the Stormy has a large judgment against via President Trump correct?

You make this too easy CLD.

You are aware she retracted that statement she made because she was in fear of NDA repercussions.  A simple google search will tell you that. I...

You are aware she retracted that statement she made because she was in fear of NDA repercussions.  A simple google search will tell you that.

I don't care what she owes or doesn't. That judgment doesn't concern the facts of  Trump's guilt. 

OW38B wrote:
So the porn star was lying then or lying now? You and your other CLD know the truth of what is going on here. What are...

So the porn star was lying then or lying now?

You and your other CLD know the truth of what is going on here. What are you stupid CLD's afraid of? 

If Trump is as bad as you say the voters will vote the geezer back in and you can hug each other in joy.

All i know is trump paid money with the specific intent of keeping her quiet. His lawyer went to jail for it. That is the truth of what is going on here. 

Funny how you discredit her but a second ago you trusted her when it suited you

3
3
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 11:50am
Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument?  You are getting cooked relentlessly...

Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument? 

You are getting cooked relentlessly in here because the facts are just not on your side. The ad-hominem is just me having fun cause you get so triggered by it.  

 

You think he's the one getting cooked? 

You're the one who thinks it's wise to leave someone with Presidential level access to and knowledge of classified government info without Secret Service protection in prison. You do understand there are many types of classified info right? Some that can be stored at home, and some that less than a handful are pricy to. 

It's the 2nd one you should have thought of before making such an ignorant statement. 

3
whyZ
Posts
1158
Joined
4/15/2009
Location
Phoenix, AZ US
4/25/2024 11:53am

why are you deflecting to Biden? Who has the court case here and is potentially going to become a felon? 

"How many times does Trump have to prove we can't be trusted." 

Straight from Joes mouth to your ears.  Finally, the truth comes out.   

2
1
4/25/2024 11:53am
Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument?  You are getting cooked relentlessly...

Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument? 

You are getting cooked relentlessly in here because the facts are just not on your side. The ad-hominem is just me having fun cause you get so triggered by it.  

 

You think he's the one getting cooked?  You're the one who thinks it's wise to leave someone with Presidential level access to and knowledge of classified...

You think he's the one getting cooked? 

You're the one who thinks it's wise to leave someone with Presidential level access to and knowledge of classified government info without Secret Service protection in prison. You do understand there are many types of classified info right? Some that can be stored at home, and some that less than a handful are pricy to. 

It's the 2nd one you should have thought of before making such an ignorant statement. 

I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that?

I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary just for him Smile

2
3
4/25/2024 11:56am

why are you deflecting to Biden? Who has the court case here and is potentially going to become a felon? 

whyZ wrote:

"How many times does Trump have to prove we can't be trusted." 

Straight from Joes mouth to your ears.  Finally, the truth comes out.   

a gaf. Trump has plenty as well. No one is defending geriatrics in politics in here. 

Nonetheless its still grasping at straws as the substance of your argument is falling apart. Classic

1
4
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX US
4/25/2024 11:58am
LungButter wrote:

TLDR

Did they get him this time?

I can help with this, possibly.

TeamGreen
Posts
36574
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/25/2024 12:07pm
Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument?  You are getting cooked relentlessly...

Not even going to bother reading these paragraphs lmao. Here's a quick quiz - how do you form a logical argument? 

You are getting cooked relentlessly in here because the facts are just not on your side. The ad-hominem is just me having fun cause you get so triggered by it.  

 

You think he's the one getting cooked?  You're the one who thinks it's wise to leave someone with Presidential level access to and knowledge of classified...

You think he's the one getting cooked? 

You're the one who thinks it's wise to leave someone with Presidential level access to and knowledge of classified government info without Secret Service protection in prison. You do understand there are many types of classified info right? Some that can be stored at home, and some that less than a handful are pricy to. 

It's the 2nd one you should have thought of before making such an ignorant statement. 

Psssst..let him and his ilk have their false victories…

It ALWAYS makes things so much better and more entertaining when their wheels come ALL THE WAY OFF…& they show up in the future…again…with yet another…

New Screen Name

as required for the permanently banished liars and self-imploders. Asylum? Anyone? Bueller? 

Anyhoo…the ever so mean and uncooperative rat bastard .060 radii that REFUSED to take their positions in today’s extremely challenging concave features within a convex mold surface have finally cooperated. 

So, as my previously frustrated engineering crew and I…oh, and Milo…head to the beach for a Pastrami and a Pacifico…maybe 2, I’m gonna have to admit that this was fun & I bid you all…

”Adieu!” 

For concave, that means “See ya!” (Didn’t want you to have to look it up).

1
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 12:23pm Edited Date/Time 4/25/2024 12:24pm
I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that? I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary...

I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that?

I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary just for him Smile

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind that the max for this is something like 4 years, but seems most first time offenders just get probation. 

So let's see:

Former President 

Now a felon ( using your hoped for result )

Serving time on parole. 

Without Secret Service protection. 

Nah, nothing could go wrong there. 

Did you by chance used to be called akillerwombat? You're argument style is strikingly similar. 

2
4
4/25/2024 12:25pm

4 more years, pause!

lol!

what a dumb ass

2
3
4/25/2024 12:31pm
I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that? I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary...

I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that?

I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary just for him Smile

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind...

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind that the max for this is something like 4 years, but seems most first time offenders just get probation. 

So let's see:

Former President 

Now a felon ( using your hoped for result )

Serving time on parole. 

Without Secret Service protection. 

Nah, nothing could go wrong there. 

Did you by chance used to be called akillerwombat? You're argument style is strikingly similar. 

You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly.

Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary - no secret service needed there. 

1
3
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 12:50pm
You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly. Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary...

You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly.

Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary - no secret service needed there. 

So now when you get your poor logic called out, suddenly it was a joke 😁😁

I expected as much....

1
1
4/25/2024 12:54pm
You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly. Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary...

You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly.

Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary - no secret service needed there. 

So now when you get your poor logic called out, suddenly it was a joke 😁😁

I expected as much....

Not surprised that you are upset the joke went over your head. Most adults don’t use emojis like that seriously online but here you are 

1
4
4/25/2024 1:00pm
You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly. Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary...

You guys have a hard time understanding jokes sadly.

Since you are so concerned with the economics of it we can lock him up in solitary - no secret service needed there. 

So now when you get your poor logic called out, suddenly it was a joke 😁😁

I expected as much....

Not surprised that you are upset the joke went over your head. Most adults don’t use emojis like that seriously online but here you are 

I get where you are coming from with Trump. He is a dickhead who I personally would rather just go away. But you have to find it suspect the timing of all these "charges" and the turning of a blind eye to any miss doing from Democrat counterparts. They are scared to death of this man winning the Presidency and are pulling out all the cards. Makes you wonder what kind of government of the people by the people we really have anymore. They want to take the front runner out of the election are are obviously stopping at nothing to do it. That scares me way more than anything Trump is accused of doing. Just because its going your way this time what happens when they turn on your guy. Why not just let Americans decide how this is going to go? 

2
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 1:04pm Edited Date/Time 4/25/2024 1:05pm

Not surprised that you are upset the joke went over your head. Most adults don’t use emojis like that seriously online but here you are 

Oh sure, it was a joke. 

Not an attempt to sidestep that you hadn't considered the possible ramifications of a President having Secret Service taken away. 

And yet you think you made a "joke" that went over my head. Does your Mom know you are online ? 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

Edited for more emojis 

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

1
2
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 1:07pm
I get where you are coming from with Trump. He is a dickhead who I personally would rather just go away. But you have to find...

I get where you are coming from with Trump. He is a dickhead who I personally would rather just go away. But you have to find it suspect the timing of all these "charges" and the turning of a blind eye to any miss doing from Democrat counterparts. They are scared to death of this man winning the Presidency and are pulling out all the cards. Makes you wonder what kind of government of the people by the people we really have anymore. They want to take the front runner out of the election are are obviously stopping at nothing to do it. That scares me way more than anything Trump is accused of doing. Just because its going your way this time what happens when they turn on your guy. Why not just let Americans decide how this is going to go? 

That's what the Democrats and RINOs are scared of - American citizens and losing power to them. 

4
2
4/25/2024 1:14pm
I get where you are coming from with Trump. He is a dickhead who I personally would rather just go away. But you have to find...

I get where you are coming from with Trump. He is a dickhead who I personally would rather just go away. But you have to find it suspect the timing of all these "charges" and the turning of a blind eye to any miss doing from Democrat counterparts. They are scared to death of this man winning the Presidency and are pulling out all the cards. Makes you wonder what kind of government of the people by the people we really have anymore. They want to take the front runner out of the election are are obviously stopping at nothing to do it. That scares me way more than anything Trump is accused of doing. Just because its going your way this time what happens when they turn on your guy. Why not just let Americans decide how this is going to go? 

That's what the Democrats and RINOs are scared of - American citizens and losing power to them. 

Back to the baseless conspiracy theories I see. 
 

this is all in prep for when your guy loses to a walking corpse lmao 

3
3
TeamGreen
Posts
36574
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/25/2024 1:26pm

Not surprised that you are upset the joke went over your head. Most adults don’t use emojis like that seriously online but here you are 

Oh sure, it was a joke.  Not an attempt to sidestep that you hadn't considered the possible ramifications of a President having Secret Service taken away. ...

Oh sure, it was a joke. 

Not an attempt to sidestep that you hadn't considered the possible ramifications of a President having Secret Service taken away. 

And yet you think you made a "joke" that went over my head. Does your Mom know you are online ? 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

Edited for more emojis 

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

The joke that went over our heads, right?

Bwaaahaaaaahaaaaaaa

Gentlemen (yes, I’m bing inclusive), that was the President of these United States exemplifying a Freudian Slip. 

When someone even tries to defend the shit this administration feeds us… from KJP to Admiral Cover’s Joe’s Ass to the ever-present and angry TDS sufferer, concave…we should simply just laugh at them.

Because, we all know what we’re witnessing. 

BTW, greetings form lunch… I took the bike and beat the crew that drove. Went for a bit of a “sunrise” when I got here. 
Laughing

2
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
4/25/2024 1:33pm Edited Date/Time 4/25/2024 1:34pm

Back to the baseless conspiracy theories I see. 
 

this is all in prep for when your guy loses to a walking corpse lmao 

So that's your line of thinking - a near braindead walking corpse is a better option for President that Trump (or RFK Jr), as long as that near braindead walking corpse is a Democrat/liberal. 

Stupidity like that deserves more emojis 

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

3
2
TeamGreen
Posts
36574
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/25/2024 1:43pm
I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that? I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary...

I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that?

I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary just for him Smile

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind...

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind that the max for this is something like 4 years, but seems most first time offenders just get probation. 

So let's see:

Former President 

Now a felon ( using your hoped for result )

Serving time on parole. 

Without Secret Service protection. 

Nah, nothing could go wrong there. 

Did you by chance used to be called akillerwombat? You're argument style is strikingly similar. 

Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or were?

Why haven’t they? 

Why won’t they?

Why do they need to hide?

Where’s the integrity in that? 

You know, neither one of them seems very civil or capable or even “nice”. They’re both kinda angry and hateful. 

I’m jus’ sayin’…

1
4
4/25/2024 1:46pm
I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that? I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary...

I am sure he will be in general population, how didn't I think of that?

I am sure they can invent the failed former president penitentiary just for him Smile

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind...

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind that the max for this is something like 4 years, but seems most first time offenders just get probation. 

So let's see:

Former President 

Now a felon ( using your hoped for result )

Serving time on parole. 

Without Secret Service protection. 

Nah, nothing could go wrong there. 

Did you by chance used to be called akillerwombat? You're argument style is strikingly similar. 

TeamGreen wrote:
Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or...

Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or were?

Why haven’t they? 

Why won’t they?

Why do they need to hide?

Where’s the integrity in that? 

You know, neither one of them seems very civil or capable or even “nice”. They’re both kinda angry and hateful. 

I’m jus’ sayin’…

You’re so mad someone new invaded your safe space that you resort to a new conspiracy theory that I’m some other past banned person. 
 

why am I not surprised that you’d bite on this line of reasoning? lol 

1
8
TeamGreen
Posts
36574
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/25/2024 2:03pm
So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind...

So you think it is wise to spend millions of dollars (US taxpayer dollars) to build a special prison for Trump? Of course you do. Nevermind that the max for this is something like 4 years, but seems most first time offenders just get probation. 

So let's see:

Former President 

Now a felon ( using your hoped for result )

Serving time on parole. 

Without Secret Service protection. 

Nah, nothing could go wrong there. 

Did you by chance used to be called akillerwombat? You're argument style is strikingly similar. 

TeamGreen wrote:
Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or...

Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or were?

Why haven’t they? 

Why won’t they?

Why do they need to hide?

Where’s the integrity in that? 

You know, neither one of them seems very civil or capable or even “nice”. They’re both kinda angry and hateful. 

I’m jus’ sayin’…

You’re so mad someone new invaded your safe space that you resort to a new conspiracy theory that I’m some other past banned person.    why...

You’re so mad someone new invaded your safe space that you resort to a new conspiracy theory that I’m some other past banned person. 
 

why am I not surprised that you’d bite on this line of reasoning? lol 

So, you’re saying you haven’t had another/other screen names?

I’ll bet you’d be the same way if we were talking physics: you’d attack the theory without offering any reasonable input…at all.

There’s only 2 reasons for that:

You got nothing and you know you’ve lost any credibility (pretty sure that’s the answer)

You’re hiding the truth: you know you’re wrong. (Also, pretty sure that’s the answer)

😂

My guys just pulled up (they drove the damn “Clone Drone”. Yech, that’s what we call the Cyber Truck…)

You have a nice day. I’m gonna go order a round for some very capable peeps that had the lung expanding laughter based opportunity to read some of your earlier fails when we were in the office. One of’em labeled you “a truly untalented troll”. It solicited laughter. Most of’em are Silicon Valley types and they have no appreciation for poor posting skills. 

2
1
4/25/2024 2:17pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or...

Has either one of’em (re: the name calling angry posting Trump hating dudes here-in with a multitude of screen-names) told us what their various other screen-names are or were?

Why haven’t they? 

Why won’t they?

Why do they need to hide?

Where’s the integrity in that? 

You know, neither one of them seems very civil or capable or even “nice”. They’re both kinda angry and hateful. 

I’m jus’ sayin’…

You’re so mad someone new invaded your safe space that you resort to a new conspiracy theory that I’m some other past banned person.    why...

You’re so mad someone new invaded your safe space that you resort to a new conspiracy theory that I’m some other past banned person. 
 

why am I not surprised that you’d bite on this line of reasoning? lol 

TeamGreen wrote:
So, you’re saying you haven’t had another/other screen names? I’ll bet you’d be the same way if we were talking physics: you’d attack the theory without...

So, you’re saying you haven’t had another/other screen names?

I’ll bet you’d be the same way if we were talking physics: you’d attack the theory without offering any reasonable input…at all.

There’s only 2 reasons for that:

You got nothing and you know you’ve lost any credibility (pretty sure that’s the answer)

You’re hiding the truth: you know you’re wrong. (Also, pretty sure that’s the answer)

😂

My guys just pulled up (they drove the damn “Clone Drone”. Yech, that’s what we call the Cyber Truck…)

You have a nice day. I’m gonna go order a round for some very capable peeps that had the lung expanding laughter based opportunity to read some of your earlier fails when we were in the office. One of’em labeled you “a truly untalented troll”. It solicited laughter. Most of’em are Silicon Valley types and they have no appreciation for poor posting skills. 

Stories that didn't happen for $100, Alex.

If you could ever stick to the substance of the argument you probably wouldn't look like such a fool on here..

I own non-moto now. You are officially my son.

1
8

Post a reply to: A Criminal Trial Begins Today

The Latest