Transgender Day of Visibility

ProKawi24 wrote:

I think they have enough days, weeks, & months dedicated to the LGBTQ+ community so yeah it does appear to infringe on Easter for those years...

I think they have enough days, weeks, & months dedicated to the LGBTQ+ community so yeah it does appear to infringe on Easter for those years when they happen to land on the same day. I would suggest maybe they chose a better date so that it removes the possibility of this happening but you'll be hard pressed to find many open dates according to this....

https://www.emporia.edu/about-emporia-state-university/diversity-inclusion/diversity-inclusion-lgbtq/lgbtq-important-dates/

 

ProKawi24 wrote:

I think they have enough days, weeks, & months dedicated to the LGBTQ+ community so yeah it does appear to infringe on Easter for those years...

I think they have enough days, weeks, & months dedicated to the LGBTQ+ community so yeah it does appear to infringe on Easter for those years when they happen to land on the same day. I would suggest maybe they chose a better date so that it removes the possibility of this happening but you'll be hard pressed to find many open dates according to this....

https://www.emporia.edu/about-emporia-state-university/diversity-inclusion/diversity-inclusion-lgbtq/lgbtq-important-dates/

 

kbsci wrote:

There were gay people way before there were Christians.

ProKawi24 wrote:

That's your rebuttal?  I think you're tank is running low on defending the topic. Easter was established long before any of these awareness days. I'm only...

That's your rebuttal?  I think you're tank is running low on defending the topic. Easter was established long before any of these awareness days. I'm only suggesting they chose a different date to avoid it ever coinciding with Easter, a long well established holiday. It's a very simple idea to avoid the massive backlash that's flooded the news headlines all weekend. 

kbsci wrote:

I described what I believe and alluded to the existence of murders, rapists and pedophiles who think they’ve done nothing wrong. Where are you getting that...

I described what I believe and alluded to the existence of murders, rapists and pedophiles who think they’ve done nothing wrong. Where are you getting that I’m considering any consensus in defining my morals?

inflammable wrote:

In the very argument you are making. From your viewpoint, you cannot discount the arguments of those who do not consider what they did wrong. You...

In the very argument you are making. From your viewpoint, you cannot discount the arguments of those who do not consider what they did wrong. You have no solid foundation for your idea of what's right and wrong other than it "makes sense" which is an idea open to change. Remember, you stated there is no such thing as truth. 

kbsci wrote:

Please tell me what the truth is. 

kbsci wrote:

Please tell me what the truth is. 

inflammable wrote:

So not able to defend your beliefs any longer and already started backpedaling?

kbsci wrote:

I just really want you to get to your point. 

inflammable wrote:

My point was already stated.  I asked if you were a Pantheist.  You said you would have to check it out and see if it gives...

My point was already stated. 

I asked if you were a Pantheist. 

You said you would have to check it out and see if it gives with what you believe. 

I asked if you should be searching for what jives with what you believe, or searching for the truth. 

You said truth doesn't exist. I called that thinking into question. You tried to come up with counter arguments but ran empty pretty fast. 

Then you asked me to tell you what the truth is, which was not what I stated originally. 

So I ask you again, should you be looking for what jives with what you believe, or should you be looking for the truth and letting that lead your beliefs?

kbsci wrote:

I love talking about this stuff and I burned out on going deeper with you because all of your responses were “gotchas” with no substance. I...

I love talking about this stuff and I burned out on going deeper with you because all of your responses were “gotchas” with no substance. I feel like I got trapped in a corner at a party by a guy who thinks he’s more interesting than he is. You’ve taught nothing in this interaction so I’ve learned nothing and don’t care to start going around again. We’d be starting from the exact same place. 

Dirtydeeds wrote:

      Big Mike!

 

 

Big Mike!

inflammable wrote:

My point was already stated.  I asked if you were a Pantheist.  You said you would have to check it out and see if it gives...

My point was already stated. 

I asked if you were a Pantheist. 

You said you would have to check it out and see if it gives with what you believe. 

I asked if you should be searching for what jives with what you believe, or searching for the truth. 

You said truth doesn't exist. I called that thinking into question. You tried to come up with counter arguments but ran empty pretty fast. 

Then you asked me to tell you what the truth is, which was not what I stated originally. 

So I ask you again, should you be looking for what jives with what you believe, or should you be looking for the truth and letting that lead your beliefs?

kbsci wrote:

I love talking about this stuff and I burned out on going deeper with you because all of your responses were “gotchas” with no substance. I...

I love talking about this stuff and I burned out on going deeper with you because all of your responses were “gotchas” with no substance. I feel like I got trapped in a corner at a party by a guy who thinks he’s more interesting than he is. You’ve taught nothing in this interaction so I’ve learned nothing and don’t care to start going around again. We’d be starting from the exact same place.