Congressman has had it with MJ coverage

Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 6:50am
|
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 5:57pm
Ivan wrote:
That's his opinion, if he feels that way, but he should stick to the facts! There was never any proof MJ hurt kids! I fact, there is proof that he helped kids.
Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
7/6/2009 6:10pm
BUTCH wrote:
That's his opinion, if he feels that way, but he should stick to the facts! There was never any proof MJ hurt kids! I fact, there...
That's his opinion, if he feels that way, but he should stick to the facts! There was never any proof MJ hurt kids! I fact, there is proof that he helped kids.
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for NAMBLA?
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 6:14pm
Ivan wrote:
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for...
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for NAMBLA?
Where is the proof he did any such thing? Stop making stuff up!
Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
7/6/2009 6:22pm
Ivan wrote:
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for...
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for NAMBLA?
BUTCH wrote:
Where is the proof he did any such thing? Stop making stuff up!
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted, does that mean that you would be OK with your 9 year old staying at his house over night? Do you need to see the vid?

The Shop

BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:00pm
Wow, you're amazing ! When the prosecution couldn't get a jury to convict. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution team there genius!
SteveS
Posts
5598
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:02pm
Ivan wrote:
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for...
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for NAMBLA?
BUTCH wrote:
Where is the proof he did any such thing? Stop making stuff up!
Ivan wrote:
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted...
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted, does that mean that you would be OK with your 9 year old staying at his house over night? Do you need to see the vid?
I wouldn't let my kids stay overnight with any dead people.
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:14pm
You'd think a Congressman would know that it's ALWAYS in bad taste to speak ill of dead people. Once a person is dead, human judgement is kind of irrelevant. If anyone is interested, Bob Herbert wrote a great column about Jackson...sort of...

MJ
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
7/6/2009 7:14pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 12:47am
So I am clear, Ivan, if someone accuses you of something, you're guilty of it.


So if someone here says that you're a rapist and that you raped his daughter, it would be perfectly acceptable for everyone on this forum, in your personal and professional life to also call you a rapist, right?


Even if you go to court and the jury acquits you, everyone can still call you a rapist, no problem, correct?
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:20pm Edited Date/Time 7/6/2009 7:40pm
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
7/6/2009 7:24pm
Like someone's daughter specifically?
`ol Ger
Posts
6269
Joined
7/15/2007
Location
Piqua, OH, USA
7/6/2009 7:27pm
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:31pm Edited Date/Time 7/6/2009 7:40pm
flarider wrote:
Like someone's daughter specifically?
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
7/6/2009 7:33pm
`ol Ger wrote:
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
No, he was found guilty of kidnapping and armed robbery


`ol Ger
Posts
6269
Joined
7/15/2007
Location
Piqua, OH, USA
7/6/2009 7:34pm
Wise move, Butch
7/6/2009 7:38pm
Ivan wrote:
King is a Republican. He's probably pissed because MJ was cockblocking him.
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:43pm
`ol Ger wrote:
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
OJ was found guilty, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.
Farva
Posts
2045
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
7/6/2009 7:47pm
Ivan wrote:
King is a Republican. He's probably pissed because MJ was cockblocking him.
Bonepony is back
jonjon714
Posts
5916
Joined
4/29/2008
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
7/6/2009 8:16pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 12:47am
`ol Ger wrote:
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
BUTCH wrote:
OJ was found guilty, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.
OJ was found liable, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.



Different....................but the same.
drummer dude
Posts
1448
Joined
5/2/2008
Location
Hermitage, PA, USA
7/6/2009 9:00pm
`ol Ger wrote:
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
the glove didnt fit,so,they aquit.
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/6/2009 9:04pm
`ol Ger wrote:
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
BUTCH wrote:
OJ was found guilty, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.
jonjon714 wrote:
OJ was found liable, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.



Different....................but the same.
Ok , you are right about that.
Big Lenny
Posts
14378
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Compton, CA, USA
7/6/2009 10:15pm
BUTCH wrote:
That's his opinion, if he feels that way, but he should stick to the facts! There was never any proof MJ hurt kids! I fact, there...
That's his opinion, if he feels that way, but he should stick to the facts! There was never any proof MJ hurt kids! I fact, there is proof that he helped kids.
Ivan wrote:
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for...
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for NAMBLA?
I think that's Ivan without his glasses, Dude spoutin' shit he doesn't even know about, How many Jackson albums do you think he owns?...
Big Lenny
Posts
14378
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Compton, CA, USA
7/6/2009 10:17pm
Ivan wrote:
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for...
What kind of "proof" are you requiring? I guess jerking a 9 year old's pee pee is not physically hurting him so it's open season for NAMBLA?
BUTCH wrote:
Where is the proof he did any such thing? Stop making stuff up!
Ivan wrote:
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted...
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted, does that mean that you would be OK with your 9 year old staying at his house over night? Do you need to see the vid?
Didn't MJ have kids of his own?...I think you're a little pissed you couldn't spend anytime with him...
Farva
Posts
2045
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
7/6/2009 10:19pm
BUTCH wrote:
Where is the proof he did any such thing? Stop making stuff up!
Ivan wrote:
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted...
I'm going to hang my hat on the fair amount of under oath testimony. Now, what do you need as proof? Because he wasn't successfully prosecuted, does that mean that you would be OK with your 9 year old staying at his house over night? Do you need to see the vid?
Big Lenny wrote:
Didn't MJ have kids of his own?...I think you're a little pissed you couldn't spend anytime with him...
We won't know if he did for awhile.
DirtyFilter75
Posts
6915
Joined
1/9/2009
Location
Evansville, IN, USA
7/7/2009 7:38am
Big Lenny wrote:
I think that's Ivan without his glasses, Dude spoutin' shit he doesn't even know about, How many Jackson albums do you think he owns?...
because I own someone's album's makes them a good person?

I have real problem with finding somone not guilty then taking them to civil court. That IS double jeapordy no mattaer how you slice it!
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/7/2009 7:44am
I like the disrespect for the constitutionally supported legal system by the right-wingers. Conservatives my ass...
Bob693
Posts
1409
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
7/7/2009 8:13am
Big Lenny wrote:
I think that's Ivan without his glasses, Dude spoutin' shit he doesn't even know about, How many Jackson albums do you think he owns?...
Yea, you can't say anything if you don't own one of his albums. WTF?
DirtyFilter75
Posts
6915
Joined
1/9/2009
Location
Evansville, IN, USA
7/7/2009 8:14am
I understand the supposed difference but if OJ was found not guilty of killing his ex-wife and her BF how can he owe anyone money for that crime? It is legal posturing that says we are going to get you somehow for something period! You have to be guilty and even though we can't prove it we're going to keep trying until we make your life miserable. This is clearly a misuse of the judiciary system and it costs us taxpayers millions. I do not care whether OJ did it or not or Michael for that matter. I want to see an end to pointless litigation. If they are guilty put them away if they are found innocent drop it. It's very simple.
Bob693
Posts
1409
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
7/7/2009 8:15am
`ol Ger wrote:
OJ was innocent too.



g-out
BUTCH wrote:
OJ was found guilty, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.
jonjon714 wrote:
OJ was found liable, in the civil case Ger. Thank you Dave.



Different....................but the same.
And MJ settled his.

Different.....................but the same.
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/7/2009 8:18am
Big Lenny wrote:
I think that's Ivan without his glasses, Dude spoutin' shit he doesn't even know about, How many Jackson albums do you think he owns?...
Bob693 wrote:
Yea, you can't say anything if you don't own one of his albums. WTF?
Laughing Laughing Laughing
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
7/7/2009 8:24am
There was never a civil trial.

Post a reply to: Congressman has had it with MJ coverage

The Latest