all kidding aside

BobbyM
Profile picture for user BobbyM
Posts
21435
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
BobbyM
Edited Date/Time 1/26/2012 4:33am
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness.

considering that both candidates suck who do you think has the brains and guts to bring this country back to it what us America have been accustomed to?

william buffett?

andy grove?

mark cuban?

colin powell?

who?
|
calimxer91
Profile picture for user calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
calimxer91 10/25/2008 10:12am
10/25/2008 10:12am
Do you speak English?
Void Main
Profile picture for user Void Main
Posts
17013
Joined
3/19/2008
Location
USA
Void Main 10/25/2008 10:13am
10/25/2008 10:13am
Chuck Norris.
J.F.S
Profile picture for user J.F.S
Posts
4383
Joined
10/20/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
J.F.S 10/25/2008 10:16am
10/25/2008 10:16am
Bill Clinton
Big Lenny
Profile picture for user Big Lenny
Posts
14378
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Compton, CA, USA
Big Lenny 10/25/2008 10:19am
10/25/2008 10:19am
Fuckin' right, your court jester job is a lock...

The Shop

See All »
calimxer91
Profile picture for user calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
calimxer91 10/25/2008 10:19am
10/25/2008 10:19am
Dont forget B M as press secretary.
Big Lenny
Profile picture for user Big Lenny
Posts
14378
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Compton, CA, USA
Big Lenny 10/25/2008 10:22am
10/25/2008 10:22am
No doubt...
WhKnuckle
Profile picture for user WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
WhKnuckle 10/25/2008 10:25am
10/25/2008 10:25am
Secretary of Defense - Chuck Hagel or Colin Powell (with the other being NSA Advisor)
Secretary of Treasury - Warren Buffet
Secretary of State - Bill Clinton
Secretary of Homeland Security - Dick Lugar
Fed Chairman - Ben Bernacke
Attorney General - Dick Durbin

That'd be a good start.
calimxer91
Profile picture for user calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
calimxer91 10/25/2008 10:25am
10/25/2008 10:25am
Big pictures a Dolomite everywhere.
MXMatt
Profile picture for user MXMatt
Posts
553
Joined
10/18/2006
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
MXMatt 10/25/2008 10:39am
10/25/2008 10:39am
BobbyM wrote:
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness. considering that both candidates suck who...
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness.

considering that both candidates suck who do you think has the brains and guts to bring this country back to it what us America have been accustomed to?

william buffett?

andy grove?

mark cuban?

colin powell?

who?
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I see is that we are so polarized at this point about what that means that half the country would just see that person as a political hack for the other side. I, for example, liked the "greatness" under Ronald Reagan but did not under Bill Clinton. Half the country feels the opposite. See my point?
calimxer91
Profile picture for user calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
calimxer91 10/25/2008 10:41am
10/25/2008 10:41am
Please dont compare those two . My God man!
MXMatt
Profile picture for user MXMatt
Posts
553
Joined
10/18/2006
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
MXMatt 10/25/2008 10:45am
10/25/2008 10:45am
calimxer91 wrote:
Please dont compare those two . My God man!
Like I was saying.
WhKnuckle
Profile picture for user WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
WhKnuckle 10/25/2008 10:47am
10/25/2008 10:47am
MXMatt wrote:
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I...
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I see is that we are so polarized at this point about what that means that half the country would just see that person as a political hack for the other side. I, for example, liked the "greatness" under Ronald Reagan but did not under Bill Clinton. Half the country feels the opposite. See my point?
If Obama wins, he's going to have to appoint at least one and preferrably two Republicans to his cabinet. I'm sure he'd like to have Dick Lugar and Chuck Hagel - and he's also mentioned Arnold Schwarzneggar (Energy or Interior?). He's going to have to build a working bipartisan group or we'll never get this mess cleaned up. Neither party can do it on their own.
J.F.S
Profile picture for user J.F.S
Posts
4383
Joined
10/20/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
J.F.S 10/25/2008 10:49am
10/25/2008 10:49am
Some germans liked Germany when Adolf Hitler ruled, so I am not surpriesed people liked USA under Reagan.
MXMatt
Profile picture for user MXMatt
Posts
553
Joined
10/18/2006
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
MXMatt 10/25/2008 11:43am
10/25/2008 11:43am
J.F.S wrote:
Some germans liked Germany when Adolf Hitler ruled, so I am not surpriesed people liked USA under Reagan.
Are you saying that Reagan and Hitler were very similar?

I'd love to here the comparisons. I hardly think that a conservative president is anything close to a mass murdering psychopathic war monger like Adolf. Have at it.
BobbyM
Profile picture for user BobbyM
Posts
21435
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
BobbyM 10/25/2008 12:03pm
10/25/2008 12:03pm
BobbyM wrote:
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness. considering that both candidates suck who...
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness.

considering that both candidates suck who do you think has the brains and guts to bring this country back to it what us America have been accustomed to?

william buffett?

andy grove?

mark cuban?

colin powell?

who?
MXMatt wrote:
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I...
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I see is that we are so polarized at this point about what that means that half the country would just see that person as a political hack for the other side. I, for example, liked the "greatness" under Ronald Reagan but did not under Bill Clinton. Half the country feels the opposite. See my point?













being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to religious wingnuts akin to the enemy aka middle east regimes doctrine is also way wrong.

calimxer91
Profile picture for user calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
calimxer91 10/25/2008 12:05pm
10/25/2008 12:05pm
So youre saying you'll have Clown asses in your administration?
eddie
Profile picture for user eddie
Posts
3020
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Bragg Creek, AB, CA
eddie 10/25/2008 12:13pm
10/25/2008 12:13pm
MXMatt wrote:
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I...
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I see is that we are so polarized at this point about what that means that half the country would just see that person as a political hack for the other side. I, for example, liked the "greatness" under Ronald Reagan but did not under Bill Clinton. Half the country feels the opposite. See my point?
i see your point and i agree . what america desperately needs is a third and fourth political party to bring new perspectives and allow americans to get over the us against them mentality . better yet would be a system of no political parties , just individuals with their own ideas and opinions , but that is not realistic for a long time , if ever . if you only have the current two party system , nothing will change , no matter who the leaders are .
calimxer91
Profile picture for user calimxer91
Posts
5077
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lancaster, CA, USA
calimxer91 10/25/2008 12:16pm
10/25/2008 12:16pm
You forgot to put a BIG capital A on also.

Pit Row

See All »
MXMatt
Profile picture for user MXMatt
Posts
553
Joined
10/18/2006
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
MXMatt 10/25/2008 2:17pm
10/25/2008 2:17pm
BobbyM wrote:
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness. considering that both candidates suck who...
whoever wins this election is going to have a tough and difficult time restoring this country to it's former greatness.

considering that both candidates suck who do you think has the brains and guts to bring this country back to it what us America have been accustomed to?

william buffett?

andy grove?

mark cuban?

colin powell?

who?
MXMatt wrote:
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I...
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I see is that we are so polarized at this point about what that means that half the country would just see that person as a political hack for the other side. I, for example, liked the "greatness" under Ronald Reagan but did not under Bill Clinton. Half the country feels the opposite. See my point?
BobbyM wrote:
being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to...













being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to religious wingnuts akin to the enemy aka middle east regimes doctrine is also way wrong.

So how might someone be able to answer your origional question without an understanding of what your definition of our former "greatness" is? You're saying what think the situation is and what you don't want it to be but that leave my origional problem with the question yet unresolved. Maybe you weren't really being serious when you ask the question?
BobbyM
Profile picture for user BobbyM
Posts
21435
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
BobbyM 10/25/2008 2:27pm
10/25/2008 2:27pm
MXMatt wrote:
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I...
I like your idea here BobbyM. However, when you ask about "restoring this country to it's former greatness," what specifically do you mean? The problem I see is that we are so polarized at this point about what that means that half the country would just see that person as a political hack for the other side. I, for example, liked the "greatness" under Ronald Reagan but did not under Bill Clinton. Half the country feels the opposite. See my point?
BobbyM wrote:
being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to...













being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to religious wingnuts akin to the enemy aka middle east regimes doctrine is also way wrong.

MXMatt wrote:
So how might someone be able to answer your origional question without an understanding of what your definition of our former "greatness" is? You're saying what...
So how might someone be able to answer your origional question without an understanding of what your definition of our former "greatness" is? You're saying what think the situation is and what you don't want it to be but that leave my origional problem with the question yet unresolved. Maybe you weren't really being serious when you ask the question?
yer one of the lucky ones if you think
we are at our peak in terms of fiscal responsibility
military might and world leadership.

good for you i suppose
MXMatt
Profile picture for user MXMatt
Posts
553
Joined
10/18/2006
Location
Gilbert, AZ, USA
MXMatt 10/25/2008 3:49pm
10/25/2008 3:49pm Edited Date/Time 10/25/2008 3:51pm
BobbyM wrote:
being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to...













being in debt at the magnitude we are in equates to loserdom status imho, bombing soverign countries is another, relinguishing thde leadership of this country to religious wingnuts akin to the enemy aka middle east regimes doctrine is also way wrong.

MXMatt wrote:
So how might someone be able to answer your origional question without an understanding of what your definition of our former "greatness" is? You're saying what...
So how might someone be able to answer your origional question without an understanding of what your definition of our former "greatness" is? You're saying what think the situation is and what you don't want it to be but that leave my origional problem with the question yet unresolved. Maybe you weren't really being serious when you ask the question?
BobbyM wrote:
yer one of the lucky ones if you think we are at our peak in terms of fiscal responsibility military might and world leadership. good for...
yer one of the lucky ones if you think
we are at our peak in terms of fiscal responsibility
military might and world leadership.

good for you i suppose
What? I don't disagree with you about needing to return to geatness, I was just trying to get clarification about what you ment by it. I proposed a problem that I percieved would prevent people from agreeing on "greatness." If you didn't know what you meant by it and were just saying something without really thinking about it, no big deal. Nevermind.
Crash82
Profile picture for user Crash82
Posts
9022
Joined
9/16/2006
Location
MONTGOMERY, AL, USA
Crash82 10/25/2008 4:17pm
10/25/2008 4:17pm
JFS... same old shit, what a pussy. EAD. A bunch of fucktards discussing politics, lmao.
No Spin Zone 10/25/2008 4:33pm
10/25/2008 4:33pm
Crash82 wrote:
JFS... same old shit, what a pussy. EAD. A bunch of fucktards discussing politics, lmao.
What a contribution.
Crash82
Profile picture for user Crash82
Posts
9022
Joined
9/16/2006
Location
MONTGOMERY, AL, USA
Crash82 10/25/2008 5:20pm
10/25/2008 5:20pm
Crash82 wrote:
JFS... same old shit, what a pussy. EAD. A bunch of fucktards discussing politics, lmao.
No Spin Zone wrote:
What a contribution.
Ya I should went with the America loves Hitler angle....

Post a reply to: all kidding aside