How come no one has interviewed

JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
Edited Date/Time 5/20/2014 12:48pm
Someone from Wada or Usada and asked point blank,
Who are you going to test?
Whos on your radar?
and why?

And when? Before, during, after a race Or all 3?
And where?
Porta pottie, motorhome, the medical trailer or behind the box van?

Or who by coughbullshitcough "random" by what method? Clothespins, drawing straws, pick a number between 1 and 1000?

Or do they pick a guy by performance, fade, how he looks after a race, spent, not tired, not even coming to a race, recovering from an injury, ran out of gas and carried his bike back to the pits and picks up his workout that got cut short on Wednesday, in the hot sun to boot?

Or do they just say, test the winner? Or pick a race and test all 22 or 40 in the main or motos?

Surely there is a method to the madness.

I know who Id test first and why. Its not who you think.
Who you guys got?

This is a big topic on a couple workout boards. Their thoughts are pretty interesting.
|
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
5/20/2014 7:29am
Well, if they were asked all of those questions, it wouldn't be random testing.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
5/20/2014 7:31am
What, no link? Biggest discussion I ever saw (only one actually...lol) on a workout site was someone asking for help to remove the "redeye" from a photo. Funny chit there!
JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 7:35am
IceMan446 wrote:
Well, if they were asked all of those questions, it wouldn't be random testing.
Evidently you didn't read the whole post?

The Shop

JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 7:40am
newmann wrote:
What, no link? Biggest discussion I ever saw (only one actually...lol) on a workout site was someone asking for help to remove the "redeye" from a...
What, no link? Biggest discussion I ever saw (only one actually...lol) on a workout site was someone asking for help to remove the "redeye" from a photo. Funny chit there!
You dont post links to these boards.
And you cant just sign up on these boards.

And not moto boards. A few on here will understand why.
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
5/20/2014 7:44am
IceMan446 wrote:
Well, if they were asked all of those questions, it wouldn't be random testing.
JordanB wrote:
Evidently you didn't read the whole post?
No, I did. A few times.

But it makes no sense.

Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that would allow people who are cheating to gain in advantage.

I'm sure they have their methods but I doubt they would go into detail just for the simple fact of trying to keep everyone honest.

And not to mention, after a few of these tests, I'm sure the riders will have it figured out. Like in other sports. So the first round or two that they are testing at will truly be "random"
GrapeApe
Posts
8858
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
5/20/2014 7:52am
GrapeApe wrote:
JordanB wrote:
Doesnt tell me anything.

Thats for telling them where you are.
If you can't answer your own questions using the usada website, I can't help you. The answers are all there.
JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 7:55am
IceMan446 wrote:
Well, if they were asked all of those questions, it wouldn't be random testing.
JordanB wrote:
Evidently you didn't read the whole post?
IceMan446 wrote:
No, I did. A few times. But it makes no sense. Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that...
No, I did. A few times.

But it makes no sense.

Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that would allow people who are cheating to gain in advantage.

I'm sure they have their methods but I doubt they would go into detail just for the simple fact of trying to keep everyone honest.

And not to mention, after a few of these tests, I'm sure the riders will have it figured out. Like in other sports. So the first round or two that they are testing at will truly be "random"
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times.


Let me say it in a way you can understand. If you could have any free car on the lot....your random choice isnt random.
Youre going to sort it by color/options/style etc.

So random has to be chosen... somehow......someway... they have to decide who to pick.

How and why are they going to pick someone? How and why are they going to single out one guy?
Or multiple guys?

And who would you pick? I Know who Id pick.
GrapeApe
Posts
8858
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
5/20/2014 8:02am Edited Date/Time 5/20/2014 8:03am
JordanB wrote:
Evidently you didn't read the whole post?
IceMan446 wrote:
No, I did. A few times. But it makes no sense. Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that...
No, I did. A few times.

But it makes no sense.

Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that would allow people who are cheating to gain in advantage.

I'm sure they have their methods but I doubt they would go into detail just for the simple fact of trying to keep everyone honest.

And not to mention, after a few of these tests, I'm sure the riders will have it figured out. Like in other sports. So the first round or two that they are testing at will truly be "random"
JordanB wrote:
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times. Let me say it in a way you can understand...
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times.


Let me say it in a way you can understand. If you could have any free car on the lot....your random choice isnt random.
Youre going to sort it by color/options/style etc.

So random has to be chosen... somehow......someway... they have to decide who to pick.

How and why are they going to pick someone? How and why are they going to single out one guy?
Or multiple guys?

And who would you pick? I Know who Id pick.
I canz reads:

In-Competition Testing Selection

In-Competition testing plans are primarily developed by coordinating with each National Governing Body (NGCool and are often in accordance with IF rules. Athletes may be selected for testing by USADA based on criteria that typically includes established rules set forth by each IF.

An example of how athletes would be selected for in competition or event testing could be: Placed finishers, such as the top three finishers and randomly selected athletes, such as 5th, 7th, 12th, 18th, 19th, etc.




Now, before you ask the next question, they are not going to publish their random testing protocols and aren't gong to disclose them to the media either.
KlootZak
Posts
1324
Joined
7/15/2012
Location
Brussels BE
5/20/2014 8:06am Edited Date/Time 5/20/2014 8:08am
JordanB wrote:
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times. Let me say it in a way you can understand...
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times.


Let me say it in a way you can understand. If you could have any free car on the lot....your random choice isnt random.
Youre going to sort it by color/options/style etc.

So random has to be chosen... somehow......someway... they have to decide who to pick.

How and why are they going to pick someone? How and why are they going to single out one guy?
Or multiple guys?

And who would you pick? I Know who Id pick.
I'll help:

In statistics, a simple random sample is a subset of individuals (a sample) chosen from a larger set (a population). Each individual is chosen randomly and entirely by chance, such that each individual has the same probability of being chosen at any stage during the sampling process, and each subset of k individuals has the same probability of being chosen for the sample as any other subset of k individuals.[1] This process and technique is known as simple random sampling, and should not be confused with systematic random sampling. A simple random sample is an unbiased surveying technique.

and

Randomization is the process of making something random; this means:

Generating a random permutation of a sequence (such as when shuffling cards).
Selecting a random sample of a population (important in statistical sampling).
Allocating experimental units via random assignment to a treatment or control condition.
Generating random numbers: see Random number generation.
Transforming a data stream (such as when using a scrambler in telecommunications).
Randomization is not haphazard. Instead, a random process is a sequence of random variables describing a process whose outcomes do not follow a deterministic pattern, but follow an evolution described by probability distributions. For example, a random sample of individuals from a population refers to a sample where every individual has a known probability of being sampled. This would be contrasted with nonprobability sampling where arbitrary individuals are selected.


have fun: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomization Whistling Hopefully you now realize what random means ... Dry And they will pick a guy "randomly" by using a random number generator, namely this site http://www.random.org/. Officially sponsered by usada
IWreckALot
Posts
8677
Joined
3/12/2011
Location
Fort Worth, TX US
5/20/2014 8:30am
JordanB wrote:
Evidently you didn't read the whole post?
IceMan446 wrote:
No, I did. A few times. But it makes no sense. Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that...
No, I did. A few times.

But it makes no sense.

Why would they tell you their way of doing things? Especially in a manner that would allow people who are cheating to gain in advantage.

I'm sure they have their methods but I doubt they would go into detail just for the simple fact of trying to keep everyone honest.

And not to mention, after a few of these tests, I'm sure the riders will have it figured out. Like in other sports. So the first round or two that they are testing at will truly be "random"
JordanB wrote:
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times. Let me say it in a way you can understand...
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times.


Let me say it in a way you can understand. If you could have any free car on the lot....your random choice isnt random.
Youre going to sort it by color/options/style etc.

So random has to be chosen... somehow......someway... they have to decide who to pick.

How and why are they going to pick someone? How and why are they going to single out one guy?
Or multiple guys?

And who would you pick? I Know who Id pick.
Umm. You've attacked journalists a bit the last few days. . . If you're so intrigued, why don't you call USADA yourself and ask your questions then come back and report. Maybe you can get Pourcel on the phone also and see what he has to say about the testing. . .
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
5/20/2014 8:30am Edited Date/Time 5/20/2014 8:30am
JordanB wrote:
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times. Let me say it in a way you can understand...
Read the part where I asked how their "random" choices are decided a few more times.


Let me say it in a way you can understand. If you could have any free car on the lot....your random choice isnt random.
Youre going to sort it by color/options/style etc.

So random has to be chosen... somehow......someway... they have to decide who to pick.

How and why are they going to pick someone? How and why are they going to single out one guy?
Or multiple guys?

And who would you pick? I Know who Id pick.
Where do you randomly pull this shit from?

I dont think YOU understand what random means.

Edit: See Klootzak and GrapeApe's posts.
JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 8:42am
IWreckALot wrote:
Umm. You've attacked journalists a bit the last few days. . . If you're so intrigued, why don't you call USADA yourself and ask your questions...
Umm. You've attacked journalists a bit the last few days. . . If you're so intrigued, why don't you call USADA yourself and ask your questions then come back and report. Maybe you can get Pourcel on the phone also and see what he has to say about the testing. . .
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports.

Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid?
Clomid. Thats kind of funny in the grand scheme of Peds...
But hey, its got its use.

Ive never heard of the NFL guy so for some reason he was picked.
Why not a more well known name?

Random is not just random. Unless its grab a straw and someone gets unlucky its not really random.
GrapeApe
Posts
8858
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
5/20/2014 8:48am
JordanB wrote:
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports. Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid? Clomid. Thats kind...
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports.

Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid?
Clomid. Thats kind of funny in the grand scheme of Peds...
But hey, its got its use.

Ive never heard of the NFL guy so for some reason he was picked.
Why not a more well known name?

Random is not just random. Unless its grab a straw and someone gets unlucky its not really random.
Robert Mathis lead the NFL in sacks last season, and is a perennial pro-bowl player. Once again, you seem very misinformed.
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
5/20/2014 8:51am
JordanB wrote:
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports. Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid? Clomid. Thats kind...
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports.

Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid?
Clomid. Thats kind of funny in the grand scheme of Peds...
But hey, its got its use.

Ive never heard of the NFL guy so for some reason he was picked.
Why not a more well known name?

Random is not just random. Unless its grab a straw and someone gets unlucky its not really random.
How do they choose them then???

Do you even know their testing policy?
JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 9:13am Edited Date/Time 5/20/2014 9:17am
JordanB wrote:
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports. Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid? Clomid. Thats kind...
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports.

Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid?
Clomid. Thats kind of funny in the grand scheme of Peds...
But hey, its got its use.

Ive never heard of the NFL guy so for some reason he was picked.
Why not a more well known name?

Random is not just random. Unless its grab a straw and someone gets unlucky its not really random.
GrapeApe wrote:
Robert Mathis lead the NFL in sacks last season, and is a perennial pro-bowl player. Once again, you seem very misinformed.
HEs good. SO WHAT.

Why did they test him? Because he led the sacks?

Why didnt they pick a guy trying to get that good?

You just proved its not random.
Youre saying he was picked based on his performance.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
5/20/2014 9:24am
Jordan, why do you ask so many questions when you seem to know it all?
GrapeApe
Posts
8858
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
5/20/2014 9:26am
JordanB wrote:
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports. Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid? Clomid. Thats kind...
I dont need to. I know how they chose people in other sports.

Why did they just bust than NFL guy for Clomid?
Clomid. Thats kind of funny in the grand scheme of Peds...
But hey, its got its use.

Ive never heard of the NFL guy so for some reason he was picked.
Why not a more well known name?

Random is not just random. Unless its grab a straw and someone gets unlucky its not really random.
GrapeApe wrote:
Robert Mathis lead the NFL in sacks last season, and is a perennial pro-bowl player. Once again, you seem very misinformed.
JordanB wrote:
HEs good. SO WHAT. Why did they test him? Because he led the sacks? Why didnt they pick a guy trying to get that good? You...
HEs good. SO WHAT.

Why did they test him? Because he led the sacks?

Why didnt they pick a guy trying to get that good?

You just proved its not random.
Youre saying he was picked based on his performance.
In the NFL every player is tested at least once throughout the year. They tested him because his number was called. USADA does not sit in a big room somewhere watching footage of every athletic event over which they have jurisdiction and say "oooh, did you see that play? that guy is juiced, send a team!" "Look at Villopoto's late race lap times, send a team!" To them, the players/riders are just numbers. Those numbers are placed into random testing protocols and you are tested when your number is called.
GrapeApe
Posts
8858
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
5/20/2014 9:26am
GuyB wrote:
Jordan, why do you ask so many questions when you seem to know it all?
Apparently, his name is Paul.
JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 9:29am
No answer grape? You proved random isnt random.
You gave a specific reason why you think that guy was tested.
peelout
Posts
18379
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT US
5/20/2014 9:35am
newmann wrote:
What, no link? Biggest discussion I ever saw (only one actually...lol) on a workout site was someone asking for help to remove the "redeye" from a...
What, no link? Biggest discussion I ever saw (only one actually...lol) on a workout site was someone asking for help to remove the "redeye" from a photo. Funny chit there!
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
5/20/2014 9:35am
GrapeApe wrote:
Robert Mathis lead the NFL in sacks last season, and is a perennial pro-bowl player. Once again, you seem very misinformed.
JordanB wrote:
HEs good. SO WHAT. Why did they test him? Because he led the sacks? Why didnt they pick a guy trying to get that good? You...
HEs good. SO WHAT.

Why did they test him? Because he led the sacks?

Why didnt they pick a guy trying to get that good?

You just proved its not random.
Youre saying he was picked based on his performance.
GrapeApe wrote:
In the NFL every player is tested at least once throughout the year. They tested him because his number was called. USADA does not sit in...
In the NFL every player is tested at least once throughout the year. They tested him because his number was called. USADA does not sit in a big room somewhere watching footage of every athletic event over which they have jurisdiction and say "oooh, did you see that play? that guy is juiced, send a team!" "Look at Villopoto's late race lap times, send a team!" To them, the players/riders are just numbers. Those numbers are placed into random testing protocols and you are tested when your number is called.
Grape...I believe they are at minimum twice a year, once during preseason and once during regular season. Sometimes they are team tests and some are individual tests.

They can and will be tested more if they are in the "intervention stage" if they have had previous positive tests. Also, their contracts and stipulate how many tests they will receive a year if they have had previous issues with positive tests. The club has to pay for the tests and they still follow the NFLPA protocols.
disbanded
Posts
6923
Joined
8/26/2007
Location
Evergreen, CO US
5/20/2014 9:39am
GuyB wrote:
Jordan, why do you ask so many questions when you seem to know it all?
Because his name is Premix and he is trolling this site.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
5/20/2014 9:41am
GuyB wrote:
Jordan, why do you ask so many questions when you seem to know it all?
disbanded wrote:
Because his name is Premix and he is trolling this site.
Not for long.
disbanded
Posts
6923
Joined
8/26/2007
Location
Evergreen, CO US
5/20/2014 9:47am
GuyB wrote:
Jordan, why do you ask so many questions when you seem to know it all?
disbanded wrote:
Because his name is Premix and he is trolling this site.
GuyB wrote:
Not for long.
My hero!!!
GrapeApe
Posts
8858
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
5/20/2014 9:49am
JordanB wrote:
No answer grape? You proved random isnt random.
You gave a specific reason why you think that guy was tested.
Uh, yes, I responded directly to your post. He was tested because his number was called.
Pond Scum
Posts
258
Joined
12/17/2013
Location
Chilcoot, CA US
5/20/2014 9:54am
PremixJunky wrote: FUN! Anything that's fun, especially if it produces an adrenaline rush. Life is short, and I'm into far too many to list, but if it's cool in any way, shape, or form, I'm probably into it, or already did it. Tahoe, Havasu, Lake Powell, Snowmobiles and Snocross, Snowboarding and Skiiing, Wakeboarding, Supercross, Shifter Karts, Tunnel Boats, Formula 1 Races, and Fighter Jets,(F-18 Hornets specifically). The Mountains, the Sierra's especially, and the Beach, and Shopping, but not really for Myself. Usually for the Beautiful Girl in my life at the time. I do like long walks on the beach, fireplaces(especially in Winter, Teddy Bears, and classy candle light dinners with someone special. I used to race motorcycles(Motocross and a little Supercross and Arenacross), and was pretty good at it I will say myself. I raced Shifter Karts for a while for fun, and now race snowmobiles in winter off and on, but nothing full time. Just when I get that competitive bug, and I always go to win, and usually do fine. I have a New Video I made coming soon. It's a work in progress, and is of a whole winter season in the Mountains. I usually Videotape everything. I have a Sony HVR-Z1U bla bla Professional HDV camcorder and a smaller one for just everyday stuff. For food, I like Sushi, good Italian, American, and all sorts of Asian stuff. Of course Carls Jr., In-N-Out, and stuff like that, but that's kinda rare for me. I pretty much live on Supplements, Pure Protein shakes, and eat like when I had time to spend a bunch of time in the gym. I try to eat pretty clean and healthy. I don't really drink alcohol all that much, unless it's a special occasion, but enjoy having a good dinner and maybe some good wine somewhere classy now and then. Martini's are good and kinda a treat once in a while. I like going clubbing now and then for a change, mostly just to pull myself away from work and see people I usually don't get to regularly, plus to listen to some good music and beats.
JordanB
Posts
297
Joined
5/3/2014
Location
CA US
5/20/2014 10:14am
JordanB wrote:
No answer grape? You proved random isnt random.
You gave a specific reason why you think that guy was tested.
GrapeApe wrote:
Uh, yes, I responded directly to your post. He was tested because his number was called.
You gave a specific reason you think his number was called.

You posted his stats and his performance. Thats not random.

I didnt know a single thing about the guy.. I asked why was he chosen and you posted his stats.
yak651
Posts
8700
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
5/20/2014 10:27am
JordanB wrote:
No answer grape? You proved random isnt random.
You gave a specific reason why you think that guy was tested.
GrapeApe wrote:
Uh, yes, I responded directly to your post. He was tested because his number was called.
JordanB wrote:
You gave a specific reason you think his number was called. You posted his stats and his performance. Thats not random. I didnt know a single...
You gave a specific reason you think his number was called.

You posted his stats and his performance. Thats not random.

I didnt know a single thing about the guy.. I asked why was he chosen and you posted his stats.
No, you said you never heard of the guy - making it sound like they tested a no name. He pointed out that he is actually a well known player. For someone that knows everything you sure don't comprehend much...

Post a reply to: How come no one has interviewed

The Latest