Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
$25K a year is poor....get real. I could live off $25K a year now, if I had to.
The difference is I'm willing to change my lifestyle to do so, instead of stick my hand into someone else's pocket and take their money so I can live the way I do now. Can't afford eating out? Stop eating out. Can't afford that car payment? Take the bus. Can't afford that data plan on your cell phone? Turn it off. Can't afford your big screen TV with its 500 satellite stations? Turn it off. Read a book from the library. It's called living within your means. I see people with a similar cost of living in Taiwan live on 1/5th what I make. And, they do quite well.
For you to even mention a car payment on a salary of $25K tells me how lost you are.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
You have $6800 left after rent? Go live somewhere cheaper. Find a place to share with another family. There are TONS of options. If I had to live on $25K now, and didn't have my house (that pays for itself), I'd be living with a couple of roommates in the cheapest place I could find. I bet I could find a place for $300 a month after splitting it with three other people. That's $3600 a year. Guessing a net income, that leaves realistically $14K or so left. That's over $1000 a month.
My vision isn't Utopian. My vision is realistic. Your vision is coming from the entitlement mentality. Americans have become spoiled. WORK your way on your OWN to a financial position where you can afford things that those who make more than you already have. Make the money before you spend it.
If you find yourself dumb enough to have a family and only $25K from a job, with no opportunity for real advancement, then go work a second job to 'make ends meet'. Used to be that was a real option. I'm sure with today's modern American entitled crowd, they wouldn't even consider that.
I also know people who only make $30K at their jobs but have the equivalent to that in cash in their savings account. Why? Because they made smart financial decisions. They paid cash for everything. They bought a $1000 car, then when they saved up enough they sold that car and bought a $2500 car. They live in a small, yet nice, 1000 sq ft home with a $350 mortgage payment. They don't eat out. They may only make $30K/yr, but in my opinion they are the rich ones. Not the guy making $80K because bank statement to bank statement the $80k/yr guy has NO MONEY. He just has stuff. Stuff that he doesn't even own. VISA and the banks own his stuff. But man does he look rich!!
EDIT: Seems others have proved my point while I was typing this.
Don't you ever read any history? Since when has growing government and these programs actually solved problems and resulted in a successful economy? They ALWAYS fail when countries go this route. You're just repeating the errors.
You bitching about not having enough money while living in a 4 bedroom house and having internet and TV is comical. How many cell phones you have in that household of yours?
Typical.
Lemme ask you a question.
As much as you cuss and hate Walmart, what do you think would happen if they said fuck it, we're tired of it, we're folding up shop? Now what happens to those poor overworked, underpaid individuals?
Pit Row
The poor people aren't poor because the rich have all the money, and won't share, and so there is no money left over for the poor people...most all poor people are poor because they made/make poor decisions, lack work ethic, or are unwilling to take risks.
The rich can have as much money as they want...and the poor can still earn/make as much money as they want.
Their isn't a finite amount of wealth...there is enough that everyone can have as much money as they want (if they are willing to work for it, and take risks, and overcome failure).
Again, the reason poor people are poor has NOTHING to do with rich people...it has to do with the poor people making bad decisions. PERIOD.
Give a poor person a dollar, and they'll be back the next day asking for another (that is our current welfare system)...teach a poor person how to earn a dollar, and how to leverage that dollar, and they'll never need to ask for another dollar again (that is what our welfare system should be doing.)
I'm happy and content with my current income. I never work more than 30 hours per week, I can go to all my kids school activities, dance recitals, and sports events...I can ride and race as much as I want...I buy a new bike every two or three years...I drive a paid off 10 year old car...I have lunch with my wife every day...and I'm comfortable with my lifestyle and income. I don't earn more because I don't want too. Nobody is holding me down...or holding me back. I'm not "rich" because I don't want to be.
I'm gradually working on replacing my income with passive income...for retirement...and that's coming a long nicely. And in the next 10-15 years, income from those investments will replace my "day job" income and I'll call it a career...
None of those reasons have ANYTHING to do with rich people...or not enough money to go around...they have to do with making stupid decisions.
It's become apparent that you never really answer anyone's questions. Instead, you deflect, deflect, deflect. You answer questions with questions. So please, just give me your honest opinion about why you think the rich are rich and how they became that way?
In hindsight they would probably support a communistic type government if everyone had to live just like them and not get paid more than they do.
You won't get many answers out if a democrat, but you will get a ton of bitter questions thrown at you.
So I'll be waiting on your opinion about how the rich became rich. I think if you could answer my simple question, you would find the answer to your question. Even though that question was just a deflection of Titan's statement.
Post a reply to: 1-in-7 On Food Stamps