Seely going 4+4+3

ocscottie
Profile picture for user ocscottie
Posts
69092
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Redding, CA, USA
ocscottie
Edited Date/Time 11/16/2012 6:17pm
Pretty freakin gnar! Woohoo

|
Yamaharider1474 11/16/2012 11:37am
11/16/2012 11:37am Edited Date/Time 11/16/2012 11:38am
can we get the link? does not work well this way at work Smile
Jamie_Munro 11/16/2012 11:56am
11/16/2012 11:56am
is he on 450 there OC?
mtl
Profile picture for user mtl
Posts
1244
Joined
9/26/2011
Location
USA
mtl 11/16/2012 12:03pm
11/16/2012 12:03pm
250, pure skill.

The Shop

See All »
ML512
Profile picture for user ML512
Posts
17008
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA, USA
Fantasy
1317th
ML512 11/16/2012 12:03pm
11/16/2012 12:03pm
250... dude has such good flow!
tbanks
Profile picture for user tbanks
Posts
1515
Joined
5/28/2011
Location
Great Mills, MD, USA
tbanks 11/16/2012 12:08pm
11/16/2012 12:08pm
Clipped the second quad a lil bit, but still very impressive indeed!!!!!
Whoops_Blitzer 11/16/2012 12:34pm
11/16/2012 12:34pm
Uh oh, someone wants to race Tomac...
therealemoney 11/16/2012 1:28pm
11/16/2012 1:28pm
LaPaglia's house? I can't believe the neighbors are still cool with that...
TriRacer27 11/16/2012 1:28pm
11/16/2012 1:28pm
That's ridiculous.

Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive, am I wrong?
Whoops_Blitzer 11/16/2012 2:07pm
11/16/2012 2:07pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
That's ridiculous. Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive...
That's ridiculous.

Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive, am I wrong?
The camera's on for a reason, dude.
Rupert X
Profile picture for user Rupert X
Posts
11034
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Newark, OH, USA
Rupert X 11/16/2012 2:30pm
11/16/2012 2:30pm
Not to be pricky - but it looks more like 3-3-3-1 to me....?
shredder23 11/16/2012 3:24pm
11/16/2012 3:24pm
Rupert X wrote:
Not to be pricky - but it looks more like 3-3-3-1 to me....?
usual people count the whole platoe as 2. so jumping over the whole step on step off would be 4, then another 4, tripling on, and stepping off would be 2
Rupert X
Profile picture for user Rupert X
Posts
11034
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Newark, OH, USA
Rupert X 11/16/2012 3:26pm
11/16/2012 3:26pm
Rupert X wrote:
Not to be pricky - but it looks more like 3-3-3-1 to me....?
shredder23 wrote:
usual people count the whole platoe as 2. so jumping over the whole step on step off would be 4, then another 4, tripling on, and...
usual people count the whole platoe as 2. so jumping over the whole step on step off would be 4, then another 4, tripling on, and stepping off would be 2
Dig it, I sucked at math anyway...
TriRacer27 11/16/2012 4:06pm
11/16/2012 4:06pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
That's ridiculous. Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive...
That's ridiculous.

Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive, am I wrong?
Whoops_Blitzer wrote:
The camera's on for a reason, dude.
It's on cuz he's jumping the whole section in 3 leaps which is incredibly, ridiculously impressive. No doubt about that.

Just wondering if it's actually faster with how high he has to go to do that.
CRF505
Profile picture for user CRF505
Posts
528
Joined
11/24/2011
Location
Clarkston, MI, USA
CRF505 11/16/2012 4:47pm
11/16/2012 4:47pm
Whoops_Blitzer wrote:
Uh oh, someone wants to race Tomac...
Yeah buddy! That was sweet
Whoops_Blitzer 11/16/2012 4:51pm
11/16/2012 4:51pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
That's ridiculous. Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive...
That's ridiculous.

Just a question though, seems like that wouldn't actually be any faster than just hitting those tabletops in between and getting more forward drive, am I wrong?
Whoops_Blitzer wrote:
The camera's on for a reason, dude.
TriRacer27 wrote:
It's on cuz he's jumping the whole section in 3 leaps which is incredibly, ridiculously impressive. No doubt about that. Just wondering if it's actually faster...
It's on cuz he's jumping the whole section in 3 leaps which is incredibly, ridiculously impressive. No doubt about that.

Just wondering if it's actually faster with how high he has to go to do that.
Fo' shizzle, Tri-Rizzle. It definitely looks faster to quad, especially since if you land on the middle table you'd have to double-double the rest of the section. WAY slower an entrance into the corner that way, I think.
JaredPartridge 11/16/2012 6:17pm
11/16/2012 6:17pm
Whoops_Blitzer wrote:
The camera's on for a reason, dude.
TriRacer27 wrote:
It's on cuz he's jumping the whole section in 3 leaps which is incredibly, ridiculously impressive. No doubt about that. Just wondering if it's actually faster...
It's on cuz he's jumping the whole section in 3 leaps which is incredibly, ridiculously impressive. No doubt about that.

Just wondering if it's actually faster with how high he has to go to do that.
Whoops_Blitzer wrote:
Fo' shizzle, Tri-Rizzle. It definitely looks faster to quad, especially since if you land on the middle table you'd have to double-double the rest of the...
Fo' shizzle, Tri-Rizzle. It definitely looks faster to quad, especially since if you land on the middle table you'd have to double-double the rest of the section. WAY slower an entrance into the corner that way, I think.
si senor. its also probably a bit faster the way hes jumping through it because hes not slowing
down any between rythms. just WFO from jump to jump.

Post a reply to: Seely going 4+4+3