Team USA Lommel Training Video

DJL52
Posts
89
Joined
8/4/2011
Location
Brockport, NY US
9/24/2012 11:42am
How come Dominicans are so good at baseball? They need to read this forum, stop working so hard and act their size.
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
9/24/2012 11:47am
mccread wrote:
It is totally valid. The USA have a huge population that gives them a major advantage at the Des Nations, because they have so many more...
It is totally valid. The USA have a huge population that gives them a major advantage at the Des Nations, because they have so many more top riders to choose from.

The US riders aren't any better than the other top riders from around the world either. The top Europeans are just as good as the Americans individually. As is Chad Reed etc.

Yet again you are confused, just because the USA win the Nations doesn't mean they are individually better than riders from the other teams. They get the advantage because it is a team race and they have three top riders, whereas it is hard for other countries to have the same depth due to being smaller countries, not because Dungey is better than Cairoli. It's all about numbers and USA have the advantage there, they have more motocross riders than any other country, and they have huge population advantage.

If the USA was the size of Holland with the same population they wouldn't win the MXDN as much.

Duno why Americans are so offended by facts. No one is saying they don't have great riders.
So like I said, explain that with soccer? Why doesnt the US win in soccer? We are far bigger then just about any other country that plays the game. We have more leagues and junior leagues then any other country. But we cant buy a win in the world cup.

You cant, and that proves my point.

Sore losers will find an excuse any way they can.

Didnt say they were individually better, but as a whole the US is better. And has been more times then not.

But you and I both know, the best GP riders all want to come to the states. Because this is where the fastest riders are.
1-forty-8
Posts
1764
Joined
9/9/2011
Location
GB
9/24/2012 11:47am
I don't think it's how big the USA is, it's them crazy assed moto dads they got over there!

Just look at their amateur program over there. It's head and heels above anything anywhere else in the world.

That's why they got so many riders to choose from.
Tbteam
Posts
2862
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Ormond Beach, FL US
9/24/2012 11:48am
DJL52 wrote:
How come Dominicans are so good at baseball? They need to read this forum, stop working so hard and act their size.
Can't they just realize that they will never be able to compete with us? I mean, look how BIG we are!

The Shop

FastEddy
Posts
14818
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL US
9/24/2012 11:49am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 12:04pm
mccread wrote:
It is totally valid. The USA have a huge population that gives them a major advantage at the Des Nations, because they have so many more...
It is totally valid. The USA have a huge population that gives them a major advantage at the Des Nations, because they have so many more top riders to choose from.

The US riders aren't any better than the other top riders from around the world either. The top Europeans are just as good as the Americans individually. As is Chad Reed etc.

Yet again you are confused, just because the USA win the Nations doesn't mean they are individually better than riders from the other teams. They get the advantage because it is a team race and they have three top riders, whereas it is hard for other countries to have the same depth due to being smaller countries, not because Dungey is better than Cairoli. It's all about numbers and USA have the advantage there, they have more motocross riders than any other country, and they have huge population advantage.

If the USA was the size of Holland with the same population they wouldn't win the MXDN as much.

Duno why Americans are so offended by facts. No one is saying they don't have great riders.
It's only 3 riders....
It's not like we send 100 riders.
Belgium could win this year.
And it would be because their guys rode the best and worked the hardest IMO and were the best.
Not because they are a bigger country then Monaco.
I mean really...Latvia,Netherlands,Denmark, Estonia,Croatia,Ireland,Czech Republic, Austria, Italy,Finland.....
The all should beat Belgium this year,based on your population argument....their population is larger.
If they don't,your argument holds no water. IMO - whether they have 1000 more people or 10 trillion more people or a godzillion MX racers.

Now if Belgium beats them -it will be because they worked harder ,trained harder and raced harder as a team and they were greater MX Nation on that day.

Nothing is stopping the back markers from twisting the throttle anymore....and it definitely isn't population that is stopping them from riding faster.

And our rider pool isn't due to population.
We just have more riders who work harder and want it!
Just like Spain with Soccer.
And yes Soccer is a team sport and the MXoN is a team event. Smile
Each team might a have great player,but they may not have as many greats as Spain.
Spain is an elite soccer country. So they have more greats then the USA ect... IMO
Husqerdo
Posts
596
Joined
7/23/2011
Location
Minneapolis, MN US
9/24/2012 11:50am
Ryan is the current ama (US) mx champ, Tony is the current EU champ, who has got the better of the other and all other EU contenders?
BKoonts
Posts
467
Joined
9/9/2010
Location
Jacksonville, FL US
9/24/2012 11:51am
They won't... Winning team will have around 15 points,at least more then 10. You obviously don't have a clue about this track.
Do you have to work at being so incredibly condescending or does it come naturally? Whatever you do, keep it up because you're great at it.
DJL52
Posts
89
Joined
8/4/2011
Location
Brockport, NY US
9/24/2012 11:54am
DJL52 wrote:
How come Dominicans are so good at baseball? They need to read this forum, stop working so hard and act their size.
Tbteam wrote:
Can't they just realize that they will never be able to compete with us? I mean, look how BIG we are!
Exactly...such a ridiculous argument.
TeamGreen
Posts
36461
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
9/24/2012 11:57am
Husqerdo wrote:
Ryan is the current ama (US) mx champ, Tony is the current EU champ, who has got the better of the other and all other EU...
Ryan is the current ama (US) mx champ, Tony is the current EU champ, who has got the better of the other and all other EU contenders?
Pfffft!

Haven't you heard?

It's really all about that Magic Sand and the fact that RD can't ride sand!

Fool!

Jus' like Donny Schmit before him. He couldn't ride sand, either...and you jus' know the Euro's kicked his ass, too...didn't they?

I mean, come on...EVERYONE jus' KNOWS that you Minnesota guys ain't got no sand!

DUH!

(Now, it's up to you to get out those pics of wtf a real SAND TRACK looks like.....bwahahahahahahaha!)
FastEddy
Posts
14818
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL US
9/24/2012 11:59am Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 12:11pm
DJL52 wrote:
How come Dominicans are so good at baseball? They need to read this forum, stop working so hard and act their size.
Tbteam wrote:
Can't they just realize that they will never be able to compete with us? I mean, look how BIG we are!
DJL52 wrote:
Exactly...such a ridiculous argument.
Exactly.
All MXer's in Ireland should move to China or India.
Then they can beat us....due to the far greater population.

Mccread - I swear if Belgium does win ,I will never let you live the population argument down,buddy. Smile hahaha
9/24/2012 12:39pm
mccread wrote:
Of course it matters you have to be stupid to think it doesn't. If the USA had a population of 8 million they wouldn't win the...
Of course it matters you have to be stupid to think it doesn't. If the USA had a population of 8 million they wouldn't win the MXDN as much.

The reason the US have a good youth program is because their country is huge so the kids have more top riders to compete against. If there just stayed in their individual states with smaller populations they wouldn't get as good as quickly, again it is down to size.

Other riders from other countries are just as good as the USA, but the USA have a big population advantage. Are you saying a team of Roczen, Herlings and Cairoli wouldn't be harder to beat?
FastEddy wrote:
Ferry,RC,JS7 all born within 50 miles of each other. That could have been a winning team when they all raced together. They could have beat not...
Ferry,RC,JS7 all born within 50 miles of each other.
That could have been a winning team when they all raced together.
They could have beat not only the world ,but the rest of the USA.
Size doesn't have shit to do with it.
All 3 of those started young and went through our youth programs and had great trainers.
If you did field a USA team with those 3 riders it is very similar to other countries,in being that the problem arises if 1 guy is out injured,you would have had to pick another Floridian,but you don't,you can choose from the rest of the USA

France had bad luck for the 2nd year in a row this year when Frossard got hurt
Italy the same with Phillipaerts
Belgian lost Desalle last year

They need that 3rd rider

I think the size and population has to come into it but your point about programs,training etc is very valid,pretty much spot on

The USA were poor at Football but they are slowly becoming very good now the infrastructure is maturing,they qualify for the World cup and are making progress all the time

Anyhow you can't nail this down properly,so many factors Coe onto this just like other sports
FastEddy
Posts
14818
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL US
9/24/2012 12:51pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 12:55pm
If you did field a USA team with those 3 riders it is very similar to other countries,in being that the problem arises if 1 guy...
If you did field a USA team with those 3 riders it is very similar to other countries,in being that the problem arises if 1 guy is out injured,you would have had to pick another Floridian,but you don't,you can choose from the rest of the USA

France had bad luck for the 2nd year in a row this year when Frossard got hurt
Italy the same with Phillipaerts
Belgian lost Desalle last year

They need that 3rd rider

I think the size and population has to come into it but your point about programs,training etc is very valid,pretty much spot on

The USA were poor at Football but they are slowly becoming very good now the infrastructure is maturing,they qualify for the World cup and are making progress all the time

Anyhow you can't nail this down properly,so many factors Coe onto this just like other sports
My theory isn't an exact Science.....by any means. Smile
But I believe years of marketing the sport have helped it grow...especially at local levels here in the USA.
MXSports has helped grow it tremendously with LL's program - that is fact.
With that said our programs have grown at all levels...thus giving us a larger pool.
Kids start working hard at very young ages here chasing the dream. Wink
Once some reach success,others want to join in & follow their footsteps.

To say to a team of Team of RC,JMB,Everts,JS7,RJ,Ward or any of the great teams like GBR or any other winning riders all around the World that the only reason won or podiumed all those years was because of their population...I think it's a bit of an insult to the hard work that they put into achieve the results they did that day as a team.
They won because they rode the fastest and finished ahead of all other teams.
Everyone gets 3 guys. It's up to that country to have all 3 guys up to standard of race speed ...
If they don't ....they get beat...regardless of the size of their country.
We could lose this year - anything is possible.
But others wouldn't win due to size!
Due to the fact that they were better that day!
mumhra
Posts
432
Joined
8/19/2008
Location
BE
9/24/2012 12:56pm
mumhra wrote:
It is true that USA has a big advantage just because of its size. While most country's have to struggle to find 3 pro riders, USA...
It is true that USA has a big advantage just because of its size. While most country's have to struggle to find 3 pro riders, USA has 100. So finding 3 riders that are good enough to win the des nations can't be to hard.

But your last line "If the past 7 MX des nations had been scored using the Europe V USA format, the USA would only have won ONCE." isn't very fair imo. There are 3 american riders and a lot of european riders that enter the mx of nations. Then AFTER the event you pick the 3 best european riders and then you said that team USA lost. Not very fair imo. If you want to make it fair, pick your 3 european riders BEFORE the event. And then you can see who wins.

So USA guys ? Are you game ? We pick the 3 best euro riders (to make it even more fair we won't pick riders that ride the AMA but only riders from the FIM world championship" and after the race we will see who wins.
Game ? Or chicken ?
I see a lot of talk how the size of the country, the number of pro riders a country can choose from, and the number of bikes sold in that particular country doesn't matter at all. But when i take you up for a real challenge nobody answers me.

C'mon guys.. Your team USA (Dungey, Baggett, Barcia) which is at the moment your best possible team (Stewart and villopoto are injured, those 3 are your best sand riders) against team Europe. MX1 Cairoli, MX2 Roczen and MXopen Herlings.
Who will win the mxdn ? USA or Europe. Please do not forget that even team USA still has a bigger population, has more pro riders and more bikes are sold compared to team Europe. Have you got the guts to take up this challenge ?
PressPassP
Posts
3329
Joined
3/3/2010
Location
Ipswich GB
9/24/2012 12:57pm
Nice vid,thanks for putting that up,that's some effort on behalf of the whole US team to come to the line,fair play to them

The MXdN neXt year is going to be INSANE !!! The atmosphere there will be awesome,the GP was electric,let alone when you get all the teams ans fans from all diferrent countries,France was big enough,I'll bet Germany will be bigger
TeamGreen
Posts
36461
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
9/24/2012 12:58pm
mumhra wrote:
It is true that USA has a big advantage just because of its size. While most country's have to struggle to find 3 pro riders, USA...
It is true that USA has a big advantage just because of its size. While most country's have to struggle to find 3 pro riders, USA has 100. So finding 3 riders that are good enough to win the des nations can't be to hard.

But your last line "If the past 7 MX des nations had been scored using the Europe V USA format, the USA would only have won ONCE." isn't very fair imo. There are 3 american riders and a lot of european riders that enter the mx of nations. Then AFTER the event you pick the 3 best european riders and then you said that team USA lost. Not very fair imo. If you want to make it fair, pick your 3 european riders BEFORE the event. And then you can see who wins.

So USA guys ? Are you game ? We pick the 3 best euro riders (to make it even more fair we won't pick riders that ride the AMA but only riders from the FIM world championship" and after the race we will see who wins.
Game ? Or chicken ?
mumhra wrote:
I see a lot of talk how the size of the country, the number of pro riders a country can choose from, and the number of...
I see a lot of talk how the size of the country, the number of pro riders a country can choose from, and the number of bikes sold in that particular country doesn't matter at all. But when i take you up for a real challenge nobody answers me.

C'mon guys.. Your team USA (Dungey, Baggett, Barcia) which is at the moment your best possible team (Stewart and villopoto are injured, those 3 are your best sand riders) against team Europe. MX1 Cairoli, MX2 Roczen and MXopen Herlings.
Who will win the mxdn ? USA or Europe. Please do not forget that even team USA still has a bigger population, has more pro riders and more bikes are sold compared to team Europe. Have you got the guts to take up this challenge ?
We already offered this up...about 2 weeks, ago
FastEddy
Posts
14818
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL US
9/24/2012 12:59pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 1:03pm
mumhra wrote:
I see a lot of talk how the size of the country, the number of pro riders a country can choose from, and the number of...
I see a lot of talk how the size of the country, the number of pro riders a country can choose from, and the number of bikes sold in that particular country doesn't matter at all. But when i take you up for a real challenge nobody answers me.

C'mon guys.. Your team USA (Dungey, Baggett, Barcia) which is at the moment your best possible team (Stewart and villopoto are injured, those 3 are your best sand riders) against team Europe. MX1 Cairoli, MX2 Roczen and MXopen Herlings.
Who will win the mxdn ? USA or Europe. Please do not forget that even team USA still has a bigger population, has more pro riders and more bikes are sold compared to team Europe. Have you got the guts to take up this challenge ?
If Belgium wins this year it would squish the size argument.

However,I dare you to walk up to Stefan and say to him...the only reason he won the MXoN 5 times is due to the size of Belgiums MX population.
He would laugh in your face.
Country size does not matter at this event.
Having 3 or more trained riders who work their ass off day in & out is what matters.
Then them being the 3 best on that day. Wink
mumhra
Posts
432
Joined
8/19/2008
Location
BE
9/24/2012 1:13pm
Ofcourse the size of the country does matter. Look at the olympics games for example. Belgium can win a gold medal, but almost always in a single person sport. Like the 100 m sprint. But in the 4*100 m relay we can't ever win a medal just because the country is to small. There just is not enough fish in the pond to find 4 good ones.
Same goes for the mx of nations. Motocross is not the most popular sport, so there are not many riders to pick. We can have 1 very good rider (like Stefan Everts), and maybe we can find a 2nd one. But to have 3 top riders really is very difficult for such a small country.
9/24/2012 1:15pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 1:18pm
If you did field a USA team with those 3 riders it is very similar to other countries,in being that the problem arises if 1 guy...
If you did field a USA team with those 3 riders it is very similar to other countries,in being that the problem arises if 1 guy is out injured,you would have had to pick another Floridian,but you don't,you can choose from the rest of the USA

France had bad luck for the 2nd year in a row this year when Frossard got hurt
Italy the same with Phillipaerts
Belgian lost Desalle last year

They need that 3rd rider

I think the size and population has to come into it but your point about programs,training etc is very valid,pretty much spot on

The USA were poor at Football but they are slowly becoming very good now the infrastructure is maturing,they qualify for the World cup and are making progress all the time

Anyhow you can't nail this down properly,so many factors Coe onto this just like other sports
FastEddy wrote:
My theory isn't an exact Science.....by any means. :) But I believe years of marketing the sport have helped it grow...especially at local levels here in...
My theory isn't an exact Science.....by any means. Smile
But I believe years of marketing the sport have helped it grow...especially at local levels here in the USA.
MXSports has helped grow it tremendously with LL's program - that is fact.
With that said our programs have grown at all levels...thus giving us a larger pool.
Kids start working hard at very young ages here chasing the dream. Wink
Once some reach success,others want to join in & follow their footsteps.

To say to a team of Team of RC,JMB,Everts,JS7,RJ,Ward or any of the great teams like GBR or any other winning riders all around the World that the only reason won or podiumed all those years was because of their population...I think it's a bit of an insult to the hard work that they put into achieve the results they did that day as a team.
They won because they rode the fastest and finished ahead of all other teams.
Everyone gets 3 guys. It's up to that country to have all 3 guys up to standard of race speed ...
If they don't ....they get beat...regardless of the size of their country.
We could lose this year - anything is possible.
But others wouldn't win due to size!
Due to the fact that they were better that day!
Yes a lot of it stems from your LL's etc way down the line through to the Nationals,nowadays other countries will pull off a win now and again but the US will usually be favourites,as you say it all comes down to the 3 riders on the day and anything can happen,I couldn't believe France were in the running at one point last year in the last Moto,its often a crazy race
FastEddy
Posts
14818
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL US
9/24/2012 1:18pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 1:57pm
mumhra wrote:
Ofcourse the size of the country does matter. Look at the olympics games for example. Belgium can win a gold medal, but almost always in a...
Ofcourse the size of the country does matter. Look at the olympics games for example. Belgium can win a gold medal, but almost always in a single person sport. Like the 100 m sprint. But in the 4*100 m relay we can't ever win a medal just because the country is to small. There just is not enough fish in the pond to find 4 good ones.
Same goes for the mx of nations. Motocross is not the most popular sport, so there are not many riders to pick. We can have 1 very good rider (like Stefan Everts), and maybe we can find a 2nd one. But to have 3 top riders really is very difficult for such a small country.
So the reason Stefan won 5 MXoN titles is because of the size of Belgium. Grinning
Or does the size thing only count when America wins (well because size is all we can think of).

And you do realize Belgium has won it 14 times I believe and beat larger countries many of other times! Smile
My guess is because they had some kick ass riders who rode their ass off on those days.
Not due to size.

But hey...if America wasn't racing this year,Belgium would be my pick due to their talented riders - not the size of the country or MX community. I guess you guy's couldn't fathom that. lol
mccread
Posts
5934
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
9/24/2012 1:53pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 2:12pm
mumhra wrote:
Ofcourse the size of the country does matter. Look at the olympics games for example. Belgium can win a gold medal, but almost always in a...
Ofcourse the size of the country does matter. Look at the olympics games for example. Belgium can win a gold medal, but almost always in a single person sport. Like the 100 m sprint. But in the 4*100 m relay we can't ever win a medal just because the country is to small. There just is not enough fish in the pond to find 4 good ones.
Same goes for the mx of nations. Motocross is not the most popular sport, so there are not many riders to pick. We can have 1 very good rider (like Stefan Everts), and maybe we can find a 2nd one. But to have 3 top riders really is very difficult for such a small country.
FastEddy wrote:
So the reason Stefan won 5 MXoN titles is because of the size of Belgium. :lol: Or does the size thing only count when America wins...
So the reason Stefan won 5 MXoN titles is because of the size of Belgium. Grinning
Or does the size thing only count when America wins (well because size is all we can think of).

And you do realize Belgium has won it 14 times I believe and beat larger countries many of other times! Smile
My guess is because they had some kick ass riders who rode their ass off on those days.
Not due to size.

But hey...if America wasn't racing this year,Belgium would be my pick due to their talented riders - not the size of the country or MX community. I guess you guy's couldn't fathom that. lol
USA have an advantage because of their size, they are also a big motocross country with many mx riders (again because of population). That is a fact.

That is because Belgium had three top level riders at that time, but you can't sustain that if you have a smaller population, last year they had a postman riding for them due to injuries, which is my point. It goes in cycles for other countries. Everts would have won a lot more if he was riding for a big country like the USA.

Cairoli doesn't win the nations because the other riders aren't as good as the other riders for USA. not because he isn't as good as the USA. Belgium beat Italy every year at the Nations, but Cairoli is still better than all the Belgians. Just because USA win the nations doesn't mean their riders are individually better than all the other riders.

The USA don't bring three riders from one state for a reason... because they have less choice of good riders being restricted to one state.

If Dungey's state was a country, he would never win the MXDN!

Europe produce as many good riders as the USA do so it has nothing to do with the system etc, but USA don't race Europe at the Nations. Have the three best European riders in a team against the individual states of the USA and the States wouldn't win as many as Europe. All to do with numbers.

It's a lot easier for the USA to win a nations team world title than the individual world title because they have an advantage in the team race.
Huckster
Posts
2585
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Woodstock , NY US
9/24/2012 2:04pm
Is Mike Tomlin over there with Justin? It looked like someone else was working on his bike?
FastEddy
Posts
14818
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL US
9/24/2012 2:20pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 2:28pm
mccread wrote:
USA have an advantage because of their size, they are also a big motocross country with many mx riders (again because of population). That is a...
USA have an advantage because of their size, they are also a big motocross country with many mx riders (again because of population). That is a fact.

That is because Belgium had three top level riders at that time, but you can't sustain that if you have a smaller population, last year they had a postman riding for them due to injuries, which is my point. It goes in cycles for other countries. Everts would have won a lot more if he was riding for a big country like the USA.

Cairoli doesn't win the nations because the other riders aren't as good as the other riders for USA. not because he isn't as good as the USA. Belgium beat Italy every year at the Nations, but Cairoli is still better than all the Belgians. Just because USA win the nations doesn't mean their riders are individually better than all the other riders.

The USA don't bring three riders from one state for a reason... because they have less choice of good riders being restricted to one state.

If Dungey's state was a country, he would never win the MXDN!

Europe produce as many good riders as the USA do so it has nothing to do with the system etc, but USA don't race Europe at the Nations. Have the three best European riders in a team against the individual states of the USA and the States wouldn't win as many as Europe. All to do with numbers.

It's a lot easier for the USA to win a nations team world title than the individual world title because they have an advantage in the team race.
Your MX population statement holds no water with me.
Poor marketing of the sport on the other side of the pond might hold some water though.
Getting more people interested in it LOCALLY!
I have watched the sport in this country indeed grow over the years.
I seen it go from pretty much nothing to what it is today.
I for one do not believe population has made all that much of an impact on it all like you think.
90% of the people do not know a thing about it.
You are looking at it from the outside.
I'm looking at it from the inside.

We sustain good top level riders because we have an elite grooming foundation to groom riders.
They become far more groomed in the pro ranks also and keep raising the bar every year along with guys from the other side of the pond who push to raise the bar.
Population has nothing to do with how fast JS7,RD5,BB,JB,Tomac,RC,RJ,Emig and all the go or went.
Large population doesn't necessarily control their existence either,or the existence of the sport in this country at the top level or local level.
Sure the pool is deeper here and to have a deeper pool you need to get people involved in the sport at a hardcore racer level. Rarely do any of these racers come from these huge/large populated Cities that fill our country with a huge population.
A lot of these riders come from small towns,places you never heard of. Small local races is how they start.
I bet if you put together the population of the towns they were born in or started racing in you would be shocked at where our talent pool comes from. You guys act like we have huge cities filled with MX racers waiting to take on Europe and that isn't the case at all.

Each and every one of these riders we have here work their asses off to get to where they are.
I would assume,Barcia,BB & Dungey work and train much more harder and more professionally then the guys from the majority of countries attending the event (not saying all).
It doesn't matter what our population is. It means squat!
And it is not only an insult to all the Team USA victories....it is also an insult to all the other countries who have won numerous times,to say it is due to their population. Or to say Team USA should have won,they were lucky to have 3 guys or they got lucky.

The population thing is bullshit to me.
mumhra
Posts
432
Joined
8/19/2008
Location
BE
9/24/2012 2:21pm
FastEddy wrote:
So the reason Stefan won 5 MXoN titles is because of the size of Belgium. :lol: Or does the size thing only count when America wins...
So the reason Stefan won 5 MXoN titles is because of the size of Belgium. Grinning
Or does the size thing only count when America wins (well because size is all we can think of).

And you do realize Belgium has won it 14 times I believe and beat larger countries many of other times! Smile
My guess is because they had some kick ass riders who rode their ass off on those days.
Not due to size.

But hey...if America wasn't racing this year,Belgium would be my pick due to their talented riders - not the size of the country or MX community. I guess you guy's couldn't fathom that. lol
No fastEddy. The reason why Everts has won so many titles is because Belgium is a very special country. In a very small country we have all types of dirt. From very sandy to hard as a rock. On top of that motorcross has always been big in Belgium. Not like soccer or bicycle races, but reasonbably ig. Ever since Everts stopped it has become a lot smaller though. There is hardly any mx on tv lately.

I don't see the problem guys. You always have your mouth full
- of how the American riders are the fastest of the world
- of how the AMA series is the premier series. The world championships is 2nd rate
- of how the american amateur series is just as fast as the world championships

Well, here is you chance guys. You have 2 champions and a runner up coming to Belgium for the biggest race of the season. They can now take on team Europe for a change. Size does not matter, does it ?

Why are you guys so afraid of this bet. Put your money where your mouth is and take me up on this. I say that Cairoli, Roczen and Herlings will completely destroy team USA.
This looks like a fair fight to me. The 3 best European riders against the 3 best American riders. This is your chance to show everybody that American riders really are better then European riders. But you guys keep beating around the bush. What's wrong ? You guys chickening out ?
MeanGreen
Posts
98
Joined
5/1/2008
Location
Victorville, CA US
9/24/2012 2:23pm
Why are you Euro fanboys making excuses already?

Euro fanboys= Excuse makers?
mumhra
Posts
432
Joined
8/19/2008
Location
BE
9/24/2012 2:30pm
I'm not making excuses. I'm looking for a fair fight but noone has the balls to take me up on it....

It's all in good fun though. If team Europe would win this i will never say that the AMA series is 2nd rate to the worldchampionships because it certainly isn't. According to me it is at a higher level. But the difference is not as big as some of you guys think.
The only reason team USA always wins the nations is because all other country's are to small to have 3 top riders. As Mccread said, a few years ago the 3rd rider of Belgium was an amateur, a postman. Just because there are not enough pro riders. I'm giving you guys the chance to have a fair race. A race against a team of the same size as yours but you guys keep telling that size does not matter. OK, if it doesn't then race against team Europe. Or does size matter after all ?
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
9/24/2012 2:37pm
mumhra wrote:
I'm not making excuses. I'm looking for a fair fight but noone has the balls to take me up on it.... It's all in good fun...
I'm not making excuses. I'm looking for a fair fight but noone has the balls to take me up on it....

It's all in good fun though. If team Europe would win this i will never say that the AMA series is 2nd rate to the worldchampionships because it certainly isn't. According to me it is at a higher level. But the difference is not as big as some of you guys think.
The only reason team USA always wins the nations is because all other country's are to small to have 3 top riders. As Mccread said, a few years ago the 3rd rider of Belgium was an amateur, a postman. Just because there are not enough pro riders. I'm giving you guys the chance to have a fair race. A race against a team of the same size as yours but you guys keep telling that size does not matter. OK, if it doesn't then race against team Europe. Or does size matter after all ?
A fair fight is sending your contries best. So I guess the Olympics arent fair either then.

Bullshit excuse if you ask me.
9/24/2012 2:42pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 2:44pm
mccread wrote:
USA have an advantage because of their size, they are also a big motocross country with many mx riders (again because of population). That is a...
USA have an advantage because of their size, they are also a big motocross country with many mx riders (again because of population). That is a fact.

That is because Belgium had three top level riders at that time, but you can't sustain that if you have a smaller population, last year they had a postman riding for them due to injuries, which is my point. It goes in cycles for other countries. Everts would have won a lot more if he was riding for a big country like the USA.

Cairoli doesn't win the nations because the other riders aren't as good as the other riders for USA. not because he isn't as good as the USA. Belgium beat Italy every year at the Nations, but Cairoli is still better than all the Belgians. Just because USA win the nations doesn't mean their riders are individually better than all the other riders.

The USA don't bring three riders from one state for a reason... because they have less choice of good riders being restricted to one state.

If Dungey's state was a country, he would never win the MXDN!

Europe produce as many good riders as the USA do so it has nothing to do with the system etc, but USA don't race Europe at the Nations. Have the three best European riders in a team against the individual states of the USA and the States wouldn't win as many as Europe. All to do with numbers.

It's a lot easier for the USA to win a nations team world title than the individual world title because they have an advantage in the team race.
FastEddy wrote:
Your MX population statement holds no water with me. Poor marketing of the sport on the other side of the pond might hold some water though...
Your MX population statement holds no water with me.
Poor marketing of the sport on the other side of the pond might hold some water though.
Getting more people interested in it LOCALLY!
I have watched the sport in this country indeed grow over the years.
I seen it go from pretty much nothing to what it is today.
I for one do not believe population has made all that much of an impact on it all like you think.
90% of the people do not know a thing about it.
You are looking at it from the outside.
I'm looking at it from the inside.

We sustain good top level riders because we have an elite grooming foundation to groom riders.
They become far more groomed in the pro ranks also and keep raising the bar every year along with guys from the other side of the pond who push to raise the bar.
Population has nothing to do with how fast JS7,RD5,BB,JB,Tomac,RC,RJ,Emig and all the go or went.
Large population doesn't necessarily control their existence either,or the existence of the sport in this country at the top level or local level.
Sure the pool is deeper here and to have a deeper pool you need to get people involved in the sport at a hardcore racer level. Rarely do any of these racers come from these huge/large populated Cities that fill our country with a huge population.
A lot of these riders come from small towns,places you never heard of. Small local races is how they start.
I bet if you put together the population of the towns they were born in or started racing in you would be shocked at where our talent pool comes from. You guys act like we have huge cities filled with MX racers waiting to take on Europe and that isn't the case at all.

Each and every one of these riders we have here work their asses off to get to where they are.
I would assume,Barcia,BB & Dungey work and train much more harder and more professionally then the guys from the majority of countries attending the event (not saying all).
It doesn't matter what our population is. It means squat!
And it is not only an insult to all the Team USA victories....it is also an insult to all the other countries who have won numerous times,to say it is due to their population. Or to say Team USA should have won,they were lucky to have 3 guys or they got lucky.

The population thing is bullshit to me.
I can see where you're coming from but the very fact that America is a super power and situated on a huge land mass DOES give you an advantage. Of course America has a fantastic amateur program, no one could deny that. But again it's an amateur program a country like Belgium or England could never come close to replicating. We simply don't have the power to produce a system like that. We don't have the land, we don't have the big money. Yet per population we probably have a similar number of people who do Motocross.

With a sport of equal interest you'll always (over time ) crush everyone else through sheer population size. That's the key.

If it's a sport you know relatively little about, just as with until fairly recently - soccer... then sure you can be beaten. But just as with soccer now (which is starting to become a lot more popular in America) you'll soon catch up and eventually, given time, overlap everyone else.
NV825
Posts
2147
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Carson City, NV US
9/24/2012 2:48pm Edited Date/Time 9/24/2012 2:52pm
mumhra wrote:
I'm not making excuses. I'm looking for a fair fight but noone has the balls to take me up on it.... It's all in good fun...
I'm not making excuses. I'm looking for a fair fight but noone has the balls to take me up on it....

It's all in good fun though. If team Europe would win this i will never say that the AMA series is 2nd rate to the worldchampionships because it certainly isn't. According to me it is at a higher level. But the difference is not as big as some of you guys think.
The only reason team USA always wins the nations is because all other country's are to small to have 3 top riders. As Mccread said, a few years ago the 3rd rider of Belgium was an amateur, a postman. Just because there are not enough pro riders. I'm giving you guys the chance to have a fair race. A race against a team of the same size as yours but you guys keep telling that size does not matter. OK, if it doesn't then race against team Europe. Or does size matter after all ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population

China - 1,347,350,000
India - 1,210,193,422
USA - 314,440,000

If size was THE underlying factor on why the USA keeps winning, then where the fuck are China and India in the win categories at the MXdN? And don't give me a bullshit excuse that they are poor and underdeveloped. Both have areas with MILLIONS of people within their borders that are developed and not impoverished.

The fact is that USA has riders that dream of being the best and will do whatever they can to be the best. End of story. Would a "Ryder Cup" style of race be awesome determining the talents of US vs. Euros. YES, it would be fucking awesome and I'd love to see it happen. But there isn't one, we have the MXdN and the USA can consistently field a team of 3 riders because we have participants that truly eat, sleep, and breathe motocross racing.

Post a reply to: Team USA Lommel Training Video

The Latest