AUTO-PEN GATE. BIDEN'S NULL SIGNATURES

inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/20/2025 2:40pm Edited Date/Time 3/20/2025 2:45pm
Right to vote? Never said anything like that.Yes I’ll always insult people who insult me first. I’ve tried being respectful to those people multiple times and...

Right to vote? Never said anything like that.

Yes I’ll always insult people who insult me first. I’ve tried being respectful to those people multiple times and it never works. So yes I’ll give it back.

Don’t repeat mainstream narratives. I don’t think anyone should trust any news outlet. Look at the evidence yourself.

Of course you want me to not ever post. You guys want an echo chamber.

I’ll say the same to you I always say and NOBODY ever actually takes me up on it. They dip out of the conversation immediately. If you wanna have a civil discussion here then I will. Like I did with a user earlier in this thread, when someone finally broke the mold. It’s not hard.

'member that time during Trump's NY trial when there was an attempt to discuss with you the lawfare being used against him, and the anomalous nature...

'member that time during Trump's NY trial when there was an attempt to discuss with you the lawfare being used against him, and the anomalous nature of the charges, but you only wanted to stay within the very very narrow boundaries of the trial and ruling? 'member how you'd get upset is anyone tried to engage you about things outside of those boundaries?

'member?

Pepperidge Farm remembers....

I kept posting multiple pieces of hard evidence and you’d always respond with Trump’s lawyers opinion. It was comical. I’ll say the same thing I said...

I kept posting multiple pieces of hard evidence and you’d always respond with Trump’s lawyers opinion. It was comical. I’ll say the same thing I said back then though. The one he was convicted on was by far the least serious. Look into the facts of the two federal cases that SCOTUS and Garland saved him on and they’re wayyy worse. But he’s President again now so none of it matters. The con man was able to con tens of millions again like he’s done his entire career. You got played. Prices didn’t drop day one. Still paying taxes on OT and tips. The anti-war POTUS is anything but that. Stock market crashing. Prices bout to skyrocket due to massive tariffs. Etc. 

Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣

How's the price of eggs now?

Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a pretty prominent attorney and I believe a specialist in constitutional law. He was also a Democrat at the time, but I think he has left the Democrat party due to their use of lawfare against Trump. 

3
3
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
3/20/2025 2:49pm Edited Date/Time 3/20/2025 2:51pm
'member that time during Trump's NY trial when there was an attempt to discuss with you the lawfare being used against him, and the anomalous nature...

'member that time during Trump's NY trial when there was an attempt to discuss with you the lawfare being used against him, and the anomalous nature of the charges, but you only wanted to stay within the very very narrow boundaries of the trial and ruling? 'member how you'd get upset is anyone tried to engage you about things outside of those boundaries?

'member?

Pepperidge Farm remembers....

I kept posting multiple pieces of hard evidence and you’d always respond with Trump’s lawyers opinion. It was comical. I’ll say the same thing I said...

I kept posting multiple pieces of hard evidence and you’d always respond with Trump’s lawyers opinion. It was comical. I’ll say the same thing I said back then though. The one he was convicted on was by far the least serious. Look into the facts of the two federal cases that SCOTUS and Garland saved him on and they’re wayyy worse. But he’s President again now so none of it matters. The con man was able to con tens of millions again like he’s done his entire career. You got played. Prices didn’t drop day one. Still paying taxes on OT and tips. The anti-war POTUS is anything but that. Stock market crashing. Prices bout to skyrocket due to massive tariffs. Etc. 

Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣How's the price of eggs now?Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a...

Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣

How's the price of eggs now?

Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a pretty prominent attorney and I believe a specialist in constitutional law. He was also a Democrat at the time, but I think he has left the Democrat party due to their use of lawfare against Trump. 

The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news organization. Primary sources are easy to find.

Eggs have skyrocketed the last few months but egg futures do look better!

You aren’t even operating in reality if you’re saying he wasn’t Trump’s lawyer so I’m not even sure we need to continue this conversation.

12
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/20/2025 2:56pm
I kept posting multiple pieces of hard evidence and you’d always respond with Trump’s lawyers opinion. It was comical. I’ll say the same thing I said...

I kept posting multiple pieces of hard evidence and you’d always respond with Trump’s lawyers opinion. It was comical. I’ll say the same thing I said back then though. The one he was convicted on was by far the least serious. Look into the facts of the two federal cases that SCOTUS and Garland saved him on and they’re wayyy worse. But he’s President again now so none of it matters. The con man was able to con tens of millions again like he’s done his entire career. You got played. Prices didn’t drop day one. Still paying taxes on OT and tips. The anti-war POTUS is anything but that. Stock market crashing. Prices bout to skyrocket due to massive tariffs. Etc. 

Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣How's the price of eggs now?Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a...

Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣

How's the price of eggs now?

Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a pretty prominent attorney and I believe a specialist in constitutional law. He was also a Democrat at the time, but I think he has left the Democrat party due to their use of lawfare against Trump. 

The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news...

The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news organization. Primary sources are easy to find.

Eggs have skyrocketed the last few months but egg futures do look better!

You aren’t even operating in reality if you’re saying he wasn’t Trump’s lawyer so I’m not even sure we need to continue this conversation.

Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?

And no, the evidence is not there to support anything. What is there is enough of a carrot to lead the willing minds, just not the critical and rational minds. 

1
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
3/20/2025 3:18pm
Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣How's the price of eggs now?Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a...

Multiple pieces of hard evidence 🤣🤣🤣

How's the price of eggs now?

Oh, and by the way, that wasn't Trump's attorney. That was Alan Dershowitz, who is a pretty prominent attorney and I believe a specialist in constitutional law. He was also a Democrat at the time, but I think he has left the Democrat party due to their use of lawfare against Trump. 

The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news...

The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news organization. Primary sources are easy to find.

Eggs have skyrocketed the last few months but egg futures do look better!

You aren’t even operating in reality if you’re saying he wasn’t Trump’s lawyer so I’m not even sure we need to continue this conversation.

Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?And no, the evidence is not there to support anything...

Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?

And no, the evidence is not there to support anything. What is there is enough of a carrot to lead the willing minds, just not the critical and rational minds. 

Oh in that specific case that was going on at the time, no he was not Trump’s lawyer. 

6

The Shop

inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/20/2025 3:29pm
The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news...

The evidence is all there. If you refuse to read it all then I guess that’s on you. You don’t even have to trust any news organization. Primary sources are easy to find.

Eggs have skyrocketed the last few months but egg futures do look better!

You aren’t even operating in reality if you’re saying he wasn’t Trump’s lawyer so I’m not even sure we need to continue this conversation.

Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?And no, the evidence is not there to support anything...

Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?

And no, the evidence is not there to support anything. What is there is enough of a carrot to lead the willing minds, just not the critical and rational minds. 

Oh in that specific case that was going on at the time, no he was not Trump’s lawyer. 

But the evidence from one of your posts earlier in this chatroom shows you address him as Trump's lawyer. 

Screenshot 20250320-172601-804.png?VersionId=vZvQa

So we MUST conclude that not only did you think he was Trump's lawyer at the time the videos were made, but that because of your prejudiced belief that he was Trump's lawyer at the time that you dismissed Dershowitz's thoughts on the case. 

See how easy that is, even with 'hard' evidence. 

1
3
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
3/20/2025 3:34pm Edited Date/Time 3/20/2025 3:36pm
Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?And no, the evidence is not there to support anything...

Perhaps you can show me evidence of where he was Trump's lawyer during the case in question?

And no, the evidence is not there to support anything. What is there is enough of a carrot to lead the willing minds, just not the critical and rational minds. 

Oh in that specific case that was going on at the time, no he was not Trump’s lawyer. 

But the evidence from one of your posts earlier in this chatroom shows you address him as Trump's lawyer. So we MUST conclude that not only did...

But the evidence from one of your posts earlier in this chatroom shows you address him as Trump's lawyer. 

Screenshot 20250320-172601-804.png?VersionId=vZvQa

So we MUST conclude that not only did you think he was Trump's lawyer at the time the videos were made, but that because of your prejudiced belief that he was Trump's lawyer at the time that you dismissed Dershowitz's thoughts on the case. 

See how easy that is, even with 'hard' evidence. 

I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping here dude to try to make yourself feel like you’re right. As I said, don’t trust anyone. Read the hard evidence and everything the people said under oath. I tend to believe multiple four and five star generals aren’t lying, that dozens of people hand picked by Trump to be in his inner circle aren’t lying under oath, and that a jury of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents did not review the facts for days and decide to convict an innocent man. As I said, the two that never went to trial were really bad. The New York one was small potatoes. 

7
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/20/2025 3:42pm

Oh in that specific case that was going on at the time, no he was not Trump’s lawyer. 

But the evidence from one of your posts earlier in this chatroom shows you address him as Trump's lawyer. So we MUST conclude that not only did...

But the evidence from one of your posts earlier in this chatroom shows you address him as Trump's lawyer. 

Screenshot 20250320-172601-804.png?VersionId=vZvQa

So we MUST conclude that not only did you think he was Trump's lawyer at the time the videos were made, but that because of your prejudiced belief that he was Trump's lawyer at the time that you dismissed Dershowitz's thoughts on the case. 

See how easy that is, even with 'hard' evidence. 

I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping...

I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping here dude to try to make yourself feel like you’re right. As I said, don’t trust anyone. Read the hard evidence and everything the people said under oath. I tend to believe multiple four and five star generals aren’t lying, that dozens of people hand picked by Trump to be in his inner circle aren’t lying under oath, and that a jury of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents did not review the facts for days and decide to convict an innocent man. As I said, the two that never went to trial were really bad. The New York one was small potatoes. 

Just as the prosecutors were grasping, too...

You keep bringing up the other two which were not pursued, but they would have no relevance to the case that was in question. It appears you would be using information not relevant to the case in order to make your decision. That would be a big no-no. 

1
OldTech
Posts
1286
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur, AL, USA
3/20/2025 4:06pm
I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping...

I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping here dude to try to make yourself feel like you’re right. As I said, don’t trust anyone. Read the hard evidence and everything the people said under oath. I tend to believe multiple four and five star generals aren’t lying, that dozens of people hand picked by Trump to be in his inner circle aren’t lying under oath, and that a jury of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents did not review the facts for days and decide to convict an innocent man. As I said, the two that never went to trial were really bad. The New York one was small potatoes. 

You say you don't trust anyone, but what about people in Bidens white house with access to a machine that applies his signature to documents?

5
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
3/20/2025 5:11pm
I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping...

I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping here dude to try to make yourself feel like you’re right. As I said, don’t trust anyone. Read the hard evidence and everything the people said under oath. I tend to believe multiple four and five star generals aren’t lying, that dozens of people hand picked by Trump to be in his inner circle aren’t lying under oath, and that a jury of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents did not review the facts for days and decide to convict an innocent man. As I said, the two that never went to trial were really bad. The New York one was small potatoes. 

OldTech wrote:

You say you don't trust anyone, but what about people in Bidens white house with access to a machine that applies his signature to documents?

I would personally be okay with a law that states each individual person who gets pardoned must have their individual pardon done by POTUS with ink on paper. No blanket pardons. No grouping everyone together and signing one. No auto signatures. That’s not the law though. So we are left with what we have. Blanket pardons for the entire J6 committee by Biden as well as the J6 rioters by Trump. 

2
6
TeamGreen
Posts
37143
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
3/20/2025 6:25pm

It’s no wonder I run Stay Frosty nowadays. 🤣

2
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/20/2025 8:32pm
I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping...

I would refer to any lawyer of his recently as his lawyer. Lawyers for years after OJ were referred to as OJ’s lawyer. You’re reallllly grasping here dude to try to make yourself feel like you’re right. As I said, don’t trust anyone. Read the hard evidence and everything the people said under oath. I tend to believe multiple four and five star generals aren’t lying, that dozens of people hand picked by Trump to be in his inner circle aren’t lying under oath, and that a jury of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents did not review the facts for days and decide to convict an innocent man. As I said, the two that never went to trial were really bad. The New York one was small potatoes. 

OldTech wrote:

You say you don't trust anyone, but what about people in Bidens white house with access to a machine that applies his signature to documents?

I would personally be okay with a law that states each individual person who gets pardoned must have their individual pardon done by POTUS with ink...

I would personally be okay with a law that states each individual person who gets pardoned must have their individual pardon done by POTUS with ink on paper. No blanket pardons. No grouping everyone together and signing one. No auto signatures. That’s not the law though. So we are left with what we have. Blanket pardons for the entire J6 committee by Biden as well as the J6 rioters by Trump. 

Oh yeah, limiting it to pardons because those would be the most dangerous. Good thinking!!!

Some people have no understanding of malevolence, and they shouldn't be in charge of laws. 

1
1
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/23/2025 7:37am

Along with nullifying Hunters pardons ,Trump has pulled all secret service detail from both Hunter & Ashley. They will have to hire their own security if they want protection. 

3
3/26/2025 8:55am

The President's power to pardon should end on November 1st. "Before" the election.

8
5/17/2025 3:41pm

Word on the streets is they are looking into this auto pen dealio, Biden had no clue what he was doing.

9
3
OldTech
Posts
1286
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur, AL, USA
5/17/2025 4:48pm

America got suckered 

6
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
5/18/2025 1:44pm

Ole Joe may not be around much longer. Hopefully he gets the cancer nipped. But it sounds aggressive. 

5/18/2025 1:47pm
FastEddy wrote:

Ole Joe may not be around much longer. Hopefully he gets the cancer nipped. But it sounds aggressive. 

They were never gonna let him live long after he left. 

All bs aside. I'd never wish this on anyone and hope the best for him.

4
2
Joey Bridges
Posts
9658
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
5/18/2025 3:33pm

Advanced stage 4, metatizised into the bone carries a 5-20yr life expectancy. 

Androgen therapy may have limited results with someone who has his mental decline. 

1
3
Joey Bridges
Posts
9658
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
5/18/2025 3:35pm
FastEddy wrote:

Ole Joe may not be around much longer. Hopefully he gets the cancer nipped. But it sounds aggressive. 

Can't eliminate it once it's gotten into the bones.

1
Moto Nomad
Posts
1161
Joined
1/19/2021
Location
Grass Valley, CA, USA
5/19/2025 10:41am

This roll-out of the controversy about Biden's mental/physical state feels so orchestrated. Especially when Tapper, who is now cashing in on his own complicity in this cover-up by writing a book, is supposedly the one calling out others. It's totally ridiculous. They are doing this now to act like they are actual journalists instead of Dem Party propagandists because it's all over with. And they know that nobody will remember come 2028.

As usual, there will be no accountability or prosecutions for this. We are talking about a literal coup when people behind the scenes assume the powers of a President. Our government is such a joke.

11
3
EVH4Ever
Posts
1857
Joined
3/6/2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
5/19/2025 11:08am

Agree completely about the interesting timing of Tapper’s book. Disgraceful.

2
1
Kenny Banyan
Posts
4401
Joined
6/2/2024
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
5/19/2025 6:04pm
bonseff wrote:

Always found it curious that there was a laser focus on Hunter but Jared and Ivanka got a pass

You DingBat!

1
5/25/2025 8:22am

Well, this could get interesting.......

7/12/2025 8:55am

Will anything ever come of this? We shall see.

2
TeamGreen
Posts
37143
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
7/12/2025 2:51pm

Will anything ever come of this? We shall see.

But…but…but…

The Minions say,”Everyone does it!”….uh, no…everyone doesn’t use the Autopen ALL THE TIME…& without knowing WHO authorized it…

You Can Not Make Thus Shit Up

1
3
OldTech
Posts
1286
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur, AL, USA
7/12/2025 3:14pm
TeamGreen wrote:

But…but…but…

The Minions say,”Everyone does it!”….uh, no…everyone doesn’t use the Autopen ALL THE TIME…& without knowing WHO authorized it…

You Can Not Make Thus Shit Up

The thing is supposed to be for Christmas cards and such! The Doctor is the key, need to give immunity and compelled to testify 

1
2
TeamGreen
Posts
37143
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
7/12/2025 3:24pm
TeamGreen wrote:

But…but…but…

The Minions say,”Everyone does it!”….uh, no…everyone doesn’t use the Autopen ALL THE TIME…& without knowing WHO authorized it…

You Can Not Make Thus Shit Up

OldTech wrote:

The thing is supposed to be for Christmas cards and such! The Doctor is the key, need to give immunity and compelled to testify 

That Dr. is a Hobbit. Just give him The Ring & he’ll do whatever you want. 

1
2
Joey Bridges
Posts
9658
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
7/14/2025 3:46am

The "autopen" was frantically stamping out pardons right up to the last minute during the actual swearing in of our current president.

2
1
Joey Bridges
Posts
9658
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
7/14/2025 4:03am

From the NYT...

GvyTpLkWUAE6o 7.jpeg?VersionId=oFOeQtXuQhj
1
1

Post a reply to: AUTO-PEN GATE. BIDEN'S NULL SIGNATURES

The Latest