WADA Antidoping Agency Lost Track of Open Cases and Test Results Before Olympics

Snoqualmie
Posts
551
Joined
12/29/2014
Location
Boise, ID US
3
1
|
JazzyJJ
Posts
823
Joined
12/1/2020
Location
PNW, WA US
9/27/2024 3:02pm

People who believe all sports are clean are idiots anyway. Why are our tax dollars funding these pee fiends in the first place?

4
1
LungButter
Posts
6652
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID US
9/27/2024 3:24pm

I could be mistaken but I don't think WADA has been involved in AMA SX&MX for several years now.

6
NSP139
Posts
948
Joined
5/6/2021
Location
Temecula, CA US
9/27/2024 3:33pm

WADA left with the FIM it's now USADA .

6
mooch
Posts
1452
Joined
2/16/2008
Location
OH US
Fantasy
260th
9/27/2024 4:21pm
LungButter wrote:

I could be mistaken but I don't think WADA has been involved in AMA SX&MX for several years now.

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

6
3

The Shop

Flatliner
Posts
3129
Joined
11/3/2009
Location
CA
9/28/2024 10:17am

It's always an agenda, or a shell game with anti "doping" anyways.  The list of banned substances is so vast I'm surprised red meat and eggs isn't on it.

2
3
9/30/2024 5:30am

If anyone wants to learn more about the anti doping agencies, start by watching the film Icarus.

12
9/30/2024 6:37am
NSP139 wrote:

WADA left with the FIM it's now USADA .

I dont think sx or outdoors use USADA any longer

1
NSP139
Posts
948
Joined
5/6/2021
Location
Temecula, CA US
9/30/2024 6:42am
NSP139 wrote:

WADA left with the FIM it's now USADA .

SlowOldGuy wrote:

I dont think sx or outdoors use USADA any longer

I know they used to who's doing the testing now?

GrapeApe
Posts
7521
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
Fantasy
388th
9/30/2024 6:48am
NSP139 wrote:

WADA left with the FIM it's now USADA .

SlowOldGuy wrote:

I dont think sx or outdoors use USADA any longer

NSP139 wrote:

I know they used to who's doing the testing now?

Aegis Sciences Corporation

UpTiTe
Posts
7894
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
CA US
Fantasy
4617th
9/30/2024 10:56am
LungButter wrote:

I could be mistaken but I don't think WADA has been involved in AMA SX&MX for several years now.

mooch wrote:

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

2
9
mooch
Posts
1452
Joined
2/16/2008
Location
OH US
Fantasy
260th
9/30/2024 12:08pm Edited Date/Time 9/30/2024 12:09pm
LungButter wrote:

I could be mistaken but I don't think WADA has been involved in AMA SX&MX for several years now.

mooch wrote:

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

Maybe you have a short memory on the horrendous handling of cases by WADA or maybe you're just ok with an organization mishandling and delaying cases to the point that racers are no longer able to race?  Rather than rehash the poor communication and prolonged judgment decisions involved with a number of cases I'll just leave a link here.  

https://www.vitalmx.com/forums/Moto-Related,20/WADA-declared-unfit-for-purpose-by-17-anti-doping-agencies,1348892

2
2
zehn
Posts
7510
Joined
1/15/2013
Location
Anchorage, AK US
9/30/2024 12:15pm
LungButter wrote:

I could be mistaken but I don't think WADA has been involved in AMA SX&MX for several years now.

mooch wrote:

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

Which riders were cheating using actual PEDs?

2
1
mxtech1
Posts
1963
Joined
7/21/2011
Location
Galesburg, IL US
9/30/2024 1:48pm

LOL @ the summer intern who corrupted the Excel spreadsheet

3
GrapeApe
Posts
7521
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
Fantasy
388th
9/30/2024 2:20pm Edited Date/Time 9/30/2024 2:21pm
LungButter wrote:

I could be mistaken but I don't think WADA has been involved in AMA SX&MX for several years now.

mooch wrote:

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

True, but the accused have rights and WADA ignored the US-based cases and let the riders twist for several months. They had no business being involved in a US series, a byproduct of the ". . . an FIM World Championship" suffix.

1
GrapeApe
Posts
7521
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
Fantasy
388th
9/30/2024 2:22pm
mooch wrote:

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

zehn wrote:

Which riders were cheating using actual PEDs?

Stewart, Clason and Tickle

4
mooch
Posts
1452
Joined
2/16/2008
Location
OH US
Fantasy
260th
9/30/2024 2:30pm
mooch wrote:

Correct...but unfortunately here just long enough to screw up several different rider's careers. 

UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

GrapeApe wrote:
True, but the accused have rights and WADA ignored the US-based cases and let the riders twist for several months. They had no business being involved...

True, but the accused have rights and WADA ignored the US-based cases and let the riders twist for several months. They had no business being involved in a US series, a byproduct of the ". . . an FIM World Championship" suffix.

I agree with you other than the part where you agree that riders intentionally cheated.  From everything I've read, often the "cheating" would be better described as riders who weren't hyper vigilant about ingesting something that had an ingredient that was on the long list of substances that would result in a positive test.  To then be stonewalled for extended periods of time when it came to any kind of communication on the infraction was ridiculous. 

2
Boggins
Posts
329
Joined
7/30/2019
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA US
9/30/2024 3:21pm

Translation =  WADA received a large check $$ from several countries to "lose track" of the samples.   You cant be this negligent or stupid without being paid a large sum.

4
Falcon
Posts
10679
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
Fantasy
407th
9/30/2024 3:34pm

^ Never underestimate the stupidity of people. It's entirely possible to be negligent or stupid without ever getting paid for it. (But of course it never hurts when there's some greasing of the wheels.) 

How many people think WADA will just suspend everyone until they figure out which athletes are really under scrutiny? It should only take about four years.

1
10/1/2024 9:40am
UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

GrapeApe wrote:
True, but the accused have rights and WADA ignored the US-based cases and let the riders twist for several months. They had no business being involved...

True, but the accused have rights and WADA ignored the US-based cases and let the riders twist for several months. They had no business being involved in a US series, a byproduct of the ". . . an FIM World Championship" suffix.

mooch wrote:
I agree with you other than the part where you agree that riders intentionally cheated.  From everything I've read, often the "cheating" would be better described...

I agree with you other than the part where you agree that riders intentionally cheated.  From everything I've read, often the "cheating" would be better described as riders who weren't hyper vigilant about ingesting something that had an ingredient that was on the long list of substances that would result in a positive test.  To then be stonewalled for extended periods of time when it came to any kind of communication on the infraction was ridiculous. 

As posted by another above with archery being an example, the ability of WADA to ruin a career for a substance that sometimes is found in the measurement of PPB (Parts Per BILLIONTH) all because we can't always get perfectly clean supplements or even food here in the US is ridiculous.

If you want to hear some details about how it upended a prominent archer's career and some other wild instances of failures by WADA in archery (I know it's not moto but its relevant to the topic) give this a listen: GP & Paige talk Marlow drug test failure - Bowjunky Media Podcast | Podcast on Spotify

2
10/1/2024 9:51am

I've been doing bath salts ever since I saw Deegan do them on the starting line. I sure hope they don't ban these things any time soon.

1
3
Wisco322
Posts
64
Joined
10/3/2012
Location
Coon Valley, WI US
Fantasy
305th
10/1/2024 11:10am
Wisco322 wrote:

Beat me to it. All because of some contaminated Pre workout....

Wasn’t like he Bob Eyler’d his way into the shoot offs either haha

1
10/1/2024 11:22am
Wisco322 wrote:

Beat me to it. All because of some contaminated Pre workout....

Wisco322 wrote:

Wasn’t like he Bob Eyler’d his way into the shoot offs either haha

I feel like after the shoot off he had to have been like, “Drug test? Oh shit!”

1
Wisco322
Posts
64
Joined
10/3/2012
Location
Coon Valley, WI US
Fantasy
305th
10/1/2024 12:41pm

Beat me to it. All because of some contaminated Pre workout....

Wisco322 wrote:

Wasn’t like he Bob Eyler’d his way into the shoot offs either haha

I feel like after the shoot off he had to have been like, “Drug test? Oh shit!”

He should have just put one in the 9 first end 😂We should have known as soon as he came out with a bottle of Mountain Dew too! A 900 while high is still impressive 

1
10/1/2024 1:16pm
UpTiTe wrote:

They shouldn’t have cheated. 

zehn wrote:

Which riders were cheating using actual PEDs?

GrapeApe wrote:

Stewart, Clason and Tickle

Stewarts issue was a paperwork issue and not filing and following up to make sure the proper forms were filed.  I don't know the specifics on Clason, but Tickle's PED was a super low level of something that in many peoples opinion would not have really benefited a MX racer and I believe was tracked back to some sort of pre workout bar that just about anybody could buy. 

 

Allergy meds, and tons of stuff that people  consume everyday without realizing it were on the banned substance list.  I think that the person was asking out of the riders that were penalized, who was really using something that could be thought of as a true PED.  Nobody was really caught using something that would have given them any advantage. Stewart and his meds that he had been on long term were really the closest thing to what  most people would think of as a PED. 

 

But if not for a mistake filing his TUE he would have been fine. If somebody is able to be exempt and allowed to use and otherwise banned substance, it feels like a loophole and I have trouble saying that James was really cheating.  

 

 All they really did was screw up three racers lives and help show every racer out there that Adderall would help them race, and they could take it legally if they went through the proper channels. So instead of making the sport cleaner, it just showed people how to get around the rules and use substances legally.    If its not legal, it shouldn't be legal.  Nobody can get a Dr.s note that allows them to ride a works bike  or other advantage. And the rider is the biggest part of the package. A TUE can be like legal big bores or works bikes.  That was the big lesson I learned from what happened to James.  

3
10/1/2024 1:53pm
zehn wrote:

Which riders were cheating using actual PEDs?

GrapeApe wrote:

Stewart, Clason and Tickle

Stewarts issue was a paperwork issue and not filing and following up to make sure the proper forms were filed.  I don't know the specifics on...

Stewarts issue was a paperwork issue and not filing and following up to make sure the proper forms were filed.  I don't know the specifics on Clason, but Tickle's PED was a super low level of something that in many peoples opinion would not have really benefited a MX racer and I believe was tracked back to some sort of pre workout bar that just about anybody could buy. 

 

Allergy meds, and tons of stuff that people  consume everyday without realizing it were on the banned substance list.  I think that the person was asking out of the riders that were penalized, who was really using something that could be thought of as a true PED.  Nobody was really caught using something that would have given them any advantage. Stewart and his meds that he had been on long term were really the closest thing to what  most people would think of as a PED. 

 

But if not for a mistake filing his TUE he would have been fine. If somebody is able to be exempt and allowed to use and otherwise banned substance, it feels like a loophole and I have trouble saying that James was really cheating.  

 

 All they really did was screw up three racers lives and help show every racer out there that Adderall would help them race, and they could take it legally if they went through the proper channels. So instead of making the sport cleaner, it just showed people how to get around the rules and use substances legally.    If its not legal, it shouldn't be legal.  Nobody can get a Dr.s note that allows them to ride a works bike  or other advantage. And the rider is the biggest part of the package. A TUE can be like legal big bores or works bikes.  That was the big lesson I learned from what happened to James.  

A TUE isn’t always cut and dry either though I don’t think. It’s not just a matter of being prescribed and turning in the paperwork. I believe you have to have the doctor sign off on why is needed as well and they can be denied. They talk about it some in that podcast I linked. I need to go back through it and listen to the exact process again. 

2
burn1986
Posts
10257
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA US
Fantasy
3694th
10/1/2024 2:16pm

The FIM told Davey and Feld to do the WADA and they said “Yes Boss.” No one who matters cares about what happens with them. 

1
10/1/2024 2:49pm
GrapeApe wrote:

Stewart, Clason and Tickle

Stewarts issue was a paperwork issue and not filing and following up to make sure the proper forms were filed.  I don't know the specifics on...

Stewarts issue was a paperwork issue and not filing and following up to make sure the proper forms were filed.  I don't know the specifics on Clason, but Tickle's PED was a super low level of something that in many peoples opinion would not have really benefited a MX racer and I believe was tracked back to some sort of pre workout bar that just about anybody could buy. 

 

Allergy meds, and tons of stuff that people  consume everyday without realizing it were on the banned substance list.  I think that the person was asking out of the riders that were penalized, who was really using something that could be thought of as a true PED.  Nobody was really caught using something that would have given them any advantage. Stewart and his meds that he had been on long term were really the closest thing to what  most people would think of as a PED. 

 

But if not for a mistake filing his TUE he would have been fine. If somebody is able to be exempt and allowed to use and otherwise banned substance, it feels like a loophole and I have trouble saying that James was really cheating.  

 

 All they really did was screw up three racers lives and help show every racer out there that Adderall would help them race, and they could take it legally if they went through the proper channels. So instead of making the sport cleaner, it just showed people how to get around the rules and use substances legally.    If its not legal, it shouldn't be legal.  Nobody can get a Dr.s note that allows them to ride a works bike  or other advantage. And the rider is the biggest part of the package. A TUE can be like legal big bores or works bikes.  That was the big lesson I learned from what happened to James.  

A TUE isn’t always cut and dry either though I don’t think. It’s not just a matter of being prescribed and turning in the paperwork. I...

A TUE isn’t always cut and dry either though I don’t think. It’s not just a matter of being prescribed and turning in the paperwork. I believe you have to have the doctor sign off on why is needed as well and they can be denied. They talk about it some in that podcast I linked. I need to go back through it and listen to the exact process again. 

I know its not as simple as just getting a prescription.  But its also not a lot more than just getting the right Dr's to sign  some forms and file paperwork.  The point being that it is not acting in the spirit of the rule to have the exemptions  and then penalize somebody to the level they did. In this case the strong penalty did the opposite of what they intended it to do.  

Never mind the impact it may have had on local and Am racing . With a local racer it would be as simple as getting Your hands on the substance. No testing is done at local races that I know of. Maybe if somebody looks like they are intoxicated they may be tested or not allowed to race.  By putting all of that attention on James and the med he clearly had a legit medical need for made it appear like it could be a big advantage.  So who knows how many local racers  started to take it while riding.   Isn't that the opposite of what they intended the rule to do?  

 

I understand that there should be clear ways for somebody who needs a med to be able to take it and compete. But I feel like they could do the exemption or penalty differently. In a case like Stewarts it makes no sense to have the penalty the same as if somebody got busted for taking something and hiding it. Some sort of shorter term penalty would have been more appropriate. And the way they dealt with it just went against the spirit of the rules. James thought he was doing everything  the way he was supposed to do it. And from what I remember he had been prescribed the med for years. Being diagnosed around the time that most people are in their lives. I know that its also not that simple either since stuff can be missed and  not diagnosed properly for years. Just overall the way they dealt with most of the penalty's they handed out was not acting in the spirit of the rule.     

I'm sure if the process was super simple James would not have had a problem.   

1

Post a reply to: WADA Antidoping Agency Lost Track of Open Cases and Test Results Before Olympics

The Latest