Posts
10098
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Dallas, TX
US
Edited Date/Time
7/6/2022 11:23am
How do the folks in the midwest feel about the idea of diverting a bunch of Mississippi River flow to try to bring back the Colorado? Is this something that the federal government should be able to force upon states, or is that water an asset owned by the individual states. For rivers that flow on state borders, should one have more say than another? Should an ‘upriver’ state be allowed to do whatever they wish without needing agreement from downriver states?
The state of the reservoirs of the Colorado are getting pretty desperate, and there are going to be some major decisions that will need to be made within the next 5-10 years…..
The state of the reservoirs of the Colorado are getting pretty desperate, and there are going to be some major decisions that will need to be made within the next 5-10 years…..
The environmentalists and industry haters have too much power here. I'll leave it at that.
The Shop
It’d be similar, but exponentially larger obviously, than our Columbia Basin Project here in Washington. That water has to be pumped uphill also, though not the several thousand feet that this project would entail. Once you get over your last ‘peak’ then you’d need to decide how many homes would be relocated or destroyed by the new tributary that you’d be creating to join the Colorado. The one good thing that you’d create is that you could put several hydroelectric dams on the ’new’ river to create power several times over on its descent to reach the Colorado. There wouldn’t be any need to provide for fish migration because the new, man made river never had native fish to begin with.
Lots of opportunities, issues, etc.
The biggest question that comes to my mind is whether any individual state that would have land affected by a project like that could refuse to allow it, or whether the needs of the country as a whole would override a state’s refusal to go along.
That plan sounds ridiculous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_v._Colorado
The only way I see there ever being a pipeline is if it's from water that was about to be dumped into the ocean. So, figure out how you get water from New Orleans to Colorado/Utah.
Pit Row
It's a legally binding interstate compact among the U.S. states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
I don't know if the Federal government can over-ride it or not.
So far, it has been challenged numerous times and has prevailed.
In order to get access to the water from the Tennessee river.
Not to mention the absolute uproar from environmentalists ??
https://www.deseret.com/2022/3/3/22878373/utah-county-desperate-water-g…
https://www.ksl.com/article/50429627/drought-the-drying-colorado-river-…
Post a reply to: Speaking of states rights…..