Posts
6097
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA
US
Edited Date/Time
3/26/2012 10:16pm
Is the Supreme Court punting on first down by requiring oral arguments where the plaintiff and defendant are not in dispute?
In other words, pro Obama care and anti Obama care lawyers are on the same side, arguing that the Anti Injunction Act should not be considered and that the Court should decide the Constitutionality of the law now instead of in 2015.
In other words, pro Obama care and anti Obama care lawyers are on the same side, arguing that the Anti Injunction Act should not be considered and that the Court should decide the Constitutionality of the law now instead of in 2015.
Ultimately, the ability of those Pieces of Shit in D.C. to corrupt the language of our founding document & their worst intentions to manipulate the will of the people is being argued.
I'm jus' sayin'...
Post a reply to: SCOTUS question.