Reagan released Atta?

txmxer
Profile picture for user txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX US
txmxer
Edited Date/Time 1/21/2012 4:33pm
An Arab terrorist named Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986.
The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the
Oslo agreement Israel had to agree to release so called
"political prisoners". However, Israeli officials insisted that they
would not release any with "blood on their hands". Some well
meaning American President and Secretary of State insisted
that all be released.

Thus Mr. Atta was freed and eventually thanked the US by
flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center.
This was reported by many of the networks at the time the
terrorists were first identified. It was missing from later reports.
That President and Secretary of State were Ronald Reagan and
George Schultz.

|
indy_maico
Profile picture for user indy_maico
Posts
4983
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN US
indy_maico 2/9/2010 9:39am
2/9/2010 9:39am
No-no-no!

Reagan is only guilty of selling arms to Iran and bin Laden, and selling chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein.

He had nothing to do with Atta.
Bob693
Profile picture for user Bob693
Posts
1393
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TX US
Bob693 2/9/2010 10:07am
2/9/2010 10:07am
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2

The Shop

See All »
txmxer
Profile picture for user txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX US
txmxer 2/9/2010 10:15am
2/9/2010 10:15am
Bob693 wrote:
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
flarider
Profile picture for user flarider
Posts
25499
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL US
flarider 2/9/2010 10:17am
2/9/2010 10:17am
Bob693 wrote:
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2
txmxer wrote:
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
Good point.

Bob?


txmxer
Profile picture for user txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX US
txmxer 2/9/2010 10:35am
2/9/2010 10:35am
Bob693 wrote:
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2
txmxer wrote:
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
flarider wrote:
Good point.

Bob?


Echo...echo...echo...
Farva
Profile picture for user Farva
Posts
2045
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
Farva 2/9/2010 10:36am
2/9/2010 10:36am
Bob693 wrote:
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2
txmxer wrote:
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
You're 2 for 2 on catching indy.
noob
Profile picture for user noob
Posts
2109
Joined
8/12/2008
Location
Burbank, CA US
noob 2/9/2010 10:52am
2/9/2010 10:52am
Bob693 wrote:
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2
txmxer wrote:
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
Farva wrote:
You're 2 for 2 on catching indy.
Indy wrote: "No-no-no! ...[Reagan] had nothing to do with Atta."

Are you retarded?
sc961
Profile picture for user sc961
Posts
2242
Joined
12/11/2006
Location
Hutchinson, MN US
sc961 2/9/2010 10:56am
2/9/2010 10:56am
Bob693 wrote:
Wow, can you find any more complete crap to post today? 0 for 2
txmxer wrote:
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
I'm doing something wrong, so now let's talk about someone else that does the same thing.......
Farva
Profile picture for user Farva
Posts
2045
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
Farva 2/9/2010 10:58am
2/9/2010 10:58am
txmxer wrote:
I imagine I could...why don't you respond like this to all of Woody's bullshit threads?
Farva wrote:
You're 2 for 2 on catching indy.
noob wrote:
Indy wrote: "No-no-no! ...[Reagan] had nothing to do with Atta."

Are you retarded?
I'm reading Indy as coming off sarcastic in his post.
brent26wood
Profile picture for user brent26wood
Posts
1103
Joined
11/1/2006
Location
Washington, DC US
brent26wood 2/9/2010 11:39am
2/9/2010 11:39am
Does it really matter who did what in the past. You could probably link the last 6 presidents to terrorists somehow. How about we do what the country did prior to the 40's and work toward the future instead of dwelling on the past.
brainbasket
Profile picture for user brainbasket
Posts
1531
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ventura, CA US
brainbasket 2/9/2010 12:08pm
2/9/2010 12:08pm
From what I recall none of the 9-11 hijackers were old enough to have been an adult in 1986....
indy_maico
Profile picture for user indy_maico
Posts
4983
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN US
indy_maico 2/9/2010 1:03pm
2/9/2010 1:03pm
Farva wrote:
You're 2 for 2 on catching indy.
noob wrote:
Indy wrote: "No-no-no! ...[Reagan] had nothing to do with Atta."

Are you retarded?
Farva wrote:
I'm reading Indy as coming off sarcastic in his post.
Nope.

I already posted the snopes about Atta on the other thread before this one was started.

I knew that ol' tex was having a go at woody when he started this thread.

TG130
Profile picture for user TG130
Posts
1073
Joined
4/13/2008
Location
US
TG130 2/9/2010 1:03pm
2/9/2010 1:03pm
Whether it's true or not, they would have just got someone else to do it if Atta was still in prison.
flarider
Profile picture for user flarider
Posts
25499
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL US
flarider 2/9/2010 1:08pm
2/9/2010 1:08pm
Funny how NOW it's "it (doesn't) really matter who did what in the past," but throughout almost all of the Bush administration, everything was blamed on the administration before it.

So, when a Democratic administration follows a Republican administration, it's about not looking at the past, but only about looking forward

When a Republican administration follows a Democratic administration, it's all about blaming the previous administration, pointing out their faults and utilization of the "scape goat principle"

Got it


brent26wood
Profile picture for user brent26wood
Posts
1103
Joined
11/1/2006
Location
Washington, DC US
brent26wood 2/9/2010 5:16pm
2/9/2010 5:16pm
flarider wrote:
Funny how NOW it's "it (doesn't) really matter who did what in the past," but throughout almost all of the Bush administration, everything was blamed on...
Funny how NOW it's "it (doesn't) really matter who did what in the past," but throughout almost all of the Bush administration, everything was blamed on the administration before it.

So, when a Democratic administration follows a Republican administration, it's about not looking at the past, but only about looking forward

When a Republican administration follows a Democratic administration, it's all about blaming the previous administration, pointing out their faults and utilization of the "scape goat principle"

Got it


You won't find me blaming anyone from either party. See I know they are all the same. We are witnessing the downfall of our country and it is on both parties shoulders.

Post a reply to: Reagan released Atta?