Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
More laws when you don't ENFORCE the laws you ALREADY HAVE?
Blow me.
I can understand his sentiment: I can't understand his disdain for our foundation and our charter.
...nothing but a White Al Sharpton.
Period.
The Shop
I've wanted to slap that fuck ever since he made "Bowling".
Fuck him.
The guys of "Southpark" have this shit-head figured out...ever see Team America?
I'm not suggesting getting rid of all your guns, just maybe putting some restrictions on the sale, and storage of them. Here it is such a pain in the ass to get one, most say fuck it. I'm not suggesting that either, but do you really need a fully automatic assault rifle to protect your family?
Here they have to be kept locked in a safe, and ammunition in a separate secured location.
Anyone care to know where Mr. Dershowitz get's his stats...? I sure would.
Hey, Alan, fuck you and your Limousine Liberal friends.
Also, take a look at the fundamental differences in in History and Origin between our two countries and you'll see why we're a bunch of cowboys.
Province Blacks by number Blacks by %
Ontario 473,765 3.9%
Quebec 188,070 2.5%
Alberta 47,075 1.4%
British Columbia 28,315 0.7%
Nova Scotia 19,230 2.1%
Manitoba 15,660 1.4%
Saskatchewan 5,090 0.5%
New Brunswick 4,455 0.6%
Newfoundland and Labrador 905 0.2%
Prince Edward Island 640 0.5%
Northwest Territories 375 0.9%
Yukon 125 0.4%
Nunavut 100 0.3%
Canada 783,795
Wikipedia
Race / Ethnicity Number Percentage of
U.S. population
Americans 308,745,538 100.0 %
White or European American 223,553,265 72.4 %
Black or African American 38,929,319 12.6 %
Information from the American Firearms Institute.
Weapon Use and Violent Crime
Estimates from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) indicate that between 1993 and 2001 - about 10% of the violent victimizations involved a firearm - approximately 26% of the average annual 8.9 million violent victimizations were committed by offenders armed with a weapon.
From 1993 through 2001 violent crime declined 54%; weapon violence went down 59%; and firearm violence, 63%.
Males, American Indians, and Hispanics, the young, and those with the lowest annual household income were more vulnerable to weapon violence in general and firearm violence in particular than their respective counterparts.
For the 9-year period beginning with 1993, 23% of white victims of violence and 36% of black victims were victims of violence involving an offender armed with a weapon.
About 7% of white victims and 17% of black victims were involved in incidents in which an offender was armed with a gun.
Blacks were about 9 times more likely than whites to be victims of gun-related homicides (25 per 100,000 blacks age 12 or older versus 3 per 100,000 whites.)
Firearm violence rates for blacks age 12 or older (8.4 per 1,000 blacks) were - 40% higher than rates for Hispanics (6.0), - 200% higher than rates for whites (2.8 per 1,000).
Blacks were about 9 times more likely than whites to be murdered with a firearm.
On average black victims of firearm violence were 3 years younger than white victims - 29 versus 32.
From 1993 through 2001 blacks accounted for 49% of homicide victims and 54% of victims of firearm homicide but 12% of the U.S. population.
The likelihood of an injury was the same for victims facing armed and unarmed offenders (26%); serious injury was more likely from armed offenders (7% versus 2%).
From 1993 through 2001 the number of murders declined 36% while the number of murders by firearms dropped 41%.
From 1994 through 1999, the years for which data are available, about 7 in 10 murders at school involved some type of firearm, and approximately 1 in 2 murders at school involved a handgun.
You tell me what's wrong with this picture.
I do not see the need for assault weapons, that are no good for hunting, or really for personal protection being available so easily, they are useful for nothing except killing and maiming a large amount of people quickly,
however in saying this, i know their are that many out there already, that the problem is far to big to stop now,
Friend of mine has let my youngest son burn off thousands of rounds through this one and thousands through several other historical guns and no one died. Funny how that works. Manufactured in the General Motors Saginaw Steering Gear Plant back during WW2. Little history involved there but the anti gun nuts won't appreciate that I'm sure.
One thing I do find interesting is that our two countries are similar in many ways, but Canadians don't have the fear Americans have of not owning a gun. I talk to Americans about this, and their question is " how do you feel safe without a gun"? I'm not anti gun, I have owned a few in the past. I just wonder if the media plays a bigger role in the fear mongering.
Newmann, I'm not anti gun, and I would love to shoot that myself, and I doubt your friend carries that around over his shoulder, or would shoot up a movie theater. I think it's cool your son has shot it, and has learned proper, and safe use of a firearm.
as for the historical gun, i have no problem with these as well, but as Markout says, in a controlled enviroment they are a very cool thing,
Pit Row
And btw, I love guns, but I don´t think they are for everyone
you dont need guns to kill alot of people. this dude likely had the brains and the resources are definitely out there, that he could have bombed the whole theater. sorry to come off that way. but its the truth.
In doing this, they NEVER discussed the idea that said "The Right to Bear Arms" was based on "Hunting"...it was based on a need to defend.
Look into it...
I wasn't calling Markout a anti gun nut . But his reference to shooting up a movie theatre? That was not a fully automatic assault rifle used in Co. was it?
And according to the statistics above, it appears that blacks/African Americans are way less responsible with guns than anyone else, so what exactly were you trying to say again?
And the cause of mass murders like this is a fundamental breakdown in society and that problem can ONLY be fixed by strengthening the family. The government can't legislate this problem away, it can only be solved by a huge shift in society (and that will have to start in the home).
Taking away guns to stop mass murders is the equivilant of putting a band-aide on a slit throat. It's not even close to adequate.
The government will continue to use disasters such as this to take away liberties (in the name of security, and protection-protecting us from ourselves), and Americans will continue to allow disasters such as this as an excuse to give up their liberty in the name of security (because most Americans don't value liberty).
Fix the family! Fix Society!
(Oh, and screw Moore...he's an opportunist, and a douche bag.)
Post a reply to: Michael Moore talks about gun control.