In a Parallel Universe...

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

Yea if you could somehow jump at twice the speed of light you can get out to a certain distance then look back and see who...

Yea if you could somehow jump at twice the speed of light you can get out to a certain distance then look back and see who shot John Kennedy. You could essentially play it back and forth slow motion. Rewind etc if we had ability to jump like that.

greenmx5 wrote:

I'm genuinely interested. Can you send some good video info on quantum physics? One that will really make me question everything? I love this kind of...

I'm genuinely interested. Can you send some good video info on quantum physics? One that will really make me question everything? I love this kind of stuff. My release is sitting on my back porch watching the stars and thinking about the endless possibilities of this universe we live in.

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

How does the universe not end ? What else begins ? The universe could be a small part of a mega universe. Or some shit. How...

How does the universe not end ? What else begins ? The universe could be a small part of a mega universe. Or some shit. How are we just sitting in a vast area of......essentially nothing if the universe does end? Define end. So many questions.

JeremyK wrote:

That's what gets me ,the fact that you cant step and physically observe the universe.

fastchookracing wrote:

Thanks for the kind words😊 I’m working on a webpage. Stay tuned. Friedmann talks of a 3 metric, the 3-sphere surface satisfies this. An observer within...

Thanks for the kind words😊 I’m working on a webpage. Stay tuned. Friedmann talks of a 3 metric, the 3-sphere surface satisfies this. An observer within this 3D surface by definition has few ways of measuring 4D curvature (think of a 2D observer on the surface of a sphere). In Cosmology by Weinberg it talks about extra dimensional spaces and curvature. But as a University maths/physics major I found the maths horrible (and I don’t like over complex solutions. They tell me the question isn’t fully understood). The observer could measure a triangle in space and check if the internal angles are greater than 60 degrees each which would prove k>0 (this is one way scientists came to the conclusion the universe is flat). But the triangle would have to be huge to measure any deviation, which results in so much error of measurement that it is useless. Also in my presentation the observable universe is less than one sixth of the total (1/2pi) which makes measuring a big enough triangle even harder!

lestat wrote:

Yea what you are saying about measuring the flatness is the way I understand it . It is somewhat inconclusive because we simply don’t know what...

Yea what you are saying about measuring the flatness is the way I understand it . It is somewhat inconclusive because we simply don’t know what the scale of the universe is . The larger the universe the more inaccurate our measurement is , and we just don’t know . I have been trying to wrap my head around extra dimensions but it is difficult . I don’t have the education background to dig into the details and do the math like you can . I can only approach it from a conceptual view point . But I encourage you to run with this idea if you think you are on to something . Physics has been ‘stuck’ for a hundred years now , so like you said , we need to put everything on the table and examine it all . Go for it 👍

fastchookracing wrote:

For a 3 torus space is flat and finite 😊

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

Jesus, youre a glass empty type a guy aren’t you? Not even half empty, just empty.

fastchookracing wrote:

For a 3 torus space is flat and finite 😊

lestat wrote:

So I’ve heard , but my brain struggles with those two things together lol . Does that mean if I were to move in a straight...

So I’ve heard , but my brain struggles with those two things together lol .

Does that mean if I were to move in a straight line , I would eventually come back to where I started , and would be orientated exactly how I began ? Is that a way to try to visualize it ? Or is that totally wrong ? Lol .... how the hell do people deal with ten dimensions of string theory ?!? Crazy shit right ...

Recently I have tried imagining what it would look like to me if I encountered a 4d cube , rotating in my 3D space . Best I can come up with would be that I would see a series of squares that appear to ‘turn themselves inside out’ ... if that makes any sense I don’t know ... now where’d that bong get to ....

fastchookracing wrote:

Your visualisation is correct but you’d have to travel faster than light. And string theory is wrong. Are you following my Facebook discussion? I appreciate the...

Your visualisation is correct but you’d have to travel faster than light. And string theory is wrong. Are you following my Facebook discussion? I appreciate the moderator response but uni professors are stubborn. I present a model that Satisfies Friedmann but they cling to the status quo infinite model which satisfies nothing. That’s why I’m starting a Facebook page. It gauges interest and opens to a huge audience 😊

fastchookracing wrote:

Your visualisation is correct but you’d have to travel faster than light. And string theory is wrong. Are you following my Facebook discussion? I appreciate the...

Your visualisation is correct but you’d have to travel faster than light. And string theory is wrong. Are you following my Facebook discussion? I appreciate the moderator response but uni professors are stubborn. I present a model that Satisfies Friedmann but they cling to the status quo infinite model which satisfies nothing. That’s why I’m starting a Facebook page. It gauges interest and opens to a huge audience 😊

lestat wrote:

Every time I think I’m out of Facebook ... they pull me back in .... 😁. Got a link to your page ? I found this...

Every time I think I’m out of Facebook ... they pull me back in .... 😁. Got a link to your page ?

I found this today , narrator is a little strange but the presentation was a big help to me . Check out comment by Viki Secrets .

https://youtu.be/RFK2_dAZvLo

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

How does the universe not end ? What else begins ? The universe could be a small part of a mega universe. Or some shit. How...

How does the universe not end ? What else begins ? The universe could be a small part of a mega universe. Or some shit. How are we just sitting in a vast area of......essentially nothing if the universe does end? Define end. So many questions.

TXDirt wrote:

Instead of alternate realities, think maybe of alternate positions. Take a snapshot of everything in the world at once. Every electron has a position. From your...

Instead of alternate realities, think maybe of alternate positions. Take a snapshot of everything in the world at once. Every electron has a position. From your hair, to a coffee cup, to a waterfall, to a guy smoking in china.

How long would it take for every electron In the world to have every possible alternate position under every possible scenario mathematically possible.

It would basically be infinity.

If I had a high powered camera fixed on a waterfall that has water splashing onto the rocks below, and I took a snapshot and could map out all the positions of every electron that makes up a single snapshot of the water splashing, how long would it be until I could capture an identical snapshot with every splash in perfect identical form as my original snapshot.

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

A long time but eventually it WILL happen again, as time doesn’t exist. It’s just made up by humans to quantify metabolism on a linear track...

A long time but eventually it WILL happen again, as time doesn’t exist. It’s just made up by humans to quantify metabolism on a linear track, day night rotation etc..

TXDirt wrote:

I'm just not sure about that. Every electron in the "spalsh" photo would have to be in complete perfect alignment to be able to ever capture...

I'm just not sure about that. Every electron in the "spalsh" photo would have to be in complete perfect alignment to be able to ever capture an exact replica snapshot.

I googled "how many electrons in a drop of water"...

We can use Avogadro’s number to determine the number of molecules in a drop of water. Avogadro’s number tells us that there are 6.022 x 10^23 molecules of water per mole of water. So, next, we calculate how many molecules there are in a drop of water, which we determined:

molecules in a water drop = (6.022 x 102^3 molecules/mole) x 0.002275 moles
molecules in a water drop = 1.67 x 10^21 molecules of water.

In another way; there are 1.67 sextillion water molecules in a water droplet.

Now, the number of atoms in one drop of water is 3x the number of molecules:

atoms in a drop of water = 3 atoms/molecule x 1.67 x 1021 molecules
atoms in a drop of water = 5.01 x 1021 atoms

Or, we can say there are about five sextillion atoms in a drop of water.

Now think about it, that's just in a single drop of water. In the splash snapshot photo there are likely thousands of gallons splashing around. You take a single picture. It would seem damn near impossible that at some point in the future, that you could ever take another picture and have an identical snapshot.

Perhaps "randomness" would just prevent that from ever being possible.

Now I suppose when we are talking about "infinity" you could argue yes, if given enough time that exact splash will repeat itself.

But wow.... makes you think for sure.

This is partly why I don't believe in the parallel or multiple universe theory. Because every possible combination would equate a new universe. Not just me personally, but that includes all of the things in my universe all being different at different times. And a different universe exists for every single combination/change/outcome.

It's intriguing for sure.

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

How does the universe not end ? What else begins ? The universe could be a small part of a mega universe. Or some shit. How...

How does the universe not end ? What else begins ? The universe could be a small part of a mega universe. Or some shit. How are we just sitting in a vast area of......essentially nothing if the universe does end? Define end. So many questions.

JeremyK wrote:

That's what gets me ,the fact that you cant step and physically observe the universe.

GeorgiePorgie wrote:

I’m a firm believer we could figure out how to step and observe the universe. Eventually. Not me. But with computers, AI and scientists it can...

I’m a firm believer we could figure out how to step and observe the universe. Eventually. Not me. But with computers, AI and scientists it can be done.

Bending the universe to jump is a wild concept. But I don’t think that impossible.

MotofactioN wrote:

Imagine telling people of the 1600s coming over to establish North America that one day you’ll have a little tablet in your hand that you touch...

Imagine telling people of the 1600s coming over to establish North America that one day you’ll have a little tablet in your hand that you touch and order food, play games, purchase tickets to fly in an airplane across the world. Oh and tell them the world isn’t flat!

They think all of that is just as crazy, as we think someone being able to bend time and all that. Give humans another 4-500 years