Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
The Shop
“It bothers me a lot that you want to broadcast that you’re associating with black people,” the man said in the recording. “Do you have to?”
Later, the man went on: “You can sleep with them, you can bring them in, you can do whatever you want. The little I ask you is not to promote it on that and not to bring them to my games.”
What the hell is that all about? The only explanation I can come up with is that he doesn't want other people to see her hanging out with black men. She can fuck them and "bring them in", whatever the hell that means, but don't advertise it? They refer to her as his G/F. Doesn't sound like it to me.
How does he remain owner of the team and expect the players to push it that extra mile to win a championship?
I really don't care what happens to Sterling. Certainly the NBA cant allow somebody like Sterling to be a part of the league, but is it OK that anybody's private conversation can be made public like this? I understand that it is sometimes necessary in legal proceedings but is it OK to do it for profit or revenge?
The players who showed up, and did their job, are the real criminals here.
Thank you.
Thank you. D
I just think it is odd that some people are more concerned with the players reactions, instead of the cause.
There is a song that I like talking about "Like a little girl mad at her brother 'cause she lost his ball".
I don't think the NBA can rescind his ownership, but I think that people will band together to ensure that he gets NO advertising revenue. He can think what he wants, but he will soon feel it in his pocketbooks for his beliefs.
The media is single handidly to blame for fanning this flame repeatedly to keep people stirred up and get ratings. "We need dirty laundry....."
If they want to re-sign with the Clippers, that is FINE.
If he cannot field a team, and forfeits every single game next year, that is ALSO fine.
His investment would diminish until the point he decided to sell.
With that said, his players, the fans, his advertisers, etc. all have a right to not support him with their money, their talent nor their time.
The free market will deal with this guy...advertisers are already jumping ship, fans are in an uproar, and the players are ticked. The NBA doesn't need to do anything, nor should they (they can't force their owners, nor their employees or players to say/believe a certain way). Let the free market punish this guy.
Magic just wants the NBA to force him to sell so he can purchase the team...
Pit Row
P
JBlain619, the correct term is racist.
P
We are of the HUMAN RACE.
Our ETHNICITIES are what the difference is.
So again, PREJUDICE is the proper term. Anything else I can clear up for you???
1) A group or population of humans categorized on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics (such as color of skin, eyes, and hair).
(2) A descent from a common heritage, ancestor, breed or stock.
(3) A tribe or family of people sharing a common breed or lineage.
P
A little clarification for you!
Human taxonomy is the classification of the species Homo sapiens (Latin: "wise man"), or modern human. Homo is the human genus, which also includes Neanderthals and many other extinct species of hominid; H. sapiens is the only surviving species of the genus Homo. Extinct Homo species are known as archaic humans. Modern humans are the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens, differentiated from a direct ancestor, Homo sapiens idaltu.
Prior to the current scientific classification of humans, philosophers and scientists have made various attempts to classify humans. They offered various definitions of the human being and various schemes for classifying types of humans. Biologists once classified races as subspecies, but today scientists question even the concept of race itself. Certain issues in human taxonomy remain topics of debate today.[/i][/i]
Post a reply to: Got us another racist. That's two this week.